Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending S...
Search
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Research
0
1.5k
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles
論文"Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles"を読んだ際に使用したスライド
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Shinichi Takayanagi
See All by Shinichi Takayanagi
バイブコーディングの正体——AIエージェントはソフトウェア開発を変えるか?
stakaya
5
1.1k
[NeurIPS 2023 論文読み会] Wasserstein Quantum Monte Carlo
stakaya
0
530
[KDD2021 論文読み会] ControlBurn: Feature Selection by Sparse Forests
stakaya
2
1.9k
[ICML2021 論文読み会] Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shift
stakaya
0
2k
[情報検索/推薦 各社合同 論文読み祭 #1] KDD ‘20 "Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Search"
stakaya
2
620
【2020年新人研修資料】ナウでヤングなPython開発入門
stakaya
29
21k
論文読んだ「Simple and Deterministic Matrix Sketching」
stakaya
1
1.2k
Quick Introduction to Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) with R"
stakaya
3
350
The Road to Machine Learning Engineer from Data Scientist
stakaya
5
4.4k
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
最適決定木を用いた処方的価格最適化
mickey_kubo
4
1.9k
Agentic AIとMCPを利用したサービス作成入門
mickey_kubo
0
520
単施設でできる臨床研究の考え方
shuntaros
0
2.7k
Minimax and Bayes Optimal Best-arm Identification: Adaptive Experimental Design for Treatment Choice
masakat0
0
170
能動適応的実験計画
masakat0
2
810
国際論文を出そう!ICRA / IROS / RA-L への論文投稿の心構えとノウハウ / RSJ2025 Luncheon Seminar
koide3
6
4.5k
Mechanistic Interpretability:解釈可能性研究の新たな潮流
koshiro_aoki
1
400
Delta Airlines® Customer Care in the U.S.: How to Reach Them Now
bookingcomcustomersupportusa
0
110
言語モデルの地図:確率分布と情報幾何による類似性の可視化
shimosan
5
1.4k
When Submarine Cables Go Dark: Examining the Web Services Resilience Amid Global Internet Disruptions
irvin
0
300
MetaEarth: A Generative Foundation Model for Global-Scale Remote Sensing Image Generation
satai
4
180
20250605_新交通システム推進議連_熊本都市圏「車1割削減、渋滞半減、公共交通2倍」から考える地方都市交通政策
trafficbrain
0
760
Featured
See All Featured
Testing 201, or: Great Expectations
jmmastey
45
7.6k
GraphQLの誤解/rethinking-graphql
sonatard
72
11k
GraphQLとの向き合い方2022年版
quramy
49
14k
Large-scale JavaScript Application Architecture
addyosmani
512
110k
Visualizing Your Data: Incorporating Mongo into Loggly Infrastructure
mongodb
48
9.7k
A Modern Web Designer's Workflow
chriscoyier
696
190k
Why Our Code Smells
bkeepers
PRO
339
57k
Agile that works and the tools we love
rasmusluckow
330
21k
How to train your dragon (web standard)
notwaldorf
96
6.2k
The Pragmatic Product Professional
lauravandoore
36
6.9k
We Have a Design System, Now What?
morganepeng
53
7.8k
Building Better People: How to give real-time feedback that sticks.
wjessup
368
19k
Transcript
RCO論文輪読会(2016/05/27) “Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles”(KDD2011) Chong Wang,
David M. Blei 高柳慎一
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. ABSTRACT 1
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 2
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 3
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 4
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2. BACKGROUND & 2.1 Recommendation Tasks
5
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 6
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 7
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 8
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 9
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 10
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 11
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.3 Probabilistic Topic Models 12
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの生成過程 13
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの特徴 14
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 15
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 16
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRの生成過程 17
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 18
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRのモデルのRegressionたる所以 19
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 20
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 21
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 簡単な証明 by iPad手書き 22
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 23
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 予測 24
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 4. EMPIRICAL STUDY 25
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. データの規模感 26
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 評価 27
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 28
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 (ライブラリ内の論文数(Fig 5)・ある論文をLikeした数(Fig 6) 依存性) 29
数が増えると Recallが下がる (あまり有名な論文じゃ ないのを出すため) 数が増えると Recallが上がる (みんな見てる論文 だとCFがうまく動く)
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(ある2ユーザの好んだトピックを抽出) 30 トピックの潜 在ベクトルの 重みをランキ ングして抽出
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(オフセットの大きかった論文BEST 10) 31 ※内容よりもCFが効くケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(EMの論文がベイズ統計勢にもよく参照されている例) 32 ※内容よりもCFが効く ケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(逆にトピックが広がらない例) 33 ※内容が支配的なケー スに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 34