Knowledge Visualisation |
[email protected] You are a scientist. You are passionate about your research and love to share your ideas. Most likely you’ll visit several (inter)national meetings every year and discuss ideas that enable you to fine tune your research agenda. Also, you publish your findings in peer reviewed magazines and maybe even in professional media. Possibly you’ve been interviewed for a newspaper article or radio show. And last but not least, you’re probably active in one of the ‘new’ social media like Linkedin (which is already close to ten years old by the way), twitter, facebook or Youtube – for personal or work purposes. So now you’ve picked up the idea to launch a Linkedin Group. You may be driven by a need to open up discussions and research results for a wider public. Or you are collaborating on a topic with international partners and need a medium to participate in discus- sions without cluttering your mailbox. Whatever the reason, you feel Linkedin will provide a good environ- ment to host this platform. So you choose a name, invite some people and prepare for some intense discussions. And than it is silent. You started by putting articles in your group weekly, but as no one responded, your enthusiasm faded away. Maybe Linkedin isn’t the right medium? Maybe no one is interested? Or everyone’s busy? Although all of the above may be true, the success of your group hinges on a few key points. Do your members find the group: Useful - The group must fill a need not otherwise met. If people meet each other at the coffee machine every day and have their informal discussions there, what use is there for a digital, time consuming, discussion platform? Active – Does anything happen in the group or is it mostly silent? Linkedin users judge a group by its activity. If no one of the other members has added anything for a week, or worse, a month, how interesting can it be? More activity generates activity, but inactivity is the death of every Linkedin Group. Personal – Do the members feel connected to each other? Is the information posted relevant to them on a personal level? Have you invited them personally, or have you simply sent out a uniform template? Do you regularly interact and ask for feedback, or just post news links and let others start the discussions? Do you let your own personality shine through, do members get a glance at the person behind the scientist? The above gives you some pointers to creating an interactive Linkedin Group. But to break it down, here is a 10 step program enabling you to create Linkedin Group that’s is Useful, Active and Personal? or: How to start up an interactive Linkedin Group? 1. Make sure you need a Linkedin Group. Ask yourself de question: what need does this group fill, that cannot be accomplished any other way? Linkedin Groups are a good idea when people are not able to regularly meet and discuss the topic, for instance in international projects, or after projects have finished, but researchers want to keep in touch and exchange ideas. 2. Make sure your topic is relevant and not yet covered by another Linkedin Group. Find your niche and make sure the topic is broad enough to interest a big enough group of people and yet narrow enough so the discussions remain focused and you attract people specifically interested in your topic. 3. Choose a good name. A good name ensures that people interested in your topic, can actually find it, either in Google or in the Linkedin Search. Make sure the name of the group covers the topic. You can change your name 3 times. 4. Choose a focus. What kind of discussions do you want to facilitate? What do you want and what not. Write these things down in the Group Rules. Make sure include a section in Group Rules about banning members that misbehave. It’s also good to include a Why don’t they talk? How to create an interactive Linkedin Group for Scientists Why don’t they talk (Marjolein Pijnappels, 2012)