$30 off During Our Annual Pro Sale. View Details »

The Service-Delivery Review: The Missing Agile Feedback Loop

Matt Philip
November 06, 2017

The Service-Delivery Review: The Missing Agile Feedback Loop

As presented at the ThoughtWorks-Hamburg meetup, 6 Nov 2017.

Matt Philip

November 06, 2017
Tweet

More Decks by Matt Philip

Other Decks in Business

Transcript

  1. # t w - h a m b u r g | @ m a t t p h i l i p
    THE SERVICE-DELIVERY REVIEW
    The Missing Agile Feedback Loop

    View Slide

  2. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    WHAT’S YOUR FAVORITE PART?

    View Slide

  3. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    WHAT’S YOUR FAVORITE PART?

    View Slide

  4. WHAT'S THE
    PROBLEM?

    View Slide

  5. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    HOW WOULD YOU ANSWER?

    View Slide

  6. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    IS THIS SATISFACTORY?

    View Slide

  7. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    In the absence of any quantitative
    feedback about the performance of our
    service delivery, fake due dates and
    artificial boundaries are always going to
    persist.

    View Slide

  8. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    DELIVERY CONCERNS
    Service
    Product
    Team 

    (Internal)
    Customer
    (External)
    Viewpoint
    Component

    View Slide

  9. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    FEEDBACK NEEDS
    Is our 

    team 

    healthy?
    Is our 

    service delivery
    fit for its
    purpose?
    Is our 

    product 

    healthy?
    Is our 

    product

    fit for its
    purpose?
    Service
    Product
    Customer 

    (Build right thing)
    Team 

    (Build thing right)

    View Slide

  10. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    FEEDBACK LOOPS
    ? ?
    ? ?
    Service
    Product
    Customer 

    (Build right thing)
    Team 

    (Build thing right)

    View Slide

  11. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    FEEDBACK LOOPS
    Retrospective ?
    ? ?
    Service
    Product
    Customer 

    (Build right thing)
    Team 

    (Build thing right)

    View Slide

  12. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    FEEDBACK LOOPS
    Retrospective ?
    ■ Automated
    build/tests
    ■ Code metrics
    ■ Performance
    monitors
    ?
    Service
    Product
    Customer 

    (Build right thing)
    Team 

    (Build thing right)

    View Slide

  13. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    FEEDBACK LOOPS
    Retrospective ?
    ■ Automated
    build/tests
    ■ Code metrics
    ■ Performance
    monitors
    ■ Demo
    ■ Usage
    metrics
    ■ Money!
    Service
    Product
    Customer 

    (Build right thing)
    Team 

    (Build thing right)

    View Slide

  14. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    FEEDBACK LOOPS
    Retrospective ?
    ■ Automated
    build/tests
    ■ Code metrics
    ■ Performance
    monitors
    ■ Demo
    ■ Usage
    metrics
    ■ Money!
    Service
    Product
    Customer 

    (Build right thing)
    Team 

    (Build thing right)

    View Slide

  15. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    A POSSIBLE SOLUTION
    Retrospective
    Service-
    Delivery
    Review
    ■ Automated
    build/tests
    ■ Code metrics
    ■ Performance
    monitors
    ■ Demo
    ■ Usage
    metrics
    ■ Money!
    Service
    Product
    Customer 

    (Build right thing)
    Team 

    (Build thing right)

    View Slide

  16. SERVICE-DELIVERY
    REVIEW

    View Slide

  17. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    A regular, quantitatively-oriented
    discussion between a customer and
    delivery team about the fitness for
    purpose of its service delivery.

    View Slide

  18. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    7 KANBAN CADENCES

    View Slide

  19. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    Is our service fit for its purpose?

    View Slide

  20. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    POSSIBLE TOPICS
    ▫︎Delivery times (aka Cycle/Lead/Time-in-Process) of
    recent work and tail length in distribution
    ▫︎Blocker-clustering results and remediations
    ▫︎Work-type mix (% allocation to work types)
    ▫︎Classes of service/expectations of each work type
    ▫︎Value-demand ratio (value-add or failure demand)
    ▫︎Due-date performance (fixed-date misses)
    ▫︎Policy changes
    ▫︎Results of fitness surveys (e.g., F4P Box Score)
    ▫︎“What obstacles stand in the way of our service-
    delivery expectations?”

    View Slide

  21. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    FEEDBACK METRICS
    ■ Team health
    ■ Engagement
    ■ Flow
    efficiency
    ■ Delivery time
    distribution
    ■ Throughput
    ■ Due-date
    performance
    ■ Mean time to
    restore
    ■ Code health
    ■ Performance
    ■ Revenue
    ■ Usage
    metrics
    ■ App-store
    rating
    Service
    Product
    Customer 

    (Build right thing)
    Team 

    (Build thing right)

    View Slide

  22. SERVICE-DELIVERY REVIEW CANVAS
    FITNESS CRITERIA METRICS
    What does our customer value about our service? e.g.
    Predictable delivery, quality, delivery-time expectation at 85th%
    Delivery Team (single kanban):
    SERVICES WE PROVIDE
    Which service requests / work items types do we accept?
    What are the service level expectations of each work item
    type?
    PARTICIPANTS IN REVIEW
    E.g., Flow manager, coach, exec sponsor, Product owner,
    customer(s), external stakeholders, delivery team reps

    INPUTS OUTPUTS
    DUE-DATE PERFORMANCE
    How well did we do with on-time delivery of fixed-date items?
    EXPEDITE PERFORMANCE
    How well did we do with on-time delivery of expedite items?
    STANDARD-URGENCY PERFORMANCE
    How well did we do with on-time delivery of expedite items?
    Service-level expectation:
    85th percentile:
    50th percentile:
    BLOCKER CLUSTERS
    Express largest clusters by type, count and total days blocked
    ACHIEVEMENTS AND SHORTFALLS VS. EXPECTATIONS
    OPTIONS TO REDUCE RISK
    Or system-design changes to improve capability vs. expectations (e.g., reduce WIP)
    FORECAST
    Based on delivery times, our expectation that we will complete remaining work
    IMPROVEMENT HYPOTHESES
    We believe that will result in and we’ll know because of
    Date:
    “Is our service delivery fit for its purpose according to our customer?”

    View Slide

  23. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    DELIVERY-TIME SCATTERPLOT

    View Slide

  24. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    DELIVERY-TIME HISTOGRAM

    View Slide

  25. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    VALUE-DEMAND RATIO
    0%
    25%
    50%
    75%
    100%
    7-Jan
    14-Jan
    21-Jan
    28-Jan
    4-Feb
    11-Feb
    18-Feb
    25-Feb
    4-M
    ar
    11-M
    ar
    18-M
    ar
    25-M
    ar
    1-Apr

    View Slide

  26. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    PROBABILISTIC FORECAST

    View Slide

  27. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    AGING WORK IN PROGRESS

    View Slide

  28. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    TOP CUSTOMER SERVICE-DELIVERY EXPECTATIONS
    ▫︎Be accessible
    ▫︎Treat me courteously
    ▫︎Be responsive to what I need and want
    ▫︎Do what I ask promptly
    ▫︎Provide well-trained and informed employees
    ▫︎Tell me what to expect
    ▫︎Meet your commitments and keep your promises
    ▫︎Do it right the first time
    ▫︎Follow up
    ▫︎Be socially responsible and ethical

    View Slide

  29. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    Delighting customers 

    doesn’t build loyalty; 

    reducing their effort—

    the work they must do 

    to get their problem solved

    —does.

    View Slide

  30. @mattphilip
    BENEFITS OF A SERVICE-DELIVERY REVIEW
    ▫︎Forces you to focus on customers and become fit
    for the purpose for which they chose you
    ▫︎Sets clear standards and achievement
    ▫︎Generates feedback with (meaningful) data
    ▫︎Helps you understand why you fail and then align
    improvement efforts
    ▫︎Builds customer trust and loyalty
    ▫︎Improve your relationships!

    View Slide

  31. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    93%, my love.

    View Slide

  32. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    TAKEAWAYS FOR TOMORROW
    ▫︎Identify and involve your customer
    ▫︎Ask the “fitness” question (What do you value…?)
    ▫︎Discover your services
    ▫︎Establish service-delivery expectations
    ▫︎Keep doing the other useful feedback loops
    ▫︎Reduce/combine meetings rather than add new
    ▫︎Consider as way to measure “agile adoption”

    View Slide

  33. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    REFERENCES AND FURTHER EXPLORATION
    ▫︎ http://www.djaa.com/kanban-cadences
    ▫︎ https://www.slideshare.net/agilemanager/kanban-cadences-
    information-flow
    ▫︎ https://mattphilip.wordpress.com/2017/05/24/service-delivery-
    review-the-missing-agile-feedback-loop/
    ▫︎ When will it be done? by Dan Vacanti (https://leanpub.com/
    whenwillitbedone)
    ▫︎ http://kanbanize.com/
    ▫︎ https://actionableagile.com/
    ▫︎ https://hbr.org/1988/07/the-power-of-unconditional-service-
    guarantees
    ▫︎ http://www.icmi.com/Resources/Customer-Experience/2015/10/
    Ten-Customer-Expectations-and-How-They-Are-Changing
    ▫︎ https://hbr.org/2010/07/stop-trying-to-delight-your-customers

    View Slide

  34. @mattphilip #tw-hamburg
    Questions?
    THANK YOU

    View Slide