Wei-‐Ming Chung, Hsin-‐Liu Kao, Tsen-‐Ying Lin Department of Industrial and Commercial Design, NaAonal Taiwan University of Science and Technology (NTUST), Taipei, Taiwan
by 5 students coming from design and 5 from computer science backgrounds, respecAvely. • All players found the system to be “fun” and “very interesAng”. The system was able to engage users to explore for an enough span of Ame to report their accounts.
that could inspire future innovaAon. • The intenAonality of InTouch is not a physical form only but a parAcipaAve situaAon manifesAng arAfact in the domesAc context.
arAfact as outcome that can transfer the world from visual feedback as a major output of networked social interacAon to a preferred future where all sensory outputs can become significant feedback. • From our empirical user study, we have found that users concerned how many friends they can interact with through the system.
Perceptual interacAons in a minimalist virtual environment. New Ideas in Psychology, 27(1), 32-‐47. • De Jaegher, H. (2009). Social understanding through direct percepAon? Yes, by interacAng. Consciousness and CogniAon, 18(2), 535-‐542. Elsevier. • Deckers, E., Wensveen, S., Ahn, R., & Overbeeke, K. (2011). Designing for Perceptual Crossing to Improve User Involvement. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in CompuAng Systems (pp. 1929-‐1938). New York, NY: ACM Press. • Godshaw, R. (2012). Feel tomorrow's air temperature today. hhp://robb.cc/Cryoscope • Gaver, W. (2002). Designing for Homo Ludens. i3 Magazine, June (2002), pp. 2—5 • Gaver, W., Beaver, J.,& Benford, S. (2003). Ambiguity as a resource for design; In Pro-‐ ceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in CompuAng Systems (pp. 233-‐240). New York, NY: ACM Press. • MarA, P. (2010). Perceiving while being perceived. InternaAonal Journal of Design, 4(2), 27-‐38. • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, New York: Signet. • Merleau-‐Ponty, M., (1945). Phenomenology of PercepAon (Original: Phénoménologie de la percepAon 1945). (D. Tiemersma & R. Vlasblom). Boom. • Victor, B. (2011). A Brief Pant on the Future of InteracAon Design. hhp://worrydream.com/ ABriefRantOnTheFutureOfInteracAonDesign • Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Evenson, S. (2007). Research through design as a method for interacAon design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in CompuAng Systems (pp. 493-‐502). New York, NY: ACM Press.