Twin Higgs at High Temperature (minimal)

Finite temperature behaviour of a Twin Higgs inspired toy model without gauge bosons, focusing on the top sector.

Transcript

1. Twin Higgs at High Temperature Sivaramakrishnan Swaminathan (w/ Can Kilic) November 20, 2014
2. Outline Motivation Twin Higgs mechanism & toy model Finite temperature corrections Observations Conclusions
3. Finite temperature symmetry (non)restoration Thermal mass restores symmetry (eg: magnets) Λ2 divergence at T = 0 −→ T2 correction at T = 0 So, naturalness =⇒ symmetry non-restoration? Not true for boson-fermion cancellations How about same-spin partners? “Symmetry non-restoration at high-temperatures, in Little-Higgs models” – Phys.Rev.D72 (2005) 043520
4. FTFT for EWPT is hard “It should be emphasized, however, that the application of perturbation theory to EWPT physics is fraught with uncertainties as well as the potential for ambiguities.” – New J.Phys. 14 (2012) 125003 Perturbation theory is not expected to be well behaved IR divergences, resummations; high-temperature approximations Lattice methods are the best option (3d EFT)
5. FTFT for EWPT is hard, but. . . “At the same time, perturbation theory is the only feasible approach for surveying a broad range of BSM scenarios [...] One can then perform Monte Carlo computations that focus on a more limited range of parameters within a given model.” – New J.Phys. 14 (2012) 125003
6. Our goal Investigate finite temperature behaviour Simple model UV completable (up to naturalness issues) Same-spin partners Phenomenologically motivated Does a theory with same spin partners have symmetry non-restoration at high temperature?
7. Higgses and twins
8. We finally found the Higgs! v ≈ 173GeV , mh ≈ 125GeV
9. The Standard Model http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Standard_Model_of_Elementary_Particles.svg
10. Now what? Pretty much nothing else so far. . .
11. A flagship problem Quadratic divergent contributions to Higgs mass 3×(−4)×(y2 t /2)Λ2 16π2 3×3×(g2/2)Λ2 4×16π2 × 2 (6×(λ/4)+3×2(λ/4)) 16π2 × 2 1% tuning 4% tuning 6% tuning So, plausibly Λ not too large (eg: 5TeV above) Bottom up: New physics around the corner. . . LHC?! There are also other reasons to expect new physics at TeV scale
12. Things haven’t quite gone to plan No real BSM hints at the LHC yet
13. Things haven’t quite gone to plan No real BSM hints at the LHC yet But.. how?! LHC was supposed to generically produce anything and everything coloured, up to few 100 GeV! (eg: top partners)
14. Things haven’t quite gone to plan No real BSM hints at the LHC yet But.. how?! LHC was supposed to generically produce anything and everything coloured, up to few 100 GeV! (eg: top partners) Could we reconcile with naturalness, at least at one-loop?
15. An idea What if new dofs were uncharged under SM? Discrete symmetry
16. Our caricature model Toy model motivated by the same idea. Twin image of SM (A←→B) Focus on the top sector (forget all other fermions) Forget the gauge bosons for now (Set gi = 0)
17. Ingredients: SU(4)/SU(3) NLSM (1) H = HA HB Lscalar = |∂H|2 − −m2|H|2 + λ|H|4 + µ2|HA|2 µ = 0 for now; SU(4) symmetry This leads to SSB: H = exp i f      h1 0 h2 h3 h∗ 1 h∗ 2 h∗ 3 h0           0 0 0 f      Integrate out the radial mode; work with NLSM
18. Ingredients: SU(4)/SU(3) NLSM (2) Parametrize NLSM in terms of NGBs H = HA HB =     if h √ h† h sin √ h† h f if h √ h † h cos √ h† h f     where SM Higgs is h = h1 h2 (SU(2)A doublet) SU(4) symmetry prevents Λ2 contributions to m2 h from the Goldstones!
19. Ingredients: SU(4)/SU(3) NLSM (3) Exploit SU(2)A SU(2)B H SU(2)A×SU(2)B − − − − − − − − − − → | HA | | HB | =   f sin v f f cos v f   ≈ v f − v2 2f HB HA vEW v f
20. Ingredients: Top sector (1) [SU(3) × SU(2)]A × [SU(3) × SU(2)]B global symmetry SM quarks: QA (3A , 2A ) and UA (3A , 1A ) Twin partners: QB (3B , 2B ) and UB (3B , 1B ) Only up-type quark interacts with vev Lup-type yukawa = y ¯ QA( HA)UA + ¯ QB( HB)UB + h.c. Yukawas break SU(4) but have twin symmetry (A ↔ B)
21. Twin mechanism HA H† A HB H† B h h y y h h ×yf − y 2f + h h × yf − y 2f Discrete Z2 symmetry causes quadratic terms to mimic SU(4) symmetry (which is otherwise broken) − 3y2Λ2 8π2 H† A HA + H† B HB = − 3y2 8π2 Λ2|H|2
22. The effective potential, at one-loop Effective (free) energy after integrating out fluctuations
23. The effective potential, at one-loop Effective (free) energy after integrating out fluctuations treating fluctuations as free modes (at one-loop level)
24. The effective potential, at one-loop Effective (free) energy after integrating out fluctuations treating fluctuations as free modes (at one-loop level) Zero-point energy cost VCW = i (−1)Fi ni d3k 1 2 k2 + m2
25. The effective potential, at one-loop Effective (free) energy after integrating out fluctuations treating fluctuations as free modes (at one-loop level) Zero-point energy cost VCW = i (−1)Fi ni d3k 1 2 k2 + m2 For studying phase, can drop field-independent terms
26. The effective potential, at one-loop (2) VCW ≡ V T=0 1 = dofs: i (−1)Fi ni 64π2 m4 i log m2 i µ2 ∗ − 3 2 m2 tA = y2f 2 sin2 v f and m2 tB = y2f 2 cos2 v f Goldstones cannot conspire to give a potential for one amongst themselves m2 h ∼ 3y2 8π2 m2 tB log Λ2 m2 tB ∼ f π 2 =⇒ f ∼ 500GeV
27. µH† A HA for asymmetric vacuum HB HA vEW f HB HA vEW f Need to push up m2 h while keeping down vEW Use µ and increase f Small µ technically natural Soft breaking, needn’t consider one-loop corrections
28. Schematic spectrum Radial mode √ λf ∼ 2 TeV Partner top yf ∼ 500 GeV SM top yv ∼ 175 GeV SM Higgs ∼ 125 GeV Schematic spectrum: f ∼ 500 GeV , λ ∼ 1 16 , y ∼ 1
29. Twin-Higgs model at zero temperature: Upshot Quadratic divergences cancelled between same-spin partners No dofs charged under both SM and twin
30. Twin-Higgs model at zero temperature: Upshot Quadratic divergences cancelled between same-spin partners No dofs charged under both SM and twin Very weak constraints from experiments
31. Twin-Higgs model at zero temperature: Upshot Quadratic divergences cancelled between same-spin partners No dofs charged under both SM and twin Very weak constraints from experiments What happens when we heat the theory?
32. Finite temperature
33. Matsubara formalism Compactify and Wick rotate time direction t → −iτ , τ ∈ S1 R=β periodic BCs for bosons ωB n = 2πT n anti-periodic BCs for fermions ωF n = 2πT n + 1 2 Corrected two-point function; Replace d4k → ωn d3k
34. Finite temperature effective potential Veff = Vtree + V T=0 1 + ∆V T 1 ∆V T 1 = i T4 2π2 niJb/f m2 i T2 Let’s look at Jb/f and high temperature approximations
35. Finite temperature corrections: fermions Jf m2 T2 4 × T4 2π2 Jf = 4 T4 2π2 dkk2 − log 1 + exp − k2 + m2 T2 = −7π2T4 180 + m2 T2 12 + m4 16π2 log m2 aF T2 + . . .
36. Finite temperature corrections: bosons Jb m2 T2 T4 2π2 Jb = T4 2π2 dkk2 log 1 − exp − k2 + m2 T2 = −π2T4 90 + m2 T2 24 − m3 T 12π − m4 64π2 log m2 aBT2 + . . .
37. Resumming the daisies ∼ λT2 IR divergences at high temperature; Expansion in λT2 m2 Resum: m2 thermal = m2 T=0 + ΠT for zero modes (3d EFT) Use this effective mass in the m3T term Expansion parameter improves to λT meff (3d perturbativity)
38. Observations
39. SM-like VT computed numerically VT approximated to m2T2 f = 500GeV , µ = 100GeV , Tmax = 1000GeV Symmetry is restored on heating Truncating to m2T2: thermal masses cancel Subleading terms comparable to zero-temperature potential
40. Let’s be more careful Are pushing the theory beyond it’s allowed energy scales? What happens to the VEV of the radial mode, in LσM UV completion?
41. LσM completion H = HA HB = 1 √ 2 FA FB Fluctuating degrees of freedom m2 R = −m2 + 3λ (F2 A + F2 B )2 7 × m2 G = −m2 + λ (F2 A + F2 B )2 m2 tA = y2F2 A 2 , m2 tB = y2F2 B 2
42. LσM completion H = HA HB = 1 √ 2 FA FB Fluctuating degrees of freedom m2 R = −m2 + 3λ (F2 A + F2 B )2 7 × m2 G = −m2 + λ (F2 A + F2 B )2 m2 tA = y2F2 A 2 , m2 tB = y2F2 B 2 Plug into formula for 1-loop corrections, to get Veff
43. At high temperatures Push to high temperature =⇒ m2T2 approximation good Symmetry restoration due to thermal mass Since µ2 for A sector, we expect EW symmetry to be restored before radial VEV shrinks to origin Lack perturbative control close to phase transition At high temperature, restored phase with minimum at origin λT meff ∼ √ λ
44. Summary Goal: High temperature symmetry (non?)restoration, in theory with same-spin partners Considered example of Twin-Higgs inspired model Symmetry is restored in NLSM If UV completed as LσM then radial vev shrinks to zero
45. Future work Gauge the theory Can this be generalized to a broader class of theories?
46. Stepping back and taking stock Imperfect arguments; working intuition; spirit of no-go Heuristic thermodynamic argument F = E − TS Broken symmetry at high temperatures, if possible, might require some surprising mechanism, or different conditions Any unnaturalness gets recycled into symmetry restoration SUSY breaks at T > 0 and leads to symmetry restoration