Speaker's Position Lepidum Co. Ltd. ( https://lepidum.co.jp/ ) President, Founder and Owner Internet Society Japan Chapter Program Committee Member 2013, 2014 OpenID Foundation Japan Producer Identity Conference ( #idcon ) Organizer Keio University Visiting Researcher, Keio Research Institute at SFC
Projects | lepidum IDzumo (Digital Identity Components) LACCOONS (Large-scale Automatic Configuration and Control Over Open Network for SvDI) Skyeye (Wi-Fi Connect and Auth) Fail-Safe C (memory-safe implementation of the full ANSI C language) HTTP Mutual Access Authentication Protocol (new protocol for preventing Phishing attacks against Web systems) Service Defined Network (SvDI)
rtcweb Agenda(IETF82, 83) IETF82 Agenda Day 1: Report from AVTCORE WG Report from W3C Signalling Discussion Glare Resolution Proposal Day 2: Security Discussion Media Codec Discussion Data Transport IETF83 Agenda Day 1: update from mmusic, avtcore, ICCRG and other WG W3C Update Identity Proxy What to do about RTP and/or SDES Day 2: Signaling Data Channel Codec Selection
rtcweb Agenda(IETF84, 85) IETF84 Agenda Day 1: Consent-freshness CODEC Control CODEC Selection Process Day 2: DSCP Usages and constraints Firewall traversal RTP usage Security architecrture Key management IETF85 Agenda Day 1: Report from WebRTC F2F Other IETF WG updates IETF IPR rules JSEP Document Update(non-SDP) JSEP/SDP discussion Constraints registry Day 2: Stats registry Video Codec Presentations General discussion Call the question of which mandatory to implement video codec to select Issues list from WEBRTC meeting
rtcweb Agenda(IETF86, 87) IETF86 Agenda Day 1: Data Channel WGLC Issue resolution RTCP-XR FEC in RTCWEB Mobile issues for RTCWEB Day 2: JSEP Video Codec IETF87 Agenda Day 1: Should SDES be part of WebRTC security practice and, if so, how? Post-Plan A/Plan B MMUSIC discussion of impact to RTCWEB documents Security document updates Day 2: Chair review of dependencies in other groups Use Case Requirements updates Data channel Issues list presentation
rtcweb Agenda(IETF88, 89) IETF88 Agenda Day 1: JSEP Data channel document Security Documents RTP Usages Day2 : VP8 presentation with clarify questions H.264 presentation with clarify questions IETF89 Agenda Day 1: Data Channel Transports Stun/DTLS heartbeat discussion Day 2: JSEP Update from RMCAT Sec / Sec Arch RTP usage NAT-Firewall: Still trying to resolve what parts of this are in this WG
from Peter Saint-Andre via IETF rtcweb Mailing List [Jan 29] ">If anyone has concerns about tabling this discussion until September >29, 2014 please let us know by February 4. I have concerns that September 2014 is too soon. It was relatively easy for the WG to choose two MTI audio codecs because Opus was a clear winner among modern codecs (and because we had an obvious fallback). We have no such codec in the video space. My suggestion is to wait until we have such a codec (and, in parallel within some other WG or initiative, push hard to make that happen), rather than continue the endless and fruitless wrangling over the current options."
videocodec BoF (in IETF85 Nov, 2012) Internet Video Codec BOF 「今度こそRFのInternetのVideo Codecを！」 「「「「「え？」」」」」 "Recent efforts within the MPEG LA to create an RF license for the Restricted Baseline profile of H.264, while ultimately unsuccessful, showed that there are many consumer device manufacturers that would support RF licensing for a video codec." (BoFのDescriptionより) VPnext! → VP9 HD画質に対応とか色々 Daala etc...
lef
linyows
neuecc
hirosatogamo
oztick139
shujisado
nikinusu
oracle4engineer
ysknsid25
lycorp_recruit_jp
sinsoku
nobutomurata
mikit
eileencodes
palkan
mongodb
sugarenia
bkeepers
vanstee
morganepeng
chriscoyier
smashingmag
addyosmani
aleyda
bcantrill
