Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Rob Walling - The Trade-Offs Of Bootstrapping vs. Raising Funding (Turing Fest 2022)

Rob Walling - The Trade-Offs Of Bootstrapping vs. Raising Funding (Turing Fest 2022)

The typical startup narrative includes a garage, a brilliant idea, and boatloads of venture capital. But with the shrinking costs of starting up, bootstrapping is as viable as it's ever been. Add to that the rise of "Indie Funding" - angels and smaller funds that are willing to invest in companies without the expectation of billion-dollar exits - and founders and their teams have a lot of options to weigh as they grow their company. There are many trade-offs between these approaches, and there is no "best" path to travel. This talk explores the trade-offs that not just founders, but also management and employees should expect when they choose to work in a bootstrapped vs. a funded company.

Head to www.turingfest.com to learn more about Europe's best cross-functional tech conference.

Turing Fest

August 15, 2022
Tweet

More Decks by Turing Fest

Other Decks in Business

Transcript

  1. Venture Funding ๏ Institutional money ๏ General partners ๏ Goal

    is 3x+ return over 10 years ๏ “Power law” needs unicorns or decacorns
  2. Indie Funding ๏ Works with “base hit” outcomes ๏ Usually

    supports long-term, pro fi table companies ๏ Mix of personal and institutional money ๏ F&F, some angels, Indie.vc, TinySeed, Upekkha, etc ๏ Higher success rate, but smaller successes
  3. “It's all things we would've done but would have had

    to hold off until later. For us, it was compliance (SOC 2 Type 2 and HIPAA) so we can start closing bigger deals. Also infrastructure for scaling and compliance.” Ruben Gamez SignWell
  4. ”Money allows you to hire more senior roles than you

    could afford as a bootstrapper. Especially when it comes to sales and development, senior folks are always more effective than their junior counterparts. Funding has allowed us to ‘live in the future’ in this respect.” Craig Hewitt Castos
  5. Pros ๏ Simple ๏ Maintain full control ๏ Don’t need

    permission ๏ Can run a company for decades and take pro fi ts
  6. Cons ๏ “Hard mode” ๏ Move slower ๏ Lack of

    mentorship & network ๏ Dif fi cult/impossible to start certain types of businesses (Amazon, Uber, Google, Facebook, Stripe)
  7. “I've always wanted to stay bootstrapped and grow as much

    as possible organically but a lot of people right now are telling me that it would be unwise not to take the money.” Ilya Semin Datanyze
  8. “Talk me out of it, Rob” ๏ Board seats? ๏

    Control of the company? ๏ Pressure to hire? ๏ Pressure to grow faster?
  9. “Why I did it” ๏ Good terms ๏ Credibility. We

    were selling six- fi gure, multi-year contracts and being bootstrapped hurt us. ๏ Hiring became easier. ๏ Extra capital gave us breathing room to experiment with go to market strategies.
  10. Pros ๏ Move fast ๏ Can hire senior people early

    ๏ Don’t waste mental cycles on small expenses ๏ Instant network + advice ๏ Market credibility
  11. Cons ๏ Often kills “good” businesses because you must aim

    for unicorn outcomes ๏ Growth at all costs (T2D3) ๏ Foolish spending / “Thrashing” ๏ Lots of time fundraising ๏ (Sometimes) loss of control ๏ Boards (and board meetings)
  12. Pros ๏ Lower growth expectations than VC ๏ Maintain optionality

    (buys you time to fi gure out if you’re going to be a base hit or unicorn) ๏ Advice, mentorship, and (sometimes) community
  13. Cons ๏ Lower valuations than VC ๏ Only supports certain

    ideas (probably not Uber or Facebook) ๏ Some terms are unproven/complex ๏ Not as many funding options as venture