Share
Embed
英語教育とSLA研究の距離感: 理論と実践は往復するべきか / 2023-11-04_LET-Kansai-Symposium_Tamura
2023年11月4日開催の2023年度外国語教育メディア学会(LET)関西支部秋季研究大会におけるシンポジウム「誰のための研究か,何のための研究か」における田村の発表において使用した投影資料です。
Yu Tamura
November 04, 2023
Transcript
33 slides
-
جૅՊֶͱࡦՊֶͷҧ͍ • جૅՊֶɿϝΧχζϜɾݱͷղ໌ • ݴޠ༻ͷΈ • ݴޠֶशͷϝΧχζϜ • ݴޠࣝͷ༷૬ •
ࡦՊֶɿҙࢥܾఆ • ࢦಋํ๏ͷબ • ڭࡐͷબ ʮՊֶੑʯͷҧ͍ ʹݟ͑ͳ͍ͷͷཧղ ݱ࣮ੈքͷղܾ -
“…claims about the internal structures and processes of the learning
organism take on a very secondary character in the teaching perspective; such claims may not even be desirable here. But such claims do provide the raison d'etre for viewing second-language learning from the learning perspective.” (p. 210) Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10, 209–232. -
SLAݚڀͷ՝ • ݱͷ؍ͱҰൠԽʹґڌ • ݱΛ؍ͯ͠ྨΛߟ͑Δ • ྨ͞Εͨݱͷഎޙʹநతͳ֓೦ΛԾఆ • ֓೦͕ӨڹΛٴ΅͢ͱߟ͑ΒΕΔߦಈΛతͳσʔλͱͯ͠ૢ࡞Խ •
؍Λ૿ͯ͠༧ଌਫ਼Λ্͛Δ • ༧ଌͷਫ਼͕͕͋ͬͯڭҭతࣔࠦʹͳΔ͜ͱ͋ͬͯɼ͜ͷӦΈͰ ϝΧχζϜ໌Β͔ʹͳΒͳ͍ ͜Ε·ͰͷSLAݚڀ -
ELLIS (2005, P.151ʣ༁ൃදऀʹΑΔ දྫɿ໌ࣔతɾ҉ࣔతࣝݚڀ ಛੑ ҉ࣔతࣝ ໌ࣔతࣝ ΞΣΞωε ײత ҙࣝత
ࣝͷλΠϓ खଓ͖త એݴత ମܥੑ Մมత͔ͭମܥత มଇతͰҰ؏ੑΛܽ͘ ࣝͷΞΫηε ࣗಈతॲཧ ౷੍తॲཧ L2ࣝͷ༻ ྲྀெͳύϑΥʔϚϯε࣌ʹ ΞΫηε ܭըࠔ࣌ͷࣝͷΞΫηε ࣗݾใࠂՄೳੑ ݴޠԽෆՄೳ ݴޠԽՄೳ ֶशՄೳੑ ྟքظͷΈ ԿࡀͰशಘՄೳ -
ݱͷ؍ ಉ じ Α͏ͳݴޠܦݧΛ͍ͯ͠ Δʹ͔͔ΘΒ ず ɺݴޠशಘ ʹޭ͢Δֶशऀͱͦ͏ で ͳ
ֶ͍शऀ が ͍Δͷͳͥʁ ֶशऀͷύϑΥʔϚϯεͦ ͷൃୡΛͲͷΑ͏ʹଊ͑ΒΕ ΔͩΖ͏͔ ྨͱநత ͳ֓೦ͷԾఆ ྲྀெͰແҙࣝతͳݴޠӡ༻ ҉ࣔతࣝɼඇྲྀெͰҙࣝత ͳݴޠӡ༻Λ໌ࣔత͕ࣝओ ʹ༻͍ΒΕ͍ͯΔͷͰͳ͍ ͩΖ͏͔ ਖ਼֬͞ɼྲྀெ͞ɼෳࡶ͞ͱ͍ ͏3ͭͷଆ໘ʹྨͰ͖ΔͷͰ ͳ͍ͩΖ͏͔ ଌఆ ਖ਼֬͞୯Ґ͋ͨΓͷޡΓͷ ɼྲྀெ͞୯Ґ࣌ؒ͋ͨΓ ͷൃޠɼෳࡶ͞୯Ґ͋ ͨΓͷޠઅ, จ๏ੑஅ՝ʹ੍࣌ؒݶΛ ͚ͭΔɼࣗݾϖʔεಡΈࢹ ઢܭଌ՝Λ༻͍ͯ҉ࣔత ࣝΛଌఆ͢Δɼ Bialystok (1978)ͳͲ Ellis (2005)ͳͲ Vafaee et al. (2017)ͳͲ Skehan (1998)ͳͲ Housen & Kuiken, 2009ͳͲ ૬ؔʹجͮ͘ ٞ -
ᬑɾࠤ౻ʢ1991ʣ΄͔ ੑ֓೦ͱཧతߏ֓೦ ੑ֓೦ ཧతߏ֓೦ ؍͞ΕΔنଇੑࣗମ͕ ઌߦ݅ʹґଘ ؍͞Εͨ֎తͳཁҼͱಠཱͳ ཧత࣮ମͱରԠ ྫɿՄ೩ੑ ྫɿॏྗ
؍ʹؐݩՄೳ ؍ෆՄೳ نଇੑͷݪҼͷઆ໌ʹͳΒͳ͍ ʢ͕ɼݶఆ͞Εͨ༧ଌྗ࣋ͭʣ ؍͞ΕͨݱͷݪҼ ʹ͍ͭͯͷใΛؚΉ -
ͦͷજࡏมੑ֓೦Ͱ ݱͷ؍ ͋ͷਓɼ࠙ձͰ͍ΖΜͳਓ ʹ͔͚ͯ͠Δ ͋ͷਓɼۀऀలࣔͷํʑʹ ؾ͘͞ʹ͔͚ͯ͠Δ நతͳϥϕϧ͚ͮ ͔ͯ͠͠…ίϛϡྗ͓͚ʁ ʮઆ໌ʯ ͏Θʂೋ࣍ձʹ͍Δʂ͋ͷਓ
ίϛϡྗ͓͚͔ͩΒઈରདྷΔ ͱࢥͬͨʂ ㅟ ㅟ ㅟ ͜Ετʔτϩδʔ -
৺త࣮ࡏͱ؍ଌมͷؔ ৺త࣮ࡏ ԠA ʢςετࢦඪʣ ԠB ʢςετࢦඪʣ (1) ҼՌతʹӨڹ (2) ߴ͍૬ؔ
(3) ಉ͡ͷΛଌఆʁ ాଞʢ2023, p. 51, ਤ3.3ʣ -
HYPOTHESIS Ծઆ PREDICTION ༧ଌ CONFIRMED ߹͢Δ݁Ռ FALSIFIED ূ͢Δ݁Ռ ࣮ݧ ΞϒμΫγϣϯʹΑͬͯ
આ໌ԾઆΛܗ͢Δ ͜ͷԾઆ͕ΓཱͭͳΒ ɼͲͷΑ͏ͳࣄ࣮͕༧ ଌ͞ΕΔ͔Λԋ៷ʹΑΓ ಋ͘ ؼೲʹΑΔҰൠԽΛߦ͍ɼԋ៷ʹ Αͬͯಋ͔Εͨ༧ଌ͕Ͳͷఔܦ ݧతʹਖ਼͍͔͠Λஅ͢Δ σʔλͷू߹ ʨ ԾઆͷଥੑΛߴΊΔ ༧ଌͨ͜͠ͱਖ਼͍͠ Ծઆͷमਖ਼ɾఫճ ୳ٻͷཧֶ ాଞʢ2023, p. 46, ਤ3.2ʣ -
• ڻ͖͘ࣄ࣮C͕؍͞ΕΔ • ͔͠͠͠H͕ਅͰ͋ΕɼCવͷࣄฑͰ͋Ζ͏ • ΑͬͯɼH͕ਅͰ͋Δͱߟ͑Δ͖ཧ༝͕͋Δ ΞϒμΫγϣϯ ୳ٻΛҾ͖ى͜͢ҙ֎ͳࣄ࣮ આ໌Ծઆ આ໌ԾઆʹԿ͕બΕΔ͔ͷج४
• ͬͱΒ͠͞ • ݕূՄೳੑ • ୯७ੑ • ܦࡁੑ -
୯ޠϞχλϦϯά՝ΛྫʹͱΔ Ծઆ֓೦ͷଘࡏతղऍՄೳੑ The book is being closely [*pick] by the
large group of curious students. The book is being closely [picked] by the large group of curious students. ඇจ๏తͳཁૉͷӨڹ ͰԠ͕࣌ؒΕΔ ؍ Ԡ࣌ؒͷΕΛੜΉͳΜΒ͔ͷࣝද͕͋Δ ਪ -
HYPOTHESIS Ծઆ PREDICTION ༧ଌ CONFIRMED ߹͢Δ݁Ռ FALSIFIED ূ͢Δ݁Ռ ࣮ݧ ΞϒμΫγϣϯʹΑͬͯ
આ໌ԾઆΛܗ͢Δ ͜ͷԾઆ͕ΓཱͭͳΒ ɼͲͷΑ͏ͳࣄ࣮͕༧ ଌ͞ΕΔ͔Λԋ៷ʹΑΓ ಋ͘ ؼೲʹΑΔҰൠԽΛߦ͍ɼԋ៷ʹ Αͬͯಋ͔Εͨ༧ଌ͕Ͳͷఔܦ ݧతʹਖ਼͍͔͠Λஅ͢Δ σʔλͷू߹ ʨ ԾઆͷଥੑΛߴΊΔ ༧ଌͨ͜͠ͱਖ਼͍͠ Ծઆͷमਖ਼ɾఫճ ୳ٻͷཧֶ ాଞʢ2023, p. 46, ਤ3.2ʣ -
• Bialystok, E. (1978). A theoretical model of second language
learning. Language learning, 28, 69–83. • Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172. • Fukuta, J., Nishimura, Y., & Tamura, Y. (2022). Pitfalls of production data analysis for investigating L2 cognitive mechanism: An ontological realism perspective. Journal of Second Language Studies, 6, 95–118. • Gregg, K. R. (1993). Talking explanation seriously; or, let a couple of flowers bloom. Applied Linguistics, 14, 276–294. • Housen, A. & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30, 461–473. • ా७ɾխوɾాଜ༞ɾଜਸੋɾๆݟҰًʢ2023ʣʰୈೋݴޠݚڀͷࢥߟ๏ɿೝγεςϜͷݚڀʹԿ͕ඞཁ͔ʱ͘Ζ͓͠ग़൛ • ࣉܟ(2015)ʮӳޠڭҭֶʹ͓͚ΔՊֶతΤ ビ デ ϯεͱ?:খֶߍӳޠڭҭࡦΛࣄྫʹʯʰ֎ࠃޠڭҭϝ デ ΟΞֶձ(LET)த෦ࢧ෦֎ࠃޠڭҭجૅݚڀ෦ձ2014 ใࠂूʱ15–30. • ཧཅҰɾಽɾࣉܟɾӜݚɾ౻༸࿏ɾञҪӳथʢ2021ʣʰӳޠڭҭͷΤ ビ デ ϯε:͜Ε͔ΒͷӳޠڭҭͷͨΊʹʱݚڀࣾ. • ᬑ๕೭ɾࠤ౻ୡ࠸(1991)ʮ パ ʔιφϦςΟ֓೦Λ༻͍ͨߦಈઆ໌ʹΈΒΕΔํ๏తʯʰਓจՊֶूʱ25, 19–31. • ᬑ๕೭(2010)ʰੑ֨ͱͳΜ だ ͬͨͷ͔:৺ཧֶͱৗ֓೦ʱ৽༵ࣾ • ถ༟ೋ(2007)ʰΞ ブ ダ Ϋγϣϯ:ԾઆͱൃݟͷཧʱႻॻ. • Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10, 209–232. • Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. • Vafaee, P., Suzuki, Y., & Kachisnke, I. (2017). Validating grammaticality judgment tests: Evidence from two new psycholinguistic measures. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 59-95. • van Rooij, I. & Baggio, G. (2021). Theory before the test: How to build high-verisimilitude explanatory theories in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16( 682–697. ࢀߟจݙ