Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Class 3

Class 3

Well Ordering

Mohammad Mahmoody

August 29, 2017
Tweet

More Decks by Mohammad Mahmoody

Other Decks in Education

Transcript

  1. Plan - Well-Ordering Principle - Closer look: ordering / well

    ordering - General Well-Ordering Theorem? - Using Well-Ordering Principle
  2. Well-Ordering Principle Every nonempty set of non-negative integers has a

    smallest element. …is the crux of mathematical induction, which is the basis for many of the most important proofs in CS.
  3. What is an Ordered Set? Definition. An ordered set :

    (1) If ≠ then either < or < (2) < and < then <
  4. Well Ordered Sets Definition. An ordered set (with respect to

    an ordering `relation’ like < ) is well-ordered if any of its non-empty subsets ⊆ has a minimum.
  5. Well Ordering Principle (again) Well Ordering Principle. The set of

    natural numbers under the order “<“ is well ordered. Every nonempty set of non-negative integers has a smallest element. Why called “principle” ?
  6. Well-Ordered? Set: the non-negative rationals Comparator: < Definition. A number

    is rational if it can be written as a ratio of two integers.
  7. Set: the non-negative rationals Comparator: ? Is there some comparator

    that makes the non-negative rationals well-ordered?
  8. General Well-Ordering Theorem For every set S, there is some

    ordering on that makes well-ordered. Is this true?
  9. Gyula Kőnig There is no comparator that results in a

    well- ordering of the real numbers.
  10. Gyula Kőnig Claimed counter-proof: There is no comparator that results

    in a well- ordering of the real numbers. Proof withdrawn as incorrect
  11. Georg Cantor Well-ordering theorem is a fundamental law of thought.

    What should we (mathematics) do when there is something that seems like it should be true, but no one can prove?
  12. “General Well Ordering” Axiom? Is it really that obvious? Is

    it `equivalent’ to something else that is obvious?
  13. Axiom of Choice For any collection of non-empty sets, there

    is a choice function that picks exactly one element from each set.
  14. Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) To choose one sock from each of

    infinitely many pairs of socks requires the Axiom of Choice, but for shoes the Axiom is not needed.
  15. For every set S, there is some ordering on that

    makes well-ordered. For any collection of non-empty sets, there is a choice function that picks one element from each set. implies Well-Ordered Theorem Axiom of Choice
  16. For every set S, there is some ordering on that

    makes well-ordered. For any collection of non-empty sets, there is a choice function that picks one element from each set. Well-Ordered Theorem Axiom of Choice implies
  17. Axiom of Choice: Still Controversial… General Well Ordering Theorem on

    “larger sets”… Banach-Tasrski Paradox Well Ordering Principle (as stated) not controversial
  18. Betable Numbers A number is betable if it can be

    produced using some combination of $2 and $5 chips.
  19. Betable Numbers A number is betable if it can be

    produced using some combination of $2 and $5 chips. Are all integers greater than $3 betable?
  20. Betable Numbers A number is betable if it can be

    produced using some combination of $2 and $5 chips. Are all integers greater than $3 betable?
  21. Proof: Using Well-Ordering Principle A number is betable if it

    can be produced using some combination of $2 and $5 chips. All integers > 3 are betable.
  22. Charge • If you need to enroll in the class,

    bring us a course action form to sign (now, or later) • Due Friday (6:29pm): PS1 • Read MCS Ch 2, 3 (at least through 3.5) before Thursday’s class