Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Property Based Testing
Search
Mathias Verraes
April 06, 2016
Technology
1
2.7k
Property Based Testing
5min lightning talk for the SoCraTes Belgium meetup and CukeUp London.
Mathias Verraes
April 06, 2016
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Mathias Verraes
See All by Mathias Verraes
On Being Explicit
mathiasverraes
0
2.9k
How to Find the Bar
mathiasverraes
1
2k
Designed Stickiness
mathiasverraes
1
2.1k
The Monty Hall Problem with Haskell
mathiasverraes
0
2.7k
The World's Shortest and Most Chaotic Introduction to Event Storming
mathiasverraes
2
2.7k
Towards Modelling Processes
mathiasverraes
3
5.7k
Modelling Heuristics
mathiasverraes
1
2.8k
Object Reorientation
mathiasverraes
6
2.8k
Small Controlled Experiments
mathiasverraes
1
4k
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
データベースの負荷を紐解く/untangle-the-database-load
emiki
2
540
ExaDB-XSで利用されているExadata Exascaleについて
oracle4engineer
PRO
3
280
Ruby on Railsで持続可能な開発を行うために取り組んでいること
am1157154
3
160
"TEAM"を導入したら最高のエンジニア"Team"を実現できた / Deploying "TEAM" and Building the Best Engineering "Team"
yuj1osm
1
230
データモデルYANGの処理系を再発明した話
tjmtrhs
0
180
AI Agent時代なのでAWSのLLMs.txtが欲しい!
watany
3
340
クラウド関連のインシデントケースを収集して見えてきたもの
lhazy
9
1.8k
LINE NEWSにおけるバックエンド開発
lycorptech_jp
PRO
0
330
目標と時間軸 〜ベイビーステップでケイパビリティを高めよう〜
kakehashi
PRO
8
860
1行のコードから社会課題の解決へ: EMの探究、事業・技術・組織を紡ぐ実践知 / EM Conf 2025
9ma3r
12
4.4k
Potential EM 制度を始めた理由、そして2年後にやめた理由 - EMConf JP 2025
hoyo
2
2.9k
どちらかだけじゃもったいないかも? ECSとEKSを適材適所で併用するメリット、運用課題とそれらの対応について
tk3fftk
2
240
Featured
See All Featured
Fontdeck: Realign not Redesign
paulrobertlloyd
83
5.4k
Mobile First: as difficult as doing things right
swwweet
223
9.5k
RailsConf & Balkan Ruby 2019: The Past, Present, and Future of Rails at GitHub
eileencodes
134
33k
Code Reviewing Like a Champion
maltzj
521
39k
We Have a Design System, Now What?
morganepeng
51
7.4k
Building Better People: How to give real-time feedback that sticks.
wjessup
367
19k
Producing Creativity
orderedlist
PRO
344
40k
Cheating the UX When There Is Nothing More to Optimize - PixelPioneers
stephaniewalter
280
13k
"I'm Feeling Lucky" - Building Great Search Experiences for Today's Users (#IAC19)
danielanewman
227
22k
How To Stay Up To Date on Web Technology
chriscoyier
790
250k
Testing 201, or: Great Expectations
jmmastey
42
7.2k
Statistics for Hackers
jakevdp
797
220k
Transcript
Property Based Testing @mathiasverraes
None
function inc(x) { return x + 1; }
inc x = x + 1
-- Tests double 1 `should_be` 2 double 2 `should_be` 4
-- Implementation double x | x == 1 = 2 | x == 2 = 4
A property of double double_is_always_even :: Int -> Bool double_is_always_even
x = even (double x)
> quickCheck double_is_always_even Failed: 0 (after 1 test) Exception: Non-exhaustive
patterns in function double
double x = x * 2
quickCheck double_is_always_even Passed: 0 Passed: 1 Passed: -3 Passed: -1
(...) Passed: -58 Passed: 89 +++ OK, passed 100 tests.
More properties of double double_compare_to_input x | x > 0
= double x > x | x < 0 = double x < x | x == 0 = True double_minus_input x = double x - x == x
Distributivity Law reverse_is_distributive xs ys = reverse (xs++ys) == reverse
xs ++ reverse ys
> quickCheck reverse_is_distributive Passed: [] [] Passed: [] [1] Passed:
[1] [] Failed: [3,-3] [0,2,0] Passed: [] [0,2,0] Failed: [3] [0,2,0] Failed: [-3] [0,2,0] Failed: [0] [0,2,0] Failed: [0] [2,0] (...) Falsifiable (after 4 tests and 6 shrinks): [0] [1]
Oops... reverse_is_distributive xs ys = reverse (xs++ys) == reverse ys
++ reverse xs
Passed: [] [] Passed: [1,-2] [0] Passed: [-2] [] (...)
Passed: [-34,44,-58,-41,-17,-53,-14,27,54,46,-10,-46,-20,46] [-9,-32,-47,50,43,-47,-43,-61,37,4,-59,48,34] +++ OK, passed 100 tests.
Split 1 -- define split :: Char -> String ->
[String] -- so that split '@' "foo@example.com" == ["foo","example.com"] split '/' "/usr/include" == ["", "usr", "include"] 1 https://www.schoolofhaskell.com/user/pbv/an-introduction-to-quickcheck-testing
-- splitting an empty list results in an empty list
split char [] = [] split char str | null after = before : [] | otherwise = before : split char (tail after) where before = takeWhile (/=char) str after = dropWhile (/=char) str
Property: Splitting and unsplitting -- test unsplit '@' ["foo","example.com"] ==
"foo@example.com" unsplit '/' ["", "usr", "include"] == "/usr/include" --implementation unsplit :: Char -> [String] -> String unsplit char = concat . intersperse [char]
-- property unsplit_inverses_split str = forAll (elements str) (\char ->
unsplit char (split char str) == str)
> quickCheck unsplit_inverses_split Passed: "" Passed: "\252\210" '\252' Passed: "\163^\EOT"
'\163' Passed: "v\RSs" 'v' Failed: "y" 'y' Failed: "a" 'a' Falsifiable (after 6 tests and 1 shrink): "a" 'a'
split 'a' "a" == [""] unsplit 'a' [""] == ""
-- should be: split 'a' "a" == ["", ""] unsplit 'a' ["", ""] == "a"
Modify the definition of split split char [] = []
... -- becomes split char [] = [""] ... > quickCheck unsplit_inverses_split +++ OK, passed 100 tests.
Property Based Testing → test lots of random cases cheaply
→ encourage thinking about general properties Thanks :-) @mathiasverraes