SHARE Update for CASRAI, November 2014

As presented by Judy Ruttenberg and Eric Celeste to CASRAI Canada ReConnect14, November 2014.

Transcript

1. SHARE UPDATE CASRAI Canada ReConnect14 19 November 2014 Judy Ruttenberg, Association of Research Libraries Eric Celeste, SHARE Technical Director
2. WHO & WHAT IS SHARE? A higher education and research community initiative to ensure the widest possible preservation of, access to, and reuse of research outputs
3. WHO & WHAT IS SHARE? Interlocking components that leverage the existing research ecosystem to better understand what research is being produced, and to render that research as accessible as possible. No#fica#on  Service  and  Registry   Discovery   Mining  and  Reuse  Services  
4. WHO & WHAT IS SHARE? Advisory Board Director, small operations group Repository, Workflow, Technical, and Communications Working Groups
5. FUNDING $1,000,000 to develop Notification Service and long term SHARE vision March, 2014 through September, 2015
6. MISSION “Research universities are long-lived and are mission-driven to generate, make accessible, and preserve over time new knowledge and understanding. “ SHared Access Research Ecosystem, June 7, 2013 “The best way to predict the future is to invent it.” Alan Kay
7. INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT US federal agencies join growing international trend to require public access to funded research Measurable proliferation of institutional and disciplinary repositories Premium on impact and visibility in HE
8. RESEARCH CONTEXT o  “Scholarly outcomes are contextualized by materials generated in the process and aftermath of scholarly inquiry. o  The research process generates materials covering methods employed, evidence used, and formative discussion. o  The research aftermath generates materials covering discussion, revision, and reuse of scholarly outcomes.” (Lavoie, et al, OCLC Research, 2014)
9. RESEARCH CONTEXT o  “Scholarly outcomes are contextualized by materials generated in the process and aftermath of scholarly inquiry. o  The research process generates materials covering methods employed, evidence used, and formative discussion. o  The research aftermath generates materials covering discussion, revision, and reuse of scholarly outcomes.” (Lavoie, et al, OCLC Research, 2014)
10. RESEARCH CONTEXT o  “Scholarly outcomes are contextualized by materials generated in the process and aftermath of scholarly inquiry. o  The research process generates materials covering methods employed, evidence used, and formative discussion. o  The research aftermath generates materials covering discussion, revision, and reuse of scholarly outcomes.” (Lavoie, et al, OCLC Research, 2014)
11. RESEARCH LIBRARIES collaboration among institutions shift from collections as products to collections as components of the academy’s knowledge resources. library is supporting and embedded within the processes of scholarship.
12. CHALLENGES Infrastructure Workflow Policy
13. CHALLENGES Infrastructure Workflow Policy Varied  repository   pla.orms/capaci2es   Standards  and  Protocols   Iden2fiers       Public  access   Open  access   Copyright   Data   management   &  sharing       Mul2ple  siloed   systems  =   Administra2ve   burden  
14. SOLUTIONS Good stewardship Infrastructure Workflow Policy SoDware  (No2fica2on   Service  and  other   components)   Open  data  and  APIs   Encouraging  standards       Best   prac2ces  re:   ins2tu2onal   policies     New  services  to   op2mize   communica2on;   support   research   lifecycle  
15. STATEMENTS OF SUPPORT 15  
16. IMMEDIATE PROBLEM SPACE Knowing who is producing what, and under whose auspices, is critical to a wide range of stakeholders—funders, sponsored research offices, government agencies, tenure and promotion committees, repository managers, and the research community.
17. RESEARCH RELEASE EVENTS Data Sets Articles Preprints
18. CONSUMERS OF RESEARCH RELEASE EVENTS Funders Campus Repositories Sponsored Research Offices
20. SHARE Notification Service
21. CENTER FOR OPEN SCIENCE “We foster openness, integrity, and reproducibility of scientific research” centerforopenscience.org & osf.io
22. THE TEAM AT COS
23. SHARE Notification Service
31. STATUS AT END OF SUMMER Planned for 3 platforms, 5 institutions, 2 agencies, and 5 publishers, 50 research release events, including papers and data. COS harvesting data from Clinical Trials, DOE’s SciTech and Pages, PLoS, UC eScholarship, Wayne State Digital Commons, VTechWorks, NLM PubMedCentral, CrossRef, arXiv, and DataONE. Experimental RSS feed to see output.
32. RESEARCH RELEASE EVENT REPORTS Only a dozen sources Over 40,000 reports
33. PROTOTYPE PLANS Plans for prototype expansion include: 10 more campus sites from DuraSpace and bepress; More data, perhaps Data Management Plans; At least one more agency; 150 more research release events.
34. NEXT STEPS Push protocol Creation of a “push API” to make participation simpler for some sources. Consumption of notifications Provide subscription methods Recruit trial subscribers Public release Early 2015 beta release Fall 2015 first full release
35. SOME EARLY LESSONS Clarity about intent to share. Some sites not sure about their right to, for example, share abstracts. Encourage collection of vital metadata. Most of our sources do not even collect email addresses of authors, much less universal identifiers such as ORCID or ISNI. Most sources make no effort to collect funding information or grant award numbers. This data needs to be collected and distributed to make effective notifications. Importance of the SHARE Registry. Some consumers will want the enhanced records it will provide.
36. GET https://frogworld. com/api/frogs Request Response [ { name: Kermit, color: green, type: felt }, { name: Travis, color: green, type: tree } ]
37. POST https://osf.io/api/share Request Response { title: Easy Being Green?, contributors: [ Kermit, Travis ], source: frogworld, id: 10.100/frogworld.102 } Success
38. Resource 1 Resource 2 { title: Easy Being Green?, contributors: [ Kermit, Travis ], source: frogworld, id: 10.100/frogworld.102 } { title: Easy Being Green?, contributors: [ Kermit, Travis ], origin: frogworld, id: 10.100/frogworld.102, description: Exploring greenness. }
39. Resource 1 Resource 2 { title: Easy Being Green?, contributors: [ Kermit, Travis ], source: frogworld, id: 10.100/frogworld.102 } { name: Easy Being Green?, contributors: [ Frog Scientists Intl, Amphibians United, ], origin: frogworld, doi: 10.100/frogworld.102 }
40. Resource 1 Resource 2 { title: Easy Being Green?, contributors: [ Kermit, Travis ], source: frogworld, id: 10.100/frogworld.102 } { title: Easy Being Green?, contributors: [ No Contributors ], source: frogworld, id: 10.100/frogworld.102 }
41. VARIETY VS. AVAILABILITY •  We accept that we will have a variety of providers with a variety of expressions. •  But we need some key identifiers to be available in order to create effective notifications.
42. PRIORITY 1: INCLUSION •  Researcher identifiers such as ORCID, ISNI, and so on. •  Funding identifier such as FundRef. •  Grant award identifiers. •  Further metadata elements encouraged by CASRAI and others.
43. PRIORITY 2: CONSISTENCY •  We can manage the variety. …however… •  Consistency reduces errors. •  Consistency simplifies preparing for new providers. •  Consistency will be required for push reporting.
44. SHARE Notification Service SHARE Registry SHARE Discovery For Systems via Protocol & API For People timely, structured, comprehensive organized and related source of linked data searchable and friendly
45. SHARE Notification Service SHARE Registry SHARE Discovery For Systems via Protocol & API For People
46. CHALLENGES •  Adoption of key identifiers just getting underway, requires international collaboration, •  Inferences prone to error, •  Duplicate detection difficult, •  Scale quite large, not well understood, •  This is a never-ending task requiring sustainable funding and governance.
47. BENEFITS •  Researchers can keep everyone informed by keeping anyone informed, •  Institutions can assemble more comprehensive record of impact, •  Open access advocates can hold publishers accountable for promises, •  Other systems can count on consistency of metadata from SHARE.
48. HOW CASRAI HELPS Dictionaries and identifiers •  Participants, CASRAI ID •  Activity Info, Activity ID •  Funding Requests, Funding Source ID •  Outputs, what is research? International Interoperability •  COAR blueprint
49. LOOKING FORWARD Business planning: agile governance and institutional sustainability Strengthening international partnerships Workflow pilots and prototypes with several institutions
50. LOOKING FORWARD Identifiers and platforms for new, hybrid, and more granular forms of research output Contributor roles & other research administration data Higher education policies on non- exclusive copyrights
51. CONTACT US www.arl.org/share www.facebook.com/SHARE.research www.twitter.com/share_research share@arl.org