Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Launching GitHub's Public GraphQL API
Search
Sponsored
·
Ship Features Fearlessly
Turn features on and off without deploys. Used by thousands of Ruby developers.
→
Brooks Swinnerton
May 21, 2017
Technology
590
2
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Launching GitHub's Public GraphQL API
Brooks Swinnerton
May 21, 2017
More Decks by Brooks Swinnerton
See All by Brooks Swinnerton
Building GitHub Integrations with Webhooks and REST
bswinnerton
1
190
Launching GitHub's GraphQL API
bswinnerton
4
530
Optimizing APIs for Consumers with GraphQL
bswinnerton
2
460
GitHub GraphQL API
bswinnerton
4
160
GraphQL for Rubyists
bswinnerton
0
330
The Road To Code: Ruby
bswinnerton
0
120
The history of Vim
bswinnerton
0
160
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
Contract One Engineering Unit 紹介資料
sansan33
PRO
0
20k
「ミスを許さない手順書」を作ってみた 〜 個人的にはこれ以上できることはあまりなさそう/20260827-ssmjp-operation-procedure-update
opelab
18
17k
AIで実装は速くなった。なのにプロダクトは速くならない。職能の壁を越えて価値のフローを設計する
nwiizo
1
1.9k
スクラムで身についていた動き方を、XPで捉え直してみた
codmoninc
0
150
DGX Sparkを2台使って いろいろ動かす話
sonoda_mj
1
110
いかに伝えるか 〜新卒エンジニアの教育のための、ライトノベル活用の一例
ikedon
1
170
生成AI時代の クレデンシャルとパーミッション設計
nrinetcom
PRO
3
1.2k
APIセキュリティを組織で実現するには~注力する点と設計・実装に入れたい対策~
riiimparm
3
880
Azure App Service / Container Apps の組み込み認証
kuniteru
0
140
Jetpack Compose で挑む新聞紙面UI ─ 複合ジェスチャー・ポリゴン記事領域・適応的ページ構成という3つの壁/droidkaigi2026
nikkei_engineer_recruiting
0
140
[DroidKaigi 2026] Making UI specifications visible: Android UI development in the AI agent era supported by Compose Screenshot Testing and galleries
syarihu
0
460
Does an AI Watermark Survive Translation?
machinetranslation
0
520
Featured
See All Featured
How to Think Like a Performance Engineer
csswizardry
28
2.8k
Are puppies a ranking factor?
jonoalderson
2
3.9k
[SF Ruby Conf 2025] Rails X
palkan
2
1.3k
Conquering PDFs: document understanding beyond plain text
inesmontani
PRO
4
3k
Writing Fast Ruby
sferik
630
63k
The Cult of Friendly URLs
andyhume
79
7k
Bash Introduction
62gerente
615
220k
Designing Dashboards & Data Visualisations in Web Apps
destraynor
232
55k
Navigating Team Friction
lara
192
16k
"I'm Feeling Lucky" - Building Great Search Experiences for Today's Users (#IAC19)
danielanewman
230
23k
How to make the Groovebox
asonas
2
2.4k
JAMstack: Web Apps at Ludicrous Speed - All Things Open 2022
reverentgeek
1
590
Transcript
+ a
Hi, I’m Brooks
I work at !
let’s talk about launching the GitHub GraphQL API
How our GraphQL API came to be
March 20th, 2016 proposal submitted
we had dreams of APIv4
multiple resources in one roundtrip
schema introspection
April 6th, 2016 proof of concept done
{ current_user { login repositories(affiliation: "owner") { id name }
} }
April 12th, 2016 New team created
September 14th, 2016 early access
Today >100 million queries/day
We learned some things along the way
Tooling
documentation
https://github.com/gjtorikian/graphql-docs
GraphiQL all-in-one
"but we’re going to need a Ruby client"
github/graphql-client
objects in exchange for a query
collocate our queries with our views
but in Rails
query profiling
query { repository(owner:"rails", name:"rails") { viewerHasStarred } }
{ "data": { "repository": { "viewerHasStarred": false } }, "extensions":
{ "totalDuration": 42.06737782806158, "trackedAssociations": {}, "profiling": { "Repository:viewerHasStarred": { "type": "Boolean!", "sql": [ { "duration": 2.07, "sql": "SELECT 1 AS one FROM `repositories` INNER JOIN `stars` ON `repositories`.`id` = `stars`.`starrable_id` WHERE `stars`.`user_id` = 934497 AND `stars`.`starrable_type` = 'Repository' AND `repositories`.`id` = 8514 LIMIT 1 " } ] } } } }
Authorization
reusing the OAuth logic from our REST API
OAuth scopes are granted to a token
token is used to make a request
familiar to our users
less for us to build
Organization = GraphQL::ObjectType.define do name "Organization" accepted_scopes ["read:org", "admin:org"] end
Organization = GraphQL::ObjectType.define do name "Organization" accepted_scopes ["read:org", "admin:org"] end
but with ✨ GraphQL ✨…
we can analyze the query before resolution
query { organization(login:"github") { members { totalCount } } }
query { organization(login:"github") { members { totalCount } } }
Organization = GraphQL::ObjectType.define do name "Organization" accepted_scopes ["read:org", "admin:org"] end
but this isn’t perfect
in some cases you need to perform resolution first
repo vs public_repo
we’ve introduced an authz layer for resolution
Schema design
first off
there’s more than one
one for new & sensitive features
one for everyone else
Organization = GraphQL::ObjectType.define do name "Organization" accepted_scopes ["read:org"] end
Organization = GraphQL::ObjectType.define do name "Organization" accepted_scopes ["read:org"] visibility :public
end
Organization = GraphQL::ObjectType.define do name "Organization" accepted_scopes ["read:org"] visibility :public
end
CoolNewFeature = GraphQL::ObjectType.define do name "CoolNewFeature" accepted_scopes ["repo"] visibility :internal
end
mandatory first/last arguments on connections
query { viewer { repositories(last:30) { edges { node {
name } } } } }
query { viewer { repositories(last:30) { edges { node {
name } } } } }
is/has/can prefix
query { repository(owner:"rails", name:"rails") { isFork hasIssuesEnabled viewerCanAdminister } }
query { repository(owner:"rails", name:"rails") { isFork hasIssuesEnabled viewerCanAdminister } }
avoiding fields that should be types
query { repository(owner:"rails", name:"rails") { ownerLogin } }
query { repository(owner:"rails", name:"rails") { ownerLogin } }
query { repository(owner:"rails",name:"rails") { owner { login } } }
Feature Parity
schema driven development* *stay tuned!
with our REST API
new features were developed for the UI
then staff-shipped
then released
REST API work started after the ship
but, today…
all new features are built with GraphQL
from the start
CoolNewFeature = GraphQL::ObjectType.define do name "CoolNewFeature" accepted_scopes ["repo"] visibility :internal
end
CoolNewFeature = GraphQL::ObjectType.define do name "CoolNewFeature" accepted_scopes ["repo"] visibility :internal
end
CoolNewFeature = GraphQL::ObjectType.define do name "CoolNewFeature" accepted_scopes ["repo"] visibility :public
end
this allows us to build a true public API
this allows us to build a true public API
this allows us to build a true platform
shared between GitHubbers and integrators
but change is scary
GraphQL-backed REST APIs
this works great for new features
but what about legacy features?
GET https://api.github.com/user
enter Scientist
github/scientist
measure data discrepancies
measure the difference in performance
None
Where we’re headed
static analysis of schema during code review
rate limiting
expose global relay IDs in REST API
preview new fields and objects with headers
Thank you @bswinnerton on Twitter & GitHub @brooks on Slack