Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Property Based Testing
Search
Mathias Verraes
April 06, 2016
Technology
1
2.7k
Property Based Testing
5min lightning talk for the SoCraTes Belgium meetup and CukeUp London.
Mathias Verraes
April 06, 2016
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Mathias Verraes
See All by Mathias Verraes
On Being Explicit
mathiasverraes
0
3.1k
How to Find the Bar
mathiasverraes
1
2.1k
Designed Stickiness
mathiasverraes
1
2.3k
The Monty Hall Problem with Haskell
mathiasverraes
0
2.8k
The World's Shortest and Most Chaotic Introduction to Event Storming
mathiasverraes
2
2.7k
Towards Modelling Processes
mathiasverraes
3
5.9k
Modelling Heuristics
mathiasverraes
1
3k
Object Reorientation
mathiasverraes
6
2.9k
Small Controlled Experiments
mathiasverraes
1
4.2k
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
複雑さを受け入れるか、拒むか? - 事業成長とともに育ったモノリスを前に私が考えたこと #RSGT2026
murabayashi
0
810
Data Hubグループ 紹介資料
sansan33
PRO
0
2.5k
Claude Skillsの テスト業務での活用事例
moritamasami
1
130
_第4回__AIxIoTビジネス共創ラボ紹介資料_20251203.pdf
iotcomjpadmin
0
170
ルネサンス開発者を育てる 1on1支援AIエージェント
yusukeshimizu
0
130
[PR] はじめてのデジタルアイデンティティという本を書きました
ritou
0
720
Eight Engineering Unit 紹介資料
sansan33
PRO
0
6.1k
TED_modeki_共創ラボ_20251203.pdf
iotcomjpadmin
0
190
Autonomous Database - Dedicated 技術詳細 / adb-d_technical_detail_jp
oracle4engineer
PRO
5
12k
Redshift認可、アップデートでどう変わった?
handy
1
120
自己管理型チームと個人のセルフマネジメント 〜モチベーション編〜
kakehashi
PRO
4
650
名刺メーカーDevグループ 紹介資料
sansan33
PRO
0
1k
Featured
See All Featured
WENDY [Excerpt]
tessaabrams
9
35k
JavaScript: Past, Present, and Future - NDC Porto 2020
reverentgeek
52
5.8k
Into the Great Unknown - MozCon
thekraken
40
2.2k
Taking LLMs out of the black box: A practical guide to human-in-the-loop distillation
inesmontani
PRO
3
2k
I Don’t Have Time: Getting Over the Fear to Launch Your Podcast
jcasabona
34
2.6k
Imperfection Machines: The Place of Print at Facebook
scottboms
269
13k
Primal Persuasion: How to Engage the Brain for Learning That Lasts
tmiket
0
200
B2B Lead Gen: Tactics, Traps & Triumph
marketingsoph
0
37
[SF Ruby Conf 2025] Rails X
palkan
0
660
The Art of Delivering Value - GDevCon NA Keynote
reverentgeek
16
1.8k
"I'm Feeling Lucky" - Building Great Search Experiences for Today's Users (#IAC19)
danielanewman
231
22k
Bridging the Design Gap: How Collaborative Modelling removes blockers to flow between stakeholders and teams @FastFlow conf
baasie
0
420
Transcript
Property Based Testing @mathiasverraes
None
function inc(x) { return x + 1; }
inc x = x + 1
-- Tests double 1 `should_be` 2 double 2 `should_be` 4
-- Implementation double x | x == 1 = 2 | x == 2 = 4
A property of double double_is_always_even :: Int -> Bool double_is_always_even
x = even (double x)
> quickCheck double_is_always_even Failed: 0 (after 1 test) Exception: Non-exhaustive
patterns in function double
double x = x * 2
quickCheck double_is_always_even Passed: 0 Passed: 1 Passed: -3 Passed: -1
(...) Passed: -58 Passed: 89 +++ OK, passed 100 tests.
More properties of double double_compare_to_input x | x > 0
= double x > x | x < 0 = double x < x | x == 0 = True double_minus_input x = double x - x == x
Distributivity Law reverse_is_distributive xs ys = reverse (xs++ys) == reverse
xs ++ reverse ys
> quickCheck reverse_is_distributive Passed: [] [] Passed: [] [1] Passed:
[1] [] Failed: [3,-3] [0,2,0] Passed: [] [0,2,0] Failed: [3] [0,2,0] Failed: [-3] [0,2,0] Failed: [0] [0,2,0] Failed: [0] [2,0] (...) Falsifiable (after 4 tests and 6 shrinks): [0] [1]
Oops... reverse_is_distributive xs ys = reverse (xs++ys) == reverse ys
++ reverse xs
Passed: [] [] Passed: [1,-2] [0] Passed: [-2] [] (...)
Passed: [-34,44,-58,-41,-17,-53,-14,27,54,46,-10,-46,-20,46] [-9,-32,-47,50,43,-47,-43,-61,37,4,-59,48,34] +++ OK, passed 100 tests.
Split 1 -- define split :: Char -> String ->
[String] -- so that split '@' "
[email protected]
" == ["foo","example.com"] split '/' "/usr/include" == ["", "usr", "include"] 1 https://www.schoolofhaskell.com/user/pbv/an-introduction-to-quickcheck-testing
-- splitting an empty list results in an empty list
split char [] = [] split char str | null after = before : [] | otherwise = before : split char (tail after) where before = takeWhile (/=char) str after = dropWhile (/=char) str
Property: Splitting and unsplitting -- test unsplit '@' ["foo","example.com"] ==
"
[email protected]
" unsplit '/' ["", "usr", "include"] == "/usr/include" --implementation unsplit :: Char -> [String] -> String unsplit char = concat . intersperse [char]
-- property unsplit_inverses_split str = forAll (elements str) (\char ->
unsplit char (split char str) == str)
> quickCheck unsplit_inverses_split Passed: "" Passed: "\252\210" '\252' Passed: "\163^\EOT"
'\163' Passed: "v\RSs" 'v' Failed: "y" 'y' Failed: "a" 'a' Falsifiable (after 6 tests and 1 shrink): "a" 'a'
split 'a' "a" == [""] unsplit 'a' [""] == ""
-- should be: split 'a' "a" == ["", ""] unsplit 'a' ["", ""] == "a"
Modify the definition of split split char [] = []
... -- becomes split char [] = [""] ... > quickCheck unsplit_inverses_split +++ OK, passed 100 tests.
Property Based Testing → test lots of random cases cheaply
→ encourage thinking about general properties Thanks :-) @mathiasverraes