Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Class 3: Well-Ordering

Class 3: Well-Ordering

cs2102: Discrete Mathematics
University of Virginia, Fall 2016

See course site for notes:
https://uvacs2102.github.io

David Evans

August 30, 2016
Tweet

More Decks by David Evans

Other Decks in Programming

Transcript

  1. Plan Well-Ordering Principle Well-Ordered Sets (and Comparators) Well-Ordered Theorem? Well-Ordered

    Data Types Well-Ordering Principle Proofs The Well-Ordering Principle is the crux of mathematical induction, which is the basis for many of the most important proofs in CS.
  2. Ordering Sets Definition. A set is well-ordered with respect to

    an ordering function (e.g., <), if all of its non-empty subsets has a minimum element. Why does this mean the whole set is well-ordered?
  3. Definition. A set is well-ordered with respect to an ordering

    function (e.g., <), if all of its non-empty subsets has a minimum element.
  4. Sensible Ordering Functions Definition. A set is well-ordered with respect

    to an ordering function (e.g., <), if all of its non-empty subsets has a minimum element.
  5. Well-Ordered Sets? Set: the non-negative rationals Comparator: < Definition. A

    number is rational if it can be written as a ratio of two integers.
  6. Set: the non-negative rationals Comparator: ? Is there some comparator

    that makes the non-negative rationals well-ordered?
  7. Well-Ordered Theorem For every set, there is some comparator (that

    is transitive and trichotomic) that makes the set well-ordered. Is this true?
  8. Slack break… For every set, there is some comparator that

    is transitive and trichotomic that makes the set well-ordered.
  9. Gyula Kőnig There is no comparator that results in a

    well- ordering of the real numbers.
  10. Gyula Kőnig Claimed counter-proof: There is no comparator that results

    in a well- ordering of the real numbers. Proof withdrawn as incorrect
  11. Georg Cantor Well-ordered theorem is a fundamental law of thought.

    (1883) What should we (mathematics) do when there is something that seems like it should be true, but no one can prove?
  12. Axiom of Choice For any collection of non-empty sets, there

    is a choice function that picks exactly one element from each set.
  13. Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) To choose one sock from each of

    infinitely many pairs of socks requires the Axiom of Choice, but for shoes the Axiom is not needed.
  14. For every set, there is some comparator that is transitive

    and trichotomic that makes the set well-ordered. For any collection of non-empty sets, there is a choice function that picks exactly one element from each set. implies Well-Ordered Theorem Axiom of Choice
  15. For every set, there is some comparator that is transitive

    and trichotomic that makes the set well-ordered. For any collection of non-empty sets, there is a choice function that picks exactly one element from each set. implies Well-Ordered Theorem Axiom of Choice
  16. Betable Numbers A number is betable if it can be

    produced using some combination of $2 and $5 chips. Are all integers greater than $3 betable?
  17. Betable Numbers A number is betable if it can be

    produced using some combination of $2 and $5 chips.
  18. Charge • Maintain Well Orderliness! • If you need to

    enroll in the class, bring me a course action form to sign (now, or later) • Due Friday (6:29pm): PS1 • Read MCS Ch 2, 3 (at least through 3.5) before Thursday’s class