Upgrade to PRO for Only $50/Year—Limited-Time Offer! 🔥
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Property Based Testing
Search
Mathias Verraes
April 06, 2016
Technology
1
2.7k
Property Based Testing
5min lightning talk for the SoCraTes Belgium meetup and CukeUp London.
Mathias Verraes
April 06, 2016
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Mathias Verraes
See All by Mathias Verraes
On Being Explicit
mathiasverraes
0
3k
How to Find the Bar
mathiasverraes
1
2.1k
Designed Stickiness
mathiasverraes
1
2.2k
The Monty Hall Problem with Haskell
mathiasverraes
0
2.8k
The World's Shortest and Most Chaotic Introduction to Event Storming
mathiasverraes
2
2.7k
Towards Modelling Processes
mathiasverraes
3
5.8k
Modelling Heuristics
mathiasverraes
1
3k
Object Reorientation
mathiasverraes
6
2.9k
Small Controlled Experiments
mathiasverraes
1
4.2k
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
寫了幾年 Code,然後呢?軟體工程師必須重新認識的 DevOps
cheng_wei_chen
1
1.4k
AI時代の新規LLMプロダクト開発: Findy Insightsを3ヶ月で立ち上げた舞台裏と振り返り
dakuon
0
190
エンジニアリングをやめたくないので問い続ける
estie
2
1.2k
S3を正しく理解するための内部構造の読解
nrinetcom
PRO
2
130
文字列の並び順 / Unicode Collation
tmtms
3
610
Haskell を武器にして挑む競技プログラミング ─ 操作的思考から意味モデル思考へ
naoya
6
1.6k
AI-DLCを現場にインストールしてみた:プロトタイプ開発で分かったこと・やめたこと
recruitengineers
PRO
2
150
Lambdaの常識はどう変わる?!re:Invent 2025 before after
iwatatomoya
1
620
打 造 A I 驅 動 的 G i t H u b ⾃ 動 化 ⼯ 作 流 程
appleboy
0
350
LLM-Readyなデータ基盤を高速に構築するためのアジャイルデータモデリングの実例
kashira
0
260
ActiveJobUpdates
igaiga
1
140
5分で知るMicrosoft Ignite
taiponrock
PRO
0
390
Featured
See All Featured
The MySQL Ecosystem @ GitHub 2015
samlambert
251
13k
What’s in a name? Adding method to the madness
productmarketing
PRO
24
3.8k
Art, The Web, and Tiny UX
lynnandtonic
304
21k
GitHub's CSS Performance
jonrohan
1032
470k
Exploring the Power of Turbo Streams & Action Cable | RailsConf2023
kevinliebholz
37
6.2k
KATA
mclloyd
PRO
33
15k
Designing for Performance
lara
610
69k
Performance Is Good for Brains [We Love Speed 2024]
tammyeverts
12
1.3k
Facilitating Awesome Meetings
lara
57
6.7k
YesSQL, Process and Tooling at Scale
rocio
174
15k
Dealing with People You Can't Stand - Big Design 2015
cassininazir
367
27k
The Straight Up "How To Draw Better" Workshop
denniskardys
239
140k
Transcript
Property Based Testing @mathiasverraes
None
function inc(x) { return x + 1; }
inc x = x + 1
-- Tests double 1 `should_be` 2 double 2 `should_be` 4
-- Implementation double x | x == 1 = 2 | x == 2 = 4
A property of double double_is_always_even :: Int -> Bool double_is_always_even
x = even (double x)
> quickCheck double_is_always_even Failed: 0 (after 1 test) Exception: Non-exhaustive
patterns in function double
double x = x * 2
quickCheck double_is_always_even Passed: 0 Passed: 1 Passed: -3 Passed: -1
(...) Passed: -58 Passed: 89 +++ OK, passed 100 tests.
More properties of double double_compare_to_input x | x > 0
= double x > x | x < 0 = double x < x | x == 0 = True double_minus_input x = double x - x == x
Distributivity Law reverse_is_distributive xs ys = reverse (xs++ys) == reverse
xs ++ reverse ys
> quickCheck reverse_is_distributive Passed: [] [] Passed: [] [1] Passed:
[1] [] Failed: [3,-3] [0,2,0] Passed: [] [0,2,0] Failed: [3] [0,2,0] Failed: [-3] [0,2,0] Failed: [0] [0,2,0] Failed: [0] [2,0] (...) Falsifiable (after 4 tests and 6 shrinks): [0] [1]
Oops... reverse_is_distributive xs ys = reverse (xs++ys) == reverse ys
++ reverse xs
Passed: [] [] Passed: [1,-2] [0] Passed: [-2] [] (...)
Passed: [-34,44,-58,-41,-17,-53,-14,27,54,46,-10,-46,-20,46] [-9,-32,-47,50,43,-47,-43,-61,37,4,-59,48,34] +++ OK, passed 100 tests.
Split 1 -- define split :: Char -> String ->
[String] -- so that split '@' "
[email protected]
" == ["foo","example.com"] split '/' "/usr/include" == ["", "usr", "include"] 1 https://www.schoolofhaskell.com/user/pbv/an-introduction-to-quickcheck-testing
-- splitting an empty list results in an empty list
split char [] = [] split char str | null after = before : [] | otherwise = before : split char (tail after) where before = takeWhile (/=char) str after = dropWhile (/=char) str
Property: Splitting and unsplitting -- test unsplit '@' ["foo","example.com"] ==
"
[email protected]
" unsplit '/' ["", "usr", "include"] == "/usr/include" --implementation unsplit :: Char -> [String] -> String unsplit char = concat . intersperse [char]
-- property unsplit_inverses_split str = forAll (elements str) (\char ->
unsplit char (split char str) == str)
> quickCheck unsplit_inverses_split Passed: "" Passed: "\252\210" '\252' Passed: "\163^\EOT"
'\163' Passed: "v\RSs" 'v' Failed: "y" 'y' Failed: "a" 'a' Falsifiable (after 6 tests and 1 shrink): "a" 'a'
split 'a' "a" == [""] unsplit 'a' [""] == ""
-- should be: split 'a' "a" == ["", ""] unsplit 'a' ["", ""] == "a"
Modify the definition of split split char [] = []
... -- becomes split char [] = [""] ... > quickCheck unsplit_inverses_split +++ OK, passed 100 tests.
Property Based Testing → test lots of random cases cheaply
→ encourage thinking about general properties Thanks :-) @mathiasverraes