$30 off During Our Annual Pro Sale. View Details »
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Property Based Testing
Search
Mathias Verraes
April 06, 2016
Technology
1
2.7k
Property Based Testing
5min lightning talk for the SoCraTes Belgium meetup and CukeUp London.
Mathias Verraes
April 06, 2016
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Mathias Verraes
See All by Mathias Verraes
On Being Explicit
mathiasverraes
0
3k
How to Find the Bar
mathiasverraes
1
2.1k
Designed Stickiness
mathiasverraes
1
2.2k
The Monty Hall Problem with Haskell
mathiasverraes
0
2.8k
The World's Shortest and Most Chaotic Introduction to Event Storming
mathiasverraes
2
2.7k
Towards Modelling Processes
mathiasverraes
3
5.8k
Modelling Heuristics
mathiasverraes
1
3k
Object Reorientation
mathiasverraes
6
2.9k
Small Controlled Experiments
mathiasverraes
1
4.2k
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
多様なデジタルアイデンティティを攻撃からどうやって守るのか / 20251212
ayokura
0
460
ExpoのインダストリーブースでみたAWSが見せる製造業の未来
hamadakoji
0
110
「図面」から「法則」へ 〜メタ視点で読み解く現代のソフトウェアアーキテクチャ〜
scova0731
0
240
Fashion×AI「似合う」を届けるためのWEARのAI戦略
zozotech
PRO
2
660
チーリンについて
hirotomotaguchi
6
2k
学習データって増やせばいいんですか?
ftakahashi
2
350
AIと二人三脚で育てた、個人開発アプリグロース術
zozotech
PRO
1
730
Lambdaの常識はどう変わる?!re:Invent 2025 before after
iwatatomoya
1
560
因果AIへの招待
sshimizu2006
0
980
Haskell を武器にして挑む競技プログラミング ─ 操作的思考から意味モデル思考へ
naoya
6
1.5k
Snowflakeでデータ基盤を もう一度作り直すなら / rebuilding-data-platform-with-snowflake
pei0804
6
1.6k
乗りこなせAI駆動開発の波
eltociear
1
1.1k
Featured
See All Featured
Understanding Cognitive Biases in Performance Measurement
bluesmoon
32
2.7k
RailsConf 2023
tenderlove
30
1.3k
Art, The Web, and Tiny UX
lynnandtonic
304
21k
Templates, Plugins, & Blocks: Oh My! Creating the theme that thinks of everything
marktimemedia
31
2.6k
Building a Modern Day E-commerce SEO Strategy
aleyda
45
8.3k
Embracing the Ebb and Flow
colly
88
4.9k
It's Worth the Effort
3n
187
29k
Side Projects
sachag
455
43k
Helping Users Find Their Own Way: Creating Modern Search Experiences
danielanewman
31
3k
Done Done
chrislema
186
16k
個人開発の失敗を避けるイケてる考え方 / tips for indie hackers
panda_program
122
21k
Faster Mobile Websites
deanohume
310
31k
Transcript
Property Based Testing @mathiasverraes
None
function inc(x) { return x + 1; }
inc x = x + 1
-- Tests double 1 `should_be` 2 double 2 `should_be` 4
-- Implementation double x | x == 1 = 2 | x == 2 = 4
A property of double double_is_always_even :: Int -> Bool double_is_always_even
x = even (double x)
> quickCheck double_is_always_even Failed: 0 (after 1 test) Exception: Non-exhaustive
patterns in function double
double x = x * 2
quickCheck double_is_always_even Passed: 0 Passed: 1 Passed: -3 Passed: -1
(...) Passed: -58 Passed: 89 +++ OK, passed 100 tests.
More properties of double double_compare_to_input x | x > 0
= double x > x | x < 0 = double x < x | x == 0 = True double_minus_input x = double x - x == x
Distributivity Law reverse_is_distributive xs ys = reverse (xs++ys) == reverse
xs ++ reverse ys
> quickCheck reverse_is_distributive Passed: [] [] Passed: [] [1] Passed:
[1] [] Failed: [3,-3] [0,2,0] Passed: [] [0,2,0] Failed: [3] [0,2,0] Failed: [-3] [0,2,0] Failed: [0] [0,2,0] Failed: [0] [2,0] (...) Falsifiable (after 4 tests and 6 shrinks): [0] [1]
Oops... reverse_is_distributive xs ys = reverse (xs++ys) == reverse ys
++ reverse xs
Passed: [] [] Passed: [1,-2] [0] Passed: [-2] [] (...)
Passed: [-34,44,-58,-41,-17,-53,-14,27,54,46,-10,-46,-20,46] [-9,-32,-47,50,43,-47,-43,-61,37,4,-59,48,34] +++ OK, passed 100 tests.
Split 1 -- define split :: Char -> String ->
[String] -- so that split '@' "
[email protected]
" == ["foo","example.com"] split '/' "/usr/include" == ["", "usr", "include"] 1 https://www.schoolofhaskell.com/user/pbv/an-introduction-to-quickcheck-testing
-- splitting an empty list results in an empty list
split char [] = [] split char str | null after = before : [] | otherwise = before : split char (tail after) where before = takeWhile (/=char) str after = dropWhile (/=char) str
Property: Splitting and unsplitting -- test unsplit '@' ["foo","example.com"] ==
"
[email protected]
" unsplit '/' ["", "usr", "include"] == "/usr/include" --implementation unsplit :: Char -> [String] -> String unsplit char = concat . intersperse [char]
-- property unsplit_inverses_split str = forAll (elements str) (\char ->
unsplit char (split char str) == str)
> quickCheck unsplit_inverses_split Passed: "" Passed: "\252\210" '\252' Passed: "\163^\EOT"
'\163' Passed: "v\RSs" 'v' Failed: "y" 'y' Failed: "a" 'a' Falsifiable (after 6 tests and 1 shrink): "a" 'a'
split 'a' "a" == [""] unsplit 'a' [""] == ""
-- should be: split 'a' "a" == ["", ""] unsplit 'a' ["", ""] == "a"
Modify the definition of split split char [] = []
... -- becomes split char [] = [""] ... > quickCheck unsplit_inverses_split +++ OK, passed 100 tests.
Property Based Testing → test lots of random cases cheaply
→ encourage thinking about general properties Thanks :-) @mathiasverraes