Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Services, Architecture and Channels
Search
Andrew Godwin
April 03, 2017
Programming
730
4
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Services, Architecture and Channels
A talk I gave at DjangoCon Europe 2017 in Florence, Italy
Andrew Godwin
April 03, 2017
More Decks by Andrew Godwin
See All by Andrew Godwin
Reconciling Everything
andrewgodwin
1
390
Django Through The Years
andrewgodwin
0
310
Writing Maintainable Software At Scale
andrewgodwin
0
520
A Newcomer's Guide To Airflow's Architecture
andrewgodwin
0
420
Async, Python, and the Future
andrewgodwin
2
740
How To Break Django: With Async
andrewgodwin
1
810
Taking Django's ORM Async
andrewgodwin
0
840
The Long Road To Asynchrony
andrewgodwin
0
760
The Scientist & The Engineer
andrewgodwin
1
850
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
Agentic UI
manfredsteyer
PRO
0
150
運用エージェントは "作る" から "育てる" へ - 記憶と自己進化の3層設計パターン / self-evolving-agents-three-layer-agent-design
gawa
12
3.6k
ユニットテストの先へ:テスト技法で要求・仕様を整理するJava開発実践 / Beyond_Unit_Testing_Practical_Java_Development_Techniques_for_Organizing_Requirements_and_Specifications
shimashima35
0
390
OSもどきOS
arkw
0
560
jQueryをバージョンアップする前に使いたいjQuery Migrate
matsuo_atsushi
0
330
Contextとはなにか
chiroruxx
1
310
「AIで開発し、AIを届ける」をEvalでつなぐ 〜AIネイティブに始めるプロダクト開発の実践〜 / Connecting "Develop with AI, deliver AI" with Eval
rkaga
4
5k
Technical Debt: Understanding it Rightly, Engaging it Rightly #LaravelLiveJP
shogogg
0
220
Composerを使ったサプライチェーン攻撃の様子を眺めてみる #phpstudy
o0h
PRO
2
250
Javaの型とAI時代に型が大事な理由 / java types and type in AI era
kishida
2
130
LLM本来の能力を解き放つサンドボックス技術とAI民主化への適用
yukukotani
3
3.7k
決定論的オーケストレーションの設計と実装 / Design and Implementation of Deterministic Orchestration
nrslib
3
1.3k
Featured
See All Featured
XXLCSS - How to scale CSS and keep your sanity
sugarenia
250
1.3M
Balancing Empowerment & Direction
lara
6
1.2k
Faster Mobile Websites
deanohume
310
31k
YesSQL, Process and Tooling at Scale
rocio
174
15k
Lessons Learnt from Crawling 1000+ Websites
charlesmeaden
PRO
1
1.3k
JAMstack: Web Apps at Ludicrous Speed - All Things Open 2022
reverentgeek
1
470
The Organizational Zoo: Understanding Human Behavior Agility Through Metaphoric Constructive Conversations (based on the works of Arthur Shelley, Ph.D)
kimpetersen
PRO
0
360
How To Speak Unicorn (iThemes Webinar)
marktimemedia
1
480
Winning Ecommerce Organic Search in an AI Era - #searchnstuff2025
aleyda
1
2k
Why You Should Never Use an ORM
jnunemaker
PRO
61
9.9k
30 Presentation Tips
portentint
PRO
1
320
It's Worth the Effort
3n
188
29k
Transcript
Andrew Godwin @andrewgodwin
Andrew Godwin Hi, I'm Django core developer Senior Software Engineer
at Apparently now does software architecture
The Monolith
The Monolith Only one version of any dependency Everything can
import everything Deployed all at once No separation Side-effects from other code
None
Services Code split up by purpose/team Defined cross-boundary API Deployed
separately Can use different versions of dependencies Isolated from each other
Why services?
Easier to manage Smaller, self-contained problems
Independent Scaling And easier performance analysis
Faster Individual Deployment Less to deploy at once
Complex Interdependencies Harder to deploy & track bugs
Requires great communication Teams need calling contracts and APIs
More points of failure Not just one set of homogenous
servers
No more quick hacks Separation forces a level of code
design
Switching To Services Or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying
And Love The Monolith
Identify the "cut points" You might need to make some
Allocate inventory Calculate Price & Charge card Finalise order Make
Order Row &
Make Order Row Allocate inventory Calculate Price Charge card Finalise
inventory Finalise order
Make Order Row Allocate inventory Calculate Price Charge card Finalise
inventory Finalise order
Define APIs between services Behave like all other teams are
third-party
Separate Datastores & Servers Make them as separate as possible
Communication & Transport
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Direct Communication (20 services?
190 connections!)
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Direct with discovery Orchestrator
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Centralised Routing Router
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Message Bus
Centralised Comms Tradeoffs Distributed Comms Single point of failure Nasty
partial failures
At-least-once delivery Tradeoffs At-most-once delivery Some messages duplicated Some messages
lost
First-In-First-Out Tradeoffs First-In-Last-Out Easily backlogged Wide range of latencies
Channels & ASGI
Channel Layer Interface Server Worker Server Process 1 ASGI ASGI
Asynchronous socket handling Synchronous Django project Interface Server Worker Server ASGI ASGI Worker Server ASGI Process 2 Process 3 Process 4
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Channel Layer
Service Client inventory.request response.aF53Vds21
At-most-once delivery ASGI's Tradeoffs You have to design for potential
loss Low-latency but non-persistent Good for protocols, bad for important task queues Capacity, Backpressure and FIFO Informs producers quickly about pileups in the queue
Top Service-Oriented Architecture Tips
Per-request "correlation IDs" Track a set of service calls through
the stack
Feature Flag message headers Bundle them in, don't have every
service query them
Source Of Truth Each data model has a service that
owns (& caches) it
Metrics. Metrics everywhere. Both performance and network health
Design for failure Don't assume two things will both succeed
DO NOT START OFF WITH SERVICES Write separate Python libraries
instead
Thanks. Andrew Godwin @andrewgodwin