Introduction to Indistinguishability/Ideal Obfuscation (iO)

Introduction to Indistinguishability/Ideal Obfuscation (iO) Sora Suegami

Issues of Multi Party Computation (MPC) While MPC, including fully
homomorphic encryption (FHE), is a practical method for private computation, it relies on the following two assumptions: • Online Assumption:   Some parties holding some secrets or private inputs must remain online until MPC terminates.   • Threshold Assumption:   When one group of parties, called committee, holds secrets used during MPC for all users, more than a threshold number of the committee parties must be honest and online.

Online & Threshold Assumptions is not ideal The threshold indicates
a trade of between safety and liveness,   but online assumption requires both. t 4BGFUZ /PQSJWBUFEBUBJTNBMJDJPVTMZSFWFBMFEEVSJOH.1$ -JWFOFTT .1$ FWFOUVBMMZTVDDFFET t = n t = 1 5SBEFP ff CFUXFFO TBGFUZBOEMJWFOFTT

Obfuscation fixes this. User’s Machine Any user can evaluate a
private (unknown) program hardcoding some secrets on arbitrary input non-interactively, without learning more information than ! s x P(x, s)

Obfuscation fixes this. User’s Machine 0CGVTDBUFE QSPHSBNGPS XJUITFDSFUT P
s Any user can evaluate a private (unknown) program hardcoding some secrets on arbitrary input non-interactively, without learning more information than ! s x P(x, s)

s Input x Any user can evaluate a private (unknown) program hardcoding some secrets on arbitrary input non-interactively, without learning more information than ! s x P(x, s)

s Input x Output   P(x, s) Any user can evaluate a private (unknown) program hardcoding some secrets on arbitrary input non-interactively, without learning more information than ! s x P(x, s)

What is Obfuscation based on Cryptographic Assumptions? $JSDVJU C

$JSDVJU C 0CGVTDBUFE $JSDVJU 0CG(C) 0CGVTDBUJPO $PNQJMFS What is Obfuscation
based on Cryptographic Assumptions?

What is Obfuscation based on Cryptographic Assumptions? $JSDVJU C 0CGVTDBUFE
$JSDVJU 0CG(C) 0CGVTDBUJPO $PNQJMFS *OQVUx 0VUQVU C(x) *OQVUx 0VUQVU 0CG(C)(x) = =

0CGVTDBUFE $JSDVJU 0CG(C) "OBMZ[JOHʜ )BSEDPEFE QSJWBUFEBUB 4FDSFU BMHPSJUIN *OGPSNBM
TVQQPTFBOBEWFSTBSZDBOFYUSBDUOPOUSJWJBMJOGPSNBUJPO JOUIFDJSDVJUGSPNUIFPCGVTDBUFEDJSDVJU   XFDBODPOTUSVDUBOBEWFSTBSZUIBUCSFBLTIBSEQSPCMFNTJO DSZQUPHSBQIZ What is Obfuscation based on Cryptographic Assumptions?

Indistinguishability Obfuscation (iO) 0CGVTDBUJPOTPGUXPDJSDVJUTXJUIUIFTBNFGVODUJPOBMJUZ JF JOQVUPVUQVUSFMBUJPO BSFJOEJTUJOHVJTIBCMF $JSDVJU C0
$JSDVJU C1 ≠ C0 (x) = C1 (x) 0CGVTDBUFE $JSDVJU 0CG(C0 ) 0CGVTDBUFE $JSDVJU 0CG(C1 ) ⇒ ≈

&WFOJG DPOUBJOTTPNFIBSEDPEFEQSJWBUFEBUB JGXFDBONBLFBDJSDVJU XJUIPVUUIFQSJWBUFEBUB UIBUIBTUIFTBNFPVUQVUBTUIBUPG GPSBMMJOQVU UIBUBOBEWFSTBSZDBOQSPWJEF UIFPCGVTDBUJPOPG
EPFTOPUSFWFBMJOGPSNBUJPOBCPVU UIFIBSEDPEFEQSJWBUFEBUBCFDBVTFJUJT JOEJTUJOHVJTIBCMFGSPNUIFPCGVTDBUJPOPG C0 C1 C0 C0 C1 Indistinguishability Obfuscation (iO)

&WFOJG DPOUBJOTTPNFIBSEDPEFEQSJWBUFEBUB JGXFDBONBLFBDJSDVJU XJUIPVUUIFQSJWBUFEBUBUIBU IBTUIFTBNFPVUQVUBTUIBUPG GPSBMMJOQVUUIBUBO BEWFSTBSZDBOQSPWJEF UIFPCGVTDBUJPOPG
EPFTOPUSFWFBMJOGPSNBUJPO BCPVUUIFIBSEDPEFEQSJWBUFEBUBCFDBVTFJUJT JOEJTUJOHVJTIBCMFGSPNUIFPCGVTDBUJPOPG C0 C1 C0 C0 C1 Indistinguishability Obfuscation (iO)

Ideal Obfuscation under Pseudorandom Oracle Model [JLL+23] 6OGPSUVOBUFMZ BOZTDIFNFTJODMVEJOHJ0DBOOPUFOTVSFUIBUBOBEWFSTBSZ DBOOPUMFBSONPSFJOGPSNBUJPOUIBOUIFDJSDVJUPVUQVUJOQMBJONPEFM
<#(* >5IFTFDVSJUZPGJ0JTUIFCFTUQPTTJCMFPCGVTDBUJPO<(3> )PXFWFS CZNPEFMJOHBIBTIGVODUJPOBTBQTFVEPSBOEPNPSBDMF 1S0 TJNJMBSUPSBOEPNPSBDMFCVUEJ ff FSFOUGSPNJU XFDBODPOTUSVDUBOJEFBM PCGVTDBUJPOUIBUSFWFBMTOPJOGPSNBUJPOFYDFQUGPSUIFPVUQVU<+-- >

6OGPSUVOBUFMZ BOZTDIFNFTJODMVEJOHJ0DBOOPUFOTVSFUIBUBOBEWFSTBSZ DBOOPUMFBSONPSFJOGPSNBUJPOUIBOUIFDJSDVJUPVUQVUJOQMBJONPEFM <#(* >5IFTFDVSJUZPGJ0JTUIFCFTUQPTTJCMFPCGVTDBUJPO<(3> )PXFWFS CZNPEFMJOHBIBTIGVODUJPOBTBQTFVEPSBOEPNPSBDMF 1S0 TJNJMBSUPSBOEPNPSBDMFCVUEJ
ff FSFOUGSPNJU XFDBODPOTUSVDUBOJEFBM PCGVTDBUJPOUIBUSFWFBMTOPJOGPSNBUJPOFYDFQUGPSUIFPVUQVU<+-- > Ideal Obfuscation under Pseudorandom Oracle Model [JLL+23]

Bootstrapping iO using verifiable FHE [GGH+13] We actually need iO
only for ZKP verification + FHE decryption, which is represented by a shallow (NC1) circuit! • FHE.Enc(C( ⋅ , s)) • iOsk Obfuscation

only for ZKP verification + FHE decryption, which is represented by a shallow (NC1) circuit! • FHE.Enc(C( ⋅ , s)) • iOsk Obfuscation iOsk(π, FHE.Enc(y)) 1. Verify the proof to assert that the given is a correct output of for some .   2. Output π FHE.Enc(y) FHE.Eval(C(x, s)) x FHE.Dec(sk, FHE.Enc(y))

only for ZKP verification + FHE decryption, which is represented by a shallow (NC1) circuit! • Obfuscate( ) executed by an obfuscator: 1. Sample FHE secret and public keys . 2. Encrypt under . 3. Generate , which hardcodes . 4. Output   C, s (sk, pk) C( ⋅ , s) pk iOsk sk iO = (FHE.Enc(C( ⋅ , s)), iOsk)

only for ZKP verification + FHE decryption, which is represented by a shallow (NC1) circuit! • Obfuscate( ) executed by an obfuscator: 1. Sample FHE secret and public keys . 2. Encrypt under . 3. Generate , which hardcodes . 4. Output   C, s (sk, pk) C( ⋅ , s) pk iOsk sk iO = (FHE.Enc(C( ⋅ , s)), iOsk) • Eval( ) executed by an evaluator:   1. Compute 2. Generate a ZKP proof for 3. Evaluate , outputting .   iO, x FHE.Enc(y) := FHE.Eval(C(x, s)) π FHE.Enc(y) iOsk(π, FHE.Enc(y)) y = C(x, s)

How to construct iO 8FMMTUVEJFE$SZQUPHSBQIJD"TTVNQUJPOT   -FBSOJOH1BSJUZXJUI/PJTFBTTVNQUJPO   1TFVEP3BOEPN(FOFSBUPSJO/$
DPOTUBOUEFQUIDJSDVJU %FDJTJPO-JOFBSBTTVNQUJPOPOCJMJOFBSHSPVQT 1VCMJD,FZ'VODUJPOBM&ODSZQUJPOXIPTFFODSZQUJPOUJNFJTTVCMVOBS JOUIFTJ[FPGUIFDJSDVJUPVUQVUTJ[F [JLS22]

How to construct iO 8FMMTUVEJFE$SZQUPHSBQIJD"TTVNQUJPOT   -FBSOJOH1BSJUZXJUI/PJTFBTTVNQUJPO   1TFVEP3BOEPN(FOFSBUPSJO/$
DPOTUBOUEFQUIDJSDVJU %FDJTJPO-JOFBSBTTVNQUJPOPOCJMJOFBSHSPVQT [JLS22] [BV18] + PrO model [JLL+23] *OEJTUJOHVJTIBCJMJUZ0CGVTDBUJPO *EFBM0CGVTDBUJPO 1VCMJD,FZ'VODUJPOBM&ODSZQUJPOXIPTFFODSZQUJPOUJNFJTTVCMVOBS JOUIFTJ[FPGUIFDJSDVJUPVUQVUTJ[F

Public-Key Functional Encryption 4FUVQ .BTUFS   TFDSFULFZ msk &OD ek
.FTTBHF m $JQIFSUFYU ct ,FZ(FO msk $JSDVJU C 'VODUJPOBM   TFDSFULFZ fskC %FD ct fskC 0VUQVU C(m) 1SJWBUF0QFSBUJPO &ODSZQUJPO   LFZ ek 1VCMJD0QFSBUJPO

Public-Key Functional Encryption 1,'&WT')& 1,'& ')& 0VUQVU 1MBJOUFYU $JQIFSUFYU $JSDVJUUIBUDBO
CFFWBMVBUFE -JNJUFECZB USVTUFEQBSUZ 'SFF $JSDVJUJT 1SJWBUF1VCMJD 1VCMJD $BOCF1SJWBUF

iO from Public-Key Functional Encryption 1,'&JTBMNPTUJ0TJODFJUBMMPXTOPOJOUFSBDUJWFFWBMVBUJPOPGUIF TQFDJ fi DDJSDVJUPOQSJWBUFJOQVUT

iO from Public-Key Functional Encryption 1,'&JTBMNPTUJ0TJODFJUBMMPXTOPOJOUFSBDUJWFFWBMVBUJPOPGUIF TQFDJ fi DDJSDVJUPOQSJWBUFJOQVUT )PXFWFS
1,'&JTOPUJ0CFDBVTFBGVODUJPOBMTFDSFULFZEPFTOPU IJEFJOGPSNBUJPOJOTJEFUIFDJSDVJU

iO from Public-Key Functional Encryption 1,'&JTBMNPTUJ0TJODFJUBMMPXTOPOJOUFSBDUJWFFWBMVBUJPOPGUIF TQFDJ fi DDJSDVJUPOQSJWBUFJOQVUT )PXFWFS
1,'&JTOPUJ0CFDBVTFBGVODUJPOBMTFDSFULFZEPFTOPU IJEFJOGPSNBUJPOJOTJEFUIFDJSDVJU %VSJOHUIFFWBMVBUJPOPGC(x, s) 1,'& BSFQVCMJD JTQSJWBUF C, s x J0 BSFQSJWBUF JTQVCMJD C, s x

Constructing iO by Recursive use of PKFE [BV18] ,FZ*EFBBEEJOHFBDICJUPGUIFFWBMVBUPS`TJOQVU UPUIF
1,'&FODSZQUJPOPG QSPWJEFECZUIFPCGVTDBUPS x (C, s)

1,'&FODSZQUJPOPG QSPWJEFECZUIFPCGVTDBUPS x (C, s) 5IFFWBMVBUPSDBO fi OBMMZPCUBJOFODSZQUJPOPG BMMPXJOH1,'&EFDSZQUJPOUPPVUQVU (C, s, x) C(x, s)

1,'&FODSZQUJPOPG QSPWJEFECZUIFPCGVTDBUPS x (C, s) 5IFFWBMVBUPSDBO fi OBMMZPCUBJOFODSZQUJPOPG BMMPXJOH1,'&EFDSZQUJPOUPPVUQVU (C, s, x) C(x, s) 3FDVSTJWF&ODSZQUJPO$JSDVJU Di (C, s, x1 x2 …xi−1 ) := '&&OD(pk, (C, s, x1 x2 …xi−1 0)) || '&&OD(pk, (C, s, x1 x2 …xi−1 1))

1,'&FODSZQUJPOPG QSPWJEFECZUIFPCGVTDBUPS x (C, s) 5IFFWBMVBUPSDBO fi OBMMZPCUBJOFODSZQUJPOPG BMMPXJOH1,'&EFDSZQUJPOUPPVUQVU (C, s, x) C(x, s) 3FDVSTJWF&ODSZQUJPO$JSDVJU Di (C, s, x1 x2 …xi−1 ) := '&&OD(pk, (C, s, x1 x2 …xi−1 0))||'&&OD(pk, (C, s, x1 x2 …xi−1 1)) 5IFJUIEFDSZQUJPOPG1,'&PVUQVUTUIF1,'& FODSZQUJPOTGPS BOE (C, s, x1 x2 …xi−1 0) (C, s, x1 x2 …xi−1 1)

Constructing iO by Recursive use of PKFE [BV18] The image
is taken from [BV18]

Requirements to PKFE for iO construction [BV18] 'PSUIFPVUQVUTJ[F UIFDPNQVUBUJPOBMDPNQMFYJUZPGUIF FODSZQUJPOBMHPSJUINJODSFBTFTJOPSEFS
m 𝒪 (mα) *OPSEFSGPSUIFDPNQVUBUJPOBMDPNQMFYJUZUPDPOWFSHF BGUFS SFDVSTJPOT NVTUCFMFTTUIBO   TVCMJOFBSF ff i DJFODZ n α

PKFE in Three Steps [JLS22] 3FQSFTFOUBQSPDFTTUPHFOFSBUFBHBSCMFEDJSDVJUGPSBDJSDVJU BOEJUT HBSCMFEJOQVUTGPSJOQVUT JOBDPOTUBOUEFHSFFNVMUJWBSJBUFQPMZOPNJBM
  $POWFSUUIFQPMZOPNJBMJOUPBEFHSFFQPMZOPNJBMTVDIUIBU UIF EFHSFFGPSQSJWBUFBOEQVCMJDJOQVUTBSFUXPBOEDPOTUBOU SFTQFDUJWFMZ BOE UIFSVOOJOHUJNFUPFODPEFUIFPSJHJOBMWBSJBCMFTUPQSJWBUFBOE QVCMJDJOQVUTJTTVCMJOFBSXJUISFTQFDUUPUIFPVUQVUTJ[F 6TF1,'&GPSEFHSFFQPMZOPNJBMT DBMMFEQBSUJBMMZIJEJOHGVODUJPOBM FODSZQUJPO 1)'& C x m

PKFE in Three Steps [JLS22] 6TF1,'&GPSEFHSFFQPMZOPNJBMT HBSCMFEDJSDVJUHFOFSBUJPO Encryption Process:  
1. Encode input and random seeds into private and public inputs . 2. Encrypt under the public key for PHFE, denoted by . 3. Output .   x r (SI, PI) (SI, PI) ctPHFE ctPHFE

PKFE in Three Steps [JLS22] 6TF1,'&GPSEFHSFFQPMZOPNJBMT HBSCMFEDJSDVJUHFOFSBUJPO Decryption Process:  
1. Decrypt the given , outputting a garbled circuit and its garbled inputs. 2. Evaluate the garbled circuit on the garbled inputs, outputting   ctPHFE C(x) Encryption Process:   1. Encode input and random seeds into private and public inputs . 2. Encrypt under the public key for PHFE, denoted by . 3. Output .   x r (SI, PI) (SI, PI) ctPHFE ctPHFE

PKFE in Three Steps [JLS22] 3FQSFTFOUBQSPDFTTUPHFOFSBUFBHBSCMFEDJSDVJUGPSBDJSDVJU BOEJUT HBSCMFEJOQVUTGPSJOQVUT JOBDPOTUBOUEFHSFFNVMUJWBSJBUFQPMZOPNJBM
  $POWFSUUIFQPMZOPNJBMJOUPBEFHSFFQPMZOPNJBMTVDIUIBU UIF EFHSFFGPSQSJWBUFBOEQVCMJDJOQVUTBSFUXPBOEDPOTUBOU SFTQFDUJWFMZ BOE UIFSVOOJOHUJNFUPFODPEFUIFPSJHJOBMWBSJBCMFTUPQSJWBUFBOE QVCMJDJOQVUTJTTVCMJOFBSXJUISFTQFDUUPUIFPVUQVUTJ[F 6TF1,'&GPSEFHSFFQPMZOPNJBMT DBMMFEQBSUJBMMZIJEJOHGVODUJPOBM FODSZQUJPO 1)'& C x m

Learning Parity with Noise (LPN) Assumption The image is taken
from [JLS21]

Deg 2.5 Polynomials with LPN [JLS22] 4VCMJOFBSTJ[FE1VCMJDBOE1SJWBUF*OQVUTVTJOH-1/ The images are
taken from [JLS22]

Deg 2.5 Polynomials with LPN [JLS22] 4VCMJOFBSTJ[FE1VCMJDBOE1SJWBUF*OQVUTVTJOH-1/ 5PDPNQVUFBEFHSFF QPMZOPNJBM d
h(Y) The images are taken from [JLS22]

Deg 2.5 Polynomials with LPN [JLS22] Observation: since error is
sparse, the following is also sparse: e Corr Corr = {hj (x′ ) − hj (x′ + e)}j∈[m]

sparse, the following is also sparse: e Corr Corr = {hj (x′ ) − hj (x′ + e)}j∈[m] The matrix of has at most non-zeros for with overwhelming probability, i.e., the rank is at most . Corr m1−ϵ ϵ > 0 m1−ϵ

sparse, the following is also sparse: e Corr Corr = {hj (x′ ) − hj (x′ + e)}j∈[m] The matrix of has at most non-zeros for with overwhelming probability, i.e., the rank is at most . Corr m1−ϵ ϵ > 0 m1−ϵ , where the sizes of is sublinear, i.e., Corr = UV |U, V| 𝒪 (m1−ϵ)

Deg 2.5 Polynomials with LPN [JLS22] 4VCMJOFBSTJ[FE1VCMJDBOE1SJWBUF*OQVUTVTJOH-1/ SI = (s⊗
d 2 , U, V) PI = (A, b = sA + e + x′ ) 1. The degree is 2.5 2. the sizes of is sublinear, i.e., |U, V| 𝒪 (m1−ϵ)

3FGFSFODFT • [SW14] Sahai, A., & Waters, B. (2014, May).
How to use indistinguishability obfuscation: deniable encryption, and more. In Proceedings of the forty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (pp. 475-484). • [JLL+23] Jain, A., Lin, H., Luo, J., & Wichs, D. (2023, August). The pseudorandom oracle model and ideal obfuscation. In Annual International Cryptology Conference (pp. 233-262). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. • [BGI+01] Barak, B., Goldreich, O., Impagliazzo, R., Rudich, S., Sahai, A., Vadhan, S., & Yang, K. (2001, August). On the (im) possibility of obfuscating programs. In Annual international cryptology conference (pp. 1-18). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. • [GR07] Goldwasser, S., & Rothblum, G. N. (2007). On best-possible obfuscation. In Theory of Cryptography: 4th Theory of Cryptography Conference, TCC 2007, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, February 21-24, 2007. Proceedings 4 (pp. 194-213). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. • [JLS22] Jain, A., Lin, H., & Sahai, A. (2022, May). Indistinguishability obfuscation from LPN over F p, DLIN, and PRGs in NC 0. In Annual International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques (pp. 670-699). Cham: Springer International Publishing. • [GGH+13] Garg, S., Gentry, C., Halevi, S., Raykova, M., Sahai, A., & Waters, B. (2016). Candidate indistinguishability obfuscation and functional encryption for all circuits. SIAM Journal on Computing, 45(3), 882-929. • [BV18] Bitansky, N., & Vaikuntanathan, V. (2018). Indistinguishability obfuscation from functional encryption. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 65(6), 1-37. • [JLS21] Jain, A., Lin, H., & Sahai, A. (2021, June). Indistinguishability obfuscation from well-founded assumptions. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (pp. 60-73).

Introduction to Indistinguishability/Ideal Obfu...

Introduction to Indistinguishability/Ideal Obfuscation (iO)

More Decks by SoraSuegami

Other Decks in Technology

Featured

Transcript