Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Concurrency Basics for Elixir
Search
Maciej Kaszubowski
August 02, 2018
Programming
0
100
Concurrency Basics for Elixir
Slides from internal presentation at
https://appunite.com
Maciej Kaszubowski
August 02, 2018
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Maciej Kaszubowski
See All by Maciej Kaszubowski
Error-free Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
280
Modular Design in Elixir (ElixirConf EU 2019)
mkaszubowski
2
660
The Big Ball of Nouns
mkaszubowski
0
88
Modular Design in Elixir
mkaszubowski
1
370
Our three years with Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
210
Distributed Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
110
Software Architecture
mkaszubowski
0
120
Let it crash - fault tolerance in Elixir/OTP
mkaszubowski
0
400
CRDTs - The science behind Phoenix Presence
mkaszubowski
2
250
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
仕様変更に耐えるための"今の"DRY原則を考える / Rethinking the "Don't repeat yourself" for resilience to specification changes
mkmk884
0
160
一休.com のログイン体験を支える技術 〜Web Components x Vue.js 活用事例と最適化について〜
atsumim
0
480
ファインディLT_ポケモン対戦の定量的分析
fufufukakaka
0
710
PHPカンファレンス名古屋2025 タスク分解の試行錯誤〜レビュー負荷を下げるために〜
soichi
1
190
時計仕掛けのCompose
mkeeda
1
300
SwiftUI Viewの責務分離
elmetal
PRO
1
240
動作確認やテストで漏れがちな観点3選
starfish719
6
1k
pylint custom ruleで始めるレビュー自動化
shogoujiie
0
120
Grafana Loki によるサーバログのコスト削減
mot_techtalk
1
130
コミュニティ駆動 AWS CDK ライブラリ「Open Constructs Library」 / community-cdk-library
gotok365
2
120
Boost Performance and Developer Productivity with Jakarta EE 11
ivargrimstad
0
270
『GO』アプリ データ基盤のログ収集システムコスト削減
mot_techtalk
0
120
Featured
See All Featured
Sharpening the Axe: The Primacy of Toolmaking
bcantrill
40
2k
Six Lessons from altMBA
skipperchong
27
3.6k
The Web Performance Landscape in 2024 [PerfNow 2024]
tammyeverts
4
410
Build The Right Thing And Hit Your Dates
maggiecrowley
34
2.5k
Understanding Cognitive Biases in Performance Measurement
bluesmoon
27
1.6k
GraphQLの誤解/rethinking-graphql
sonatard
68
10k
The Success of Rails: Ensuring Growth for the Next 100 Years
eileencodes
44
7k
The Straight Up "How To Draw Better" Workshop
denniskardys
232
140k
Building Applications with DynamoDB
mza
93
6.2k
Dealing with People You Can't Stand - Big Design 2015
cassininazir
366
25k
Writing Fast Ruby
sferik
628
61k
Helping Users Find Their Own Way: Creating Modern Search Experiences
danielanewman
29
2.4k
Transcript
Concurrency basics For Elixir-based Systems
None
So, what’s concurrency?
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread)
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread) Concurrent Execution (3 functions,
3 threads)
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread) Concurrent Execution (3 functions,
3 threads) Preemptive scheduling
Where’s the benefit?
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Sequential Execution time Waiting time
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Sequential Concurrent
Execution time Waiting time
CPU bound Re Re Re Res Re Res Re Re
I/O bound
Concurrent or Parallel What’s the difference?
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads)
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads) Parallel Execution (3 functions,
3 threads, 2 cores) core 1 core 2
root@kingschat-api-c8f8d6b76-4j65j:/app# nproc 12 root@tahmeel-api-prod-b5979bdc6-q5wz6:/# nproc 1 How many cores?
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads) Parallel Execution (3 functions,
3 threads, 2 cores) core 1 core 2 (by default) One erlang scheduler per core
:observer_cli.start()
None
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Sequential Concurrent
Execution time Waiting time Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Parallel
Sequential execution
Phoenix Request Req 1
Phoenix Request Resp
Phoenix Request Req 2
Phoenix Request Resp
Phoenix Request Req 3
Phoenix Request Resp
Concurrent execution
Phoenix Request
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Req 1
Req 2 Req 3
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Resp Resp
Resp
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
R1 APP Server DB Server (3 cores) R2 R1 R2
Time Execution time Waiting time
R1 APP Server DB Server (3 cores) Send resp R2
R3 R1 R2 R3 Time Execution time Waiting time
How much can we gain?
Amdahl’s Law
Amdahl’s Law
Amdahl’s Law in a nutshell The more synchronisation, the less
benefit from multiple cores
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time Almost 100% parallel (almost no synchronisation) DB Server (3 cores)
But…
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time This is not constant DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time This is not infinite DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 Time
Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 Time
Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
R4 R4 Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time R5 R6 R7 R5 R6 R7 DB Server (3 cores)
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Req 1
Req 2 Req 3 Remember this?
This isn’t exactly true
None
Connection pool (Prevents from overworking the DB)
Pool Manager (Blocks until a free worker is available)
None
Pool Manager (Blocks until a free worker is available)
None
It gets worse
Pool Manager Mailbox Has to be synchronised
Pool Manager Message Passing Is just copying data in shared
memory
Pool Manager Remember semaphores?
Logger Metrics Sentry
Network stack
Network stack
Network stack
Network stack Sentry Metrics
OS Threads (Garbage Collection) Data Bus Virtual Machines Memory characteristics
(e.g. processor caches) … Other synchronisation points
That’s hard
That’s REALLY hard
That’s REALLY hard Seriously, people spend their entire careers on
this
So, what to do?
Measure
Measure Measure
Measure Measure Measure
Measure ON PRODUCTION
Measure ON PRODUCTION You WILL get false results on staging/locally
Measure Entire system You WILL get false results for single
functions
Measure ONLY IF YOU HAVE TRAFFIC
“premature optimization is the root of all evil”
If something takes X ms, it will always take X
ms.
Async execution cannot “remove” this time It can only hide
it
BACK PRESSURE
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer Stop
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer OK, give me more
Producent Consumer Consumer
None
Back pressure
Thanks!