Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Services, Architecture and Channels
Search
Andrew Godwin
April 03, 2017
Programming
4
680
Services, Architecture and Channels
A talk I gave at DjangoCon Europe 2017 in Florence, Italy
Andrew Godwin
April 03, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Andrew Godwin
See All by Andrew Godwin
Reconciling Everything
andrewgodwin
1
320
Django Through The Years
andrewgodwin
0
210
Writing Maintainable Software At Scale
andrewgodwin
0
450
A Newcomer's Guide To Airflow's Architecture
andrewgodwin
0
360
Async, Python, and the Future
andrewgodwin
2
670
How To Break Django: With Async
andrewgodwin
1
730
Taking Django's ORM Async
andrewgodwin
0
730
The Long Road To Asynchrony
andrewgodwin
0
660
The Scientist & The Engineer
andrewgodwin
1
770
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
Claude Code と OpenAI o3 で メタデータ情報を作る
laket
0
130
React 使いじゃなくても知っておきたい教養としての React
oukayuka
18
5.6k
kiroでゲームを作ってみた
iriikeita
0
150
ZeroETLで始めるDynamoDBとS3の連携
afooooil
0
160
サイトを作ったらNFCタグキーホルダーを爆速で作れ!
yuukis
0
180
Comparing decimals in Swift Testing
417_72ki
0
170
Portapad紹介プレゼンテーション
gotoumakakeru
1
120
MCPで実現できる、Webサービス利用体験について
syumai
7
2.5k
あまり知られていない MCP 仕様たち / MCP specifications that aren’t widely known
ktr_0731
0
240
decksh - a little language for decks
ajstarks
4
21k
WebAssemblyインタプリタを書く ~Component Modelを添えて~
ruccho
1
760
リッチエディターを安全に開発・運用するために
unachang113
1
380
Featured
See All Featured
Practical Tips for Bootstrapping Information Extraction Pipelines
honnibal
PRO
23
1.4k
VelocityConf: Rendering Performance Case Studies
addyosmani
332
24k
GraphQLの誤解/rethinking-graphql
sonatard
71
11k
Rebuilding a faster, lazier Slack
samanthasiow
83
9.1k
Bootstrapping a Software Product
garrettdimon
PRO
307
110k
Product Roadmaps are Hard
iamctodd
PRO
54
11k
How GitHub (no longer) Works
holman
314
140k
Documentation Writing (for coders)
carmenintech
73
5k
Cheating the UX When There Is Nothing More to Optimize - PixelPioneers
stephaniewalter
283
13k
How to Ace a Technical Interview
jacobian
278
23k
Learning to Love Humans: Emotional Interface Design
aarron
273
40k
Templates, Plugins, & Blocks: Oh My! Creating the theme that thinks of everything
marktimemedia
31
2.5k
Transcript
Andrew Godwin @andrewgodwin
Andrew Godwin Hi, I'm Django core developer Senior Software Engineer
at Apparently now does software architecture
The Monolith
The Monolith Only one version of any dependency Everything can
import everything Deployed all at once No separation Side-effects from other code
None
Services Code split up by purpose/team Defined cross-boundary API Deployed
separately Can use different versions of dependencies Isolated from each other
Why services?
Easier to manage Smaller, self-contained problems
Independent Scaling And easier performance analysis
Faster Individual Deployment Less to deploy at once
Complex Interdependencies Harder to deploy & track bugs
Requires great communication Teams need calling contracts and APIs
More points of failure Not just one set of homogenous
servers
No more quick hacks Separation forces a level of code
design
Switching To Services Or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying
And Love The Monolith
Identify the "cut points" You might need to make some
Allocate inventory Calculate Price & Charge card Finalise order Make
Order Row &
Make Order Row Allocate inventory Calculate Price Charge card Finalise
inventory Finalise order
Make Order Row Allocate inventory Calculate Price Charge card Finalise
inventory Finalise order
Define APIs between services Behave like all other teams are
third-party
Separate Datastores & Servers Make them as separate as possible
Communication & Transport
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Direct Communication (20 services?
190 connections!)
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Direct with discovery Orchestrator
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Centralised Routing Router
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Message Bus
Centralised Comms Tradeoffs Distributed Comms Single point of failure Nasty
partial failures
At-least-once delivery Tradeoffs At-most-once delivery Some messages duplicated Some messages
lost
First-In-First-Out Tradeoffs First-In-Last-Out Easily backlogged Wide range of latencies
Channels & ASGI
Channel Layer Interface Server Worker Server Process 1 ASGI ASGI
Asynchronous socket handling Synchronous Django project Interface Server Worker Server ASGI ASGI Worker Server ASGI Process 2 Process 3 Process 4
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Channel Layer
Service Client inventory.request response.aF53Vds21
At-most-once delivery ASGI's Tradeoffs You have to design for potential
loss Low-latency but non-persistent Good for protocols, bad for important task queues Capacity, Backpressure and FIFO Informs producers quickly about pileups in the queue
Top Service-Oriented Architecture Tips
Per-request "correlation IDs" Track a set of service calls through
the stack
Feature Flag message headers Bundle them in, don't have every
service query them
Source Of Truth Each data model has a service that
owns (& caches) it
Metrics. Metrics everywhere. Both performance and network health
Design for failure Don't assume two things will both succeed
DO NOT START OFF WITH SERVICES Write separate Python libraries
instead
Thanks. Andrew Godwin @andrewgodwin