Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending S...
Search
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Research
1.6k
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles
論文"Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles"を読んだ際に使用したスライド
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
More Decks by Shinichi Takayanagi
See All by Shinichi Takayanagi
論文紹介「Evaluation gaps in machine learning practice」と、効果検証入門に関する昔話
stakaya
0
1.3k
バイブコーディングの正体——AIエージェントはソフトウェア開発を変えるか?
stakaya
5
1.8k
[NeurIPS 2023 論文読み会] Wasserstein Quantum Monte Carlo
stakaya
0
620
[KDD2021 論文読み会] ControlBurn: Feature Selection by Sparse Forests
stakaya
2
2.1k
[ICML2021 論文読み会] Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shift
stakaya
0
2.1k
[情報検索/推薦 各社合同 論文読み祭 #1] KDD ‘20 "Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Search"
stakaya
2
690
【2020年新人研修資料】ナウでヤングなPython開発入門
stakaya
28
22k
論文読んだ「Simple and Deterministic Matrix Sketching」
stakaya
1
1.3k
Quick Introduction to Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) with R"
stakaya
3
400
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
LA-Bench 2025:実験指示から実行可能手順を生成するためのデータセット/LA-Bench 2025: A Dataset for Generating Executable Experimental Procedures from Experimental Instructions
stktu
0
130
Vector Map as Language: Toward Unified Remote Sensing Vector Mapping
satai
3
190
HAKARI-Bench - 実運用視点での情報検索モデル評価ベンチマーク
hotchpotch
1
690
大規模言語モデルは誰を覚えているか / Who Do Large Language Models Memorize?
upura
0
140
マーケットストリート 社会実験2024 in 秋葉原ジャンク通り 調査報告書
izumiyama_lab
1
110
LINEヤフー データサイエンス Meetup「三井物産コモディティ予測チャレンジ」の舞台裏-AlpacaTechパート
gamella
1
630
AIエージェント時代のLLM-jpモデルのあるべき姿
k141303
0
580
論文紹介 "ReSim: Reliable World Simulation for Autonomous Driving"
kogo
0
740
EIRによる不正端末のブロッキング 5G時代におけるデバイス識別と不正対策の進化
stellarcraft
0
120
Research Engineerという仕事 / Research Engineering: Bridging Research and Business
chck
1
270
Visual SLAM未来予測 / Future Prediction in Visual SLAM
koide3
1
920
HackSick vol.7 LT資料【LLMアーキテクチャ入門・事前学習時の躓き所解説】 スパースなAttention・状態空間モデル
rikkabotan7
0
160
Featured
See All Featured
The #1 spot is gone: here's how to win anyway
tamaranovitovic
3
1.1k
Getting science done with accelerated Python computing platforms
jacobtomlinson
2
450
SEO in 2025: How to Prepare for the Future of Search
ipullrank
3
3.8k
How to make the Groovebox
asonas
2
2.3k
The SEO Collaboration Effect
kristinabergwall1
1
530
Building a Modern Day E-commerce SEO Strategy
aleyda
45
9.2k
Discover your Explorer Soul
emna__ayadi
2
1.3k
Visualizing Your Data: Incorporating Mongo into Loggly Infrastructure
mongodb
49
10k
GitHub's CSS Performance
jonrohan
1033
470k
The innovator’s Mindset - Leading Through an Era of Exponential Change - McGill University 2025
jdejongh
PRO
1
280
The Anti-SEO Checklist Checklist. Pubcon Cyber Week
ryanjones
0
220
The Illustrated Children's Guide to Kubernetes
chrisshort
51
53k
Transcript
RCO論文輪読会(2016/05/27) “Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles”(KDD2011) Chong Wang,
David M. Blei 高柳慎一
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. ABSTRACT 1
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 2
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 3
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 4
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2. BACKGROUND & 2.1 Recommendation Tasks
5
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 6
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 7
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 8
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 9
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 10
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 11
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.3 Probabilistic Topic Models 12
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの生成過程 13
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの特徴 14
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 15
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 16
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRの生成過程 17
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 18
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRのモデルのRegressionたる所以 19
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 20
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 21
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 簡単な証明 by iPad手書き 22
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 23
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 予測 24
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 4. EMPIRICAL STUDY 25
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. データの規模感 26
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 評価 27
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 28
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 (ライブラリ内の論文数(Fig 5)・ある論文をLikeした数(Fig 6) 依存性) 29
数が増えると Recallが下がる (あまり有名な論文じゃ ないのを出すため) 数が増えると Recallが上がる (みんな見てる論文 だとCFがうまく動く)
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(ある2ユーザの好んだトピックを抽出) 30 トピックの潜 在ベクトルの 重みをランキ ングして抽出
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(オフセットの大きかった論文BEST 10) 31 ※内容よりもCFが効くケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(EMの論文がベイズ統計勢にもよく参照されている例) 32 ※内容よりもCFが効く ケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(逆にトピックが広がらない例) 33 ※内容が支配的なケー スに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 34