becomes more fixed and objectified once the new generation enters the social world. Example: When two lovers are living together, they can change almost every aspect of their interactions. But when a child is born between them, the parents’ ways of interaction become the way for the child. For this little fellow, it is just the way it is done.
granted. They are there regardless whether we accept them or not. Their presence are coercive. Their power is imposed on us. The simplest way to cope with them is to comply and, again, to take it for granted.
of where we are positioned within the institutions. Only by then, we can see if there is any unnecessary restriction that people experience. Then, if we have the power, to actually alleviate these restrictions.
critical thinking. It tends to make people accept what is presented to them at face value and overlook what lies beyond. As a consequence, there is no room for deep reflection …
freedom that I am standing for (though I would be happy to discuss about freedom). Instead, it is more about fairness and the realisation human property of reason (or ‘aql in Arabic).
a social world, because it contains: (1) parents as the conceivers of the family institution and (2) the descendants as the receivers that see the institution as given. Family business, by the same token, is also a form of economic institution that carries its own economic logic and raison d'être.