Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending S...
Search
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Research
0
1.4k
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles
論文"Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles"を読んだ際に使用したスライド
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Shinichi Takayanagi
See All by Shinichi Takayanagi
[NeurIPS 2023 論文読み会] Wasserstein Quantum Monte Carlo
stakaya
0
470
[KDD2021 論文読み会] ControlBurn: Feature Selection by Sparse Forests
stakaya
2
1.9k
[ICML2021 論文読み会] Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shift
stakaya
0
2k
[情報検索/推薦 各社合同 論文読み祭 #1] KDD ‘20 "Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Search"
stakaya
2
570
【2020年新人研修資料】ナウでヤングなPython開発入門
stakaya
29
21k
論文読んだ「Simple and Deterministic Matrix Sketching」
stakaya
1
1.1k
Quick Introduction to Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) with R"
stakaya
3
300
The Road to Machine Learning Engineer from Data Scientist
stakaya
5
4.2k
論文読んだ「Winner’s Curse: Bias Estimation for Total Effects of Features in Online Controlled Experiments」
stakaya
1
4.6k
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
複数データセットを用いた動作認識
yuyay
0
110
TransformerによるBEV Perception
hf149
1
690
サーブレシーブ成功率は勝敗に影響するか?
vball_panda
0
530
Retrieval of Hurricane Rain Rate From SAR Images Based on Artificial Neural Network
satai
2
140
アプリケーションから知るモデルマージ
maguro27
0
260
PetiteSRE_GenAIEraにおけるインフラのあり方観察
ichichi
0
270
Segment Any Change
satai
2
210
[ECCV2024読み会] 衛星画像からの地上画像生成
elith
1
1.1k
NeurIPS 2024 参加報告 & 論文紹介 (SACPO, Ctrl-G)
reisato12345
0
330
研究を支える拡張性の高い ワークフローツールの提案 / Proposal of highly expandable workflow tools to support research
linyows
0
300
Practical The One Person Framework
asonas
1
2.1k
ナレッジプロデューサーとしてのミドルマネージャー支援 - MIMIGURI「知識創造室」の事例の考察 -
chiemitaki
0
210
Featured
See All Featured
Done Done
chrislema
182
16k
BBQ
matthewcrist
87
9.5k
Visualizing Your Data: Incorporating Mongo into Loggly Infrastructure
mongodb
45
9.4k
Raft: Consensus for Rubyists
vanstee
137
6.8k
The Art of Delivering Value - GDevCon NA Keynote
reverentgeek
10
1.3k
10 Git Anti Patterns You Should be Aware of
lemiorhan
PRO
656
59k
Bootstrapping a Software Product
garrettdimon
PRO
306
110k
Put a Button on it: Removing Barriers to Going Fast.
kastner
60
3.7k
Making Projects Easy
brettharned
116
6k
RailsConf & Balkan Ruby 2019: The Past, Present, and Future of Rails at GitHub
eileencodes
133
33k
Refactoring Trust on Your Teams (GOTO; Chicago 2020)
rmw
33
2.8k
What's in a price? How to price your products and services
michaelherold
244
12k
Transcript
RCO論文輪読会(2016/05/27) “Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles”(KDD2011) Chong Wang,
David M. Blei 高柳慎一
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. ABSTRACT 1
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 2
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 3
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 4
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2. BACKGROUND & 2.1 Recommendation Tasks
5
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 6
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 7
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 8
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 9
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 10
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 11
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.3 Probabilistic Topic Models 12
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの生成過程 13
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの特徴 14
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 15
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 16
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRの生成過程 17
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 18
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRのモデルのRegressionたる所以 19
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 20
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 21
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 簡単な証明 by iPad手書き 22
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 23
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 予測 24
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 4. EMPIRICAL STUDY 25
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. データの規模感 26
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 評価 27
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 28
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 (ライブラリ内の論文数(Fig 5)・ある論文をLikeした数(Fig 6) 依存性) 29
数が増えると Recallが下がる (あまり有名な論文じゃ ないのを出すため) 数が増えると Recallが上がる (みんな見てる論文 だとCFがうまく動く)
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(ある2ユーザの好んだトピックを抽出) 30 トピックの潜 在ベクトルの 重みをランキ ングして抽出
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(オフセットの大きかった論文BEST 10) 31 ※内容よりもCFが効くケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(EMの論文がベイズ統計勢にもよく参照されている例) 32 ※内容よりもCFが効く ケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(逆にトピックが広がらない例) 33 ※内容が支配的なケー スに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 34