Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

From Open Access to Open Science

From Open Access to Open Science

This talks was given as part of the international Open Access Week.

Konrad Förstner

October 23, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by Konrad Förstner

Other Decks in Science

Transcript

  1. From Open Access to Open Science
    Konrad U. F¨
    orstner
    Core Unit Systems Medicine, Universit¨
    at W¨
    urzburg
    2014-10-23, Open Access Week
    The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer.

    View Slide

  2. Open Access means opening the final results of the
    research process...
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  3. Open Access means opening the final results of the
    research process...
    ... but what is about opening the research process
    itself?
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  4. ”It’s a tragedy we had to add the word
    open to science.”
    Eduardo Robles
    https://twitter.com/edulix/status/219390289519968256
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  5. Openness and transparency are core principles of
    science but are violated at several points in the
    research process.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  6. Examples for low reproducibility
    Study performed at Bayer prior to launching a
    drug development program - 20–25% of
    published data reproducible (Nat. Rev. Drug
    Discov. 10, 712, 2011)
    Similar approach performed at Amgen -
    reproducibility rate of 11% (Nature 483,
    531–533, 2012)
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  7. Have you ever tried to reproduce parts of previous
    study and where not able to do so due to the lack
    of a precise description/code/data?
    How much time have you spend on that?
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  8. Science needs an upgrade
    The research process is full of hampering
    artifacts and unnecessary friction.
    Only a small fraction of the potential of
    digitalization and the internet is used.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  9. Science needs an upgrade
    How would we design the research process if we
    would invent it today from scratch?
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  10. Open Science means more ...
    Transparency
    Reproducibility
    Reusability
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  11. Technical aspects (e.g. software or repositories)
    Legal aspect (e.g. Creative commons licenses)
    Cultural aspects (e.g. what is used for the
    evaluation of scientific impact)
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  12. Free does not always means free
    Free as freedom not as free beer.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  13. The research process
    Idea
    Grant application
    Experiment
    Data analysis
    Submission
    Peer Review
    Publication
    Perception
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  14. Which stages in the research process can/should we
    open?
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  15. Which stages in the research process can/should we
    open?
    All of them!
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  16. Opening up the planning of research projects
    Making research ideas online accessible and get
    feedback and suggestions for improvements.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  17. Opening up grant applications
    Making grant application and the responses online
    accessible.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  18. Opening up the experiments/protocols
    Make the lab notebooks public
    Put precise protocols online and add them to
    publications
    Automation and formalization
    => Program your experiments
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  19. Formal language – EXACT
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  20. Robot scientist ADAM
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  21. Open (research) data
    Currently: A selected subset of the experimental
    data of a project becomes part of the
    publication.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  22. Open (research) data
    Currently: A selected subset of the experimental
    data of a project becomes part of the
    publication.
    Needed: The full data set becomes public with
    the manuscript.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  23. Open (research) data
    Currently: A selected subset of the experimental
    data of a project becomes part of the
    publication.
    Needed: The full data set becomes public with
    the manuscript.
    Optimum: Data is public immediately after its
    generation.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  24. Open source software
    Releasing the data analysis tools
    Documenting the data process pipeline (e.g. as
    shell scripts).
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  25. Pre-prints server
    Making manuscripts available
    before they are peer reviewed.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  26. Open peer review
    Making the peer reviewer comments accessible.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  27. Post publication peer review
    Publish first – then perform peer review
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  28. Opening up impact evaluation systems
    Generating open and transparent measurements of
    the impact of a publication.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  29. Open Education Resources
    Making educational material accessible.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  30. Citizen Science
    Including citizens into the research process.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  31. Would you feel comfortable opening you research
    like this right now?
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  32. Collective action problem
    Opening everything immediately would be the best
    for science.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  33. Collective action problem
    Opening everything immediately would be the best
    for science.
    In the current system this is not necessarily the best
    for the scientists.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  34. Collective action problem
    Scientist compete for limited resources and try to
    adapt optimally to the given evaluation/funding
    system.
    Due to this we have to generate a system which
    promotes openness and has incentives to share
    results.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  35. The change is happening
    Top-down: Funding bodies ask increasingly for
    openness and offer funding
    Bottom-up: Countless initiatives of the science
    community and industry
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  36. What can you do right now (easily)?
    Use/promote Open Access journals
    Use/promote pre-print servers (arXiv, bioRxiv)
    Use/promote specialized data repositories as
    well as general-purpose repositories to publish
    you research data
    Use the reviewing process to push Open Science
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  37. Open Science Group of the Open Knowlege
    Foundation http://science.okfn.org/
    German Speaking Open Science group of the
    OKF http://okfn.de/open-science/
    The Open Science Peer Review Oath
    https://zenodo.org/record/12273
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcircle/500995147 – CC-BY by flickr user subcircle

    View Slide

  38. http://www.flickr.com/photos/nateone/3768979925/ – CC-BY by flick user nateone

    View Slide