Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Services, Architecture and Channels
Search
Andrew Godwin
April 03, 2017
Programming
4
640
Services, Architecture and Channels
A talk I gave at DjangoCon Europe 2017 in Florence, Italy
Andrew Godwin
April 03, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Andrew Godwin
See All by Andrew Godwin
Reconciling Everything
andrewgodwin
1
260
Django Through The Years
andrewgodwin
0
160
Writing Maintainable Software At Scale
andrewgodwin
0
400
A Newcomer's Guide To Airflow's Architecture
andrewgodwin
0
310
Async, Python, and the Future
andrewgodwin
2
610
How To Break Django: With Async
andrewgodwin
1
670
Taking Django's ORM Async
andrewgodwin
0
680
The Long Road To Asynchrony
andrewgodwin
0
590
The Scientist & The Engineer
andrewgodwin
1
700
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
ゼロからの、レトロゲームエンジンの作り方
tokujiros
3
1k
Jaspr Dart Web Framework 박제창 @Devfest 2024
itsmedreamwalker
0
150
Androidアプリのモジュール分割における:x:commonを考える
okuzawats
1
270
PHPで作るWebSocketサーバー ~リアクティブなアプリケーションを知るために~ / WebSocket Server in PHP - To know reactive applications
seike460
PRO
2
770
KubeCon NA 2024の全DB関連セッションを紹介
nnaka2992
0
120
テストコードのガイドライン 〜作成から運用まで〜
riku929hr
7
1.4k
QA環境で誰でも自由自在に現在時刻を操って検証できるようにした話
kalibora
1
140
情報漏洩させないための設計
kubotak
5
1.3k
盆栽転じて家具となる / Bonsai and Furnitures
aereal
0
1.7k
20年もののレガシープロダクトに 0からPHPStanを入れるまで / phpcon2024
hirobe1999
0
1k
ErdMap: Thinking about a map for Rails applications
makicamel
1
540
VisionProで部屋の明るさを反映させるシェーダーを作った話
segur
0
100
Featured
See All Featured
Being A Developer After 40
akosma
89
590k
KATA
mclloyd
29
14k
Statistics for Hackers
jakevdp
797
220k
Building a Scalable Design System with Sketch
lauravandoore
460
33k
Designing Experiences People Love
moore
139
23k
ピンチをチャンスに:未来をつくるプロダクトロードマップ #pmconf2020
aki_iinuma
113
50k
GitHub's CSS Performance
jonrohan
1030
460k
The Pragmatic Product Professional
lauravandoore
32
6.4k
For a Future-Friendly Web
brad_frost
176
9.5k
"I'm Feeling Lucky" - Building Great Search Experiences for Today's Users (#IAC19)
danielanewman
226
22k
RailsConf & Balkan Ruby 2019: The Past, Present, and Future of Rails at GitHub
eileencodes
132
33k
How to Think Like a Performance Engineer
csswizardry
22
1.3k
Transcript
Andrew Godwin @andrewgodwin
Andrew Godwin Hi, I'm Django core developer Senior Software Engineer
at Apparently now does software architecture
The Monolith
The Monolith Only one version of any dependency Everything can
import everything Deployed all at once No separation Side-effects from other code
None
Services Code split up by purpose/team Defined cross-boundary API Deployed
separately Can use different versions of dependencies Isolated from each other
Why services?
Easier to manage Smaller, self-contained problems
Independent Scaling And easier performance analysis
Faster Individual Deployment Less to deploy at once
Complex Interdependencies Harder to deploy & track bugs
Requires great communication Teams need calling contracts and APIs
More points of failure Not just one set of homogenous
servers
No more quick hacks Separation forces a level of code
design
Switching To Services Or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying
And Love The Monolith
Identify the "cut points" You might need to make some
Allocate inventory Calculate Price & Charge card Finalise order Make
Order Row &
Make Order Row Allocate inventory Calculate Price Charge card Finalise
inventory Finalise order
Make Order Row Allocate inventory Calculate Price Charge card Finalise
inventory Finalise order
Define APIs between services Behave like all other teams are
third-party
Separate Datastores & Servers Make them as separate as possible
Communication & Transport
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Direct Communication (20 services?
190 connections!)
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Direct with discovery Orchestrator
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Centralised Routing Router
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Message Bus
Centralised Comms Tradeoffs Distributed Comms Single point of failure Nasty
partial failures
At-least-once delivery Tradeoffs At-most-once delivery Some messages duplicated Some messages
lost
First-In-First-Out Tradeoffs First-In-Last-Out Easily backlogged Wide range of latencies
Channels & ASGI
Channel Layer Interface Server Worker Server Process 1 ASGI ASGI
Asynchronous socket handling Synchronous Django project Interface Server Worker Server ASGI ASGI Worker Server ASGI Process 2 Process 3 Process 4
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Channel Layer
Service Client inventory.request response.aF53Vds21
At-most-once delivery ASGI's Tradeoffs You have to design for potential
loss Low-latency but non-persistent Good for protocols, bad for important task queues Capacity, Backpressure and FIFO Informs producers quickly about pileups in the queue
Top Service-Oriented Architecture Tips
Per-request "correlation IDs" Track a set of service calls through
the stack
Feature Flag message headers Bundle them in, don't have every
service query them
Source Of Truth Each data model has a service that
owns (& caches) it
Metrics. Metrics everywhere. Both performance and network health
Design for failure Don't assume two things will both succeed
DO NOT START OFF WITH SERVICES Write separate Python libraries
instead
Thanks. Andrew Godwin @andrewgodwin