Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending S...
Search
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Research
1.6k
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles
論文"Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles"を読んだ際に使用したスライド
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
More Decks by Shinichi Takayanagi
See All by Shinichi Takayanagi
論文紹介「Evaluation gaps in machine learning practice」と、効果検証入門に関する昔話
stakaya
0
1.3k
バイブコーディングの正体——AIエージェントはソフトウェア開発を変えるか?
stakaya
5
1.8k
[NeurIPS 2023 論文読み会] Wasserstein Quantum Monte Carlo
stakaya
0
610
[KDD2021 論文読み会] ControlBurn: Feature Selection by Sparse Forests
stakaya
2
2k
[ICML2021 論文読み会] Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shift
stakaya
0
2.1k
[情報検索/推薦 各社合同 論文読み祭 #1] KDD ‘20 "Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Search"
stakaya
2
680
【2020年新人研修資料】ナウでヤングなPython開発入門
stakaya
28
22k
論文読んだ「Simple and Deterministic Matrix Sketching」
stakaya
1
1.3k
Quick Introduction to Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) with R"
stakaya
3
390
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
National high-resolution cropland classification of Japan with agricultural census information and multi-temporal multi-modality datasets
satai
3
310
Scalable dynamic origin-destination demand estimation enhanced by high-resolution satellite imagery data
satai
3
300
老舗ものづくり企業でリサーチが変革を起こすまで - 三菱重工DXの実践
skydats
0
200
Harness Engineering and Al Agent
kzinmr
3
1.7k
AY 2026 Guide to Academic Writing Using Generative AI - Workshop
ks91
PRO
0
120
Research Engineerという仕事 / Research Engineering: Bridging Research and Business
chck
1
220
進学校の生徒にはア行の苗字が多いのか
ozekinote
0
460
長時間動画QAにおけるマルチエージェント推論 ・SVAgent: Storyline-Guided Long Video Understanding via Cross-Modal Multi-Agent Collaboration
murakawatakuya
1
150
研究室単位での自律的 IPv6接続性確立に向けたAS共同運用モデルの提案と実証
reokashiwa
0
100
通時的な類似度行列に基づく単語の意味変化の分析
rudorudo11
0
320
typst の使い方:言語学を研究する学生のために
gitomochang
0
470
羽田新ルート運用6年の検証
1manken
0
160
Featured
See All Featured
How To Stay Up To Date on Web Technology
chriscoyier
790
250k
YesSQL, Process and Tooling at Scale
rocio
174
15k
Conquering PDFs: document understanding beyond plain text
inesmontani
PRO
4
2.8k
Scaling GitHub
holman
464
140k
Groundhog Day: Seeking Process in Gaming for Health
codingconduct
0
220
New Earth Scene 8
popppiees
3
2.4k
Evolving SEO for Evolving Search Engines
ryanjones
0
230
Deep Space Network (abreviated)
tonyrice
0
210
Navigating Weather and Climate Data
rabernat
0
250
30 Presentation Tips
portentint
PRO
1
330
Fantastic passwords and where to find them - at NoRuKo
philnash
52
3.7k
Design and Strategy: How to Deal with People Who Don’t "Get" Design
morganepeng
133
19k
Transcript
RCO論文輪読会(2016/05/27) “Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles”(KDD2011) Chong Wang,
David M. Blei 高柳慎一
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. ABSTRACT 1
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 2
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 3
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 4
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2. BACKGROUND & 2.1 Recommendation Tasks
5
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 6
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 7
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 8
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 9
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 10
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 11
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.3 Probabilistic Topic Models 12
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの生成過程 13
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの特徴 14
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 15
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 16
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRの生成過程 17
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 18
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRのモデルのRegressionたる所以 19
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 20
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 21
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 簡単な証明 by iPad手書き 22
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 23
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 予測 24
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 4. EMPIRICAL STUDY 25
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. データの規模感 26
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 評価 27
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 28
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 (ライブラリ内の論文数(Fig 5)・ある論文をLikeした数(Fig 6) 依存性) 29
数が増えると Recallが下がる (あまり有名な論文じゃ ないのを出すため) 数が増えると Recallが上がる (みんな見てる論文 だとCFがうまく動く)
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(ある2ユーザの好んだトピックを抽出) 30 トピックの潜 在ベクトルの 重みをランキ ングして抽出
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(オフセットの大きかった論文BEST 10) 31 ※内容よりもCFが効くケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(EMの論文がベイズ統計勢にもよく参照されている例) 32 ※内容よりもCFが効く ケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(逆にトピックが広がらない例) 33 ※内容が支配的なケー スに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 34