Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending S...
Search
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Research
1.6k
0
Share
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles
論文"Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles"を読んだ際に使用したスライド
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
More Decks by Shinichi Takayanagi
See All by Shinichi Takayanagi
論文紹介「Evaluation gaps in machine learning practice」と、効果検証入門に関する昔話
stakaya
0
1.2k
バイブコーディングの正体——AIエージェントはソフトウェア開発を変えるか?
stakaya
5
1.7k
[NeurIPS 2023 論文読み会] Wasserstein Quantum Monte Carlo
stakaya
0
590
[KDD2021 論文読み会] ControlBurn: Feature Selection by Sparse Forests
stakaya
2
2k
[ICML2021 論文読み会] Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shift
stakaya
0
2.1k
[情報検索/推薦 各社合同 論文読み祭 #1] KDD ‘20 "Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Search"
stakaya
2
660
【2020年新人研修資料】ナウでヤングなPython開発入門
stakaya
29
22k
論文読んだ「Simple and Deterministic Matrix Sketching」
stakaya
1
1.2k
Quick Introduction to Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) with R"
stakaya
3
380
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
データサイエンティストをめぐる環境の違い2025年版〈一般ビジネスパーソン調査の国際比較〉
datascientistsociety
PRO
0
1.2k
2026-01-30-MandSL-textbook-jp-cos-lod
yegusa
1
1.1k
LOSの検討(λ Kansai 2026 in Winter)
motopu
0
120
SoftMatcha 2: 1兆語規模コーパスの超高速かつ柔らかい検索
e869120_sub
3
390
The mathematics of transformers
gpeyre
0
230
AI Agentの精度改善に見るML開発との共通点 / commonalities in accuracy improvements in agentic era
shimacos
6
1.6k
正規分布と最適化について
koide3
0
130
Ankylosing Spondylitis
ankh2054
0
160
明日から使える!研究効率化ツール入門
matsui_528
11
6.2k
Aurora Serverless からAurora Serverless v2への課題と知見を論文から読み解く/Understanding the challenges and insights of moving from Aurora Serverless to Aurora Serverless v2 from a paper
bootjp
6
1.6k
「車1割削減、渋滞半減、公共交通2倍」を 熊本から岡山へ@RACDA設立30周年記念都市交通フォーラム2026
trafficbrain
1
1k
A History of Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search from an Applications Perspective
matsui_528
1
250
Featured
See All Featured
Efficient Content Optimization with Google Search Console & Apps Script
katarinadahlin
PRO
1
510
Paper Plane (Part 1)
katiecoart
PRO
0
6.8k
Why Your Marketing Sucks and What You Can Do About It - Sophie Logan
marketingsoph
0
130
VelocityConf: Rendering Performance Case Studies
addyosmani
333
25k
ピンチをチャンスに:未来をつくるプロダクトロードマップ #pmconf2020
aki_iinuma
128
55k
[RailsConf 2023] Rails as a piece of cake
palkan
59
6.5k
Mind Mapping
helmedeiros
PRO
1
160
BBQ
matthewcrist
89
10k
GitHub's CSS Performance
jonrohan
1032
470k
The Illustrated Guide to Node.js - THAT Conference 2024
reverentgeek
1
340
Building a A Zero-Code AI SEO Workflow
portentint
PRO
0
460
The Limits of Empathy - UXLibs8
cassininazir
1
310
Transcript
RCO論文輪読会(2016/05/27) “Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles”(KDD2011) Chong Wang,
David M. Blei 高柳慎一
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. ABSTRACT 1
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 2
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 3
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 4
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2. BACKGROUND & 2.1 Recommendation Tasks
5
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 6
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 7
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 8
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 9
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 10
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 11
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.3 Probabilistic Topic Models 12
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの生成過程 13
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの特徴 14
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 15
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 16
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRの生成過程 17
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 18
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRのモデルのRegressionたる所以 19
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 20
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 21
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 簡単な証明 by iPad手書き 22
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 23
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 予測 24
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 4. EMPIRICAL STUDY 25
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. データの規模感 26
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 評価 27
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 28
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 (ライブラリ内の論文数(Fig 5)・ある論文をLikeした数(Fig 6) 依存性) 29
数が増えると Recallが下がる (あまり有名な論文じゃ ないのを出すため) 数が増えると Recallが上がる (みんな見てる論文 だとCFがうまく動く)
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(ある2ユーザの好んだトピックを抽出) 30 トピックの潜 在ベクトルの 重みをランキ ングして抽出
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(オフセットの大きかった論文BEST 10) 31 ※内容よりもCFが効くケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(EMの論文がベイズ統計勢にもよく参照されている例) 32 ※内容よりもCFが効く ケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(逆にトピックが広がらない例) 33 ※内容が支配的なケー スに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 34