This deck illustrates the need to deproject interferometry of echelle gratings to understand the origin of instrumental artifacts in the device development process.
We didn’t used to
probably because astronomers don’t care.
but now we’re learning something, because de-projected images look like what engineers see.
shadow of grating holder
Shadow of grating holder
Photoresist thickening at edge
Periodic structures resembling Newton’s fringes
Comets from photoresist spin
Photoresist thickening at edge
de-project
We can do even better with
shadow of grating holder
Shadow of grating holder
Photoresist thickening at edge
Periodic structures resembling Newton’s fringes
Comets from photoresist spin
Photoresist thickening at edge
high pass*
.
We can do even better with
shadow of grating holder
Shadow of grating holder
Photoresist thickening at edge
Periodic structures resembling Newton’s fringes
Comets from photoresist spin
Horizontal artifact,
probably from using the cart and slit.
high pass filtering* is:
way faster than fitting Zernike polynomials.
k ~ 51 pixels is the median smoothing kernel
d = d - median( d, k )
But since we are astronomers and engineers, we want
the best of both worlds™, so:
We are proud to introduce…
ZIGZAG:
Zygo Interferometry of Gratings with Zernike Analysis by Gully
In summary:
[email protected] | astronomer and engineer
You have to de-project
the full map.
and high pass filter
and ZIGZAG™ does it all
except PSFs… for now.