Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Services, Architecture and Channels
Search
Andrew Godwin
April 03, 2017
Programming
4
660
Services, Architecture and Channels
A talk I gave at DjangoCon Europe 2017 in Florence, Italy
Andrew Godwin
April 03, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Andrew Godwin
See All by Andrew Godwin
Reconciling Everything
andrewgodwin
1
290
Django Through The Years
andrewgodwin
0
190
Writing Maintainable Software At Scale
andrewgodwin
0
420
A Newcomer's Guide To Airflow's Architecture
andrewgodwin
0
340
Async, Python, and the Future
andrewgodwin
2
640
How To Break Django: With Async
andrewgodwin
1
700
Taking Django's ORM Async
andrewgodwin
0
700
The Long Road To Asynchrony
andrewgodwin
0
630
The Scientist & The Engineer
andrewgodwin
1
740
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
リストビュー画面UX改善の振り返り
splcywolf
0
150
Deoptimization: How YJIT Speeds Up Ruby by Slowing Down / RubyKaigi 2025
k0kubun
0
860
Memory API : Patterns, Performance et Cas d'Utilisation
josepaumard
0
140
Enterprise Web App. Development (1): Build Tool Training Ver. 5
knakagawa
1
120
Road to RubyKaigi: Making Tinny Chiptunes with Ruby
makicamel
4
420
Do Dumb Things
mitsuhiko
0
440
Exit 8 for SwiftUI
ojun9
0
140
小田原でみんなで一句詠みたいな #phpcon_odawara
stefafafan
0
340
Vibe Coding の話をしよう
schroneko
10
2.5k
Being an ethical software engineer
xgouchet
PRO
0
210
[NG India] Event-Based State Management with NgRx SignalStore
markostanimirovic
1
160
SEAL - Dive into the sea of search engines - Symfony Live Berlin 2025
alexanderschranz
1
140
Featured
See All Featured
Scaling GitHub
holman
459
140k
Build The Right Thing And Hit Your Dates
maggiecrowley
35
2.6k
Reflections from 52 weeks, 52 projects
jeffersonlam
349
20k
Measuring & Analyzing Core Web Vitals
bluesmoon
7
390
[Rails World 2023 - Day 1 Closing Keynote] - The Magic of Rails
eileencodes
34
2.2k
Building Applications with DynamoDB
mza
94
6.3k
The Cost Of JavaScript in 2023
addyosmani
49
7.7k
Rebuilding a faster, lazier Slack
samanthasiow
80
8.9k
Adopting Sorbet at Scale
ufuk
76
9.3k
BBQ
matthewcrist
88
9.6k
Statistics for Hackers
jakevdp
798
220k
Rails Girls Zürich Keynote
gr2m
94
13k
Transcript
Andrew Godwin @andrewgodwin
Andrew Godwin Hi, I'm Django core developer Senior Software Engineer
at Apparently now does software architecture
The Monolith
The Monolith Only one version of any dependency Everything can
import everything Deployed all at once No separation Side-effects from other code
None
Services Code split up by purpose/team Defined cross-boundary API Deployed
separately Can use different versions of dependencies Isolated from each other
Why services?
Easier to manage Smaller, self-contained problems
Independent Scaling And easier performance analysis
Faster Individual Deployment Less to deploy at once
Complex Interdependencies Harder to deploy & track bugs
Requires great communication Teams need calling contracts and APIs
More points of failure Not just one set of homogenous
servers
No more quick hacks Separation forces a level of code
design
Switching To Services Or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying
And Love The Monolith
Identify the "cut points" You might need to make some
Allocate inventory Calculate Price & Charge card Finalise order Make
Order Row &
Make Order Row Allocate inventory Calculate Price Charge card Finalise
inventory Finalise order
Make Order Row Allocate inventory Calculate Price Charge card Finalise
inventory Finalise order
Define APIs between services Behave like all other teams are
third-party
Separate Datastores & Servers Make them as separate as possible
Communication & Transport
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Direct Communication (20 services?
190 connections!)
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Direct with discovery Orchestrator
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Centralised Routing Router
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Message Bus
Centralised Comms Tradeoffs Distributed Comms Single point of failure Nasty
partial failures
At-least-once delivery Tradeoffs At-most-once delivery Some messages duplicated Some messages
lost
First-In-First-Out Tradeoffs First-In-Last-Out Easily backlogged Wide range of latencies
Channels & ASGI
Channel Layer Interface Server Worker Server Process 1 ASGI ASGI
Asynchronous socket handling Synchronous Django project Interface Server Worker Server ASGI ASGI Worker Server ASGI Process 2 Process 3 Process 4
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Channel Layer
Service Client inventory.request response.aF53Vds21
At-most-once delivery ASGI's Tradeoffs You have to design for potential
loss Low-latency but non-persistent Good for protocols, bad for important task queues Capacity, Backpressure and FIFO Informs producers quickly about pileups in the queue
Top Service-Oriented Architecture Tips
Per-request "correlation IDs" Track a set of service calls through
the stack
Feature Flag message headers Bundle them in, don't have every
service query them
Source Of Truth Each data model has a service that
owns (& caches) it
Metrics. Metrics everywhere. Both performance and network health
Design for failure Don't assume two things will both succeed
DO NOT START OFF WITH SERVICES Write separate Python libraries
instead
Thanks. Andrew Godwin @andrewgodwin