Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
ブロックチェーン 2.0 / Blockchain 2.0
Search
Sponsored
·
SiteGround - Reliable hosting with speed, security, and support you can count on.
→
Kenji Saito
PRO
March 01, 2017
Technology
1
480
ブロックチェーン 2.0 / Blockchain 2.0
ブロックチェーンハブ主催で開催している連続講義 (通算第3期) ブロックチェーン基盤技術 第5回「ブロックチェーン 2.0」のスライドです。2017年3月1日(水) に使用しました。
Kenji Saito
PRO
March 01, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Kenji Saito
See All by Kenji Saito
AI 前提社会におけるトラスト / Trust in an AI-Driven Society
ks91
PRO
0
7
非営利組織の起業/発表と総括 / Starting up a Nonprofit Organization, Presentation and Summary
ks91
PRO
0
56
自己開発 / Self-Development
ks91
PRO
1
17
あなたは何によって憶えられたいですか? / What Do You Want to be Remembered for?
ks91
PRO
0
21
ボランティアと理事会 / Volunteers and Board of Directors
ks91
PRO
0
42
メタ・ネイチャーポジティブへの道 / The Path to Meta Nature Positive
ks91
PRO
0
34
アカデミーキャンプ2026 初春「ミライ、ゲーミファイ」DAY 3 / Academy Camp 2026 Early Spring "GAMIFY THE FUTURE!!" DAY 3
ks91
PRO
0
50
アカデミーキャンプ2026 初春「ミライ、ゲーミファイ」DAY 2 / Academy Camp 2026 Early Spring "GAMIFY THE FUTURE!!" DAY 2
ks91
PRO
0
85
アカデミーキャンプ2026 初春「ミライ、ゲーミファイ」DAY 1 / Academy Camp 2026 Early Spring "GAMIFY THE FUTURE!!" DAY 1
ks91
PRO
0
82
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
GSIが複数キー対応したことで、俺達はいったい何が嬉しいのか?
smt7174
3
150
データ民主化のための LLM 活用状況と課題紹介(IVRy の場合)
wxyzzz
2
680
生成AI時代にこそ求められるSRE / SRE for Gen AI era
ymotongpoo
5
2.8k
使いにくいの壁を突破する
sansantech
PRO
1
130
OCI Database Management サービス詳細
oracle4engineer
PRO
1
7.4k
AzureでのIaC - Bicep? Terraform? それ早く言ってよ会議
torumakabe
1
440
GitHub Issue Templates + Coding Agentで簡単みんなでIaC/Easy IaC for Everyone with GitHub Issue Templates + Coding Agent
aeonpeople
1
190
マーケットプレイス版Oracle WebCenter Content For OCI
oracle4engineer
PRO
5
1.5k
Azure Durable Functions で作った NL2SQL Agent の精度向上に取り組んだ話/jat08
thara0402
0
150
Data Hubグループ 紹介資料
sansan33
PRO
0
2.7k
仕様書駆動AI開発の実践: Issue→Skill→PRテンプレで 再現性を作る
knishioka
2
610
Amazon S3 Vectorsを使って資格勉強用AIエージェントを構築してみた
usanchuu
3
440
Featured
See All Featured
The browser strikes back
jonoalderson
0
360
Why Our Code Smells
bkeepers
PRO
340
58k
Highjacked: Video Game Concept Design
rkendrick25
PRO
1
280
Designing Powerful Visuals for Engaging Learning
tmiket
0
230
Effective software design: The role of men in debugging patriarchy in IT @ Voxxed Days AMS
baasie
0
220
jQuery: Nuts, Bolts and Bling
dougneiner
65
8.4k
Distributed Sagas: A Protocol for Coordinating Microservices
caitiem20
333
22k
Leveraging LLMs for student feedback in introductory data science courses - posit::conf(2025)
minecr
0
140
Lightning Talk: Beautiful Slides for Beginners
inesmontani
PRO
1
430
The SEO Collaboration Effect
kristinabergwall1
0
350
DBのスキルで生き残る技術 - AI時代におけるテーブル設計の勘所
soudai
PRO
62
49k
The #1 spot is gone: here's how to win anyway
tamaranovitovic
2
930
Transcript
2.0 5 SFC / CSO
[email protected]
2.0 — 5 —
2017-03-01 – p.1/47
2.0 / Segregated Witness Proof of Stake 2.0 — 5
— 2017-03-01 – p.2/47
2.0 1. 2. 3. 4. 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01
– p.3/47
1. Abra – Uber – as is Proof of Existence
– – (1) Everledger, Factom – – (2) 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.4/47
Abra Uber https://www.goabra.com Abra cf. Uber cf. Airbnb 2.0 —
5 — 2017-03-01 – p.5/47
Abra P2P ( ) ( ) (teller) → ATM →
ATM BTC 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.6/47
Abra 1.5% Abra 0.25% Abra (by CEO) 2.0 — 5
— 2017-03-01 – p.7/47
BTC (USD 3 ) Abra UI (2015 ) “Don’t lose
your phone!” ( ) Abra 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.8/47
Proof of Existence ( ) https://proofofexistence.com 2.0 — 5 —
2017-03-01 – p.9/47
Proof of Existence ( ) ( ) OP_RETURN OP_RETURN =
⇒ (burn = ( ) ) 0x444f4350524f4f46 (‘DOCPROOF’) SHA-256 Bitcoin blockchain explorer 5 mBTC (0.005 BTC) 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.10/47
– Everledger https://www.everledger.io Factom https://www.factom.com (Merkle ) 2.0 — 5
— 2017-03-01 – p.11/47
( KVS DHT) 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.12/47
2. Segregated Witness 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.13/47
BTC / . . . 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01
– p.14/47
EPOBC (Open Assets) OP_RETURN 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 –
p.15/47
Open Assets Protocol (OAP) ( = ) 2.0 — 5
— 2017-03-01 – p.16/47
ID ID (asset ID) 1. 2. 3. 160 = ID
( ) 4. base58check ‘A’ ( = 23) (asset quantity) BTC 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.17/47
OP_RETURN PUSH 0x4f41 (‘OA’) = 2 0x0100 2 1∼9 LEB128
1∼9 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.18/47
2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.19/47
Segregated Witness ( = ) (malleability) 2.0 — 5 —
2017-03-01 – p.20/47
(witness) 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.21/47
OP_RETURN PUSH 0xaa21a9ed 4 (witness) SHA-256 32 Merkle 2.0 —
5 — 2017-03-01 – p.22/47
(1) P2WPKH (version 0) (pay-to-(witnessed)-public-key-hash) witness ( ): < >
< > scriptSig ( ): scriptPubKey ( ) 0 <20-byte > 20-byte < > < > CHECKSIG 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.23/47
(2) P2WSH (version 0) (pay-to-(witnessed)-script-hash) witness: < 1 > <1
< 1 > < 2 > 2 CHECKMULTISIG> scriptSig: scriptPubKey 0 <32-byte > 32-byte 1-out-of-2 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.24/47
SegWit 2016 100 SegWit (95% ) . . . 2.0
— 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.25/47
3. 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.26/47
BIP (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal) ex. BIP 1 : BIP Purposes
and Guidelines https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0001.mediawiki ex. BIP 141 : Segregated Witness (Consensus layer) TCP/IP RFC XMPP XEP 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.27/47
4. Proof of Stake ( ) 2.0 — 5 —
2017-03-01 – p.28/47
Proof of Stake ( ) 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01
– p.29/47
Proof of Stake ( ) ( ) 2.0 — 5
— 2017-03-01 – p.30/47
Proof of Stake Hn (PD + id + t +
. . .) ≤ 2n × balance d H n : n (ex. SHA-256 (n = 256)) PD : id : (ex. ) t : (ex. UNIX ( )) balance : d : (ex. ) POW 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.31/47
Proof of Stake 3 1. 2. “Nothing at Stake” 3.
51% 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.32/47
: Proof of Stake Velocity Reddcoin 2.0 — 5 —
2017-03-01 – p.33/47
Nothing at Stake - 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 –
p.34/47
Nothing at Stake - 100% Proof of Stake 2.0 —
5 — 2017-03-01 – p.35/47
51% 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.36/47
. . . 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.37/47
2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.38/47
2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.39/47
→ ⇒ A. Back, et. al., “Enabling Blockchain Innovations with
Pegged Sidechains”, 2014 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.40/47
1 1 10 2 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 –
p.41/47
A-B 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.42/47
2 2 ( ) Ripple Path 2.0 — 5 —
2017-03-01 – p.43/47
2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.44/47
( ) 1. 2. ( ) 2.0 — 5 —
2017-03-01 – p.45/47
OP_RETURN DNS ⇒ 2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.46/47
2.0 — 5 — 2017-03-01 – p.47/47