Kubernetes Intro & Update

From the Kubernetes Meetup #3, 9/30/2015, hosted at Dell in Santa Clara.

Transcript

1. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Kubernetes: Intro & Update Kubernetes Meetup 9/30/2015 Tim Hockin <thockin@google.com> Senior Staff Software Engineer @thockin
2. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Google has been developing and using containers to manage our applications for over 10 years. Images by Connie Zhou
3. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Everything at Google runs in containers: • Gmail, Web Search, Maps, ... • MapReduce, batch, ... • GFS, Colossus, ... • Even Google’s Cloud Platform: VMs run in containers!
4. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Everything at Google runs in containers: • Gmail, Web Search, Maps, ... • MapReduce, batch, ... • GFS, Colossus, ... • Even Google’s Cloud Platform: VMs run in containers! We launch over 2 billion containers per week
5. Google confidential │ Do not distribute But it’s all so different! • Deployment • Management, monitoring • Isolation (very complicated!) • Updates • Discovery • Scaling, replication, sets A fundamentally different way of managing applications requires different tooling and abstractions Images by Connie Zhou
6. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Kubernetes Greek for “Helmsman”; also the root of the word “Governor” and “cybernetic” • Container orchestrator • Runs and manages containers • Supports multiple cloud and bare-metal environments • Inspired and informed by Google’s experiences and internal systems • 100% Open source, written in Go Manage applications, not machines
7. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Pets vs. Cattle
8. Google confidential │ Do not distribute kubelet UI kubelet CLI API users master nodes The 10000 foot view apiserver kubelet scheduler controllers
9. Google confidential │ Do not distribute UI All you really care about API Container Cluster
10. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Container clusters: A story in two parts
11. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Container clusters: A story in two parts 1. Setting up the cluster • Choose a cloud: GCE, AWS, Azure, Rackspace, on-premises, ... • Choose a node OS: CoreOS, Atomic, RHEL, Debian, CentOS, Ubuntu, ... • Provision machines: Boot VMs, install and run kube components, ... • Configure networking: IP ranges for Pods, Services, SDN, ... • Start cluster services: DNS, logging, monitoring, ... • Manage nodes: kernel upgrades, OS updates, hardware failures... Not the easy or fun part, but unavoidable This is where things like Google Container Engine (GKE) really help
12. Google confidential │ Do not distribute 2. Using the cluster • Run Pods & Containers • Replication controllers • Services • Volumes This is the fun part! A distinct set of problems from cluster setup and management Don’t make developers deal with cluster administration! Accelerate development by focusing on the applications, not the cluster Container clusters: A story in two parts
13. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Networking
14. Google confidential │ Do not distribute 10.1.1.0/24 172.16.1.1 172.16.1.2 Docker networking 10.1.2.0/24 172.16.1.1 10.1.3.0/24 172.16.1.1
15. Google confidential │ Do not distribute 10.1.1.0/24 172.16.1.1 172.16.1.2 Docker networking 10.1.2.0/24 172.16.1.1 10.1.3.0/24 172.16.1.1 NAT NAT NAT NAT NAT
16. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Kubernetes networking IPs are routable • vs docker default private IP Pods can reach each other without NAT • even across nodes No brokering of port numbers • too complex, why bother? This is a fundamental requirement • can be L3 routed • can be underlayed (cloud) • can be overlayed (SDN)
17. Google confidential │ Do not distribute 10.1.1.0/24 172.16.1.1 172.16.1.2 Kubernetes networking 10.1.2.0/24 172.16.1.1 10.1.3.0/24 172.16.1.1
18. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Pods
19. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Pods Small group of containers & volumes Tightly coupled The atom of scheduling & placement in Kubernetes Shared namespace • share IP address & localhost • share IPC Mortal • can die, cannot be reborn Example: data puller & web server Consumers Content Manager File Puller Web Server Volume Pod
20. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Volumes Very similar to Docker’s concept Pod scoped storage Share the pod’s lifetime & fate Support many types of volume plugins • Empty dir (and tmpfs) • Host path • Git repository • GCE Persistent Disk • AWS Elastic Block Store • iSCSI • NFS • GlusterFS • Ceph File and RBD • Cinder • Secret • ...
21. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Labels & Selectors
22. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Arbitrary metadata Attached to any API object Generally represent identity Queryable by selectors • think SQL ‘select ... where ...’ The only grouping mechanism • pods under a ReplicationController • pods in a Service • capabilities of a node (constraints) Labels
23. Google confidential │ Do not distribute App: MyApp Phase: prod Role: FE App: MyApp Phase: test Role: FE App: MyApp Phase: prod Role: BE App: MyApp Phase: test Role: BE Selectors
24. Google confidential │ Do not distribute App: MyApp Phase: prod Role: FE App: MyApp Phase: test Role: FE App: MyApp Phase: prod Role: BE App: MyApp Phase: test Role: BE App = MyApp Selectors
25. Google confidential │ Do not distribute App: MyApp Phase: prod Role: FE App: MyApp Phase: test Role: FE App: MyApp Phase: prod Role: BE App: MyApp Phase: test Role: BE App = MyApp, Role = FE Selectors
26. Google confidential │ Do not distribute App: MyApp Phase: prod Role: FE App: MyApp Phase: test Role: FE App: MyApp Phase: prod Role: BE App: MyApp Phase: test Role: BE App = MyApp, Role = BE Selectors
27. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Selectors App: MyApp Phase: prod Role: FE App: MyApp Phase: test Role: FE App: MyApp Phase: prod Role: BE App: MyApp Phase: test Role: BE App = MyApp, Phase = prod
28. Google confidential │ Do not distribute App: MyApp Phase: prod Role: FE App: MyApp Phase: test Role: FE App: MyApp Phase: prod Role: BE App: MyApp Phase: test Role: BE App = MyApp, Phase = test Selectors
29. Google confidential │ Do not distribute ReplicationControllers
30. Google confidential │ Do not distribute ReplicationControllers An example of control loops Runs out-of-process wrt API server Have 1 job: ensure N copies of a pod • if too few, start new ones • if too many, kill some • grouped by a selector Cleanly layered on top of the core • all access is by public APIs Replicated pods are fungible • No implied order or identity ReplicationController - name = “my-rc” - selector = {“App”: “MyApp”} - podTemplate = { ... } - replicas = 4 API Server How many? 3 Start 1 more OK How many? 4
31. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Services
32. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Services A group of pods that work together • grouped by a selector Defines access policy • “load balanced” or “headless” Gets a stable virtual IP and port • sometimes called the service portal • also a DNS name VIP is managed by kube-proxy • watches all services • updates iptables when backends change Hides complexity - ideal for non-native apps Virtual IP Client
33. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Secrets
34. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Secrets Problem: how to grant a pod access to a secured something? • don’t put secrets in the container image! 12-factor says: config comes from the environment • Kubernetes is the environment Manage secrets via the Kubernetes API Inject them as “virtual volumes” into Pods • late-binding • tmpfs - never touches disk node Pod Secret API
35. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Rolling updates
36. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Rolling Updates ReplicationController - replicas: 3 - selector: - app: MyApp - version: v1 Service - app: MyApp
37. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Rolling Updates ReplicationController - replicas: 3 - selector: - app: MyApp - version: v1 ReplicationController - replicas: 0 - selector: - app: MyApp - version: v2 Service - app: MyApp
38. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Rolling Updates ReplicationController - replicas: 3 - selector: - app: MyApp - version: v1 ReplicationController - replicas: 1 - selector: - app: MyApp - version: v2 Service - app: MyApp
39. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Rolling Updates ReplicationController - replicas: 2 - selector: - app: MyApp - version: v1 ReplicationController - replicas: 1 - selector: - app: MyApp - version: v2 Service - app: MyApp
40. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Rolling Updates ReplicationController - replicas: 2 - selector: - app: MyApp - version: v1 ReplicationController - replicas: 2 - selector: - app: MyApp - version: v2 Service - app: MyApp
41. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Rolling Updates ReplicationController - replicas: 1 - selector: - app: MyApp - version: v1 ReplicationController - replicas: 2 - selector: - app: MyApp - version: v2 Service - app: MyApp
42. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Rolling Updates ReplicationController - replicas: 1 - selector: - app: MyApp - version: v1 ReplicationController - replicas: 3 - selector: - app: MyApp - version: v2 Service - app: MyApp
43. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Rolling Updates ReplicationController - replicas: 0 - selector: - app: MyApp - version: v1 ReplicationController - replicas: 3 - selector: - app: MyApp - version: v2 Service - app: MyApp
44. Google confidential │ Do not distribute DaemonSets
45. Google confidential │ Do not distribute DaemonSets Problem: how to run a Pod on every node • or a subset of nodes Similar to ReplicationController • principle: do one thing, don’t overload “Which nodes?” is a selector Use familiar tools and patterns Status: EXPERIMENTAL in Kubernetes v1.1
46. Google confidential │ Do not distribute PersistentVolumes
47. Google confidential │ Do not distribute PersistentVolumes A higher-level abstraction • insulation from any one cloud environment Admin provisions them, users claim them Independent lifetime and fate Can be handed-off between pods and lives until user is done with it Dynamically “scheduled” and managed, like nodes and pods
48. Google confidential │ Do not distribute PersistentVolumes Cluster Admin
49. Google confidential │ Do not distribute PersistentVolumes Provision Cluster Admin PersistentVolumes
50. Google confidential │ Do not distribute PersistentVolumes Cluster Admin User PersistentVolumes
51. Google confidential │ Do not distribute PersistentVolumes Cluster Admin User PersistentVolumes PVClaim Create
52. Google confidential │ Do not distribute PersistentVolumes Cluster Admin User PersistentVolumes PVClaim Binder
53. Google confidential │ Do not distribute PersistentVolumes Cluster Admin User PersistentVolumes PVClaim Pod Create
54. Google confidential │ Do not distribute PersistentVolumes Cluster Admin User PersistentVolumes PVClaim Pod *
55. Google confidential │ Do not distribute PersistentVolumes Cluster Admin User PersistentVolumes PVClaim Pod Delete *
56. Google confidential │ Do not distribute PersistentVolumes Cluster Admin User PersistentVolumes PVClaim *
57. Google confidential │ Do not distribute PersistentVolumes Cluster Admin User PersistentVolumes PVClaim Pod Create *
58. Google confidential │ Do not distribute PersistentVolumes Cluster Admin User PersistentVolumes PVClaim Pod *
59. Google confidential │ Do not distribute PersistentVolumes Cluster Admin User PersistentVolumes PVClaim Pod Delete *
60. Google confidential │ Do not distribute PersistentVolumes Cluster Admin User PersistentVolumes PVClaim Delete *
61. Google confidential │ Do not distribute PersistentVolumes Cluster Admin User PersistentVolumes Recycler
62. Google confidential │ Do not distribute New or coming soon • Cluster auto-scaling • Jobs (run-to-completion) • Cron • Privileged containers • Graceful termination • Downward API • Simpler deployments • Interactive containers • Network plugins: CNI • Performance++ • Scalability++ (250 in v1.1) • High availability masters • Scheduling • Cluster federation • Easier setup • More volumes • Private registry • L7 load-balancing
63. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Kubernetes status & plans Open sourced in June, 2014 v1.0 in July, 2015 Google Container Engine (GKE) • hosted Kubernetes - don’t think about cluster setup • GA in August, 2015 PaaSes: • RedHat OpenShift, Deis, Stratos Distros: • CoreOS Tectonic, Mirantis Murano (OpenStack), RedHat Atomic, Mesos Driving towards a 1.1 release in O(weeks) • targeting a 3-4 month cadence
64. Google confidential │ Do not distribute The Goal: Shake things up Containers are a new way of working Requires new concepts and new tools Google has a lot of experience... ...but we are listening to the users Workload portability is important!
65. Google confidential │ Do not distribute Kubernetes is Open - open community - open design - open source - open to ideas http://kubernetes.io https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes slack: kubernetes twitter: @kubernetesio
66. Google confidential │ Do not distribute FIN