$30 off During Our Annual Pro Sale. View Details »

20190619CivicTechonlineAcademy12

 20190619CivicTechonlineAcademy12

* Code for Japanシビックテックオンラインアカデミー #12

Toshikazu SETO

June 19, 2019
Tweet

More Decks by Toshikazu SETO

Other Decks in Education

Transcript

  1. 2019/06/19 12 1
    (tosseto)
    [email protected]
    Knight Foundation (2013)

    View Slide

  2. 2019/06/19 12 2
    Civic Tech Local Gov. Tech
    My City Forecast
    AI
    My City Report
    Urban Data Challenge
    OpenStreetMap

    View Slide

  3. 2019/06/19 12 3
    http://urbandata-challenge.jp/
    7/1( )13:30
    2019

    53(3) pp.1515-1522 2018 https://doi.org/10.11361/journalcpij.53.1515

    70(6) pp.10-16 2016 https://doi.org/10.3169/itej.70.840

    2013 GIS 23(2) pp.23-30 2015 https://doi.org/10.5638/thagis.23.59

    View Slide

  4. 2019/06/19 12 4
    Civic technology
    (Google Scholar 2014 600 )
    2016
    11
    2017
    7
    2018
    4

    8
    • Civic tech Toronto
    • La civic tech

    View Slide

  5. 2019/06/19 12 5
    Web of Science Core Collection : 58
    ( civic tech* 2014 )
    • Civic Hackathons: Innovation, Procurement, or Civic Engagement?(2014)
    39
    • Institutions for Civic Technoscience: How Critical Making is Transforming
    Environmental Research (2014)
    • Datafication and empowerment: How the open data movement re-
    articulates notions of democracy, participation, and journalism (2014)

    View Slide

  6. 2019/06/19 12 6
    (Open311 )
    (ACM-CHI )
    (

    View Slide

  7. 2019/06/19 12 7
    • 2014
    – Civic Engagement ?

    – =citizen science
    – =participatory
    sensing
    • ICT

    View Slide

  8. 2019/06/19 12 8
    Civic Hackathons: Innovation, Procurement, or
    Civic Engagement?
    Peter Johnson
    Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo,
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Pamela Robinson
    School of Urban and Regional Planning, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Abstract
    At all levels, governments around the world are moving toward the provision of open data, that is, the
    direct provision to citizens, the private sector, and other third parties, of raw government datasets,
    controlled by a relatively permissible license. In tandem with this distribution of open data is the
    promotion of civic hackathons, or “app contests” by government. The civic hackathon is designed to offer
    prize money to developers as a way to spur innovative use of open data, more specifically the creation
    of commercial software applications that deliver services to citizens. Within this context, we propose that
    the civic hackathon has the potential to act in multiple ways, possibly as a backdoor to the traditional
    government procurement process, and as a form of civic engagement. We move beyond much of the hype
    of civic hackathons, critically framing an approach to understanding civic hackathons through these
    two lenses. Key questions for future research emphasize the emerging, and important, nature of this
    research path.
    KEY WORDS: civic hackathon, big data, geoweb, web2.0, civic engagement, procurement, apps,
    open data
    bs_bs_banner
    349
    Review of Policy Research, 31(4), pp.349 357, 2014

    View Slide

  9. 2019/06/19 12 9
    Communications of the ACM, Vol. 59 No. 1, pp.82-89, 2016

    View Slide

  10. 2019/06/19 12 10
    ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    POLITICS SYMPOSIUM
    Civic Engagement and
    Civic Technology
    ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    Introduction
    Hollie Russon Gilman, Columbia University, School of
    International and Public Affairs
    For many scholars and practitioners of civic
    engagement, the 2016 elections made manifest the
    deeper symptoms of declining civic engagement
    and institutional trust. Along several indices are
    alarming signs about American democracy—from
    declining participation in membership based civic organiza-
    tions to a record low level of trust in government and turnout
    in elections, especially local elections.
    Embedded within these trends is an existential concern
    that American civic life is becoming more stratified by place,
    politics, and identity. Many digital tools are accelerating iden-
    tity politics, enabling people to live within their own online
    action, which is a critical component of democratic health.
    Each article offers a contribution towards an ecosystem
    of motivations, mechanisms, and tools for impact. Taken
    together, these articles suggest a more robust role for citizens
    in decision making than simply advisory or consultative.
    Instead, they offer a model for more robust participation in
    civic life and democratic governance—driven by citizens for
    citizens. Demand-driven civic engagement pushes scholars to
    expand the traditional boundaries that delineate what is and
    is not civic action in contemporary politics and work towards
    more rigorous empirical research to understand what works
    best under which conditions (see Rajani 2010).
    One critical aspect of civic engagement is the opportunity
    offered to work more directly with public officials, especially
    on the local level. There are opportunities to leverage the tools
    of civic technology for more collaborative governance. In my
    article, I outline three cases of civic tech effectively fostering
    collaborative governance in US cities: innovation units, open
    ...............................................................................................................................................
    D 4 75 :7 ,3 4C 697 , C7 7C D D7 3 3 34 7 3 : D 53 4C 697 C9 5 C7 7C D : D 6 C9 / 2
    Political Science & Politics ,Vol.59(3),2017
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651700052X

    View Slide

  11. 2019/06/19 12 11
    Data, Design and Civics:
    An Exploratory Study of Civic Tech
    Kirsten Boehner
    Georgia Institute of Technology
    School of Literature, Media and Communication
    [email protected]
    Carl DiSalvo
    Georgia Institute of Technology
    School of Literature, Media and Communication
    [email protected]
    ABSTRACT
    Civic technology, or civic tech, encompasses a rich body of
    work, inside and outside HCI, around how we shape
    technology for, and in turn how technology shapes, how we
    govern, organize, serve, and identify matters of concern for
    communities. This study builds on previous work by
    investigating how civic leaders in a large US city
    conceptualize civic tech, in particular, how they approach
    the intersection of data, design and civics. We encountered
    a range of overlapping voices, from providers, to
    connectors, to volunteers of civic services and resources.
    Through this account, we identified different conceptions
    and expectation of data, design and civics, as well as
    several shared issues around pressing problems and
    strategic aspirations. Reflecting on this set of issues
    produced guiding questions, in particular about the current
    and possible roles for design, to advance civic tech.
    Author Keywords
    Civic technology; design; speculative design
    ACM Classification Keywords
    H.5.m. Information interfaces and presentation (e.g., HCI):
    Miscellaneous.
    INTRODUCTION
    The intersection of civics and technology has a long,
    mutually deterministic, history. Traditionally, the idea of
    Although interest in civics and technology also has a long
    history in the HCI community, arguably the naming of
    “civic technology”, or civic tech, is a relatively new area of
    study loosely defined as the design and use of technology to
    support both formal and informal aspects of government
    and public services. This attention could be narrated as a
    logical step in HCI’s many articulated turns – from the
    cognitive, to the social, to the cultural, and now perhaps to
    the civic. What driving questions should shape our research
    into and the development of civic tech? We begin to
    explore this question with civic leaders in Atlanta, where
    we work with several community projects [31].
    Greater Atlanta is growing, quickly, into one of the largest
    metro-regions in the US. Its resultant complexity is often
    blamed on factors such as the available space for sprawl, a
    perceived dearth of planning, and an automobile centric
    culture. Civic organizations here lack the geographic core
    of other cities’ downtown areas and the distribution of civic
    services often obscures which municipality is responsible
    public roads or schools or emergency response, for
    example. Atlanta’s historical roots of racial and economic
    segregation continues into the present day, while the city
    also lays claim to a legacy of advancing social justice and
    supports a contemporary group of grassroots activists
    capable of generating one of the largest urban revival
    programs in the US. Yet, some critics doubt the ceiling of
    Civic Tech, Participation and Society #chi4good, CHI 2016, San Jose, CA, USA
    Proceedings of CHI '16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858326

    View Slide

  12. 2019/06/19 12 12
    Open311:
    (Google Scholar 2014 400 )
    Adversarial Adaptation of Scene Graph Models for
    Understanding Civic Issues
    Shanu Kumar
    Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, India
    [email protected]
    Shubham Atreja, Anjali Singh, Mohit Jain
    IBM Research AI, India
    {satreja1,ansingh8,mohitjain}@in.ibm.com
    ABSTRACT
    Citizen engagement and technology usage are two emerging trends
    driven by smart city initiatives. Governments around the world are
    adopting technology for faster resolution of civic issues. Typically,
    citizens report issues, such as broken roads, garbage dumps, etc.
    through web portals and mobile apps, in order for the government
    authorities to take appropriate actions. Several mediums – text,
    image, audio, video – are used to report these issues. Through a
    user study with 13 citizens and 3 authorities, we found that image
    is the most preferred medium to report civic issues. However, ana-
    lyzing civic issue related images is challenging for the authorities
    as it requires manual eort. Moreover, previous works have been
    limited to identifying a specic set of issues from images. In this
    work, given an image, we propose to generate a Civic Issue Graph
    consisting of a set of objects and the semantic relations between
    them, which are representative of the underlying civic issue. We
    also release two multi-modal (text and images) datasets, that can
    help in further analysis of civic issues from images. We present
    a novel approach for adversarial training of existing scene graph
    models that enables the use of scene graphs for new applications
    in the absence of any labelled training data. We conduct several
    experiments to analyze the ecacy of our approach, and using
    human evaluation, we establish the appropriateness of our model
    at representing dierent civic issues.
    KEYWORDS
    Civic Engagement, Scene Graph Generation, Adversarial Training,
    Smart Cities, Intelligent Systems on Web
    ACM Reference Format:
    Shanu Kumar and Shubham Atreja, Anjali Singh, Mohit Jain. 2019. Adver-
    sarial Adaptation of Scene Graph Models for Understanding Civic Issues. In
    Proceedings of ACM Conference (Conference’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA,
    Article 4, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.475/123_4
    1 INTRODUCTION
    In recent years, there has been a signicant increase in smart city
    initiatives [9, 30, 31]. As a result, government authorities are em-
    phasizing the use of technology and increased citizen participation
    for better maintenance of urban areas. Various web platforms –
    SeeClickFix [27], FixMyStreet [1], ichangemycity [16] – have been
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or
    classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed
    for prot or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation
    on the rst page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored.
    For all other uses, contact the owner/author(s).
    Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
    © 2019 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).
    ACM ISBN 123-4567-24-567/08/06.
    https://doi.org/10.475/123_4
    Figure 1: Comparison between Civic Issue Graph and Scene
    Graph for the same image. The scene graph provides a com-
    plete representation of all objects and relationships in the
    image, while the Civic Issue Graph only consists of relations
    representative of the civic issue.
    introduced across the world, which enable the citizens to report
    civic issues such as poor road condition, garbage dumps, missing
    trac signs, etc., and track the status of their complaints. Such ini-
    tiatives have resulted in exponential increase in the number of civic
    issues being reported [2]. Even social media sites (Twitter, Face-
    book) have been increasingly utilized to report civic issues. Studies
    have found the importance of civic issue reporting platforms and
    social media sites in enhancing civic awareness among citizens
    [36]. These platforms help the concerned authorities to not only
    identify the problems, but also access the severity of the problems.
    Civic issues are reported online through various mediums – textual
    descriptions, images, videos, or a combination of them. Previous
    work [10] highlights the importance of mediums in citizen partici-
    pation. Yet, no prior work has tried to understand the role of these
    mediums in reporting of civic issues.
    In this work, we rst identify the most preferred medium for
    reporting civic issues, by conducting a user study with 13 citizens
    and 3 government authorities. Using the 84 civic issues reported by
    the citizens using our mobile app, and follow-up semi-structured
    interviews, we found that images are the most usable medium for
    the citizens. In contrast, authorities found text as the most preferred
    medium, as images are hard to analyze at scale.
    To ll this gap, several works have proposed methods to auto-
    matically identify a specic category of civic issues from images,
    such as garbage dumps [28] and road damage [24]. However, their
    methods are limited to the specic categories that they address.
    arXiv:1901.10124v1 [cs.AI] 29 Jan 2019
    https://doi.org/10.475/123_4
    https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8030115
    RESEARCH ARTICLE
    Structure of 311 service requests as a
    signature of urban location
    Lingjing Wang1,2, Cheng Qian1,2, Philipp Kats1,3, Constantine Kontokosta1,4,
    Stanislav Sobolevsky1,5,6*
    1 Center for Urban Science and Progress, New York University, Brooklyn, New York, United States of
    America, 2 Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, Brooklyn, New York, United States of
    America, 3 Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia, 4 Department of Civil and Urban Engineering, New York
    University, Brooklyn, New York, United States of America, 5 Senseable City Laboratory, Massachusetts
    Institute Of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, 6 Institute Of Design And
    Urban Studies of The Saint-Petersburg National Research University Of Information Technologies,
    Mechanics And Optics, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
    * [email protected]
    Abstract
    While urban systems demonstrate high spatial heterogeneity, many urban planning, eco-
    nomic and political decisions heavily rely on a deep understanding of local neighborhood
    contexts. We show that the structure of 311 Service Requests enables one possible way of
    building a unique signature of the local urban context, thus being able to serve as a low-cost
    decision support tool for urban stakeholders. Considering examples of New York City, Bos-
    ton and Chicago, we demonstrate how 311 Service Requests recorded and categorized by
    type in each neighborhood can be utilized to generate a meaningful classification of loca-
    tions across the city, based on distinctive socioeconomic profiles. Moreover, the 311-based
    classification of urban neighborhoods can present sufficient information to model various
    socioeconomic features. Finally, we show that these characteristics are capable of predict-
    ing future trends in comparative local real estate prices. We demonstrate 311 Service
    Requests data can be used to monitor and predict socioeconomic performance of urban
    neighborhoods, allowing urban stakeholders to quantify the impacts of their interventions.
    1 Introduction
    Cities can be seen as a complex system composed of multiple layers of activity and interactions
    across various urban domains; therefore, discovering a parsimonious description of urban
    function is quite difficult [1–4]. However, urban planners, policy makers and other types of
    urban stakeholders, including businesses and investors, could benefit from an intuitive proxy
    of neighborhood conditions across the city and over time [5–7]. At the same time, such simple
    indicators could provide not only valuable information to support urban decision-making, but
    also to accelerate the scalability of successful approaches and practices across different neigh-
    borhood and cities, as urban scaling patterns have become an increasing topic of interest [8–
    12]. As the volume and heterogeneity of urban data have increased, machine learning has
    PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186314 October 17, 2017 1 / 21
    a1111111111
    a1111111111
    a1111111111
    a1111111111
    a1111111111
    OPEN ACCESS
    Citation: Wang L, Qian C, Kats P, Kontokosta C,
    Sobolevsky S (2017) Structure of 311 service
    requests as a signature of urban location. PLoS
    ONE 12(10): e0186314. https://doi.org/10.1371/
    journal.pone.0186314
    Editor: Yanguang Chen, Peking University, CHINA
    Received: December 4, 2016
    Accepted: September 28, 2017
    Published: October 17, 2017
    Copyright: © 2017 Wang et al. This is an open
    access article distributed under the terms of the
    Creative Commons Attribution License, which
    permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
    reproduction in any medium, provided the original
    author and source are credited.
    Data Availability Statement: The data underlying
    this study was obtained from a third party. The 311
    data for the three cities is publicly available and can
    be freely downloaded from: 1) New York City Open
    data Portal https://nycopendata.socrata.co 2)
    Boston Open data Portal https://data.cityofboston.
    gov 3) Chicago Open data Portal https://data.
    cityofchicago.org The census data is available at
    census.gov. Zillow data is available from https://
    www.zillow.com/research/data/. The authors did
    not have any special privileges in obtaining this
    data.
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journ
    al.pone.0186314

    View Slide

  13. 2019/06/19 12 13


    – IoT AI engagement




    – NPO

    – Open311


    https://civichall.org/civicist/10-problems-with-impact-measurement-in-civic-tech/

    View Slide

  14. 2019/06/19 12 14
    Sustaining Civic Tech 1
    KNIGHT
    FOUNDATION
    SCALING CIVIC
    TECH
    Paths to a Sustainable Future
    Knight Foundation & Rita Allen Foundation (2017)
    Knight Foundation & Network Impact (2015)
    Knight Foundation (2013)
    mySociety & Microsoft (2017)

    View Slide

  15. 2019/06/19 12 15
    • Johnson, P., & Robinson, P. (2014). Civic Hackathons: Innovation, procurement, or civic engagement?
    Review of Policy Research, 31(4), 349 357. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12074
    • Sieber, R. E., & Johnson, P. A. (2015). Civic open data at a crossroads: Dominant models and current
    challenges. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 308 315.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.003
    • Lee, M., Almirall, E., & Wareham, J. (2015). Open data and civic apps. Communications of the ACM,
    59(1), 82 89. https://doi.org/10.1145/2756542
    • Robinson, P. J., & Johnson, P. A. (2016). Civic Hackathons: New Terrain for Local Government-Citizen
    Interaction? Urban Planning, 1(2), 65. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i2.627
    • Pogačar, K., & Žižek, A. (2016). Urban Hackathon - Alternative Information Based and Participatory
    Approach to Urban Development. Procedia Engineering, 161, 1971 1976.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.788
    • Kirsten Boehner and Carl DiSalvo. (2016). Data, Design and Civics: An Exploratory Study of Civic Tech.
    In Proceedings of CHI '16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858326
    • PS: Political Science & Politics ,Vol.59(3),2017 Symposium: Civic Engagement and Civic
    Technology https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651700052X
    • Andrew May, A. and Ross, R. (2018). The design of civic technology: factors that influence public
    participation and impact, Ergonomics, 61:2, 214-225,
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2017.1349939
    • Perng, S-Y. and Kitchin, R. (2018) Solutions and frictions in civic hacking: collaboratively designing
    and building wait time predictions for an immigration office, Social & Cultural Geography, 19:1, 1-20,
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2016.1247193

    View Slide

  16. 2019/06/19 12 16

    View Slide

  17. 2019/06/19 12 17
    • (2014) 119 pp.101-114
    • 継, Teemu Tossavainen, 響, , 2014
    2014
    SSI , pp.371-374.
    • (2014)
    79(706) pp.2711-2719
    • 2016 Vol7.2
    • 2016
    70(6) pp.10-16
    • 2017
    JRI 42(3)
    • (2017)
    100(1) pp.47-52
    • 響 2017
    9 pp.26-29
    • 2018
    53(3)
    pp.1515-1522
    • (2018) IT
    , 452

    View Slide

  18. 2019/06/19 12 18
    http://urbandata-challenge.jp/
    18 / 32

    View Slide

  19. 2019/06/19 12 19
    (UDC)

    =

    ( 200 * =
    *: 2018

    View Slide

  20. 2019/06/19 12 20
    UDC Tokyo+ 5
    2013
    UDCT
    2014
    2015
    2016
    10 56
    20 158
    75
    30 198
    2017
    40 232
    2018
    CC-BY4.0 T
    49
    200

    View Slide

  21. 2019/06/19 12 21
    ->
    http://urbandata-challenge.jp/category/2018/localhub18

    View Slide

  22. 2019/06/19 12 22
    ->
    http://urbandata-challenge.jp/category/2017/localhub17

    View Slide

  23. 2019/06/19 12 23
    UDC

    View Slide

  24. 2019/06/19 12 24
    UDC2018 (2/6
    ( ) 132 3,200
    ( 91 2,500 )
    UDC 2018
    1 3 5
    1 0 1
    1 1 0
    1 9 5
    1 4 1
    1 7 8
    1 3 2
    1 2 2
    1 0 0
    1 3 4
    2 1 3
    2 5 6
    2 1 1
    2 5 6
    2 2 2
    2 2 2
    2 0 1
    2 3 5
    2 2 3
    3 2 3
    3 3 3
    3 5 3
    3 2 4
    3 6 12
    3 3 3
    3 11 7
    4 2 0
    4 1 3
    4 3 2
    4 1 1
    4 7 2
    4 6 1
    4 10 4
    4 1 0
    4 0 8
    5 1 1
    5 1 0
    5 0 1
    5 1 0
    5 1 0
    5 1 0
    5 4 1
    5 4 7
    5 3 12

    View Slide

  25. 2019/06/19 12 25
    • AED SOS 2013
    Coaido
    X-HUB TOKYO
    • 2014
    Code for XX 19
    • MY CITY FORECAST 2014
    1,670 WS
    ICT 2016
    • Seseki 2015
    IT 科
    • 2016
    2015 9 UDC 2
    Mashup Award2016 Civic Wave
    10 25

    View Slide

  26. 2019/06/19 12 26
    UDC 5
    2019 2023
    2019 7 1 13:30
    2019
    http://urbandata-challenge.jp/news/2019-1st-symposium
    UDC UDC

    View Slide

  27. 2019/06/19 12 27

    • Open311

    View Slide

  28. 2019/06/19 12 28
    Thank you!
    [email protected]
    http://researchmap.jp/tosseto
    https://speakerdeck.com/tosseto

    View Slide