Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Interfaces in Perl5 at The Perl Conference 2019...
Search
Sponsored
·
Ship Features Fearlessly
Turn features on and off without deploys. Used by thousands of Ruby developers.
→
Kenta Kobayashi
June 17, 2019
Technology
3.3k
0
Share
Interfaces in Perl5 at The Perl Conference 2019 in Pittsburgh
Kenta Kobayashi
June 17, 2019
More Decks by Kenta Kobayashi
See All by Kenta Kobayashi
Perlの生きのこり - YAPC::Fukuoka 2025
kfly8
0
2k
プロジェクトの空気を読んで開発してくれるPerlのAIツールがほしい
kfly8
2
860
Perlの生きのこり - エンジニアがこの先生きのこるためのカンファレンス2025
kfly8
4
3.1k
Tシャツに書かれたコードを読む
kfly8
0
1.5k
Introduce Sub::Meta
kfly8
0
99
研修はイベントでなくコミュニティ作り
kfly8
0
2.3k
明日からできる新人のオンボーディングガイド
kfly8
0
890
メンター成長のためのふりかえり会
kfly8
0
1.4k
経験から効率よく学習する
kfly8
0
480
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
Modernizing Your HCL Connections Experience: Visual Report to chain, Profile Enhancements, and AI Integration
wannesrams
0
300
Agent の「自由」と「安全」〜未来に向けて今できること〜
katayan
0
350
セキュリティ対策、何からはじめる? CloudNative環境の脅威モデリングと リスク評価実践入門 #cloudnativekaigi
varu3
2
600
SLI/SLO、「完全に理解した」から「チョットデキル」へ
maruloop
1
160
AI時代に越境し、 組織を変えるQAスキルの正体 / QA Skills for Transforming an Organization
mii3king
5
4.2k
AI飲み会幹事エージェントを作っただけなのに
ykimi
0
120
React 19×Rustツール 進化の「ズレ」を設計で埋める
remrem0090
1
110
AIの揺らぎに“コシ”を与える階層化品質設計
ickx
0
270
The 7 pitfalls of AI
ufried
0
200
20260513_生成AIを専属DSに_AI分析結果の検品テクニック_ハンズオン_交通事故データ
doradora09
PRO
0
210
20260507-ACL-seminar
satoshi5884
0
110
エンタープライズの厳格な制約を開発者に意識させない:クラウドネイティブ開発基盤設計/cloudnative-kaigi-golden-path
mhrtech
0
380
Featured
See All Featured
Avoiding the “Bad Training, Faster” Trap in the Age of AI
tmiket
0
140
How to Create Impact in a Changing Tech Landscape [PerfNow 2023]
tammyeverts
55
3.3k
SEO for Brand Visibility & Recognition
aleyda
0
4.5k
No one is an island. Learnings from fostering a developers community.
thoeni
21
3.7k
Highjacked: Video Game Concept Design
rkendrick25
PRO
1
350
Odyssey Design
rkendrick25
PRO
2
610
Measuring & Analyzing Core Web Vitals
bluesmoon
9
820
How to Build an AI Search Optimization Roadmap - Criteria and Steps to Take #SEOIRL
aleyda
1
2k
Pawsitive SEO: Lessons from My Dog (and Many Mistakes) on Thriving as a Consultant in the Age of AI
davidcarrasco
0
130
The SEO identity crisis: Don't let AI make you average
varn
0
460
[Rails World 2023 - Day 1 Closing Keynote] - The Magic of Rails
eileencodes
38
2.8k
Testing 201, or: Great Expectations
jmmastey
46
8.1k
Transcript
Interfaces in Perl5 kobaken a.k.a @kfly8 The Perl Conference 2019
#TPCiP
me • kobaken a.k.a @kfly8 • leader Gotanda.pm • orgnize
YAPC::Tokyo 2019
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
I ❤ Perl
Interfaces in Perl5
DBI
my $dbh = DBI->connect(...); my $items = $dbh->selectrow_arrayref(…);
Unified Interface independent of datastore
Unified Interface provides values
Limitation makes value
Agenda 1.DEMO & Features 2.Goal 3.Example: TODO app 4.Internal 5.Performance
Function::Interface is Java-like interface
DEMO
Features of Function::Interface 1.Typed interface definition 2.Check at compile time
What is Goal ?
To maintain large Perl apps
Interface is good for large apps
1. Be easier to fix implementation
2. Stable dependencies
Goal • To maintain large apps. • Interface is good
for large apps 1. Easy to fix implementation 2. Stable Dependencies
Example: TODO app
Case: “Inheritance”
package TodoRepository; use parent qw(DBI); sub new { my $class
= shift; $class->connect(…); }
package TodoRepository; … sub select { my ($self, $user_id)
= @_; $self->selectall_arrayref( ‘SELECT * FROM todos WHERE user_id = ?’, $user_id ); }
package TodoApp; use TodoRepository; my $repo = TodoRepository->new;
package TodoApp; use TodoRepository; my $repo = TodoRepository->new(…); sub my_todo_list
{ my $self = shift; my $todos = $repo->select($self->user_id); return $self->render($todos); }
TodoApp TodoRepository DBI TODO table
TodoApp TodoRepository DBI TODO table
TodoApp TodoRepository DBI TODO table Unstable Dependencies
package TodoApp; use TodoRepository; my $repo = TodoRepository->new; sub evil_method
{ $repo->do(“ANY QUERY!!!!”); }
package TodoApp; use TodoRepository; my $repo = TodoRepository->new; sub evil_method
{ $repo->do(“ANY QUERY!!!!”); } Too many features
easy to test?
my $mock = mock TodoRepository => ( select => sub
{ … } ); my $app = TodoApp->new; test $app->my_todo_list;
my $mock = mock TodoRepository => ( select => sub
{ … } ); my $app = TodoApp->new; test $app->my_todo_list; messy to test
Problems of “Inheritance” case 1.Unstable dependencies 2.Too many features 3.messy
to test
“Role” case
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Moo::Role; requires qw(select);
package TodoRepository; use Moo; with qw( TodoRepositoryInterface ); has dbh
=> ( isa => ‘DBI::db’ );
package TodoRepository; use Moo; with qw( TodoRepositoryInterface ); has dbh
=> ( isa => ‘DBI::db’ );
package TodoRepository; … sub select { my ($self, $user_id) =
@_; $self->dbh->selectall_arrayref( ‘SELECT * FROM todos WHERE user_id = ?’, $user_id ); }
package TodoApp; use Moo; has todo_repo => ( is =>
‘ro’, does => ‘TodoRepositoryInterface’ );
package TodoApp; … sub my_todo_list { my $self = shift;
my $repo = $self->todo_repo; my $todos = $repo->select($self->user_id); return $self->render($todos); }
TodoApp TodoRepository DBI TODO table TodoRepositoryInterface
TodoApp TodoRepository DBI TODO table TodoRepositoryInterface NOT!
TodoApp TodoRepository DBI TODO table TodoRepositoryInterface more stable
Problems of “Inheritance” case 1.Unstable dependencies 2.Too many features 3.messy
to test
package TodoApp; use Moo; has todo_repo => ( is =>
‘ro’, does => ‘TodoRepositoryInterface’ ); sub evil_method { $todo_repo->do(“ANY QUERY!!!!”); }
package TodoApp; use Moo; has todo_repo => ( is =>
‘ro’, does => ‘TodoRepositoryInterface’ ); sub evil_method { $todo_repo->do(“ANY QUERY!!!!”); }
package TodoApp; use Moo; has todo_repo => ( is =>
‘ro’, does => ‘TodoRepositoryInterface’ ); sub evil_method { $todo_repo->do(“ANY QUERY!!!!”); } Necessary and sufficient features
Problems of “Inheritance” case 1.Unstable dependencies 2.Too many features 3.messy
to test
easy to test?
package TestTodoRepository; use Moo; with qw( TodoRepositoryInterface ); sub select
{ … }
package TestTodoRepository; use Moo; with qw( TodoRepositoryInterface ); sub select
{ … } Be easier to test
Problems of “Inheritance” case 1.Unstable dependencies 2.Too many features 3.messy
to test
no problem at all?
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Moo::Role; requires qw(select); sub surprised_method { ..
do anything }
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Moo::Role; requires qw(select); sub surprised_method { ..
do anything } Implementation reusable
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Moo::Role; requires qw(select);
select($id) ? select(id => $id) ? select({ id => $id
}) ?
select($id) # => arrayref of Todo ? # => iterator
of Todo ?
select($id) # => arrayref of Todo ? # => iterator
of Todo ? Ambiguous interface input / output
Problems of “Role” case 1.Implementation reusable 2.Ambiguous interface input /
output
“Function::Interface” case
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Function::Interface; use TodoTypes; method select(UserID $user_id) :Return(ArrayRef[Todo]);
Problems of “Role” case 1.Implementation reusable 2.Ambiguous interface input /
output
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Function::Interface; use TodoTypes; method select(UserID $user_id) :Return(ArrayRef[Todo]);
sub surprising_method { … do anything }
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Function::Interface; use TodoTypes; method select(UserID $user_id) :Return(ArrayRef[Todo]);
sub surprising_method { … do anything }
Problems of “Role” case 1.Implementation reusable 2.Ambiguous interface input /
output
package TodoRepository; use TodoTypes; use Function::Interface::Impl qw( TodoRepositoryInterface ); has
dbh => ( … ); method select(UserID $user_id) :Return(ArrayRef[Todo]) { … }
package TodoApp; use Moo; use TodoTypes; has todo_repo => (
isa => ImplOf["TodoRepositoryInterface"], ); sub my_todo_list { … }
Looks Good!
Internal
requirements 1.function implementation 2.function interface 3.check if interface is implmented
4.interface type
1. function implementation
Function::Parameters • subroutine signatures • developed by MAUKE
use Function::Parameters; use Types::Standard -types; fun add(Int $a, Int $b)
{ return $a + $b }
my $info = Function::Parameters::info(\&add); $info->positional_required; # => Int $a, Int
$b
Function::Return • specify function return types • created by myself
sub add :Return(Int) { 3.14 } add(); # ERROR! Invalid
type
my $info = Function::Return::info(\&add); $info->types; # => Int
Appendix about Function::Return
sub multi :Return(Num, Str) { 3.14, ‘message' } my ($pi,
$msg) = multi();
sub multi :Return(Num, Str) { 3.14, ‘message' } my ($pi,
$msg) = multi(); my $count = multi(); # ERROR!
requirements 1.function implementation 2.function interface 3.check if interface is implemented
4.interface type
2. function interface
Function::Interface • Keyword::Simple • PPR
Deparse fun hello() :Return(Str);
sub BEGIN { Function::Interface::_register_info({ package => ‘HelloInterface', keyword => ‘fun',
subname => ‘message', params => [], return => [&Str()]} ); }
my $info = Function::Interface::info(“HelloInterface”); $info->functions; # => hello(Str $msg) :Return(Str)
requirements 1.function implementation 2.function interface 3.check if interface is implemented
4.interface type
3.check if interface is implemented
use Function::Interface::Impl qw( FooInterface BarInterface BazInterface );
F::Parameters#info F::Return#info F::Interface#info
F::Parameters#info F::Return#info F::Interface#info
requirements 1.function implementation 2.function interface 3.check if interface is implemented
4.interface type
use Function::Interface::Types; my $type = ImplOF[‘FooInterface’]; # Foo is implements
of FooInterface my $foo = Foo->new; $type->check($foo);
requirements 1.function implementation 2.function interface 3.check if interface is implemented
4.interface type
Performance
F::I::Impl runs at compile time
F::Return has `no_check` option
Let’s benchmark
F::P + F::R + F::I F::P + F::R no_check +
F::I F::P + F::R no_check F::P Case1 Case4 Case2 Case3
F::P + F::R + F::I F::P + F::R no_check +
F::I F::P + F::R no_check F::P 360653.77/s 1499189.22/s 1499189.22/s 1499189.22/s Case1 Case4 Case2 Case3
$BTF $BTF $BTF $BTF
Conclusion
Features of F::Interface 1.Typed interface definition 2.Check at compile time
Goal • To maintain large apps. • Interface is good
for large apps 1. Easy to fix implementation 2. Stable Dependencies
Internal • function implementation • Function::Parameters + Function:\:Return • function
interface • Keyword::Simple + PPR • compare meta infos at compile time
Performance • The same speed as using only F::Parameters •
Function::Interface::Impl runs at CHECK phase • Function::Return has `no_check` option
Questions?
Thank you!