Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

High resolution in space and time

High resolution in space and time

Olaf Wucknitz
LOFAR Transients Key Project Meeting, Meudon, December 2011

transientskp

June 23, 2012
Tweet

More Decks by transientskp

Other Decks in Science

Transcript

  1. High resolution in space and time • International LOFAR •

    High resolution in space • The Crab • Pulsar scattering • Jupiter • High resolution in time • Some technical issues titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 1
  2. High resolution in space: 3C196 at 30–80 MHz NL only,

    35 ×22 beam NL+DE, 1. 5×0. 9 beam titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 3
  3. Sub-arcsec: HBA Images of 3C196 international Dutch resolution: 0. 35

    11 titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 4
  4. Current project: 3C123 (HBA) NL only [ Olaf Wucknitz ]

    international [ Adam Deller ] titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 6
  5. Reminder: first long-baseline observations of the Crab • 12 h

    on 13/14 Feb 2011 L2011 23410 • 115–160 MHz • international stations: DE601, DE603, FR606 • NL stations: CS032, RS106,205,208,306,307,406,503 • problems DE601 failed 50 % of subbands bad in blocks of 30/31 significant ionospheric delays, differential Faraday rotation titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 7
  6. Image of the pulsar (HBA) BOTH: 0534+220 IPOL 123.828 MHZ

    23410.ICL001.1 PLot file version 1 created 26-JUN-2011 20:14:37 Grey scale flux range= -0.018 8.566 JY/BEAM Cont peak flux = 8.5657E+00 JY/BEAM Levs = 8.566E-03 * (-2, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024) 0 2 4 6 8 DECLINATION (J2000) RIGHT ASCENSION (J2000) 05 34 32.4 32.3 32.2 32.1 32.0 31.9 31.8 31.7 31.6 22 00 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 8
  7. Crab with VLA at 5 GHz [ Bietenholz (2004) ]

    titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 10
  8. Direct comparison LOFAR (red) and 5 GHz VLA (green) titlepage

    introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 11
  9. Direct comparison (smoothed) LOFAR (red) and 5 GHz VLA (green)

    titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 14
  10. Faraday dispersion function from Q and U (30 subbands) titlepage

    introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 16
  11. Pulsar scattering: geometry DS observer θ scattering screen pulsar D

    τ = 1 2 θ2D D = DDs D −Ds ≈ D titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 18
  12. Pulsar scattering: one/three screens 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

    τ temporal profile -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 θ spatial profile -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 θ τ -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 baseline length τ 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 τ temporal profile -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 θ spatial profile -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 θ τ -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 baseline length τ titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 19
  13. Pulsar scattering: continuous medium 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

    τ temporal profile -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 θ spatial profile -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 θ τ -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 baseline length τ titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 20
  14. Jupiter: sources of decametric emission aurora Io [ Zarka (2004)

    ] titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 21
  15. Conversion to circular requires beam models • convert LOFAR X/Y

    to IAU X/Y • convert IAU X/Y to R/L • no good beam models available • own geometrical model (1.5 years old) • improved for individual station orientations titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 26
  16. Correlations at full time-resolution • Jupiter needs resolution of msec

    • same for pulsar scattering studies (or even better) • correlator output rate too low • alternative: record “raw voltages” of stations, fly’s eye correlate (multiply) later possible for couple of stations, reduced bandwidth • tried since July, many problems with data corruption • first successful test (Crab) 28 October • first successful Jupiter obs 24/25 November titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 27
  17. First full-resolution Jupiter observations • L35624, 24/25 November 2011 23:30–01:45

    UTC • 61 subbands 18–30 MHz, 256 channels/SB (763 Hz) • correlations 6 stations: DE602, FR606, RS106, RS307, SE607, UK608 1 sec integration time • fly’s eye “raw voltages” integration time 1.3 msec only 3 stations: DE602, FR606, RS106 • nice bursts, analysis in progress titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 28
  18. Last Sunday’s Jupiter observations • L37058, 11 December 2011 16:30-18:30

    UTC • 61 subbands 18–30 MHz, 64 channels/SB (3.052 kHz) • correlations 6 stations: DE602, DE604, DE605, FR606, SE607, UK608 1 sec integration time • fly’s eye “raw voltages” integration time 0.328 msec not checked yet • nice bursts, Faraday fringes titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 43
  19. Planned analysis • electron bunches moving with ∼ 20000km/s •

    cyclotron frequency: 1 MHz per 1000 km 20 MHz/s motion ca. 0. 3 over 50 ms • fringe spacing for 1000 km baseline at 20 MHz: 3 ∆φ ∼ 36◦ over 1 MHz • corresponds to delay of 100 ns ( ionosphere) • corresponds to position shift of 6 • cannot distinguish motion from delay! • need external calibration • or several emitting regions near Jupiter • serious calibration difficulty! titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 48
  20. Technical issues • how to visualise big 2d fields? (zoom

    in) • cross-correlations have phases • closure phase consistent with point-source (amplitudes?) • unusual properties for full resolution (∆ν ·∆t = 1) closure phases zero no structure from elementary cells limited S/N 1 (wave noise) but only thermal phase noise for point-source titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 49
  21. Aliens? Arecibo message from Wikipedia giant pulses from Charlotte Sobey

    titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 51
  22. Summary • long baselines work (even at 20 MHz) •

    no automatic pipeline • can correlate with full resolution (eventually!) • important for pulsar scattering and Jupiter • first successfull full-resolution Jupiter observations • good phases, but how to calibrate? • statistics different from averaged visibilities • planning correlations with LWA (New Mexico) • many technical problems on the way, strange RFI • commissioners should look at their data! titlepage introduction summary back forward −1 +1 fullscreen 52