Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Open Software for Astrophysics, AAS241
Search
Dan Foreman-Mackey
January 12, 2023
Science
600
2
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Open Software for Astrophysics, AAS241
Slides for my plenary talk at the 241st American Astronomical Society meeting.
Dan Foreman-Mackey
January 12, 2023
More Decks by Dan Foreman-Mackey
See All by Dan Foreman-Mackey
Open software for Astronomical Data Analysis
dfm
0
220
My research talk for CCA promotion
dfm
1
810
Astronomical software
dfm
1
770
emcee-odi
dfm
1
740
Exoplanet population inference: a tutorial
dfm
3
520
Data-driven discovery in the astronomical time domain
dfm
6
760
TensorFlow for astronomers
dfm
6
880
How to find a transiting exoplanets
dfm
1
530
Long-period transiting exoplanets
dfm
1
370
Other Decks in Science
See All in Science
Distributional Regression
tackyas
0
550
データベース08: 実体関連モデルとは?
trycycle
PRO
0
1.4k
データベース02: データベースの概念
trycycle
PRO
2
1.2k
AIPシンポジウム 2025年度 成果報告会 「因果推論チーム」
sshimizu2006
3
550
データベース05: SQL(2/3) 結合質問
trycycle
PRO
0
1.2k
AI(人工知能)の過去・現在・未来 ~AIは人類を越えるのか~
tagtag
PRO
0
120
ハミルトン・ヤコビ方程式の解の性質と物理的意味
enakai00
0
810
Endel Tulvingとエピソード記憶
rmaruy
0
150
機械学習 - pandas入門
trycycle
PRO
0
660
Kritische evaluatie van GenAI-output voor literatuuronderzoek
voginip
0
190
(2025) Balade en cyclotomie
mansuy
0
640
因果推論と機械学習
sshimizu2006
1
1.2k
Featured
See All Featured
Designing Experiences People Love
moore
143
24k
Information Architects: The Missing Link in Design Systems
soysaucechin
0
1k
A Guide to Academic Writing Using Generative AI - A Workshop
ks91
PRO
1
350
The Psychology of Web Performance [Beyond Tellerrand 2023]
tammyeverts
49
3.5k
Faster Mobile Websites
deanohume
310
32k
Design and Strategy: How to Deal with People Who Don’t "Get" Design
morganepeng
133
19k
How GitHub (no longer) Works
holman
316
150k
SEO for Brand Visibility & Recognition
aleyda
0
4.6k
The Anti-SEO Checklist Checklist. Pubcon Cyber Week
ryanjones
0
180
Product Roadmaps are Hard
iamctodd
55
12k
Code Reviewing Like a Champion
maltzj
528
40k
Public Speaking Without Barfing On Your Shoes - THAT 2023
reverentgeek
1
460
Transcript
OPEN SOFTWARE FOR ASTROPHYSICS Dan Foreman-Mackey
None
case study: Gaussian Processes
AAS 225 / 2015 / Seattle AAS 231 / 2018
/ National Harbor
°0.6 °0.3 0.0 0.3 0.6 raw [ppt] 0 5 10
15 20 25 time [days] °0.30 °0.15 0.00 de-trended [ppt] N = 1000 reference: DFM+ (2017)
°0.6 °0.3 0.0 0.3 0.6 raw [ppt] 0 5 10
15 20 25 time [days] °0.30 °0.15 0.00 de-trended [ppt] N = 1000 reference: DFM+ (2017)
reference: Aigrain & DFM (2022)
reference: Aigrain & DFM (2022)
reference: Aigrain & DFM (2022) ignoring correlated noise accounting for
correlated noise
reference: Aigrain & DFM (2022)
a Gaussian Process is a drop - in replacement for
chi - squared
more details: Aigrain & Foreman-Mackey (2023) arXiv:2209.08940
7 [1] model building [2] computational cost
k(tn , tm ; θ) “kernel” or “covariance”
None
import george import celerite import tinygp
my f i rst try: george 1
import numpy as np def log_likelihood(params, x, diag, r) :
K = build_kernel_matrix(params, x, diag) gof = r.T @ np.linalg.solve(K, r) norm = np.linalg.slogdet(K)[1] return -0.5 * (gof + norm)
import numpy as np def log_likelihood(params, x, diag, r) :
K = build_kernel_matrix(params, x, diag) gof = r.T @ np.linalg.solve(K, r) norm = np.linalg.slogdet(K)[1] return -0.5 * (gof + norm)
k(tn , tm ; θ) “kernel” or “covariance”
from george.kernels import * k1 = 1.5 * ExpSquaredKernel(2.3) k2
= 5.5 * Matern32Kernel(0.1) kernel = 0.5 * (k1 + k2)
from george import GP gp = GP(kernel) gp.compute(x, yerr) gp.log_likelihood(y)
from george import GP gp = GP(kernel) gp.compute(x, yerr) gp.log_likelihood(y)
gp.f i t(y) ???
the astronomical Python ecosystem + MANY MORE!
* API design (library vs scripts) * don’t reinvent the
wheel
None
faster: celerite* 2 * yes, that truly is how you
pronounce it…
import numpy as np def log_likelihood(params, x, diag, r) :
K = build_kernel_matrix(params, x, diag) gof = r.T @ np.linalg.solve(K, r) norm = np.linalg.slogdet(K)[1] return -0.5 * (gof + norm)
import numpy as np def log_likelihood(params, x, diag, r) :
K = build_kernel_matrix(params, x, diag) gof = r.T @ np.linalg.solve(K, r) norm = np.linalg.slogdet(K)[1] return -0.5 * (gof + norm)
None
“semi/quasi - separable” matrices
102 103 104 105 number of data points [N] 10
5 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 100 computational cost [seconds] 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 direct O(N) 100 101 number o reference: DFM, Agol, Ambikasaran, Angus (2017)
102 103 104 105 number of data points [N] 10
4 10 3 10 2 10 1 100 computational cost [seconds] 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 O(N) 100 101 number o reference: DFM, Agol, Ambikasaran, Angus (2017)
None
+
+ + vs
* interdisciplinary collaboration * importance of implementation
7 [1] 1 (ish) dimensional input [2] specif i c
type of kernel restrictions:
modern infrastructure: tinygp 3
what’s missing from the astronomical Python ecosystem?
7 [1] differentiable programming [2] hardware acceleration
the broader numerical computing Python ecosystem + SO MANY MORE!
jax.readthedocs.io
import numpy as np def linear_least_squares(x, y) : A =
np.vander(x, 2) return np.linalg.lstsq(A, y)[0]
import jax.numpy as jnp def linear_least_squares(x, y) : A =
jnp.vander(x, 2) return jnp.linalg.lstsq(A, y)[0]
import jax.numpy as jnp @jax.jit def linear_least_squares(x, y) : A
= jnp.vander(x, 2) return jnp.linalg.lstsq(A, y)[0]
None
tinygp.readthedocs.io
the broader numerical computing Python ecosystem + SO MANY MORE!
* I <3 JAX * don’t reinvent the wheel
the why & how of open software in astrophysics
credit: Adrian Price-Whelan / / data: SAO/NASA ADS
None
None
None
None
takeaways
open software is foundational to astrophysics research let’s consider &
discuss interface design and user interaction leverage existing infrastructure & learn when to start fresh
get in touch! dfm.io github.com/dfm
None