Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Testing Hypotheses of No Meaningful Effect

Testing Hypotheses of No Meaningful Effect

Carlisle Rainey

January 04, 2013
Tweet

More Decks by Carlisle Rainey

Other Decks in Research

Transcript

  1. Testing Hypotheses of
    No Meaningful Effect
    Carlisle Rainey

    View Slide

  2. I'd like to convince you of
    three things

    View Slide

  3. Important
    1

    View Slide

  4. Our arguments are
    not compelling
    2

    View Slide

  5. Our arguments can
    be compelling
    3

    View Slide

  6. Important
    Step 1:

    View Slide

  7. Hypotheses of no meaningful effect are
    crucial
    to complete evaluation of theories

    View Slide

  8. Interaction

    View Slide

  9. Social heterogeneity increases the
    number of parties, but only when electoral
    institutions are sufficiently permissive.


    Clark and Golder (2006)

    View Slide

  10. Adjudication

    View Slide

  11. View Slide

  12. View Slide

  13. How often do these
    examples occur?

    View Slide

  14. 30%

    View Slide

  15. Our arguments are
    not compelling
    Step 2:

    View Slide

  16. No American president since FDR has won
    a second term when the unemployment
    rate topped 7.2 percent...
    Obama must defy that
    trend to keep his job.


    New York Times
    June 1, 2011


    View Slide

  17. View Slide

  18. View Slide

  19. The nation's unemployment
    status by itself is not going to
    affect Obama's.


    Seth Masket
    June 2, 2011

    View Slide

  20. My critique

    View Slide

  21. Rule out implausible
    relationships

    View Slide

  22. View Slide

  23. View Slide

  24. View Slide

  25. View Slide

  26. View Slide

  27. View Slide

  28. Insignificance can't
    be used to argue for
    “no effect.”

    View Slide

  29. But doesn't everyone
    already know that?


    A skeptic

    View Slide

  30. Political scientists draw
    strong conclusions
    from insignificance.

    View Slide

  31. Recessions have no effect
    on whether a democracy is
    consolidated.


    Svolik (2008)

    View Slide

  32. Our arguments
    can be compelling
    Step 3:

    View Slide

  33. just like any
    other hypothesis

    View Slide

  34. Argue against
    relationships inconsistent
    with the hypothesis

    View Slide

  35. Define
    substantively
    meaningful
    Step 1:

    View Slide

  36. Check the
    90% CI
    Step 2:

    View Slide

  37. Only negativity about the respondent’s
    preferred candidate should have a significant
    demobilizing effect on voter turnout.


    Krupnikov (2011)

    View Slide

  38. What's a meaningful effect?
    1% 3% 5% 7% 9%

    View Slide

  39. The demobilizing effect
    could be as large as
    9%

    View Slide

  40. Those are the
    three things

    View Slide

  41. Important
    1

    View Slide

  42. Our arguments are
    not compelling
    2

    View Slide

  43. Our arguments can
    be compelling
    3

    View Slide

  44. But what should
    I do about this?


    You

    View Slide

  45. Go read the details
    crain.co/nme
    1

    View Slide

  46. Think about your
    own work.
    2

    View Slide

  47. Keep in mind when
    reviewing others' work
    3

    View Slide

  48. View Slide