$30 off During Our Annual Pro Sale. View Details »

Economic Frameworks for Portfolio and Product Management

Jez Humble
October 15, 2018

Economic Frameworks for Portfolio and Product Management

This class presents the idea of using economic frameworks for portfolio and project management. We’ll begin with an overview of the three horizons model, and discuss the economic models that are suitable in each horizon. We’ll then discuss and experiment with economic tools that can be applied in each horizon, including the Value of Information, Monte Carlo and Cost of Delay.

Jez Humble

October 15, 2018
Tweet

More Decks by Jez Humble

Other Decks in Education

Transcript

  1. i290 lean/agile product management
    unit 5: economic frameworks
    @jezhumble
    https://leanagile.pm/
    [email protected]
    This work © 2015-20 Jez Humble
    Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

    View Slide

  2. grasp the principles of cost of delay
    understand the principles of decision theory
    calculate the value of information
    make product decisions in an economic framework
    know how to apply optionality
    learning outcomes

    View Slide

  3. View Slide

  4. MoSCoW
    Must have
    Should have
    Could have
    Won’t have

    View Slide

  5. kano model

    View Slide

  6. “you may ignore economics, but economics
    won’t ignore you”
    — Don Reinertsen
    “The measure of execution in product
    development is our ability to constantly align
    our plans to whatever is, at the moment, the
    best economic choice.”
    — Don Reinertsen

    View Slide

  7. decision theory
    The analysis of complex decisions with significant uncertainty
    can be confusing because 1) the consequence that will result
    from selecting any specified decision alternative cannot be
    predicted with certainty, 2) there are often a large number of
    different factors that must be taken into account when making
    the decision, 3) it may be useful to consider the possibility of
    reducing the uncertainty in the decision by collecting additional
    information, and 4) a decision maker's attitude toward risk
    taking can impact the relative desirability of different
    alternatives.
    Craig W Kirkwood, Decision Tree Primer, p1

    View Slide

  8. risk matrix
    probability (0-1)
    impact ($)
    low probability
    low impact
    high probability
    low impact
    low probability
    high impact
    high probability
    high impact

    View Slide

  9. decision tree
    temperature sensor:
    • development cost: $100k, revenue $1m
    • probability of success: 0.5
    pressure sensor:
    • development cost: $10k, revenue $400k
    • probability of success: 0.8

    View Slide

  10. decision trees
    Craig W Kirkwood, Decision Tree Primer, p4
    EV=$400,000
    EV=$400,000
    EV=$310,000
    EV=$0

    View Slide

  11. decision tree

    View Slide

  12. value of information
    • information reduces uncertainty about
    decisions that have economic consequences
    • information affects the behavior of others,
    which has economic consequences
    • information sometimes has its own market
    value
    Douglas Hubbard, How to Measure Anything (3rd edn), p145

    View Slide

  13. measurement
    A quantitively expressed reduction of uncertainty
    based on one or more observations
    Douglas Hubbard, How to Measure Anything (3rd ed.), p31

    View Slide

  14. perfect information
    Value of perfect information = EV after - EV before = $100k

    View Slide

  15. not normally binary decisions — a continuum
    humans are risk averse when the stakes are high
    use utility functions; reduce stakes
    don’t capture time dependence
    use calculus monte carlo analysis
    problems with decision trees

    View Slide

  16. opportunity cost
    In microeconomic theory, the opportunity cost of a
    choice is the value of the best alternative foregone,
    where a choice needs to be made between several
    mutually exclusive alternatives given limited
    resources. Assuming the best choice is made, it is
    the "cost" incurred by not enjoying the benefit that
    would be had by taking the second best choice
    available.
    Wikipedia

    View Slide

  17. cost of delay
    Task A: upgrade package to support credit card encryption
    CoD: fine of $50,000 per day we’re not in compliance.
    Duration: 2 weeks
    Task B: Complete a feature for a key customer
    CoD: we’ll close $100,000 per week with this feature
    Duration: 1 week

    View Slide

  18. cost of delay
    Task A: 2 weeks, CoD $250k / week
    Task B: 1 week, CoD $100k / week

    View Slide

  19. urgency profiles

    View Slide

  20. exercise
    Should I wait for the feature?
    We have completed sufficient features for 85% of our
    target customers.
    We can:
    a) Launch what we have, add last 15% in next release, 6
    months from now
    b) Take 2 more months to finish last 15%
    Cost of delay for project: $200,000 / month

    View Slide

  21. batching up work
    “Black Swan Farming using Cost of Delay” | Joshua J. Arnold and Özlem Yüce | bit.ly/black-swan-farming

    View Slide

  22. technology adoption lifecycle
    Geoffrey Moore, Crossing the Chasm

    View Slide

  23. three horizons
    Baghai, M., Coley, S. and White, D., The Alchemy of Growth

    View Slide

  24. Intuit horizons and metrics

    View Slide

  25. optionality
    Nassim Taleb, Antifragile

    View Slide