train (199,483 contents) and 30 % data test (85,943 contents). • Not using technique to reduce the dimensionality of the training data. • To comparing the results we are using measures Accuracy (A), Recall (R), Precision (P), F1-Score (F1), and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) [1]. [1] Tiago A. Almeida, Akebo Yamakami, and Jurandy Almeida. 2009. Evaluation of Approaches for Dimensionality Reduction Applied with Naive Bayes Anti-Spam Filters. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA '09). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 517-522. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10. 1109/ICMLA.2009.22