Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending S...
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Research
0
1.5k
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles
論文"Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles"を読んだ際に使用したスライド
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Shinichi Takayanagi
See All by Shinichi Takayanagi
論文紹介「Evaluation gaps in machine learning practice」と、効果検証入門に関する昔話
stakaya
0
1k
バイブコーディングの正体——AIエージェントはソフトウェア開発を変えるか?
stakaya
5
1.5k
[NeurIPS 2023 論文読み会] Wasserstein Quantum Monte Carlo
stakaya
0
570
[KDD2021 論文読み会] ControlBurn: Feature Selection by Sparse Forests
stakaya
2
2k
[ICML2021 論文読み会] Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shift
stakaya
0
2k
[情報検索/推薦 各社合同 論文読み祭 #1] KDD ‘20 "Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Search"
stakaya
2
650
【2020年新人研修資料】ナウでヤングなPython開発入門
stakaya
29
21k
論文読んだ「Simple and Deterministic Matrix Sketching」
stakaya
1
1.2k
Quick Introduction to Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) with R"
stakaya
3
370
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
生成AIとうまく付き合うためのプロンプトエンジニアリング
yuri_ohashi
0
130
教師あり学習と強化学習で作る 最強の数学特化LLM
analokmaus
2
890
An Open and Reproducible Deep Research Agent for Long-Form Question Answering
ikuyamada
0
270
[IBIS 2025] 深層基盤モデルのための強化学習驚きから理論にもとづく納得へ
akifumi_wachi
19
9.6k
Attaques quantiques sur Bitcoin : comment se protéger ?
rlifchitz
0
140
Collective Predictive Coding and World Models in LLMs: A System 0/1/2/3 Perspective on Hierarchical Physical AI (IEEE SII 2026 Plenary Talk)
tanichu
1
250
生成AI による論文執筆サポート・ワークショップ ─ サーベイ/リサーチクエスチョン編 / Workshop on AI-Assisted Paper Writing Support: Survey/Research Question Edition
ks91
PRO
0
140
ACL読み会2025: Can Language Models Reason about Individualistic Human Values and Preferences?
yukizenimoto
0
120
J-RAGBench: 日本語RAGにおける Generator評価ベンチマークの構築
koki_itai
0
1.3k
LiDARセキュリティ最前線(2025年)
kentaroy47
0
130
ウェブ・ソーシャルメディア論文読み会 第36回: The Stepwise Deception: Simulating the Evolution from True News to Fake News with LLM Agents (EMNLP, 2025)
hkefka385
0
160
財務諸表監査のための逐次検定
masakat0
1
250
Featured
See All Featured
How To Stay Up To Date on Web Technology
chriscoyier
791
250k
Crafting Experiences
bethany
1
49
Google's AI Overviews - The New Search
badams
0
910
A Soul's Torment
seathinner
5
2.3k
Heart Work Chapter 1 - Part 1
lfama
PRO
5
35k
BBQ
matthewcrist
89
10k
Designing for humans not robots
tammielis
254
26k
Faster Mobile Websites
deanohume
310
31k
A designer walks into a library…
pauljervisheath
210
24k
The SEO Collaboration Effect
kristinabergwall1
0
350
Leveraging LLMs for student feedback in introductory data science courses - posit::conf(2025)
minecr
0
150
Fashionably flexible responsive web design (full day workshop)
malarkey
408
66k
Transcript
RCO論文輪読会(2016/05/27) “Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles”(KDD2011) Chong Wang,
David M. Blei 高柳慎一
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. ABSTRACT 1
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 2
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 3
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 4
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2. BACKGROUND & 2.1 Recommendation Tasks
5
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 6
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 7
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 8
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 9
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 10
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 11
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.3 Probabilistic Topic Models 12
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの生成過程 13
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの特徴 14
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 15
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 16
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRの生成過程 17
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 18
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRのモデルのRegressionたる所以 19
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 20
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 21
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 簡単な証明 by iPad手書き 22
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 23
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 予測 24
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 4. EMPIRICAL STUDY 25
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. データの規模感 26
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 評価 27
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 28
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 (ライブラリ内の論文数(Fig 5)・ある論文をLikeした数(Fig 6) 依存性) 29
数が増えると Recallが下がる (あまり有名な論文じゃ ないのを出すため) 数が増えると Recallが上がる (みんな見てる論文 だとCFがうまく動く)
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(ある2ユーザの好んだトピックを抽出) 30 トピックの潜 在ベクトルの 重みをランキ ングして抽出
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(オフセットの大きかった論文BEST 10) 31 ※内容よりもCFが効くケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(EMの論文がベイズ統計勢にもよく参照されている例) 32 ※内容よりもCFが効く ケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(逆にトピックが広がらない例) 33 ※内容が支配的なケー スに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 34