Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Open Software for Astrophysics, AAS241
Search
Dan Foreman-Mackey
January 12, 2023
Science
2
550
Open Software for Astrophysics, AAS241
Slides for my plenary talk at the 241st American Astronomical Society meeting.
Dan Foreman-Mackey
January 12, 2023
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Dan Foreman-Mackey
See All by Dan Foreman-Mackey
Open software for Astronomical Data Analysis
dfm
0
160
My research talk for CCA promotion
dfm
1
790
Astronomical software
dfm
1
740
emcee-odi
dfm
1
680
Exoplanet population inference: a tutorial
dfm
3
470
Data-driven discovery in the astronomical time domain
dfm
6
730
TensorFlow for astronomers
dfm
6
830
How to find a transiting exoplanets
dfm
1
480
Long-period transiting exoplanets
dfm
1
320
Other Decks in Science
See All in Science
データベース02: データベースの概念
trycycle
PRO
2
940
論文紹介 音源分離:SCNET SPARSE COMPRESSION NETWORK FOR MUSIC SOURCE SEPARATION
kenmatsu4
0
370
Symfony Console Facelift
chalasr
2
480
防災デジタル分野での官民共創の取り組み (1)防災DX官民共創をどう進めるか
ditccsugii
0
350
データマイニング - コミュニティ発見
trycycle
PRO
0
170
機械学習 - pandas入門
trycycle
PRO
0
350
KH Coderチュートリアル(スライド版)
koichih
1
51k
Agent開発フレームワークのOverviewとW&B Weaveとのインテグレーション
siyoo
0
370
Vibecoding for Product Managers
ibknadedeji
0
100
高校生就活へのDA導入の提案
shunyanoda
0
6k
Hakonwa-Quaternion
hiranabe
1
150
データマイニング - グラフデータと経路
trycycle
PRO
1
240
Featured
See All Featured
Raft: Consensus for Rubyists
vanstee
140
7.2k
How STYLIGHT went responsive
nonsquared
100
5.9k
Design and Strategy: How to Deal with People Who Don’t "Get" Design
morganepeng
132
19k
Building Flexible Design Systems
yeseniaperezcruz
329
39k
Building Applications with DynamoDB
mza
96
6.7k
Refactoring Trust on Your Teams (GOTO; Chicago 2020)
rmw
35
3.2k
Build The Right Thing And Hit Your Dates
maggiecrowley
38
2.9k
Designing Dashboards & Data Visualisations in Web Apps
destraynor
231
54k
Writing Fast Ruby
sferik
630
62k
Why You Should Never Use an ORM
jnunemaker
PRO
60
9.6k
CoffeeScript is Beautiful & I Never Want to Write Plain JavaScript Again
sstephenson
162
15k
The Pragmatic Product Professional
lauravandoore
36
7k
Transcript
OPEN SOFTWARE FOR ASTROPHYSICS Dan Foreman-Mackey
None
case study: Gaussian Processes
AAS 225 / 2015 / Seattle AAS 231 / 2018
/ National Harbor
°0.6 °0.3 0.0 0.3 0.6 raw [ppt] 0 5 10
15 20 25 time [days] °0.30 °0.15 0.00 de-trended [ppt] N = 1000 reference: DFM+ (2017)
°0.6 °0.3 0.0 0.3 0.6 raw [ppt] 0 5 10
15 20 25 time [days] °0.30 °0.15 0.00 de-trended [ppt] N = 1000 reference: DFM+ (2017)
reference: Aigrain & DFM (2022)
reference: Aigrain & DFM (2022)
reference: Aigrain & DFM (2022) ignoring correlated noise accounting for
correlated noise
reference: Aigrain & DFM (2022)
a Gaussian Process is a drop - in replacement for
chi - squared
more details: Aigrain & Foreman-Mackey (2023) arXiv:2209.08940
7 [1] model building [2] computational cost
k(tn , tm ; θ) “kernel” or “covariance”
None
import george import celerite import tinygp
my f i rst try: george 1
import numpy as np def log_likelihood(params, x, diag, r) :
K = build_kernel_matrix(params, x, diag) gof = r.T @ np.linalg.solve(K, r) norm = np.linalg.slogdet(K)[1] return -0.5 * (gof + norm)
import numpy as np def log_likelihood(params, x, diag, r) :
K = build_kernel_matrix(params, x, diag) gof = r.T @ np.linalg.solve(K, r) norm = np.linalg.slogdet(K)[1] return -0.5 * (gof + norm)
k(tn , tm ; θ) “kernel” or “covariance”
from george.kernels import * k1 = 1.5 * ExpSquaredKernel(2.3) k2
= 5.5 * Matern32Kernel(0.1) kernel = 0.5 * (k1 + k2)
from george import GP gp = GP(kernel) gp.compute(x, yerr) gp.log_likelihood(y)
from george import GP gp = GP(kernel) gp.compute(x, yerr) gp.log_likelihood(y)
gp.f i t(y) ???
the astronomical Python ecosystem + MANY MORE!
* API design (library vs scripts) * don’t reinvent the
wheel
None
faster: celerite* 2 * yes, that truly is how you
pronounce it…
import numpy as np def log_likelihood(params, x, diag, r) :
K = build_kernel_matrix(params, x, diag) gof = r.T @ np.linalg.solve(K, r) norm = np.linalg.slogdet(K)[1] return -0.5 * (gof + norm)
import numpy as np def log_likelihood(params, x, diag, r) :
K = build_kernel_matrix(params, x, diag) gof = r.T @ np.linalg.solve(K, r) norm = np.linalg.slogdet(K)[1] return -0.5 * (gof + norm)
None
“semi/quasi - separable” matrices
102 103 104 105 number of data points [N] 10
5 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 100 computational cost [seconds] 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 direct O(N) 100 101 number o reference: DFM, Agol, Ambikasaran, Angus (2017)
102 103 104 105 number of data points [N] 10
4 10 3 10 2 10 1 100 computational cost [seconds] 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 O(N) 100 101 number o reference: DFM, Agol, Ambikasaran, Angus (2017)
None
+
+ + vs
* interdisciplinary collaboration * importance of implementation
7 [1] 1 (ish) dimensional input [2] specif i c
type of kernel restrictions:
modern infrastructure: tinygp 3
what’s missing from the astronomical Python ecosystem?
7 [1] differentiable programming [2] hardware acceleration
the broader numerical computing Python ecosystem + SO MANY MORE!
jax.readthedocs.io
import numpy as np def linear_least_squares(x, y) : A =
np.vander(x, 2) return np.linalg.lstsq(A, y)[0]
import jax.numpy as jnp def linear_least_squares(x, y) : A =
jnp.vander(x, 2) return jnp.linalg.lstsq(A, y)[0]
import jax.numpy as jnp @jax.jit def linear_least_squares(x, y) : A
= jnp.vander(x, 2) return jnp.linalg.lstsq(A, y)[0]
None
tinygp.readthedocs.io
the broader numerical computing Python ecosystem + SO MANY MORE!
* I <3 JAX * don’t reinvent the wheel
the why & how of open software in astrophysics
credit: Adrian Price-Whelan / / data: SAO/NASA ADS
None
None
None
None
takeaways
open software is foundational to astrophysics research let’s consider &
discuss interface design and user interaction leverage existing infrastructure & learn when to start fresh
get in touch! dfm.io github.com/dfm
None