$30 off During Our Annual Pro Sale. View Details »

Examining Factors That Influence the STEM Career Choices of Secondary School Students: Using Data from TIMSS 2019

Examining Factors That Influence the STEM Career Choices of Secondary School Students: Using Data from TIMSS 2019

International Conference of East-Asian Association for Science Education 2021 (EASE2021) 2021年6月18日

Daiki Nakamura

June 18, 2021
Tweet

More Decks by Daiki Nakamura

Other Decks in Education

Transcript

  1. Examining Factors That Influence the STEM Career
    Choices of Secondary School Students:
    Using Data from TIMSS 2019
    Daiki Nakamura
    (Hiroshima University)

    View Slide

  2. Introduction: Demand for STEM Workforce 2
    ⚫ U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projections
    for 2019-29 (Zilberman & Ice, 2021)
    STEM occupations : +8.0%
    All other occupations : +3.7%
    The demand for STEM workforce is increasing
    ⚫ The gap between supply and demand for STEM workforce
    ➢ EU
    • 40% EU employers said in 2013 that they have difficulty finding the
    right skills when recruiting (Cedefop, 2018).
    ➢ Japan
    • There is a shortage of STEM workforce to meet the demand of
    companies (METI, 2018).
    We need to increase the number of people choosing STEM careers
    to close these gaps.

    View Slide

  3. STEM Career Choice Models: Self-Efficacy Model 3
    ⚫ Self-Efficacy Model (Bandura, 1977; Hackett & Betz, 1981)
    Self-Efficacy Choice Goals
    Self-Efficacy: Confidence in job-related areas.
    Choice Goal: Aspirations of what career choice to make.
    ◆Lent et al. (1986)
    Self-efficacy predicts science and technology career aspirations.
    ◆Nauta et al. (1998)
    Self-efficacy influences higher-order science career aspirations.
    What are the psychological mechanisms by which young people choose their careers?

    View Slide

  4. STEM Career Choice Models: Social Cognitive Career Theory (Choice Model) 4
    ⚫ Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT: Lent et al., 1994, 2000)
    Self-Efficacy
    Interest
    Outcome
    Expectations
    Choice Goals
    Learning STEM will be useful
    in future careers.
    Supports & Barriers
    • Parents’ expectations
    • Parents' educational background
    • Socioeconomic status (SES)
    I am confident that I can understand
    the content of STEM fields.

    View Slide

  5. STEM Career Choice Models: Social Cognitive Career Theory (Choice Model) 5
    ⚫ Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT)
    Meta-analysis by Lent et al. (2018)
    Integrating 143 studies on STEM careers.
    # 84% of the data is from the US.
    Generalization possible?

    View Slide

  6. Purpose and Method 6
    This study aims to find how the SCCT fits in different countries.
    ⚫ Purpose
    ⚫ Method
    ➢ Data
    Data from 8th grade students in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, the United States, and the United Kingdom
    in the TIMSS 2019 survey.
    *Teenage career aspirations predict career attainment in adulthood (e.g., Schoon, 2001).
    ➢ Analysis
    • Path analysis for data from different countries.
    • Checking for goodness of fit.
    • Estimation of direct and indirect effects.

    View Slide

  7. Hypothetical Path Diagram 7
    Self-Efficacy
    Outcome
    Expectations
    Interest Choice Goals
    SES
    ◼ Mplus ver. 8.6
    ANALYSIS:
    REPSE = JACKKNIFE2;
    TYPE = GENERAL COMPLEX;
    ESTIMATOR IS WLSMV;
    ⚫ SCCT Choice Model

    View Slide

  8. Measurement Item: Using Questionnaire Survey Data from TIMSS 2019 8
    Outcome
    Expectations
    Self-Efficacy
    Choice
    Goals
    Interest
    SES
    1 item: BSBS25E
    “I would like a job that involves using science”
    Mean of 4 items: BSBS25C, D, F, G
    ex. “Learning science will give me more job opportunities when I am an adult”
    Student Confident in Science (*Estimated from 8 items based on IRT)
    ex. “I usually do well in science”
    Students Like Learning Science (*Estimated from 9 items based on IRT)
    ex. “I enjoy learning science”
    Home Educational Resources (*Estimated from 3 items based on IRT)
    ex. “Highest level of education of either parent”

    View Slide

  9. Result 9
    Self-Efficacy
    (Student Confident
    in Science)
    Outcome
    Expectations
    Interest
    (Students Like
    Learning Science)
    Choice Goals
    (Science-related career
    aspirations: “BSBS25E”)
    SES
    (Home Educational
    Resources)
    R-Square
    JPN: 0.478
    KOR: 0.550
    TWN: 0.695
    UK : 0.652
    USA: 0.622
    JPN: 0.111
    KOR: 0.175
    TWN: 0.190
    UK : 0.169
    USA: 0.183
    JPN: 0.153
    KOR: 0.161
    TWN: 0.183
    UK : 0.203
    USA: 0.052
    JPN: 0.500
    KOR: 0.397
    TWN: 0.649
    UK : 0.636
    USA: 0.650
    JPN: 0.004 (n.s.)
    KOR:-0.044
    TWN:-0.050
    UK :-0.037
    USA:-0.006 (n.s.)
    JPN: 0.319
    KOR: 0.398
    TWN: 0.446
    UK : 0.407
    USA: 0.353
    JPN: 0.181
    KOR: 0.328
    TWN: 0.130
    UK : 0.098
    USA: 0.191
    JPN: 0.276
    KOR: 0.318
    TWN: 0.314
    JPN: 0.557
    KOR: 0.557
    TWN: 0.539
    JPN: 0.137
    KOR: 0.130
    TWN: 0.094
    UK : 0.043
    USA: 0.071
    Region N RMSEA CFI TLI SRMR
    Total SE
    to CG
    Total OE
    to CG
    Total SES
    to CG
    Japan 4435 0.032 0.999 0.992 0.040 0.244 0.710 0.097
    Korea 3855 0.042 0.999 0.990 0.053 0.270 0.646 0.081
    Taiwan 4909 0.000 1.000 1.000 0.011 0.269 0.851 0.077
    UK 3132 0.031 0.999 0.992 0.033 0.259 0.827 0.056
    USA 8128 0.055 0.996 0.959 0.057 0.203 0.857 0.077

    View Slide

  10. Discussion 10
    ⚫ It is important to build confidence in students through science education that
    focuses on understandability. (i.e., Self-efficacy)
    ⚫ It might be important to show them how learning science can be useful in STEM
    careers. (i.e., Outcome expectations)
    ⚫ SCCT fit the data not only for the United States, but also for East Asian regions.
    ⚫ Self-efficacy (β=.203–270) and outcome expectations (β=.646–.857) influence
    STEM career choice.
    Region N RMSEA CFI TLI SRMR
    Total SE
    to CG
    Total OE
    to CG
    Total SES
    to CG
    Japan 4435 0.032 0.999 0.992 0.040 0.244 0.710 0.097
    Korea 3855 0.042 0.999 0.990 0.053 0.270 0.646 0.081
    Taiwan 4909 0.000 1.000 1.000 0.011 0.269 0.851 0.077
    UK 3132 0.031 0.999 0.992 0.033 0.259 0.827 0.056
    USA 8128 0.055 0.996 0.959 0.057 0.203 0.857 0.077

    View Slide

  11. Limitations and Future Challenges 11
    ⚫ This study did not address the hierarchical nature of the TIMSS data.
    ➢ Multilevel model
    ⚫ Did not measure broad career aspirations in STEM fields.
    ➢ Increase the number of measurement items and improve the validity.
    ⚫ The effectiveness of the intervention on self-efficacy and outcome
    expectations is unknown.
    ➢ Longitudinal intervention studies

    View Slide

  12. Appendix
    12

    View Slide

  13. How Improve Outcome Expectations for STEM Careers? 13
    ⚫ Reinhold et al. (2018), Drymiotou et al. (2021)
    • Introduce science topics that are relevant to everyday life.
    • Connect with scientists or experts.
    • Provide information about STEM careers and pathways.
    ⚫ Projects in Japanese High Schools
    ➢ High school students participate in
    conferences and interact with experts.
    ➢ Experts in STEM fields to lecture
    at high schools.

    View Slide