Upgrade to PRO for Only $50/Year—Limited-Time Offer! 🔥

Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending S...

Avatar for Shinichi Takayanagi Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Research
0
1.5k

Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles

論文"Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles"を読んだ際に使用したスライド

Avatar for Shinichi Takayanagi

Shinichi Takayanagi

May 30, 2016
Tweet

More Decks by Shinichi Takayanagi

See All by Shinichi Takayanagi
論文紹介「Evaluation gaps in machine learning practice」と、効果検証入門に関する昔話
Avatar for Shinichi Takayanagi stakaya
0
970
バイブコーディングの正体——AIエージェントはソフトウェア開発を変えるか？
Avatar for Shinichi Takayanagi stakaya
5
1.4k
[NeurIPS 2023 論文読み会] Wasserstein Quantum Monte Carlo
Avatar for Shinichi Takayanagi stakaya
0
560
[KDD2021 論文読み会] ControlBurn: Feature Selection by Sparse Forests
Avatar for Shinichi Takayanagi stakaya
2
2k
[ICML2021 論文読み会] Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shift
Avatar for Shinichi Takayanagi stakaya
0
2k
[情報検索/推薦 各社合同 論文読み祭 #1] KDD ‘20 "Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Search"
Avatar for Shinichi Takayanagi stakaya
2
640
【2020年新人研修資料】ナウでヤングなPython開発入門
Avatar for Shinichi Takayanagi stakaya
29
21k
論文読んだ「Simple and Deterministic Matrix Sketching」
Avatar for Shinichi Takayanagi stakaya
1
1.2k
Quick Introduction to Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) with R"
Avatar for Shinichi Takayanagi stakaya
3
360

Other Decks in Research

See All in Research
Language Models Are Implicitly Continuous
Avatar for Sho Yokoi eumesy
PRO
0
360
生成AI による論文執筆サポート・ワークショップ ─ サーベイ／リサーチクエスチョン編 / Workshop on AI-Assisted Paper Writing Support: Survey/Research Question Edition
Avatar for Kenji Saito ks91
PRO
0
130
論文紹介: ReGenesis: LLMs can Grow into Reasoning Generalists via Self-Improvement
Avatar for Hisao Katsumi hisaokatsumi
0
150
Nullspace MPC
Avatar for MizuhoAOKI mizuhoaoki
1
520
競合や要望に流されない─B2B SaaSでミニマム要件を決めるリアルな取り組み / Don't be swayed by competitors or requests - A real effort to determine minimum requirements for B2B SaaS
Avatar for 株式会社カミナシ kaminashi
0
380
Multi-Agent Large Language Models for Code Intelligence: Opportunities, Challenges, and Research Directions
Avatar for Fatemeh Fard (UBC) fatemeh_fard
0
120
まずはここから：Overleaf共同執筆・CopilotでAIコーディング入門・Codespacesで独立環境
Avatar for Yusuke Matsui matsui_528
3
950
その推薦システムの評価指標、ユーザーの感覚とズレてるかも
Avatar for kuri8ive kuri8ive
1
290
Time to Cash: The Full Stack Breakdown of Modern ATM Attacks
Avatar for D ratatata
0
180
Neural Spatial Audio Processing for Sound Field Analysis and Control
Avatar for NII S. Koyama's Lab skoyamalab
0
130
大学見本市2025 JSTさきがけ事業セミナー「顔の見えないセンシング技術：多様なセンサにもとづく個人情報に配慮した人物状態推定」
Avatar for Mariko Isogawa miso2024
0
190
大規模言語モデルにおけるData-Centric AIと合成データの活用 / Data-Centric AI and Synthetic Data in Large Language Models
Avatar for tsurubee tsurubee
1
460

Featured

See All Featured
Primal Persuasion: How to Engage the Brain for Learning That Lasts
Avatar for Mike Taylor tmiket
0
190
Making the Leap to Tech Lead
Avatar for Ryan Cromwell cromwellryan
135
9.7k
Thoughts on Productivity
Avatar for Jon Yablonski jonyablonski
73
5k
Learning to Love Humans: Emotional Interface Design
Avatar for Aarron Walter aarron
274
41k
Art, The Web, and Tiny UX
Avatar for Lynn Fisher lynnandtonic
304
21k
Reflections from 52 weeks, 52 projects
Avatar for Jefferson Lam jeffersonlam
355
21k
Un-Boring Meetings
Avatar for Sebastian Deterding codingconduct
0
160
Crafting Experiences
Avatar for Bethany Jepchumba bethany
0
22
RailsConf & Balkan Ruby 2019: The Past, Present, and Future of Rails at GitHub
Avatar for Eileen M. Uchitelle eileencodes
141
34k
Raft: Consensus for Rubyists
Avatar for Patrick Van Stee vanstee
141
7.3k
Designing Dashboards & Data Visualisations in Web Apps
Avatar for Des Traynor destraynor
231
54k
Speed Design
Avatar for Sergey Chernyshev sergeychernyshev
33
1.4k

Transcript

  1. RCO論文輪読会(2016/05/27) “Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles”(KDD2011) Chong Wang,

    David M. Blei 高柳慎一

  2. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. ABSTRACT 1

  3. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 2

  4. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 3

  5. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 4

  6. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2. BACKGROUND ＆ 2.1 Recommendation Tasks

    5

  7. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 6

  8. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 7

  9. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 8

  10. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 9

  11. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 10

  12. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 11

  13. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.3 Probabilistic Topic Models 12

  14. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの生成過程 13

  15. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの特徴 14

  16. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 15

  17. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 16

  18. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRの生成過程 17

  19. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 18

  20. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRのモデルのRegressionたる所以 19

  21. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 20

  22. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 21

  23. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 簡単な証明 by iPad手書き 22

  24. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 23

  25. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 予測 24

  26. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 4. EMPIRICAL STUDY 25

  27. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. データの規模感 26

  28. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 評価 27

  29. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 28

  30. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 (ライブラリ内の論文数(Fig 5)・ある論文をLikeした数(Fig 6) 依存性) 29

    数が増えると Recallが下がる (あまり有名な論文じゃ ないのを出すため) 数が増えると Recallが上がる (みんな見てる論文 だとCFがうまく動く)

  31. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(ある2ユーザの好んだトピックを抽出) 30 トピックの潜 在ベクトルの 重みをランキ ングして抽出

  32. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(オフセットの大きかった論文BEST 10) 31 ※内容よりもCFが効くケースに相当

  33. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(EMの論文がベイズ統計勢にもよく参照されている例) 32 ※内容よりもCFが効く ケースに相当

  34. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(逆にトピックが広がらない例) 33 ※内容が支配的なケー スに相当

  35. （C）Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 34