Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Improving the Representation of Major Landforms in Analytical Relief Shading

Improving the Representation of Major Landforms in Analytical Relief Shading

Brooke Marston
Bernhard Jenny
Oregon State University
#nacis2015

Nathaniel V. KELSO

October 16, 2015
Tweet

More Decks by Nathaniel V. KELSO

Other Decks in Education

Transcript

  1. Improving the Representation of Major Landforms in Analytical Relief Shading

    Brooke Marston Bernhard Jenny NACIS Minneapolis October 14–17, 2015
  2. Why is manual preferred? • Locally bright and dark slopes improve

    legibility • Easier and faster to interpret topography • Better for small-scale maps where contours degenerate Source: shadedreliefarchive.com
  3. Benefits of Automation • Faster production of shaded relief adhering to

    manual design principles • More aesthetically pleasing maps • Explicit terrain visualization • Improve quality of maps produced by non-professionals
  4. Source: Orzan, A., et al., 2008. Diffusion Curves: A Vector

    Representation for Smooth-Shaded Images. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2008), 27, Article 92:1–8. Diffusion Curves • Introduced by Orzan et al., 2008 • Create images with smooth color gradients using cubic Bézier splines with control points • Colors diffused independently on left and right sides of curves by linear interpolation
  5. Terrain Tilting •  Wedge-shaped base with artificial elevation grade (γ)

    applied to terrain model 8 times (N, E, S, W, NE, NW, SE, SW) •  Ridgelines are filtered based on their stability
  6. Aspect Simplification • Reduces variability of adjusted illumination directions • Results in

    more regular gray values along ridges and valleys Original Low tolerance High tolerance
  7. Conclusions • Diffusion curve shading enhanced analytical shading • Best results in

    terrain with sharp, clearly defined ridges and valleys • Tilting removes irrelevant or visually disturbing ridgelines • Our method presents alternative to other filter-based generalization approaches
  8. Future Work • Incorporate colors modulated by elevation and exposure to

    illumination (Jenny and Hurni 2006) • Integrate software applications
  9. Acknowledgments •  Tom Patterson, National Park Service •  OSU Cartography

    and Geovisualization Group •  Oregon State University, AAG Cartography Specialty Group, Google, ICA Commission on Mountain Cartography, Phi Beta Kappa
  10. Why is manual preferred? • Locally bright and dark slopes improve

    legibility and aesthetic quality • Easier and faster for the user to interpret topography • Better for small-scale maps where contours degenerate Source: reliefshading.com, Google Maps
  11. Graph-based Network Analysis • Series of vertices connected by edges • Generalizes

    line geometry and filters out short, unimportant ridgelines (a) Identify shortest leaf edge (b) Remove edge (c) Remove degree- two vertex (d) Connect remaining edges
  12. Illumination Adjustment (a) northeast (b) northwest (c) north-south Dst –

    β = 0 Dst – β = π/2 Dst Dst – β = 3π/4 Dst Dst Dst + Dmax Dst + D No adjustment