avoid bad outcome) Predicted Sepsis Treated a false case (unnecessary) Predicted No Sepsis Didn’t treat (all good) Predicted No Sepsis Failed to treat (Bad outcome)
total. • How does that help us decide? • The key is to compare against the alternatives. • Treat everyone? <==> set decision threshold to zero • Treat no one? <==> set decision threshold to one • Some other strategy? <==> Random? Status quo? • Choose the alternative that is least bad • Or, if you prefer the J perspective, multiply everything by -1 and choose the one that’s the most good!
total. • How does that help us decide? • The key is to compare against the alternatives. • Treat everyone? <==> set decision threshold to zero • Treat no one? <==> set decision threshold to one • Some other strategy? <==> Random? Status quo? • Choose the alternative that is least bad • Or, if you prefer the J perspective, multiply everything by -1 and choose the one that’s the most good!
There are still things we don’t know, like what all these C terms actually are. • Work backwards and ask: • In what range would they need to be for us to choose the model over an alternative strategy? • How much better would the model need to be before we would choose to use it?
Treat all Pregnancy Related Hypertension (PRH) is the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in the U.S. High-risk patients à remote blood pressure monitoring https://healthcareinnovation.upenn.edu/projects/heart-safe-motherhood
as we’ve done here • Nothing is stopping us from making different assumptions: • “What if the false positives lead to additional harm?” • “What if I have other priorities, like fairness?” • Decision theory analysis is not infallible, but it allows us to: • Get the best possible answers • to the most precisely formulated questions, • when starting from a given set of assumptions