Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending S...
Search
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Research
1.6k
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles
論文"Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles"を読んだ際に使用したスライド
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
More Decks by Shinichi Takayanagi
See All by Shinichi Takayanagi
論文紹介「Evaluation gaps in machine learning practice」と、効果検証入門に関する昔話
stakaya
0
1.3k
バイブコーディングの正体——AIエージェントはソフトウェア開発を変えるか?
stakaya
5
1.9k
[NeurIPS 2023 論文読み会] Wasserstein Quantum Monte Carlo
stakaya
0
630
[KDD2021 論文読み会] ControlBurn: Feature Selection by Sparse Forests
stakaya
2
2.1k
[ICML2021 論文読み会] Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shift
stakaya
0
2.1k
[情報検索/推薦 各社合同 論文読み祭 #1] KDD ‘20 "Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Search"
stakaya
2
690
【2020年新人研修資料】ナウでヤングなPython開発入門
stakaya
28
22k
論文読んだ「Simple and Deterministic Matrix Sketching」
stakaya
1
1.3k
Quick Introduction to Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) with R"
stakaya
3
400
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
【Zozo Research 技術共有会】三次元領域の現在と展望
mickey_0226
3
600
医療LLMの現在地〜最新研究から社会実装までを考える〜
kento1109
1
1.7k
適応的スパムフィルタのための軽量な類似メッセージカウンタ / jsai2026-adaptive-spam-filter
monochromegane
0
5.3k
Data Visualization Tools in the Age of AI
flekschas
0
200
大規模言語モデルは誰を覚えているか / Who Do Large Language Models Memorize?
upura
0
160
Pretrain Where? Investigating How Pretraining Data Diversity Impacts Geospatial Foundation Model Performance
satai
3
130
IA for theory
gpeyre
1
400
データサイエンティストの就労意識~2015 → 2026 一般(個人)会員アンケートより
datascientistsociety
PRO
0
760
[BlackHatAsia2026] Hidden Telemetry: Uncovering TraceLogging ETW Providers You're Not Using (Yet)
asuna_jp
1
700
ros2-perf-multihost: 分散システムにおける客観的なアーキテクチャ評価フレームワーク
takasehideki
0
250
EIRによる不正端末のブロッキング 5G時代におけるデバイス識別と不正対策の進化
stellarcraft
0
130
20260624 NLP colloquium: 単一のhubテキストがCLIPを壊す:hubnessによる埋め込みの脆弱性特定
de9uch1
2
250
Featured
See All Featured
Music & Morning Musume
bryan
47
7.4k
Self-Hosted WebAssembly Runtime for Runtime-Neutral Checkpoint/Restore in Edge–Cloud Continuum
chikuwait
0
770
The agentic SEO stack - context over prompts
schlessera
0
900
How to build an LLM SEO readiness audit: a practical framework
nmsamuel
1
890
Winning Ecommerce Organic Search in an AI Era - #searchnstuff2025
aleyda
1
2.1k
We Have a Design System, Now What?
morganepeng
55
8.3k
Highjacked: Video Game Concept Design
rkendrick25
PRO
1
450
The Illustrated Children's Guide to Kubernetes
chrisshort
51
53k
Primal Persuasion: How to Engage the Brain for Learning That Lasts
tmiket
0
440
Automating Front-end Workflow
addyosmani
1369
210k
Put a Button on it: Removing Barriers to Going Fast.
kastner
60
4.6k
Mobile First: as difficult as doing things right
swwweet
225
10k
Transcript
RCO論文輪読会(2016/05/27) “Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles”(KDD2011) Chong Wang,
David M. Blei 高柳慎一
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. ABSTRACT 1
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 2
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 3
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 4
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2. BACKGROUND & 2.1 Recommendation Tasks
5
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 6
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 7
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 8
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 9
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 10
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 11
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.3 Probabilistic Topic Models 12
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの生成過程 13
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの特徴 14
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 15
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 16
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRの生成過程 17
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 18
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRのモデルのRegressionたる所以 19
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 20
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 21
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 簡単な証明 by iPad手書き 22
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 23
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 予測 24
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 4. EMPIRICAL STUDY 25
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. データの規模感 26
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 評価 27
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 28
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 (ライブラリ内の論文数(Fig 5)・ある論文をLikeした数(Fig 6) 依存性) 29
数が増えると Recallが下がる (あまり有名な論文じゃ ないのを出すため) 数が増えると Recallが上がる (みんな見てる論文 だとCFがうまく動く)
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(ある2ユーザの好んだトピックを抽出) 30 トピックの潜 在ベクトルの 重みをランキ ングして抽出
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(オフセットの大きかった論文BEST 10) 31 ※内容よりもCFが効くケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(EMの論文がベイズ統計勢にもよく参照されている例) 32 ※内容よりもCFが効く ケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(逆にトピックが広がらない例) 33 ※内容が支配的なケー スに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 34