Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
In Defense of Extreme Openness
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Jake VanderPlas
March 22, 2016
Science
16
4.5k
In Defense of Extreme Openness
Lightning Talk at Python in Astronomy 2016
Jake VanderPlas
March 22, 2016
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Jake VanderPlas
See All by Jake VanderPlas
Altair Tutorial Intro - PyCon 2018
jakevdp
29
6.3k
Seven Strategies for Optimizing Numerical Code
jakevdp
54
12k
Intro to Pydata
jakevdp
18
3.8k
Bespoke Visualizations with a Declarative Twist
jakevdp
3
2.8k
Statistics, Data Mining, and Machine Learning (mostly don't work) in Astronomy
jakevdp
3
2k
Image Analysis At Scale
jakevdp
8
2.3k
PyData 101
jakevdp
25
12k
Python's Visualization Landscape (PyCon 2017)
jakevdp
43
110k
The Unexpected Effectiveness of Python in Science
jakevdp
22
10k
Other Decks in Science
See All in Science
データベース09: 実体関連モデル上の一貫性制約
trycycle
PRO
0
1.1k
なぜ21は素因数分解されないのか? - Shorのアルゴリズムの現在と壁
daimurat
0
310
AIに仕事を奪われる 最初の医師たちへ
ikora128
0
1k
Cross-Media Technologies, Information Science and Human-Information Interaction
signer
PRO
3
32k
Rashomon at the Sound: Reconstructing all possible paleoearthquake histories in the Puget Lowland through topological search
cossatot
0
600
先端因果推論特別研究チームの研究構想と 人間とAIが協働する自律因果探索の展望
sshimizu2006
3
790
AI(人工知能)の過去・現在・未来 —AIは人間を超えるのか—
tagtag
PRO
0
150
Amusing Abliteration
ianozsvald
0
120
データマイニング - グラフ埋め込み入門
trycycle
PRO
1
180
良書紹介04_生命科学の実験デザイン
bunnchinn3
0
130
baseballrによるMLBデータの抽出と階層ベイズモデルによる打率の推定 / TokyoR118
dropout009
2
860
検索と推論タスクに関する論文の紹介
ynakano
1
160
Featured
See All Featured
Money Talks: Using Revenue to Get Sh*t Done
nikkihalliwell
0
170
Designing for humans not robots
tammielis
254
26k
How to Talk to Developers About Accessibility
jct
2
140
How to optimise 3,500 product descriptions for ecommerce in one day using ChatGPT
katarinadahlin
PRO
1
3.5k
Impact Scores and Hybrid Strategies: The future of link building
tamaranovitovic
0
220
From π to Pie charts
rasagy
0
150
Reality Check: Gamification 10 Years Later
codingconduct
0
2k
Dealing with People You Can't Stand - Big Design 2015
cassininazir
367
27k
WCS-LA-2024
lcolladotor
0
470
The World Runs on Bad Software
bkeepers
PRO
72
12k
Paper Plane
katiecoart
PRO
0
47k
The Director’s Chair: Orchestrating AI for Truly Effective Learning
tmiket
1
120
Transcript
In Defense of Extreme Openness Jake VanderPlas Python In Astronomy
2016
I think we all see the benefit of coding in
the open . . . Eases Collaboration — Eases Sharing Heightens Visibility — Encourages Reproducibility Encourages Extensibility — Encourages Integrity etc. — etc.
. . . why not do all research in the
open? Eases Collaboration — Eases Sharing Heightens Visibility — Encourages Reproducibility Encourages Extensibility — Encourages Integrity etc. — etc.
A case study from yours truly . . .
https://github.com/jakevdp/multiband_LS/ We wrote this paper on GitHub from day 1
None
None
None
gh-publisher Each new commit triggers a Travis CI process which
builds the current paper PDF and pushes it to this website. . . https://github.com/ewanmellor/gh-publisher/
None
None
None
None
Jeff Scargle!!! — as in “Lomb-Scargle Periodogram”!!!!!!!
None
None
None
None
“But I might get scooped!”
. . . putting work on Github is publication!
. . . putting work on Github is publication! “Scooping”
→ “Plagiarism”
“But Jake. . . would you do this if there
were any real competition?”
Three very similar papers all published within a few months
last summer . . .
So. . . how did it turn out?
None
None
None
(* not that I’m keeping track . . .)
Be Open. Thank You.