Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending S...
Search
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Research
0
1.4k
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles
論文"Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles"を読んだ際に使用したスライド
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Shinichi Takayanagi
See All by Shinichi Takayanagi
[NeurIPS 2023 論文読み会] Wasserstein Quantum Monte Carlo
stakaya
0
440
[KDD2021 論文読み会] ControlBurn: Feature Selection by Sparse Forests
stakaya
2
1.8k
[ICML2021 論文読み会] Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shift
stakaya
0
1.9k
[情報検索/推薦 各社合同 論文読み祭 #1] KDD ‘20 "Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Search"
stakaya
2
550
【2020年新人研修資料】ナウでヤングなPython開発入門
stakaya
28
20k
論文読んだ「Simple and Deterministic Matrix Sketching」
stakaya
1
1.1k
Quick Introduction to Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) with R"
stakaya
3
280
The Road to Machine Learning Engineer from Data Scientist
stakaya
5
4.2k
論文読んだ「Winner’s Curse: Bias Estimation for Total Effects of Features in Online Controlled Experiments」
stakaya
1
4.6k
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
Weekly AI Agents News! 9月号 プロダクト/ニュースのアーカイブ
masatoto
2
170
移動ビッグデータに基づく地理情報の埋め込みベクトル化
tam1110
0
160
EBPMにおける生成AI活用について
daimoriwaki
0
220
文献紹介:A Multidimensional Framework for Evaluating Lexical Semantic Change with Social Science Applications
a1da4
1
230
Embers of Autoregression: Understanding Large Language Models Through the Problem They are Trained to Solve
eumesy
PRO
7
1.2k
The many faces of AI and the role of mathematics
gpeyre
1
1.4k
MetricSifter:クラウドアプリケーションにおける故障箇所特定の効率化のための多変量時系列データの特徴量削減 / FIT 2024
yuukit
2
140
データサイエンティストをめぐる環境の違い 2024年版〈一般ビジネスパーソン調査の国際比較〉
datascientistsociety
PRO
0
780
Leveraging LLMs for Unsupervised Dense Retriever Ranking (SIGIR 2024)
kampersanda
2
250
Language is primarily a tool for communication rather than thought
ryou0634
4
790
marukotenant01/tenant-20240916
marketing2024
0
620
尺度開発における質的研究アプローチ(自主企画シンポジウム7:認知行動療法における尺度開発のこれから)
litalicolab
0
360
Featured
See All Featured
Designing for Performance
lara
604
68k
Building an army of robots
kneath
302
44k
Rebuilding a faster, lazier Slack
samanthasiow
79
8.7k
4 Signs Your Business is Dying
shpigford
181
21k
Making the Leap to Tech Lead
cromwellryan
133
9k
Why Our Code Smells
bkeepers
PRO
335
57k
Bootstrapping a Software Product
garrettdimon
PRO
305
110k
Designing Experiences People Love
moore
138
23k
Dealing with People You Can't Stand - Big Design 2015
cassininazir
365
25k
Git: the NoSQL Database
bkeepers
PRO
427
64k
JavaScript: Past, Present, and Future - NDC Porto 2020
reverentgeek
47
5.1k
What’s in a name? Adding method to the madness
productmarketing
PRO
22
3.2k
Transcript
RCO論文輪読会(2016/05/27) “Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles”(KDD2011) Chong Wang,
David M. Blei 高柳慎一
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. ABSTRACT 1
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 2
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 3
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 4
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2. BACKGROUND & 2.1 Recommendation Tasks
5
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 6
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 7
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 8
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 9
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 10
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 11
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.3 Probabilistic Topic Models 12
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの生成過程 13
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの特徴 14
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 15
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 16
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRの生成過程 17
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 18
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRのモデルのRegressionたる所以 19
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 20
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 21
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 簡単な証明 by iPad手書き 22
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 23
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 予測 24
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 4. EMPIRICAL STUDY 25
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. データの規模感 26
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 評価 27
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 28
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 (ライブラリ内の論文数(Fig 5)・ある論文をLikeした数(Fig 6) 依存性) 29
数が増えると Recallが下がる (あまり有名な論文じゃ ないのを出すため) 数が増えると Recallが上がる (みんな見てる論文 だとCFがうまく動く)
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(ある2ユーザの好んだトピックを抽出) 30 トピックの潜 在ベクトルの 重みをランキ ングして抽出
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(オフセットの大きかった論文BEST 10) 31 ※内容よりもCFが効くケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(EMの論文がベイズ統計勢にもよく参照されている例) 32 ※内容よりもCFが効く ケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(逆にトピックが広がらない例) 33 ※内容が支配的なケー スに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 34