Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Services, Architecture and Channels
Search
Andrew Godwin
April 03, 2017
Programming
4
690
Services, Architecture and Channels
A talk I gave at DjangoCon Europe 2017 in Florence, Italy
Andrew Godwin
April 03, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Andrew Godwin
See All by Andrew Godwin
Reconciling Everything
andrewgodwin
1
330
Django Through The Years
andrewgodwin
0
230
Writing Maintainable Software At Scale
andrewgodwin
0
460
A Newcomer's Guide To Airflow's Architecture
andrewgodwin
0
370
Async, Python, and the Future
andrewgodwin
2
690
How To Break Django: With Async
andrewgodwin
1
740
Taking Django's ORM Async
andrewgodwin
0
740
The Long Road To Asynchrony
andrewgodwin
0
680
The Scientist & The Engineer
andrewgodwin
1
790
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
Claude CodeによるAI駆動開発の実践 〜そこから見えてきたこれからのプログラミング〜
iriikeita
0
360
Blazing Fast UI Development with Compose Hot Reload (Bangladesh KUG, October 2025)
zsmb
2
360
AkarengaLT vol.38
hashimoto_kei
1
130
3年ぶりにコードを書いた元CTOが Claude Codeと30分でMVPを作った話
maikokojima
0
680
alien-signals と自作 OSS で実現する フレームワーク非依存な ロジック共通化の探求 / Exploring Framework-Agnostic Logic Sharing with alien-signals and Custom OSS
aoseyuu
2
760
Software Architecture
hschwentner
6
2.3k
Google Opalで使える37のライブラリ
mickey_kubo
3
150
Domain-centric? Why Hexagonal, Onion, and Clean Architecture Are Answers to the Wrong Question
olivergierke
3
980
AI 駆動開発におけるコミュニティと AWS CDK の価値
konokenj
5
290
Server Side Kotlin Meetup vol.16: 内部動作を理解して ハイパフォーマンスなサーバサイド Kotlin アプリケーションを書こう
ternbusty
3
260
チームの境界をブチ抜いていけ
tokai235
0
230
バッチ処理を「状態の記録」から「事実の記録」へ
panda728
PRO
0
190
Featured
See All Featured
Helping Users Find Their Own Way: Creating Modern Search Experiences
danielanewman
31
2.9k
BBQ
matthewcrist
89
9.9k
ReactJS: Keep Simple. Everything can be a component!
pedronauck
667
130k
Agile that works and the tools we love
rasmusluckow
331
21k
The MySQL Ecosystem @ GitHub 2015
samlambert
251
13k
CSS Pre-Processors: Stylus, Less & Sass
bermonpainter
359
30k
What’s in a name? Adding method to the madness
productmarketing
PRO
24
3.7k
Faster Mobile Websites
deanohume
310
31k
Code Review Best Practice
trishagee
72
19k
The Web Performance Landscape in 2024 [PerfNow 2024]
tammyeverts
10
890
Unsuck your backbone
ammeep
671
58k
A better future with KSS
kneath
239
18k
Transcript
Andrew Godwin @andrewgodwin
Andrew Godwin Hi, I'm Django core developer Senior Software Engineer
at Apparently now does software architecture
The Monolith
The Monolith Only one version of any dependency Everything can
import everything Deployed all at once No separation Side-effects from other code
None
Services Code split up by purpose/team Defined cross-boundary API Deployed
separately Can use different versions of dependencies Isolated from each other
Why services?
Easier to manage Smaller, self-contained problems
Independent Scaling And easier performance analysis
Faster Individual Deployment Less to deploy at once
Complex Interdependencies Harder to deploy & track bugs
Requires great communication Teams need calling contracts and APIs
More points of failure Not just one set of homogenous
servers
No more quick hacks Separation forces a level of code
design
Switching To Services Or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying
And Love The Monolith
Identify the "cut points" You might need to make some
Allocate inventory Calculate Price & Charge card Finalise order Make
Order Row &
Make Order Row Allocate inventory Calculate Price Charge card Finalise
inventory Finalise order
Make Order Row Allocate inventory Calculate Price Charge card Finalise
inventory Finalise order
Define APIs between services Behave like all other teams are
third-party
Separate Datastores & Servers Make them as separate as possible
Communication & Transport
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Direct Communication (20 services?
190 connections!)
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Direct with discovery Orchestrator
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Centralised Routing Router
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Message Bus
Centralised Comms Tradeoffs Distributed Comms Single point of failure Nasty
partial failures
At-least-once delivery Tradeoffs At-most-once delivery Some messages duplicated Some messages
lost
First-In-First-Out Tradeoffs First-In-Last-Out Easily backlogged Wide range of latencies
Channels & ASGI
Channel Layer Interface Server Worker Server Process 1 ASGI ASGI
Asynchronous socket handling Synchronous Django project Interface Server Worker Server ASGI ASGI Worker Server ASGI Process 2 Process 3 Process 4
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Channel Layer
Service Client inventory.request response.aF53Vds21
At-most-once delivery ASGI's Tradeoffs You have to design for potential
loss Low-latency but non-persistent Good for protocols, bad for important task queues Capacity, Backpressure and FIFO Informs producers quickly about pileups in the queue
Top Service-Oriented Architecture Tips
Per-request "correlation IDs" Track a set of service calls through
the stack
Feature Flag message headers Bundle them in, don't have every
service query them
Source Of Truth Each data model has a service that
owns (& caches) it
Metrics. Metrics everywhere. Both performance and network health
Design for failure Don't assume two things will both succeed
DO NOT START OFF WITH SERVICES Write separate Python libraries
instead
Thanks. Andrew Godwin @andrewgodwin