Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Authors Write: The Third Wheel of Scholarly Communication

Authors Write: The Third Wheel of Scholarly Communication

Given at the Society for Scholarly Publishing in Boston, May 28, 2014. Text of the talk published at http://micahvandegrift.wordpress.com/2014/06/02/ssptalk/

Micah Vandegrift

May 28, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by Micah Vandegrift

Other Decks in Education

Transcript

  1. Authors Write The Third Wheel of Scholarly Communication presented by

    Micah Vandegrift at the Society for Scholarly Publishing in Boston, Wednesday, May 28 2014
  2. Scholarly Communication should be Photo: Well clean cassette cleaning system

    by Stuart.Childs. https://flic.kr/p/n6sgdj transparent
  3. Photo: Circles by Rich Renomeron. https://flic.kr/p/bw8Py Library Author Publisher Erin

    McKiernan’s OA Pledge McKiernan, Erin (2014): Being open as an early career researcher. figshare. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.954994
  4. Taylor and Francis Group - Open Access Author Survey March

    2013 p. 18 What are your future intentions regarding your article publishing practices? I will choose to publish more often in open access journals with article processing charges (APCs). I will have to publish more often in open access journals, due to mandates from my research funder / institute. Yes - 15% No - 35% I’m not sure - 51% Yes - 9% No - 47% I’m not sure - 44%
  5. Photo: Anonymous by Jenny Downing. https://flic.kr/p/dC51H8 “We are not trying

    to create an organization with an orthodoxy that says you have to make everything available on an open access basis. We want to empower people to understand what their options are, and the pros and cons of those options, facilitating the dissemination goals of our members. We are pursuing the long-term horizon: it is part of our mission to think about how the public good can be served through authorship that makes works widely available.” - Pamela Samuelson
  6. Scholarly Communication should be Photo: Well clean cassette cleaning system

    by Stuart.Childs. https://flic.kr/p/n6sgdj transparent
  7. “What we need is an environment in which it’s possible

    for all stakeholders to speak openly, candidly, and rationally about the pros and cons, the costs and benefits, of all publishing models — not without fear of contradiction, but without being shamed, silenced, or accused of bad faith simply for raising important and troublesome issues. - Rick Anderson, discussingoa.wordpress.com IS A RATIONAL DISCUSSION OF OPEN ACCESS POSSIBLE?