Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Is it Just Me? Exploring Dilemmas and Choices i...

Is it Just Me? Exploring Dilemmas and Choices in Organizational Design

Presentation by Fiddy Abraham, Principal Researcher / Consultant (TIHR) to the European Organizational Design Forum Meeting Vienna 2013: Designing Thriving Organizations: Resilience, Partnership, Enablement

Avatar for Tavistock  Institute

Tavistock Institute

April 28, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by Tavistock Institute

Other Decks in Education

Transcript

  1. Is  it  Just  Me?  Exploring  Dilemmas   and  Choices  in

     Organiza<onal   Design     Frances  Abraham   The  Tavistock  Ins<tute  of  Human  Rela<ons   1   28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al  
  2. Overview   •  A  narra<ve  account  of  collabora<ve  inter-­‐ organiza<onal

     design  to  increase  resilience   •  Three  cases:     – The  same  brief  but  surprises  and  challenges   – Varia<on  in  organiza<onal  design  approaches     •  This  presenta<on  as  a  prompt  to  collabora<ve   enquiry  with  par<cipants   28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   2  
  3. Focus  for  today’s  collabora<ve     enquiry     • 

    Have  you  experienced  <mes  when  your   preferred  organiza<onal  design  approach  ran   into  unexpected  difficul<es?   •  What  other  design  approaches  could  have   been  used  effec<vely  in  each  of  the  cases   presented?   •  What  do  you  do  when  you  encounter   surprises  which  make  you  want  to  revise  your   approach?   28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   3  
  4. The  Tavistock  Ins<tute’s  tradi<ons   in  organiza<onal  design   • 

    Ac<on  research  and  inter-­‐disciplinarity     •  Collabora<on  with  whole  system:  ver<cal  and   horizontal     •  Structure  (socio-­‐technical  systems  design)  and   •  Organiza<onal  Culture     •  Inter-­‐organiza<onal    design  (‘Referent   Organiza<ons’)  thro’  different  levels  (eg  large   group:  Search  Conferences;  small  group,   individual)   •  Complexity,  Post-­‐modern  approaches   28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   4  
  5. Prac<cal  applica<ons  of  approaches   •  Steering  Group  of  partnership

     actors  from  across  ver<cal  and   agency  boundaries,  involving  consultants  as  collaborators,   process  consultants  and  experts   •  Data  collec<on  through  individual  interview  and  at   naturalis<c  partnership  se_ngs  to  iden<fy  range  of  issues,   both  overt  and  hidden   •  Events  at  whole  system  as  well  as  sub-­‐system  levels,   sponsored  by  Steering  Group  members  and  their  agencies,  to:   •  develop  authorisa<on  of  decisionmaking  on  structures  (task/ role,  membership  etc)     •  Develop  conversa<onal  rou<nes  which  can  challenge  power   dynamics  as  well  as  support  change       28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   5  
  6. Inter-­‐organiza<onal  design  for   resilience:  the  three  cases    

    •  Three  cases  of  inter-­‐organiza<onal   collabora<on  for  UK  local  government   together  with  other  local  agencies   •  Common  across  all:  developing  greater   resilience  in  the  face  of  shared  challenges   (young  people  into  work,  social  cohesion,   climate  change)           28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   6  
  7. The  Context:  locally  and  na<onally     •  Declining  autonomy

     for  local  government  through   more  requirements  from  central  governments   •  Na<onal  performance  requirements  for  local  forms   of  na<onal  organiza<ons  (eg  NHS,  Post-­‐16  Educa<on)   •  Central  government  requirement  for   interorganiza<onal  forms   •  Poli<cal  contest  na<onally  and  locally   •  Dynamics  of  compe<<on  and  blame,  differen<als  of   power  and  influence         28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   7  
  8. Local  level  cross-­‐sectoral  actors   and  agencies:  different  worldviews  

      The  stakeholders:   •  local  government,  local  health  services,  NGOs,   police,  (regional  +  central/na<onal  government,   business)   •  local  ci<zens  who  want  more  ‘joined-­‐up’  and   improved  services  at  reasonable  cost       •  local  ac<vists  who  want  to  par<cipate  in  shaping   local  services     •  Partner  organisa<ons  assessed  on  delivery   •  Staff  and  managers  need  to  make  sense  of  their   respec<ve  roles,  tasks  and  interdependencies   28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   8  
  9. Case  One:  Collabora<ve  Design     Conceptualisa<on:  structures,  linking  processes:

      design  for  progression/consult  to  regression     •  Agreed  steps  in  making  progress  towards  agreed   objec<ves  with  shared  inten<ons   •  Steering  Group  of  authorised  representa<ves  of  a     cross-­‐sec<on  of  the  relevant  organiza<ons     •  Engaging  with  those  engaged  in  exis<ng  inter-­‐ organiza<onal  structures  to  iden<fy  problems,   assess  needs,  scope  out  alterna<ves,   •  Whole  system  (large  group)  ra<fica<on/ elabora<on   28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   9  
  10. Case  One  Outcomes:  Structure   and  Culture   •  Clarifying

     primary  task/role  of  different  structures  and   consequently  membership   •  Linking  thinking  (strategy)  to  doing  (delivery  and   implementa<on  (rather  than  previous  parallel  systems)   •  Improvements  to  condi<ons  for  delivery  performance,  eg   relevant  actors  all  present,  more  issues  addressed  eg   environment,  previously  absent,  included       •  More  informal  dialogue  reported  across  agencies  before  and   aler  mee<ngs  for  prac<cal  problem-­‐solving   •  More  commitment  and  sensemaking  of  individual  roles  in   cross-­‐boundary  work         28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   10  
  11. Case  Two:  Contested  objec<ves   and  compe<ng  inten<ons    

    •  Many  similari<es  to  Case  One  but   •  Lack  of  agreement  about  inter-­‐organiza<onal   aims  and  inten<ons   •  Highly  poli<cised  inter  organiza<onal  culture,   with  tensions  near  the  surface     •  Backbi<ng  and  point-­‐scoring   •  Lack  of  authorisa<on  of  representa<ves  of   sectors  and  agencies   28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   11  
  12. (In  Parenthesis):  Rules  and   rou<nes  for  review  and  restart

      •  Single  loop:  Are  we  doing  what  we  intended   and  agreed?    Are  they?   •  Double  loop:  Is  this  the  right  approach?     Would  something  else  work  bener?   •  Lewin’s  rules:  dynamic  approach;  field  theory;   contemporaneity;  construc<ve  method   (Neuman  @  www.tavins<tute.org)   •  What’s  the  best  approach  for  this  case?       28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   12  
  13. Case  Two:  Adapta<ons  to  inter-­‐ organiza<onal  design  approach    

    •  Re-­‐conceptualising  the  engagements  with   actors  in  Case  2  differently  from  Case  1,  aler   encountering  the  difficul<es  there   •  Task  more  about  communica(ve  ac(on  so     •  Focus  on  discursive  prac(ces     •  Encouraging  conversa(onal  enquiry   approaches  to  ac<on  within  cons<tuent   agencies  or  sectors     •  Offering  support  for  authorising  processes   28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   13  
  14. Case  Two:  Outcomes   •  A  wider  and  deeper  consensus

     built  on  shared   values  amongst  stakeholders  in  face  of   common  concerns  (especially  young  people)   •  More  honest  but  less  abrasive  communica<ve   styles  between  sectors  and  hierarchical  levels   •  Some  cataly<c  shared  ac<ons   •  A  final  whole  systems  event  workshopped  the   outline  architecture  for  inter-­‐organiza<onal   form   28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   14  
  15. Case  Three:  The  challenge  of   Ins<tu<onalism   •  A

     small  authority  without  resources  for  the   required  inter-­‐organiza<onal  form     •  The  same  number  of  actors  and  agencies   engaged  over  alloca<on  of  <ny  resources   •  Reconceptualised  task  as  suppor<ng   ins<tu<onal  pressures  to  isomorphism       •  Need  to  improvise  to  work  out  the  fit   •  Engaging  with  those  prepared  to  commit,  not   those  along  for  the  ride           28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   15  
  16. Case  Three:  Outcomes   •  More  opera<onal  level  interdependencies  

    worked  on  for  joint  delivery  performance   •  New  alliances  made  with  neighbouring  areas,   with  similar  resources,  focussing  on   developing  shared  values     •  Less  going  through  the  mo<ons  without   linkages  to  opera<ons       28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   16  
  17. References   Chris  Argyris  and  Donald  Schon.    Organiza(onal  Learning:

     A  Theory  of  Ac(on   Perspec(ve.  Boston,  Mass:    Addison  Wesley   Jurgen  Habermas,  tr.  Thomas  A  McCarthy  (1981)    Theory  of  Communica(ve   Prac(ce.  Boston,  Mass:  Beacon  Press   Jean  Neumann,  J.  ‘Lewinian  Principles  for  Scholarly  Prac<ce’  at   www.tavins<tute.org   W.Richard  Scon,  John  W.  Meyer  &  Associates    (1994)  Ins(tu(onal   Environments  and  Organiza(ons:  Structural  Complexity  and  Individualism.   London:  SAGE   Patricia  Shaw  (2002)  Changing  Conversa(ons  in  Organiza(ons:  A  Complexity   Approach  to  Change.    London:  Routledge   Eric  Trist    ‘Referent  Organiza<ons  and  the  Development  of  Inter-­‐ Organiza<onal  Domains’  in  Trist,  Emery,  and  Murray  (1997)  The  Social   Engagement  of  Social  Science:  A  Tavistock  Anthology,  Volume  111:  The   Ecological  Perspec(ve.    Pennsylvania:  University  of  Pennsylvania  Press       28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   17