Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Concurrency Basics for Elixir
Search
Sponsored
·
SiteGround - Reliable hosting with speed, security, and support you can count on.
→
Maciej Kaszubowski
August 02, 2018
Programming
150
0
Share
Concurrency Basics for Elixir
Slides from internal presentation at
https://appunite.com
Maciej Kaszubowski
August 02, 2018
More Decks by Maciej Kaszubowski
See All by Maciej Kaszubowski
Error-free Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
450
Modular Design in Elixir (ElixirConf EU 2019)
mkaszubowski
2
920
The Big Ball of Nouns
mkaszubowski
0
130
Modular Design in Elixir
mkaszubowski
1
410
Our three years with Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
280
Distributed Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
190
Software Architecture
mkaszubowski
0
160
Let it crash - fault tolerance in Elixir/OTP
mkaszubowski
0
520
CRDTs - The science behind Phoenix Presence
mkaszubowski
2
310
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
AIを導入する前にやるべきこと
negima
2
330
「話せることがない」を乗り越える 〜日常業務から登壇テーマをつくる思考法〜
shoheimitani
4
970
PHPer、Cloudflare に引っ越す
suguruooki
1
140
tRPCの概要と少しだけパフォーマンス
misoton665
2
260
リセットCSSを1行消したらアクセシビリティが向上した話
pvcresin
4
460
t *testing.T は どこからやってくるの?
otakakot
1
900
Augmenting AI with the Power of Jakarta EE
ivargrimstad
0
140
AI-DLC Deep Dive
yuukiyo
9
5.5k
Terraform言語の静的解析 / static analysis of Terraform language
wata727
1
130
Kubernetesを使わない環境にもCloud Nativeなデプロイを実現する / Enabling Cloud Native deployments without the complexity of Kubernetes
linyows
2
180
의존성 주입과 모듈화
fornewid
0
160
Symfony AI in Action - SymfonyLive Berlin 2026
chr_hertel
1
110
Featured
See All Featured
Exploring the relationship between traditional SERPs and Gen AI search
raygrieselhuber
PRO
2
3.9k
Building a A Zero-Code AI SEO Workflow
portentint
PRO
0
490
Music & Morning Musume
bryan
47
7.2k
Building AI with AI
inesmontani
PRO
1
960
Keith and Marios Guide to Fast Websites
keithpitt
413
23k
Thoughts on Productivity
jonyablonski
76
5.1k
Building a Modern Day E-commerce SEO Strategy
aleyda
45
9k
How GitHub (no longer) Works
holman
316
150k
Utilizing Notion as your number one productivity tool
mfonobong
4
300
Testing 201, or: Great Expectations
jmmastey
46
8.1k
Design in an AI World
tapps
1
210
Collaborative Software Design: How to facilitate domain modelling decisions
baasie
1
200
Transcript
Concurrency basics For Elixir-based Systems
None
So, what’s concurrency?
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread)
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread) Concurrent Execution (3 functions,
3 threads)
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread) Concurrent Execution (3 functions,
3 threads) Preemptive scheduling
Where’s the benefit?
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Sequential Execution time Waiting time
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Sequential Concurrent
Execution time Waiting time
CPU bound Re Re Re Res Re Res Re Re
I/O bound
Concurrent or Parallel What’s the difference?
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads)
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads) Parallel Execution (3 functions,
3 threads, 2 cores) core 1 core 2
root@kingschat-api-c8f8d6b76-4j65j:/app# nproc 12 root@tahmeel-api-prod-b5979bdc6-q5wz6:/# nproc 1 How many cores?
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads) Parallel Execution (3 functions,
3 threads, 2 cores) core 1 core 2 (by default) One erlang scheduler per core
:observer_cli.start()
None
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Sequential Concurrent
Execution time Waiting time Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Parallel
Sequential execution
Phoenix Request Req 1
Phoenix Request Resp
Phoenix Request Req 2
Phoenix Request Resp
Phoenix Request Req 3
Phoenix Request Resp
Concurrent execution
Phoenix Request
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Req 1
Req 2 Req 3
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Resp Resp
Resp
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
R1 APP Server DB Server (3 cores) R2 R1 R2
Time Execution time Waiting time
R1 APP Server DB Server (3 cores) Send resp R2
R3 R1 R2 R3 Time Execution time Waiting time
How much can we gain?
Amdahl’s Law
Amdahl’s Law
Amdahl’s Law in a nutshell The more synchronisation, the less
benefit from multiple cores
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time Almost 100% parallel (almost no synchronisation) DB Server (3 cores)
But…
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time This is not constant DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time This is not infinite DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 Time
Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 Time
Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
R4 R4 Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time R5 R6 R7 R5 R6 R7 DB Server (3 cores)
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Req 1
Req 2 Req 3 Remember this?
This isn’t exactly true
None
Connection pool (Prevents from overworking the DB)
Pool Manager (Blocks until a free worker is available)
None
Pool Manager (Blocks until a free worker is available)
None
It gets worse
Pool Manager Mailbox Has to be synchronised
Pool Manager Message Passing Is just copying data in shared
memory
Pool Manager Remember semaphores?
Logger Metrics Sentry
Network stack
Network stack
Network stack
Network stack Sentry Metrics
OS Threads (Garbage Collection) Data Bus Virtual Machines Memory characteristics
(e.g. processor caches) … Other synchronisation points
That’s hard
That’s REALLY hard
That’s REALLY hard Seriously, people spend their entire careers on
this
So, what to do?
Measure
Measure Measure
Measure Measure Measure
Measure ON PRODUCTION
Measure ON PRODUCTION You WILL get false results on staging/locally
Measure Entire system You WILL get false results for single
functions
Measure ONLY IF YOU HAVE TRAFFIC
“premature optimization is the root of all evil”
If something takes X ms, it will always take X
ms.
Async execution cannot “remove” this time It can only hide
it
BACK PRESSURE
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer Stop
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer OK, give me more
Producent Consumer Consumer
None
Back pressure
Thanks!