to ground research and design Consideration of affect, cognition, and motivation as drivers of behavior Measurement and monitoring of behavioral outcomes HOW IS BCD UNIQUE?
designing interventions that address barriers to target behaviors and promote conditions that are favorable to target behaviors BEHAVIOR CHANGE DESIGNERS . . .
Operational analysis Participatory design Usefulness/desirability testing Surveys A/B tests User feedback Real world observations Quasi-experiments Randomized control trials (RCTs) BEHAVIOR CHANGE DESIGNERS USE: And more!
what success looks like, you won’t know if you’ve achieved it Behavior change design requires defining target behaviors and outcomes targets as a first step = Clarity of vision KEY RISK: SUCCESS METRICS ARE UNCLEAR
weight Wanting to make a change Being happy Reading a chapter a night Saving $100 a month Preparing for retirement Practicing Spanish vocabulary WHICH ONES ARE BEHAVIORS?
a night Saving $100 a month Practicing Spanish vocabulary Feeling confident Losing weight Wanting to make a change Being happy Preparing for retirement BEHAVIOR ZONE NOPE WHICH ONES ARE BEHAVIORS?
or outcome goals? Do you have access to the people who do that behavior? Can you influence them within the constraints of your toolkit? What is the effort and cost of influencing those behaviors relative to their effect? SELECTING TARGET BEHAVIORS Sample evaluation grid
in context Complexity of behavior change approach Clicking on a link Learning to run and training for a race Medication adherence with side effects Managing a chronic health condition with comorbidities, medication, diet, exercise Prompting societal behavior shifts in physical distance, mask wearing, hand washing, etc.
are the vision 2. User behavior over time yields the outcomes 3. The product (intervention) delivers the support users need to change and sustain new behaviors 4. Baseline measurements make the change visible 4. 3. 2. 1.
to users about their motivations and contexts helps establish product desirability and fit Research can help discover the overlap between stakeholder or customer KPIs and user needs KEY RISK: NOBODY WANTS OR NEEDS THIS PRODUCT
their goals, beliefs, and experiences Test product concepts against real-world scenarios Look at previous research to see what worked and what did not KEY RISK: PRODUCT DOESN’T FIT PEOPLE’S LIVES
behavioral therapy • COM-B model & the behaviour change wheel • Culture capital framework • DEFRA 4Es model • Diffusion of innovation theory • EAST framework • Environmental policy framework • Epicure taxonomy • EPOC taxonomy of interventions • Fogg behavior model • Framework on public policy in physical activity • Goal setting theory • Habit formation (plus Hooked) • Health action process approach • Health beliefs model • Implementation taxonomy • Information motivation behavioral skills model • Injury control framework • Intervention mapping • Legal framework • MINDSPACE • Motivational interviewing • People and places framework • Population Services International (PSI) framework • RURU: Intervention implementation taxonomy • Self-determination theory of motivation • Social cognitive theory • Social ecological model • Social norms theory • Taxonomy of behaviour change techniques • Theory of planned behavior • Theory of reasoned action • Transtheoretical model (stages of change) These are just some of the top models that social scientists use to think about behavior and behavior change. BEHAVIOR CHANGE THEORIES AND FRAMEWORKS
or problem area? • Does it have a strong, recent evidence base? • If you use it, will it yield useful action items given the project you’re working on?
to include key concepts from the framework. • Borrow validated question sets or approaches. • Look to the framework for possible solution ideas based on what you’ve found in your research. • Generate creative thinking.
Automatic mechanisms that activate or inhibit behavior Physical and Social environment that enables behavior CAPABILITY MOTIVATION OPPORTUNITY BEHAVIOR THE COM-B MODEL
[behavior]? What, if anything, makes it hard for you to do [behavior]? What, if anything, makes it easier for you to do [behavior]? ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS TO UNCOVER BARRIERS Capability Probes • What makes it physically challenging for you to do [behavior]? • What information do you need to do [behavior]? • What training would help you do [behavior]? Opportunity Probes • What do other people do related to the behavior? • What is the physical environment in which you do the behavior? How does it make it easier or harder? Motivation Probes • What, if anything, interests you in doing the behavior? • What do you believe the consequences of doing the behavior will be? • How does doing this behavior relate to other goals you have?
a purpose Tie features back to desired outcomes – and check that outcomes have features in place to support them Be specific about anything that might be stopping users from getting the job done and design to help with those barriers KEY RISK: CHOOSING THE WRONG FEATURES
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. AMOTIVATED I have no desire to do this. EXTERNAL Someone told me I have to do this. INTROJECTED I’ve internalized the nagging: Better do this. IDENTIFIED Doing this will help me achieve goals I really value. INTEGRATED Doing this is part of who I am. INTRINSIC I love doing this; it feels great! CONTROLLED AUTONOMOUS
QUALITY “I can make my own meaningful choices” “I am learning, growing, and succeeding.” “I am part of something bigger than myself. I belong.” Autonomy Competence Relatedness Motivation Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
ways to support basic psychological needs for users Research shows specific ways users might need their needs fulfilled by this product in this context KEY RISK: THE PRODUCT ISN’T ENGAGING
Translate behavior change ingredients into functionality and features • Test prototypes with users and internal stakeholders for alignment with requirements and needs • Determine best options to include in product release • Work with cross-functional teams to ensure that prototypes accurately represent behavior change concepts
post-evaluations Tracking key performance indicators (KPIs) Desirability or usefulness studies Usability studies Case studies Surveys TESTING FOR EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICACY
the source of the problem, not just whether a problem exists A research mindset supports constant mini-investigations and tweaks The outcomes map provides guidance on whether or not approach needs to be adjusted KEY RISK: STUCK WITH A PRODUCT THAT DOESN’T WORK