Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Is it Just Me? Exploring Dilemmas and Choices in Organizational Design

Is it Just Me? Exploring Dilemmas and Choices in Organizational Design

Presentation by Fiddy Abraham, Principal Researcher / Consultant (TIHR) to the European Organizational Design Forum Meeting Vienna 2013: Designing Thriving Organizations: Resilience, Partnership, Enablement

Tavistock Institute

April 28, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by Tavistock Institute

Other Decks in Education

Transcript

  1. Is  it  Just  Me?  Exploring  Dilemmas   and  Choices  in

     Organiza<onal   Design     Frances  Abraham   The  Tavistock  Ins<tute  of  Human  Rela<ons   1   28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al  
  2. Overview   •  A  narra<ve  account  of  collabora<ve  inter-­‐ organiza<onal

     design  to  increase  resilience   •  Three  cases:     – The  same  brief  but  surprises  and  challenges   – Varia<on  in  organiza<onal  design  approaches     •  This  presenta<on  as  a  prompt  to  collabora<ve   enquiry  with  par<cipants   28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   2  
  3. Focus  for  today’s  collabora<ve     enquiry     • 

    Have  you  experienced  <mes  when  your   preferred  organiza<onal  design  approach  ran   into  unexpected  difficul<es?   •  What  other  design  approaches  could  have   been  used  effec<vely  in  each  of  the  cases   presented?   •  What  do  you  do  when  you  encounter   surprises  which  make  you  want  to  revise  your   approach?   28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   3  
  4. The  Tavistock  Ins<tute’s  tradi<ons   in  organiza<onal  design   • 

    Ac<on  research  and  inter-­‐disciplinarity     •  Collabora<on  with  whole  system:  ver<cal  and   horizontal     •  Structure  (socio-­‐technical  systems  design)  and   •  Organiza<onal  Culture     •  Inter-­‐organiza<onal    design  (‘Referent   Organiza<ons’)  thro’  different  levels  (eg  large   group:  Search  Conferences;  small  group,   individual)   •  Complexity,  Post-­‐modern  approaches   28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   4  
  5. Prac<cal  applica<ons  of  approaches   •  Steering  Group  of  partnership

     actors  from  across  ver<cal  and   agency  boundaries,  involving  consultants  as  collaborators,   process  consultants  and  experts   •  Data  collec<on  through  individual  interview  and  at   naturalis<c  partnership  se_ngs  to  iden<fy  range  of  issues,   both  overt  and  hidden   •  Events  at  whole  system  as  well  as  sub-­‐system  levels,   sponsored  by  Steering  Group  members  and  their  agencies,  to:   •  develop  authorisa<on  of  decisionmaking  on  structures  (task/ role,  membership  etc)     •  Develop  conversa<onal  rou<nes  which  can  challenge  power   dynamics  as  well  as  support  change       28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   5  
  6. Inter-­‐organiza<onal  design  for   resilience:  the  three  cases    

    •  Three  cases  of  inter-­‐organiza<onal   collabora<on  for  UK  local  government   together  with  other  local  agencies   •  Common  across  all:  developing  greater   resilience  in  the  face  of  shared  challenges   (young  people  into  work,  social  cohesion,   climate  change)           28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   6  
  7. The  Context:  locally  and  na<onally     •  Declining  autonomy

     for  local  government  through   more  requirements  from  central  governments   •  Na<onal  performance  requirements  for  local  forms   of  na<onal  organiza<ons  (eg  NHS,  Post-­‐16  Educa<on)   •  Central  government  requirement  for   interorganiza<onal  forms   •  Poli<cal  contest  na<onally  and  locally   •  Dynamics  of  compe<<on  and  blame,  differen<als  of   power  and  influence         28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   7  
  8. Local  level  cross-­‐sectoral  actors   and  agencies:  different  worldviews  

      The  stakeholders:   •  local  government,  local  health  services,  NGOs,   police,  (regional  +  central/na<onal  government,   business)   •  local  ci<zens  who  want  more  ‘joined-­‐up’  and   improved  services  at  reasonable  cost       •  local  ac<vists  who  want  to  par<cipate  in  shaping   local  services     •  Partner  organisa<ons  assessed  on  delivery   •  Staff  and  managers  need  to  make  sense  of  their   respec<ve  roles,  tasks  and  interdependencies   28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   8  
  9. Case  One:  Collabora<ve  Design     Conceptualisa<on:  structures,  linking  processes:

      design  for  progression/consult  to  regression     •  Agreed  steps  in  making  progress  towards  agreed   objec<ves  with  shared  inten<ons   •  Steering  Group  of  authorised  representa<ves  of  a     cross-­‐sec<on  of  the  relevant  organiza<ons     •  Engaging  with  those  engaged  in  exis<ng  inter-­‐ organiza<onal  structures  to  iden<fy  problems,   assess  needs,  scope  out  alterna<ves,   •  Whole  system  (large  group)  ra<fica<on/ elabora<on   28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   9  
  10. Case  One  Outcomes:  Structure   and  Culture   •  Clarifying

     primary  task/role  of  different  structures  and   consequently  membership   •  Linking  thinking  (strategy)  to  doing  (delivery  and   implementa<on  (rather  than  previous  parallel  systems)   •  Improvements  to  condi<ons  for  delivery  performance,  eg   relevant  actors  all  present,  more  issues  addressed  eg   environment,  previously  absent,  included       •  More  informal  dialogue  reported  across  agencies  before  and   aler  mee<ngs  for  prac<cal  problem-­‐solving   •  More  commitment  and  sensemaking  of  individual  roles  in   cross-­‐boundary  work         28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   10  
  11. Case  Two:  Contested  objec<ves   and  compe<ng  inten<ons    

    •  Many  similari<es  to  Case  One  but   •  Lack  of  agreement  about  inter-­‐organiza<onal   aims  and  inten<ons   •  Highly  poli<cised  inter  organiza<onal  culture,   with  tensions  near  the  surface     •  Backbi<ng  and  point-­‐scoring   •  Lack  of  authorisa<on  of  representa<ves  of   sectors  and  agencies   28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   11  
  12. (In  Parenthesis):  Rules  and   rou<nes  for  review  and  restart

      •  Single  loop:  Are  we  doing  what  we  intended   and  agreed?    Are  they?   •  Double  loop:  Is  this  the  right  approach?     Would  something  else  work  bener?   •  Lewin’s  rules:  dynamic  approach;  field  theory;   contemporaneity;  construc<ve  method   (Neuman  @  www.tavins<tute.org)   •  What’s  the  best  approach  for  this  case?       28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   12  
  13. Case  Two:  Adapta<ons  to  inter-­‐ organiza<onal  design  approach    

    •  Re-­‐conceptualising  the  engagements  with   actors  in  Case  2  differently  from  Case  1,  aler   encountering  the  difficul<es  there   •  Task  more  about  communica(ve  ac(on  so     •  Focus  on  discursive  prac(ces     •  Encouraging  conversa(onal  enquiry   approaches  to  ac<on  within  cons<tuent   agencies  or  sectors     •  Offering  support  for  authorising  processes   28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   13  
  14. Case  Two:  Outcomes   •  A  wider  and  deeper  consensus

     built  on  shared   values  amongst  stakeholders  in  face  of   common  concerns  (especially  young  people)   •  More  honest  but  less  abrasive  communica<ve   styles  between  sectors  and  hierarchical  levels   •  Some  cataly<c  shared  ac<ons   •  A  final  whole  systems  event  workshopped  the   outline  architecture  for  inter-­‐organiza<onal   form   28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   14  
  15. Case  Three:  The  challenge  of   Ins<tu<onalism   •  A

     small  authority  without  resources  for  the   required  inter-­‐organiza<onal  form     •  The  same  number  of  actors  and  agencies   engaged  over  alloca<on  of  <ny  resources   •  Reconceptualised  task  as  suppor<ng   ins<tu<onal  pressures  to  isomorphism       •  Need  to  improvise  to  work  out  the  fit   •  Engaging  with  those  prepared  to  commit,  not   those  along  for  the  ride           28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   15  
  16. Case  Three:  Outcomes   •  More  opera<onal  level  interdependencies  

    worked  on  for  joint  delivery  performance   •  New  alliances  made  with  neighbouring  areas,   with  similar  resources,  focussing  on   developing  shared  values     •  Less  going  through  the  mo<ons  without   linkages  to  opera<ons       28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   16  
  17. References   Chris  Argyris  and  Donald  Schon.    Organiza(onal  Learning:

     A  Theory  of  Ac(on   Perspec(ve.  Boston,  Mass:    Addison  Wesley   Jurgen  Habermas,  tr.  Thomas  A  McCarthy  (1981)    Theory  of  Communica(ve   Prac(ce.  Boston,  Mass:  Beacon  Press   Jean  Neumann,  J.  ‘Lewinian  Principles  for  Scholarly  Prac<ce’  at   www.tavins<tute.org   W.Richard  Scon,  John  W.  Meyer  &  Associates    (1994)  Ins(tu(onal   Environments  and  Organiza(ons:  Structural  Complexity  and  Individualism.   London:  SAGE   Patricia  Shaw  (2002)  Changing  Conversa(ons  in  Organiza(ons:  A  Complexity   Approach  to  Change.    London:  Routledge   Eric  Trist    ‘Referent  Organiza<ons  and  the  Development  of  Inter-­‐ Organiza<onal  Domains’  in  Trist,  Emery,  and  Murray  (1997)  The  Social   Engagement  of  Social  Science:  A  Tavistock  Anthology,  Volume  111:  The   Ecological  Perspec(ve.    Pennsylvania:  University  of  Pennsylvania  Press       28/04/2014   Crea<ng  a  connected  community,  exploring  inspira<onal   perspec<ves  to  release  organisa<onal  poten<al   17