ISO problem in a simple static context ISO Generator Load u ISO has to balance supply and demand u Generator and load bid their supply and demand curves u ISO intersects to find right price
Wind farm Nuclear power plant Hydropower plant ISO Commerci al load Industrial load Load serving entity Storage service • Dynamic constraints: ramping, thermal inertia • Lots of uncertainty: Wind, temperature, water flow • All choices have costs/benefits • How can ISO ensure maximum social welfare? • How much should be generated, and balance • How should generators and loads bid? Time Generation Time Consumption
stochastic and dynamic behaviour • Stochastic: renewable energy availability has temporal fluctuations that are hard to predict • Dynamic: Agents’ utilities at a time depend upon the past actions too e.g. thermal loads = 1 − + , = 1,2, … , are bid-instants
• Such a simple one-shot iterative scheme is highly sub-optimal when the agents are stochastic and have “dynamic utilities” • The ISO has to ensure optimal operation of such a electiricity grid
4 Prosumer 6 x 1 (t +1) = f 1 (x 1 (t),u 1 (t),w 1 (t)) (x 1 (t),u 1 (t)) Î G 1 (t) Max E U 1 t=0 T å (x 1 (t),u 1 (t)) Max E U i (x i (t),u i (t)) t=0 T å i=1 N å How to assign ui (t)’s? ISO Without knowledge of: • States xi (t) • Models fi (xi ,ui ,wi ) • Utilities Ui (xi ,ui ) Balance: u i (t) i=1 N å = 0 for all t Load 3 x 3 (t +1) = f 3 (x 3 (t),u 3 (t),w 3 (t)) (x 3 (t),u 3 (t)) Î G 3 (t) Max E U 3 t=0 T å (x 3 (t),u 3 (t))
and prosumers are deterministic dynamical systems • Goal x i (t +1) = f i (x i (t),u i (t)) (x i (t),u i (t)) Î G i (t) Max U i (x i (t),u i (t)) t=0 T å i=1 N å s.t. u i (t) i=1 N å = 0 for all t
, p(T)) • The entire sequence of prices for all future times • Agent i distributedly chooses ui = (ui (0), ui (1), … , ui (T)) to maximize its own utility • This yields value of dual function () U i (x i (t),u i (t))- p(t)u i (t) ( ) t=0 T å
needs to solve dual problem: • Subgradient iteration • Now • Price iteration • Converges after weighted averaging under convexity and compactness assumptions (“ergodic” method) Min p³0 D(p) pk+1 = pk - ek ¶D(pk ) ¶pk pk+1 = pk + ek u i k (0) i=1 N å , u i k (1) i=1 N å ,..., u i k (T ) i=1 N å æ è ç ö ø ÷ ¶D ¶p = - u i (0) i=1 N å , u i (1) i=1 N å ,..., u i (T ) i=1 N å æ è ç ö ø ÷
loads, storage, prosumers are stochastic – dependent on a common uncertainty • Ex: All loads depend on common temperature of the city • Common uncertainty w() is observed by all loads/gens • Goal Max E w(×) U i (x i (t),u i (t)) t=0 T å i=1 N å æ è ç ö ø ÷ x i (t +1) = f i (x i (t),u i (t),w(t)) (x i (t),u i (t)) Î G i (t)
• Since probability of a node does not depend on previous actions • Optimization problem Min p(v)c(x(v,uv ),uv ) v å s.t. u i (v) = 0 for all v i=1 N å
loads, storage and prosumers are stochastic having private uncertainties • Goal: Max E w1 (×),w2 (×),...,wN (×) U i (x i (t),u i (t)) t=0 T å i=1 N å æ è ç ö ø ÷ x i (t +1) = f i (x i (t),u i (t),w i (t)) (x i (t),u i (t)) Î G i (t)
know the values of the uncertainties • It only needs to know and announce • Labels of remaining tree (w1 (s), w2 (s), …, wN (s)) for s ≥ t • Law of remaining labels • Labels could be hashed • Confidentiality of information can be assured • Agent i communicates the label of wi (t) to ISO at time t • Similar scheme works – but great complexity
• If agent i’s actions affect another agent j, but that agent i doesn’t know the action that j applied, then problem is intractable, even in LQG case • Generally intractable in stochastic case with private uncertainty • Any solution?
plant Hydropower plant ISO Commerci al load Industrial load Load serving entity Storage service Price p Price p Price p Price p Price p Price p Price p Price p
plant Hydropower plant ISO Commerci al load Industrial load Load serving entity Storage service Gen u1 Gen u2 Gen u3 Cons u7 Cons u6 Cons u5 Gen u4 Cons u8 • ISO needs to choose p • So that • Ensures least cost in simple static context u i = 0 å
Choose action u(v) for each vertex v • State x(v, uv) • One step cost is c(x(v, uv), u(v)) • Convexity of c(.) in uv • Optimization problem Min p(v)c(x(v,uv ),uv ) v å s.t. u i (v) = 0 for all v i=1 N å w(1) w(0) w(2) w(3) v v u Very complex since number of loads is exponentially large
loads are LQG systems having private uncertainties • Goal: Max E x i (t)T Q i x i (t)+u i (t)T R i u i (t) t=0 T å i=1 N å æ è ç ö ø ÷ x i (t +1) = A i x i (t)+ b i u i (t)+ C i w i (t) y i (t) = D i x i (t)+ H i v i (t) x 0 ,w i (t),v i t ( ) ∼ N, mean 0, and independent
= 0, 1, 2, … • Iterations k=1,2,3, …: • At iteration k: • ISO announces deterministic, future price sequence • Each Generator/Load i responds with optimal solution (ui k (t), ui k (t+1), …, ui k (T)) of deterministic LQ problem pk = pk-1 +e k-1 u i k-1(t) i=1 N å , u i k-1(t +1) i=1 N å ,..., u i k-1(T ) i=1 N å æ è ç ö ø ÷ x i (t +1) = A i x i (t)+ b i u i (t) Min x i (t)T Q i x i (t)+ u i (t)T R i u i (t)+ pk (t)u i (t) T å æ è ç ö ø ÷
t Coal power plant Wind farm Nuclear power plant Hydropower plant ISO Commerci al load Industrial load Load serving entity Storage service (p1(t),….,p1(T)) (p1(t),….,p1(T)) (p1(t),….,p1(T)) (p1(t),….,p1(t)) (p1(t),….,p1(T)) (p1(t),….,p1(T)) (p1(t),….,p1(T)) (p1(t),….,p1(T))
t Coal power plant Wind farm Nuclear power plant Hydropower plant ISO Commerci al load Industrial load Load serving entity Storage service (u1(t),….,u1(T)) (u1(t),….,u1(T)) (u1(t),….,u1(T)) (u1(t),….,u1(T)) (u1(t),….,u1(T)) (u1(t),….,u1(T)) (u1(t),….,u1(T)) (u1(t),….,u1(T))
equivalent of exchanging supply and demand curves in simple static context • With 15 min intervals, is this iterative bidding feasible? • Communication/computation infrastructure to automate this • May not be any better alternative • Can truncate the iterations after finite threshold • Investigating strategic considerations, line losses, etc Conclusion: