Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending S...
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Research
1.6k
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles
論文"Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles"を読んだ際に使用したスライド
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
More Decks by Shinichi Takayanagi
See All by Shinichi Takayanagi
論文紹介「Evaluation gaps in machine learning practice」と、効果検証入門に関する昔話
stakaya
0
1.3k
バイブコーディングの正体——AIエージェントはソフトウェア開発を変えるか?
stakaya
5
1.8k
[NeurIPS 2023 論文読み会] Wasserstein Quantum Monte Carlo
stakaya
0
630
[KDD2021 論文読み会] ControlBurn: Feature Selection by Sparse Forests
stakaya
2
2.1k
[ICML2021 論文読み会] Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shift
stakaya
0
2.1k
[情報検索/推薦 各社合同 論文読み祭 #1] KDD ‘20 "Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Search"
stakaya
2
690
【2020年新人研修資料】ナウでヤングなPython開発入門
stakaya
28
22k
論文読んだ「Simple and Deterministic Matrix Sketching」
stakaya
1
1.3k
Quick Introduction to Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) with R"
stakaya
3
400
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
Visual SLAM未来予測 / Future Prediction in Visual SLAM
koide3
1
980
Ghost in the 7‑Zip: The Shadow of Residential Proxies Creeping into Your Life
nttcom
0
2k
Fukui Shibiten 39 - AI Art
butchi
0
190
SoftMatcha 2: 1兆語規模コーパスの超高速かつ柔らかい検索
e869120_sub
7
3.8k
[BlackHatAsia2026] Hidden Telemetry: Uncovering TraceLogging ETW Providers You're Not Using (Yet)
asuna_jp
1
690
HackSick vol.7 LT資料【LLMアーキテクチャ入門・事前学習時の躓き所解説】 スパースなAttention・状態空間モデル
rikkabotan7
0
170
Sleuthcon Keynote - How Cybercriminals (ab)use AI
fr0gger
0
310
Claude Code × autoresearch 実践
mathbullet
0
260
Model Discovery and Graph Simulation: A Lightweight Gateway to Chaos Engineering
anatolykr
0
280
[最先端NLP勉強会2026] Agentic Rubrics as Contextual Verifiers for SWE Agents
rfujii
1
320
J-STAGEの現況と全文XML登載必須化について
xspa2012
0
180
多様なデータを許容し学習し続ける模倣学習 / Advanced Imitation Learning for VLA
prinlab
0
290
Featured
See All Featured
Building a Modern Day E-commerce SEO Strategy
aleyda
45
9.2k
Typedesign – Prime Four
hannesfritz
42
3.2k
Building Experiences: Design Systems, User Experience, and Full Site Editing
marktimemedia
0
590
The SEO identity crisis: Don't let AI make you average
varn
0
550
Prompt Engineering for Job Search
mfonobong
0
430
The Curse of the Amulet
leimatthew05
2
14k
New Earth Scene 8
popppiees
3
2.5k
A better future with KSS
kneath
240
18k
Navigating Algorithm Shifts & AI Overviews - #SMXNext
aleyda
1
1.6k
Mozcon NYC 2025: Stop Losing SEO Traffic
samtorres
1
510
Git: the NoSQL Database
bkeepers
PRO
432
67k
Testing 201, or: Great Expectations
jmmastey
46
8.3k
Transcript
RCO論文輪読会(2016/05/27) “Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles”(KDD2011) Chong Wang,
David M. Blei 高柳慎一
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. ABSTRACT 1
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 2
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 3
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 4
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2. BACKGROUND & 2.1 Recommendation Tasks
5
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 6
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 7
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 8
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 9
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 10
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 11
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.3 Probabilistic Topic Models 12
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの生成過程 13
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの特徴 14
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 15
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 16
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRの生成過程 17
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 18
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRのモデルのRegressionたる所以 19
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 20
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 21
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 簡単な証明 by iPad手書き 22
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 23
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 予測 24
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 4. EMPIRICAL STUDY 25
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. データの規模感 26
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 評価 27
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 28
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 (ライブラリ内の論文数(Fig 5)・ある論文をLikeした数(Fig 6) 依存性) 29
数が増えると Recallが下がる (あまり有名な論文じゃ ないのを出すため) 数が増えると Recallが上がる (みんな見てる論文 だとCFがうまく動く)
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(ある2ユーザの好んだトピックを抽出) 30 トピックの潜 在ベクトルの 重みをランキ ングして抽出
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(オフセットの大きかった論文BEST 10) 31 ※内容よりもCFが効くケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(EMの論文がベイズ統計勢にもよく参照されている例) 32 ※内容よりもCFが効く ケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(逆にトピックが広がらない例) 33 ※内容が支配的なケー スに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 34