Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Sign up for free
Menu
Search
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Pricing
Search
Sign in
Sign up for free
異常検知の評価指標って何を使えばいいの? / Metrics for one-class cl...
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Kon
October 19, 2018
Science
7.4k
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
異常検知の評価指標って何を使えばいいの? / Metrics for one-class classification
https://netadashi.connpass.com/event/100334/
Kon
October 19, 2018
More Decks by Kon
See All by Kon
Numerai はいいぞ / An encouragement of Numerai
yohrn
0
3.3k
M5 Forecasting 参加報告 / 143rd place solution of M5 Forecasting Accuracy
yohrn
1
1.5k
AutoML はお好きですか? / 8th place solution of AutoWSL 2019
yohrn
1
3.6k
3rd Place Solution of AutoSpeech 2019
yohrn
0
530
自然言語処理初心者が AutoNLP に挑戦した話 / 8th place solution of AutoNLP 2019
yohrn
0
990
AutoML パッケージの開発を円滑に進めたい / How to develop AutoML package
yohrn
1
3.7k
機械学習の再現性 / Enabling Reproducibility in Machine Learning Workshop
yohrn
9
3.1k
35th ICML における異常検知に関する論文紹介 / Deep One-Class Classification
yohrn
0
9.8k
機械学習の公平性と解釈可能性 / Fairness, Interpretability, and Explainability Federation of Workshops
yohrn
5
2.7k
Other Decks in Science
See All in Science
Toward Causal Scientific Discovery with AI
sshimizu2006
0
180
生成AIが科学とRAにもたらしていること:メタサイエンスの視点から
rmaruy
0
130
サンプル対応のない複数遺伝子発現プロファイルに対するテンソル分解型統合解析の要約
tagtag
PRO
0
250
第67回コンピュータビジョン勉強会論文紹介「RoboWheel: A Data Engine from Real-World Human Demonstrations for Cross-Embodiment Robotic Learning」
x_ttyszk
0
200
Where does the rigor go? Research software and the future of trustworthy science.
arfon
0
180
1. CPC理論の展開と集合的知能モデル(JSAI2026 KS-27 集合的予測符号化と新たな知性の時代)
hayashiyus884
1
360
Leitner Inauguration Lecture Chalmers University of Technology
xleitix
0
350
Non-Gaussian, nonlinear causal discovery with hidden variables and application
sshimizu2006
0
180
Bリーグのショットデータを活用した得点期待値モデルの構築 / Construction of expected points model using shot data of B.LEAGUE
konakalab
0
210
機械学習 - ニューラルネットワーク入門
trycycle
PRO
0
1.2k
機械学習 - DBSCAN
trycycle
PRO
0
2.1k
[第67回 CV勉強会@関東] CV × Scientific Figures / kantoCV 67th CVPR 2026
lychee1223
0
200
Featured
See All Featured
B2B Lead Gen: Tactics, Traps & Triumph
marketingsoph
0
240
Stop Working from a Prison Cell
hatefulcrawdad
274
21k
4 Signs Your Business is Dying
shpigford
187
23k
Thoughts on Productivity
jonyablonski
76
5.4k
Color Theory Basics | Prateek | Gurzu
gurzu
0
460
Fantastic passwords and where to find them - at NoRuKo
philnash
52
3.8k
Ten Tips & Tricks for a 🌱 transition
stuffmc
0
230
The SEO identity crisis: Don't let AI make you average
varn
0
560
Git: the NoSQL Database
bkeepers
PRO
432
67k
Information Architects: The Missing Link in Design Systems
soysaucechin
1
1.1k
Mozcon NYC 2025: Stop Losing SEO Traffic
samtorres
1
530
SEO in 2025: How to Prepare for the Future of Search
ipullrank
3
3.8k
Transcript
Netadashi Meetup #7 Oct 19, 2018 異常検知の評価指標って何を使えばいいの?
Yu Ohori (a.k.a. Kon) NS Solutions Corporation (Apr 2017 -
) • Researcher • Data Science & Infrastructure Technologies • System Research & Development Center • Technology Bureau @Y_oHr_N @Y-oHr-N #SemiSupervisedLearning #AnomalyDetection #DataOps
学習を終えたらモデルの性能を評価しなければならない Chapman, P., et al., "CRISP-DM 1.0 Step-by-step data mining
guides," 2000. 3
不均衡データの場合,評価指標に F 値を使う事が多い 適合率(precision)と 再現率(recall)の調和平均で表される評価指標 実ラベル Y 混同行列 (confusion matrix)
正常 pos: +1 異常 neg: -1 予測ラベル f(X) 正常 pos: +1 true positive (tp) false positive (fp) 異常 neg: -1 false negative (fn) true negative (tn) 4
新規性検知の評価指標は F 値を使えばいいの? 新規性検知の場合,異常標本を一つも入手できない事がある このとき,F 値(正確に言うと適合率)は算出できない いいえ 5
F 値に似た Lee-Liu metric と呼ばれる評価指標がある 適合率と再現率の幾何平均の二乗の定数倍で表される 評価指標 実ラベル Y 混同行列
(confusion matrix) 正常 pos: +1 異常 neg: -1 予測ラベル f(X) 正常 pos: +1 true positive (tp) false positive (fp) 異常 neg: -1 false negative (fn) true negative (tn) Lee, W. S, and Liu, B., "Learning with positive and unlabeled examples using weighted Logistic Regression," In Proceedings of ICML, pp. 448-455, 2003. 6
新規性検知の評価指標は Lee-Liu metric を使えばいいの? ベイズの定理より式変形することで適合率が消える したがって,明示的に適合率を求めることなく算出できる https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/192530/metrics-for-one-class-classification はい 7