2. to give an account of the causes of events. 3. to clarify and make something more precise. 4. to situate the unknown in the context of established knowledge.
knowledge of the facts. ARGUMENTS demonstrate what is true or what it is reasonable to believe. 2. to justify what is explained. JUSTIFICATION shows how what happened is good or necessary.
knowledge of the facts. ARGUMENTS demonstrate what is true or what it is reasonable to believe. 2. to justify what is explained. JUSTIFICATION shows how what happened is good or necessary. 3. to rationalize or fit all phenomena into a pre-given storyline.
knowledge of the facts. ARGUMENTS demonstrate what is true or what it is reasonable to believe. 2. to justify what is explained. JUSTIFICATION shows how what happened is good or necessary. 3. to rationalize or fit all phenomena into a pre-given storyline. Explanations can challenge our presumed knowledge and deeply held beliefs.
the heat shock caused by pouring hot liquid into it ! interpretive: Hamlet is a story about the loss of orientation of the individual in modern society
the heat shock caused by pouring hot liquid into it ! interpretive: Hamlet is a story about the loss of orientation of the individual in modern society ! teleological/functional: the brain serves to keep the blood cool
the heat shock caused by pouring hot liquid into it ! interpretive: Hamlet is a story about the loss of orientation of the individual in modern society ! teleological/functional: the brain serves to keep the blood cool ! procedural: to make bread, first you mix the yeast with warm water and sugar
wrong by evidence inconsistent with them; 2. fruitful: lead to new, unexpected connections and successful but surprising predictions; 3. broad in scope: account for many apparently divergent phenomena;
wrong by evidence inconsistent with them; 2. fruitful: lead to new, unexpected connections and successful but surprising predictions; 3. broad in scope: account for many apparently divergent phenomena; 4. simple: rely on the smallest possible number of assumptions;
wrong by evidence inconsistent with them; 2. fruitful: lead to new, unexpected connections and successful but surprising predictions; 3. broad in scope: account for many apparently divergent phenomena; 4. simple: rely on the smallest possible number of assumptions; 5. conservative: do not conflict with well-established beliefs.
and subsequent killing of Lee Harvey Oswald by Jack Ruby. possible explanations: 1. Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone; Jack Ruby took it upon himself to take revenge.
and subsequent killing of Lee Harvey Oswald by Jack Ruby. possible explanations: 1. Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone; Jack Ruby took it upon himself to take revenge. 2. Oswald and Ruby were Cuban agents both acting on orders from Fidel Castro.
and subsequent killing of Lee Harvey Oswald by Jack Ruby. possible explanations: 1. Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone; Jack Ruby took it upon himself to take revenge. 2. Oswald and Ruby were Cuban agents both acting on orders from Fidel Castro. 3. There was a conspiracy reaching to the highest levels of the CIA to have JFK removed; Oswald and Ruby were working for them along with other conspirators.
completed a mission to land astronauts on the moon. Events are shown on TV as they happen. possible explanations: 1. They really did this and the movies and photographs taken on the Apollo 11 mission really show people on the moon.
completed a mission to land astronauts on the moon. Events are shown on TV as they happen. possible explanations: 1. They really did this and the movies and photographs taken on the Apollo 11 mission really show people on the moon. 2. The moon landing was faked in secret studios in Area 51.
Trade Center and attack on the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. possible explanations: 1. Members of a militant group led by Osama bin Laden hijacked 4 planes and flew two of them into the WTC and one of them into the Pentagon.
Trade Center and attack on the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. possible explanations: 1. Members of a militant group led by Osama bin Laden hijacked 4 planes and flew two of them into the WTC and one of them into the Pentagon. 2. Key members of the US government knew ahead of time of this attack and let it happen on purpose.
Trade Center and attack on the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. possible explanations: 1. Members of a militant group led by Osama bin Laden hijacked 4 planes and flew two of them into the WTC and one of them into the Pentagon. 2. Key members of the US government knew ahead of time of this attack and let it happen on purpose. 3. George W. Bush and his top advisors planned this attack and made it happen on purpose; the buildings came down because explosives were planted in them and were detonated after the impact of the planes.
trying to explain anyway? 2. State THEORY and test for internal and external consistency. 3. Assess the EVIDENCE in favor of this theory. 4. SCRUTINIZE alternative theories that might explain the facts.
trying to explain anyway? 2. State THEORY and test for internal and external consistency. 3. Assess the EVIDENCE in favor of this theory. 4. SCRUTINIZE alternative theories that might explain the facts. 5. TEST the theory for adequacy: is it testable, fruitful, broad in scope, simple, conservative?