Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Concurrency Basics for Elixir
Search
Sponsored
·
SiteGround - Reliable hosting with speed, security, and support you can count on.
→
Maciej Kaszubowski
August 02, 2018
Programming
160
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Concurrency Basics for Elixir
Slides from internal presentation at
https://appunite.com
Maciej Kaszubowski
August 02, 2018
More Decks by Maciej Kaszubowski
See All by Maciej Kaszubowski
Error-free Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
460
Modular Design in Elixir (ElixirConf EU 2019)
mkaszubowski
2
930
The Big Ball of Nouns
mkaszubowski
0
150
Modular Design in Elixir
mkaszubowski
1
420
Our three years with Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
300
Distributed Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
210
Software Architecture
mkaszubowski
0
170
Let it crash - fault tolerance in Elixir/OTP
mkaszubowski
0
550
CRDTs - The science behind Phoenix Presence
mkaszubowski
2
320
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
VibeCodingからAgenticWorkflowへ
starfish719
0
400
Laravel Boostに学ぶ、AIにPHPを書かせる技術 〜OSSの実装から蒸留するエージェント制御の王道〜
kentaroutakeda
3
680
S3 を使うアプリケーションをローカル完結で動かすことに全力を注いでみた / Running S3 Apps Offline
contour_gara
0
430
AWS DevOps AgentのAzure接続機能を検証して見えた活用法/Use Cases Verified for the AWS DevOps Agent's Azure Connectivity Feature
masakiokuda
1
230
自動化したのに回らない テスト運用の壁―AI時代の品質責任と生産性
mfunaki
0
140
AI時代に設計が 最大の生産性レバーになる 意図駆動開発とデータを消さない設計|Don't Delete Your Data or Your Intent — Design as the Deepest Lever in the AI Era
tomohisa
1
810
GDG Korea Android: 2026 I/O Extended ~ What's new in Android development tools
pluu
0
220
為什麼你並不需要ViewModel / No, you don't need a ViewModel
lovee
1
490
仕様駆動開発の消費期限
watany
20
8.1k
PHP Application における Kubernetes 内 gRPC 通信
ganchiku
0
590
Laravelで学ぶ Webアプリケーションチューニング入門/web_application_tuning_101
hanhan1978
4
1.7k
Lean は証明の正しさを確認するためだけのツールって思ってませんか?
inoueasei
1
150
Featured
See All Featured
Leveraging LLMs for student feedback in introductory data science courses - posit::conf(2025)
minecr
1
340
CoffeeScript is Beautiful & I Never Want to Write Plain JavaScript Again
sstephenson
162
16k
Pawsitive SEO: Lessons from My Dog (and Many Mistakes) on Thriving as a Consultant in the Age of AI
davidcarrasco
0
210
Faster Mobile Websites
deanohume
310
32k
The Illustrated Children's Guide to Kubernetes
chrisshort
51
53k
Bootstrapping a Software Product
garrettdimon
PRO
307
120k
Tell your own story through comics
letsgokoyo
1
1k
What the history of the web can teach us about the future of AI
inesmontani
PRO
1
650
It's Worth the Effort
3n
188
29k
The Limits of Empathy - UXLibs8
cassininazir
1
600
How STYLIGHT went responsive
nonsquared
100
6.2k
SEO Brein meetup: CTRL+C is not how to scale international SEO
lindahogenes
1
2.8k
Transcript
Concurrency basics For Elixir-based Systems
None
So, what’s concurrency?
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread)
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread) Concurrent Execution (3 functions,
3 threads)
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread) Concurrent Execution (3 functions,
3 threads) Preemptive scheduling
Where’s the benefit?
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Sequential Execution time Waiting time
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Sequential Concurrent
Execution time Waiting time
CPU bound Re Re Re Res Re Res Re Re
I/O bound
Concurrent or Parallel What’s the difference?
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads)
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads) Parallel Execution (3 functions,
3 threads, 2 cores) core 1 core 2
root@kingschat-api-c8f8d6b76-4j65j:/app# nproc 12 root@tahmeel-api-prod-b5979bdc6-q5wz6:/# nproc 1 How many cores?
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads) Parallel Execution (3 functions,
3 threads, 2 cores) core 1 core 2 (by default) One erlang scheduler per core
:observer_cli.start()
None
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Sequential Concurrent
Execution time Waiting time Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Parallel
Sequential execution
Phoenix Request Req 1
Phoenix Request Resp
Phoenix Request Req 2
Phoenix Request Resp
Phoenix Request Req 3
Phoenix Request Resp
Concurrent execution
Phoenix Request
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Req 1
Req 2 Req 3
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Resp Resp
Resp
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
R1 APP Server DB Server (3 cores) R2 R1 R2
Time Execution time Waiting time
R1 APP Server DB Server (3 cores) Send resp R2
R3 R1 R2 R3 Time Execution time Waiting time
How much can we gain?
Amdahl’s Law
Amdahl’s Law
Amdahl’s Law in a nutshell The more synchronisation, the less
benefit from multiple cores
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time Almost 100% parallel (almost no synchronisation) DB Server (3 cores)
But…
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time This is not constant DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time This is not infinite DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 Time
Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 Time
Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
R4 R4 Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time R5 R6 R7 R5 R6 R7 DB Server (3 cores)
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Req 1
Req 2 Req 3 Remember this?
This isn’t exactly true
None
Connection pool (Prevents from overworking the DB)
Pool Manager (Blocks until a free worker is available)
None
Pool Manager (Blocks until a free worker is available)
None
It gets worse
Pool Manager Mailbox Has to be synchronised
Pool Manager Message Passing Is just copying data in shared
memory
Pool Manager Remember semaphores?
Logger Metrics Sentry
Network stack
Network stack
Network stack
Network stack Sentry Metrics
OS Threads (Garbage Collection) Data Bus Virtual Machines Memory characteristics
(e.g. processor caches) … Other synchronisation points
That’s hard
That’s REALLY hard
That’s REALLY hard Seriously, people spend their entire careers on
this
So, what to do?
Measure
Measure Measure
Measure Measure Measure
Measure ON PRODUCTION
Measure ON PRODUCTION You WILL get false results on staging/locally
Measure Entire system You WILL get false results for single
functions
Measure ONLY IF YOU HAVE TRAFFIC
“premature optimization is the root of all evil”
If something takes X ms, it will always take X
ms.
Async execution cannot “remove” this time It can only hide
it
BACK PRESSURE
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer Stop
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer OK, give me more
Producent Consumer Consumer
None
Back pressure
Thanks!