Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

To Estimate or Not to Estimate, Is that the Question? LeanAgileUS 2017

Matt Philip
February 27, 2017

To Estimate or Not to Estimate, Is that the Question? LeanAgileUS 2017

My #NoEstimates talk from the LeanAgileUS conference, 27 Feb 2017

Matt Philip

February 27, 2017
Tweet

More Decks by Matt Philip

Other Decks in Business

Transcript

  1. To Estimate or Not to Estimate, Is that the Question?

    #leanagileUS @mattphilip LeanAgileUS Conference, 27 Feb 2017
  2. Hofstadter’s Law “It always takes longer than you expect, even

    when you take into account Hofstadter’s Law.” #leanagileUS @mattphilip
  3. Parkinson’s Law “Work expands so as to fill the time

    available for its completion." #leanagileUS @mattphilip
  4. The Spectrum of Estimating Never Estimate Anything Always Estimate Everything

    Question purpose of estimating Include all sources of variation Focus on characterizing work Probabilistic forecast Use delivery data Less effort spent Estimation culture Consider effort only Deterministic forecast Use intuition Heavy effort involved Tasks in hours #leanagileUS @mattphilip
  5. What NoEstimates is not saying • You are evil if

    you estimate • All estimates are totally useless • Stop doing your successful estimating practice • Stop having the conversations to understand/analyze/break down work • Work items must be the same size • You must place your full faith and confidence in Monte Carlo forecasts #leanagileUS @mattphilip
  6. What NoEstimates is saying • Know why you are estimating

    • Discover for yourself how good you are at estimating (measure) • Keep doing the things that help you understand the work • Upfront estimates need to be held loosely #leanagileUS @mattphilip
  7. NoEstimates, Manifesto Style … We have come to value: Probabilistic

    over Deterministic Delivery time over Development time MVP scope over Full scope Data over Intuition* Reducing sources of variation over Improving estimating That is, while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left more. *Neil Killick uses “empiricism over guesswork” #leanagileUS @mattphilip
  8. Do You Assume Correlation? Is the initial sizing a good

    predictor for when you can get your stuff? In our case, the surprising truth was ”no.” -- Mattias Skarin, Real-World Kanban #leanagileUS @mattphilip
  9. What’s Going On? Low process efficiency (typically 5-15% in software

    delivery) means that even if we nailed the effort estimates … we would be accurately predicting 5-15% of elapsed delivery time! -- Troy Magennis #leanagileUS @mattphilip
  10. Other Sources of Variation Often system factors account for more

    of the elapsed delivery time than different story sizes. -- Troy Magennis #leanagileUS @mattphilip
  11. Sources of Variation #leanagileUS @mattphilip • WIP • Technology/domain/product •

    Team composition • User, client and client representative • Multitasking/focus factor • Market and competitors • System dependencies • Team dependencies • Specialization • Waiting for availability • Rework • Steps/handoffs (50%*50%*50%...) • Stages in team development (Tuckman) • Selection policy • Essential complication (How hard a problem is on its own) • Accidental complication (“How much we suck at our jobs” -Rainsberger)
  12. Keogh’s “Scale of Ignorance” 1. Just about everyone in the

    world has done this. 2. Lots of people have done this, including someone on our team. 3. Someone in our company has done this, or we have access to expertise. 4. Someone in the world did this, but not in our organization (and probably at a competitor). 5. Nobody in the world has ever done this before. #leanagileUS @mattphilip
  13. What You Can Do About Variation • Lower WIP •

    ConWIP/System WIP • Five Focusing Steps • Blocker clustering • Reduce workflow stages • Explicit policies • Cost of Delay scheduling, sequencing and selection #leanagileUS @mattphilip Lean-Kanban
  14. What You Can Do About Variation • “Agile 101” (simple,

    decoupled design; thin vertical slices; pairing) • Identify/make visible/measure dependencies • Collaborate/Share work (Dimitar Bakardzhiev) • Spike and stabilize (Dan North) • Reduce accidental complexity (Liz Keogh) #leanagileUS @mattphilip Team Why?
  15. NoEstimates and the Business • Determine what actions would be

    different based on the estimate • Customer-based fitness criteria • Budgeting: Team run rate • Focus conversation on value, not cost • MVP and product ownership • Create probabilistic forecast ASAP (as soon as you have data) – together! • Service-Delivery Reviews • Teams: Keep teams together, dedicated (reduces context-switching, Tuckman stages) #leanagileUS @mattphilip
  16. To Estimate or Not to Estimate? Never Estimate Anything Always

    Estimate Everything Question purpose of estimating Include all sources of variation Focus on characterizing work Probabilistic forecast Use delivery data Less effort spent Estimation culture Consider effort only Deterministic forecast Use intuition Heavy effort involved Tasks in hours #leanagileUS @mattphilip A better question: What can you do to maximize value and reduce risk in planning and delivery?
  17. • noestimatesbook.com (Vasco Duarte) • focusedobjective.com (Troy Magennis) • actionableagile.com

    (Dan Vacanti) • infoq.com/articles/noestimates-monte-carlo (Dimitar Bakardzhiev) • priceonomics.com/why-are-projects-always- behind-schedule/ • scrumandkanban.co.uk/estimation-meets- cynefin/ • ronjeffries.com • lizkeogh.com • neilkillick.com • zuill.us • mattphilip.wordpress.com/tag/noestimates References and More Info #leanagileUS @mattphilip