Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Sign up for free
Menu
Search
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Pricing
Search
Sign in
Sign up for free
ブロックチェーン 2.0 / Blockchain 2.0
Search
Sponsored
·
Ship Features Fearlessly
Turn features on and off without deploys. Used by thousands of Ruby developers.
→
Kenji Saito
PRO
March 01, 2017
Technology
480
1
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
ブロックチェーン 2.0 / Blockchain 2.0
ブロックチェーンハブ主催で開催している連続講義 (通算第3期) ブロックチェーン基盤技術 第5回「ブロックチェーン 2.0」のスライドです。2017年3月1日(水) に使用しました。
Kenji Saito
PRO
March 01, 2017
More Decks by Kenji Saito
See All by Kenji Saito
アカデミーキャンプ 2026秋「位置ゲーに秀でよ!ウチらとヤツらのゲーム・デザイン」DAY 4 / Academy Camp 2026 Fall - Excel at Location-Based Games! Our and Their Game Design DAY 4
ks91
PRO
0
7
アカデミーキャンプ 2026秋「位置ゲーに秀でよ!ウチらとヤツらのゲーム・デザイン」DAY 3 / Academy Camp 2026 Fall - Excel at Location-Based Games! Our and Their Game Design DAY 3
ks91
PRO
0
37
アカデミーキャンプ 2026秋「位置ゲーに秀でよ!ウチらとヤツらのゲーム・デザイン」DAY 2 / Academy Camp 2026 Fall - Excel at Location-Based Games! Our and Their Game Design DAY 2
ks91
PRO
0
83
アカデミーキャンプ 2026秋「位置ゲーに秀でよ!ウチらとヤツらのゲーム・デザイン」DAY 1 / Academy Camp 2026 Fall - Excel at Location-Based Games! Our and Their Game Design DAY 1
ks91
PRO
0
33
責任2.0/3.0 ∼ 知的創造過程の脱領土化 / Responsibility 2.0 and 3.0: The Deterritorialization of the Intellectual Creative Process
ks91
PRO
0
37
国と地域のマネジメントと AGI / National and Regional Management and AGI
ks91
PRO
0
26
2026 年度「AI による研究・教育サポート」ワークショップ (教員向け) / AY 2026 “AI-Based Research and Education Support” Workshop (For Faculty)
ks91
PRO
0
54
エージェント化するAI:現在地とその先に起きる変化 / AI as Agents: The Current State and the Changes Ahead
ks91
PRO
0
220
文化的ループ (推論, エージェント) と思考プロセスの検証可能性 / Cultural Loops (Inference, Agents) and the Verifiability of Thought Processes
ks91
PRO
0
50
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
AIエージェントの権限管理 3: Agentic RAG の Fine grained access control 編
ren8k
0
130
Vibe Coding で作ったプロダクトをどう安全に動かすか / How to Safely Run Products Built with Vibe Coding
glidenote
0
210
Azure Serverless 2026:Production-ready な AI エージェント基盤 / Azure Serverless 2026: Production-Ready AI Agent Platform
miyake
2
270
GoのInterface内部構造から学ぶ!最高パフォーマンスを出すコード設計
yappli_developers
0
190
Minecraft JavaのMODをSwiftで作る
1mash0
0
180
データ_AIの事業の勝敗をわけるもの
nek0128
1
460
ユーザー価値を届け続けるためにウォンテッドリーが大切にしている文化
kotaminato
0
180
リアーキテクチャ後の障害ゼロを目指したShadow Testingの取り組み
nihonbuson
PRO
1
160
AIは推し活である。
kurazuuuuuu
1
830
データ界隈LT祭 第1回LT登壇
taromatsui_cccmkhd
2
1.5k
銀行勘定系システムにおける開発プロセス刷新×AIによる環境モダナイゼーション / Development Process Transformation and AI-Driven Environment Modernization
muit
1
2.4k
アプリログインとWeb認証基盤をつなぐ ASWebAuthenticationSession 作法
shimastripe
1
340
Featured
See All Featured
The Cost Of JavaScript in 2023
addyosmani
55
10k
Distributed Sagas: A Protocol for Coordinating Microservices
caitiem20
333
23k
Put a Button on it: Removing Barriers to Going Fast.
kastner
60
4.6k
Winning Ecommerce Organic Search in an AI Era - #searchnstuff2025
aleyda
2
2.1k
Bridging the Design Gap: How Collaborative Modelling removes blockers to flow between stakeholders and teams @FastFlow conf
baasie
0
700
Prompt Engineering for Job Search
mfonobong
0
450
YesSQL, Process and Tooling at Scale
rocio
174
15k
The Art of Delivering Value - GDevCon NA Keynote
reverentgeek
16
2.2k
Evolving SEO for Evolving Search Engines
ryanjones
0
300
Kristin Tynski - Automating Marketing Tasks With AI
techseoconnect
PRO
0
520
The SEO identity crisis: Don't let AI make you average
varn
0
560
What the history of the web can teach us about the future of AI
inesmontani
PRO
1
690
Transcript
2.0 5 SFC / CSO
[email protected]
2.0 — 5 —
2017-03-01 – p.1/47
2.0 / Segregated Witness Proof of Stake 2.0 — 5
— 2017-03-01 – p.2/47
2.0 1. 2. 3. 4. 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01
– p.3/47
1. Abra – Uber – as is Proof of Existence
– – (1) Everledger, Factom – – (2) 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.4/47
Abra Uber https://www.goabra.com Abra cf. Uber cf. Airbnb 2.0 —
5 — 2017-03-01 – p.5/47
Abra P2P ( ) ( ) (teller) → ATM →
ATM BTC 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.6/47
Abra 1.5% Abra 0.25% Abra (by CEO) 2.0 — 5
— 2017-03-01 – p.7/47
BTC (USD 3 ) Abra UI (2015 ) “Don’t lose
your phone!” ( ) Abra 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.8/47
Proof of Existence ( ) https://proofofexistence.com 2.0 — 5 —
2017-03-01 – p.9/47
Proof of Existence ( ) ( ) OP_RETURN OP_RETURN =
⇒ (burn = ( ) ) 0x444f4350524f4f46 (‘DOCPROOF’) SHA-256 Bitcoin blockchain explorer 5 mBTC (0.005 BTC) 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.10/47
– Everledger https://www.everledger.io Factom https://www.factom.com (Merkle ) 2.0 — 5
— 2017-03-01 – p.11/47
( KVS DHT) 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.12/47
2. Segregated Witness 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.13/47
BTC / . . . 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01
– p.14/47
EPOBC (Open Assets) OP_RETURN 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 –
p.15/47
Open Assets Protocol (OAP) ( = ) 2.0 — 5
— 2017-03-01 – p.16/47
ID ID (asset ID) 1. 2. 3. 160 = ID
( ) 4. base58check ‘A’ ( = 23) (asset quantity) BTC 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.17/47
OP_RETURN PUSH 0x4f41 (‘OA’) = 2 0x0100 2 1∼9 LEB128
1∼9 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.18/47
2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.19/47
Segregated Witness ( = ) (malleability) 2.0 — 5 —
2017-03-01 – p.20/47
(witness) 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.21/47
OP_RETURN PUSH 0xaa21a9ed 4 (witness) SHA-256 32 Merkle 2.0 —
5 — 2017-03-01 – p.22/47
(1) P2WPKH (version 0) (pay-to-(witnessed)-public-key-hash) witness ( ): < >
< > scriptSig ( ): scriptPubKey ( ) 0 <20-byte > 20-byte < > < > CHECKSIG 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.23/47
(2) P2WSH (version 0) (pay-to-(witnessed)-script-hash) witness: < 1 > <1
< 1 > < 2 > 2 CHECKMULTISIG> scriptSig: scriptPubKey 0 <32-byte > 32-byte 1-out-of-2 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.24/47
SegWit 2016 100 SegWit (95% ) . . . 2.0
— 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.25/47
3. 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.26/47
BIP (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal) ex. BIP 1 : BIP Purposes
and Guidelines https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0001.mediawiki ex. BIP 141 : Segregated Witness (Consensus layer) TCP/IP RFC XMPP XEP 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.27/47
4. Proof of Stake ( ) 2.0 — 5 —
2017-03-01 – p.28/47
Proof of Stake ( ) 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01
– p.29/47
Proof of Stake ( ) ( ) 2.0 — 5
— 2017-03-01 – p.30/47
Proof of Stake Hn (PD + id + t +
. . .) ≤ 2n × balance d H n : n (ex. SHA-256 (n = 256)) PD : id : (ex. ) t : (ex. UNIX ( )) balance : d : (ex. ) POW 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.31/47
Proof of Stake 3 1. 2. “Nothing at Stake” 3.
51% 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.32/47
: Proof of Stake Velocity Reddcoin 2.0 — 5 —
2017-03-01 – p.33/47
Nothing at Stake - 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 –
p.34/47
Nothing at Stake - 100% Proof of Stake 2.0 —
5 — 2017-03-01 – p.35/47
51% 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.36/47
. . . 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.37/47
2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.38/47
2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.39/47
→ ⇒ A. Back, et. al., “Enabling Blockchain Innovations with
Pegged Sidechains”, 2014 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.40/47
1 1 10 2 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 –
p.41/47
A-B 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.42/47
2 2 ( ) Ripple Path 2.0 — 5 —
2017-03-01 – p.43/47
2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.44/47
( ) 1. 2. ( ) 2.0 — 5 —
2017-03-01 – p.45/47
OP_RETURN DNS ⇒ 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.46/47
2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.47/47