Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Evolution in Literature: Texts and Series

Evolution in Literature: Texts and Series

Presentation at the Distinguishability in Genealogical Phylogenetic Networks workshop at the Lorenz Center (Leiden), showcasing how trees and networks have been used both in textual criticism and historiography of literature. I briefly discussed stemmatology (with specific example from the Bible and from the Divine Comedy), as well as history of literature mentioning Tynyanov and Jauss.

Tiago Tresoldi

August 14, 2018
Tweet

More Decks by Tiago Tresoldi

Other Decks in Education

Transcript

  1. Evolution in Literature:
    Texts and Series
    Evolution in Literature:
    Texts and Series
    Tiago Tresoldi
    Computer-Assisted Language Comparison (CALC)
    Max Planck Institute for the Science of
    Human History (MPI-SHH / Jena)

    View Slide

  2. Textual Criticism

    Investigates the evolution of written texts,
    focusing in understanding differences among
    copies of a work (its witnesses) in order to
    produce a critical edition
    – Concepts of “errors” and “corruption”

    Evolved from the long tradition of “philology”
    (religious and legal exegesis) into a scientific
    discipline in the same period and cultural
    framework of Darwinism and Historical
    Linguistics

    View Slide

  3. Steps of Stemmatology

    Recensio, a survey collecting textual and non-textual
    information of all copies

    Collatio, scrutiny of manuscripts’ contents which are
    transcribed, aligned, and compared

    Identification of shared disjunctive errors, assumed as
    evidence of relationship

    Production of the stemma codicum, a tree representing the
    evolution of the tradition

    Emendatio, a reconstruction that explains the variants and
    represents the archetype

    View Slide

  4. Stemma Codicum for Dante Aligheri’s Divine Comedy (source: Petrocchi, 1965)

    View Slide

  5. Textual Tradition of the Gospels (source: yuriystasyuk.com)

    View Slide

  6. Relationships among the Synoptic Gospels

    View Slide

  7. Augustinian Theory Q Hypothesis
    Farrer Theory Jerusalem School Hypothesis

    View Slide

  8. Phylogenetics

    First phylogenetic methods by Platnick & Cameron
    (1977)

    Number of editions using such method is increasing
    very slowly: Barbrook et al. (1998); Stolz (2003); Lantin
    et al. (2004); Shaw (2011), as well as critical thinking
    over it as Robinson (2016)
    – Overall, low acceptance

    For a review of developments, criticisms and
    responses, see Macé & Baret (2006), Howe et al.
    (2012)

    View Slide

  9. Consensus phylogram the Divine Comedy (source: Tresoldi, not published)

    View Slide

  10. NN for selected manuscripts of the Divine Comedy (source: Tresoldi, not published)

    View Slide

  11. From history to evolution

    Historiography of literature is itself a genre, of teleological
    motivation
    – Gervinus’ Geschichte der poetischen Nationallitteratur der Deutschen
    (1835–1842)
    – De Sanctis’ Storia della letteratura italiana (1883)

    Not evolution but either
    – A path towards some individuality (of genre, of national literature, etc.)
    – The biological metaphor

    After the nationalist experiences, either
    – Psychological genesis – evolution by authors “ahead of time”
    – The history of genres
    – Influences (Warburg, Curtius)

    Still being taught this way

    View Slide

  12. Yury Tynyanov

    First serious movement from “chronology” to
    “evolution” (Литературная эволюция
    [Literaturnaya evolyutsiya], 1927)
    – Part of the Russian “Formalism”, associated with
    Jakobson and Trubetzkoy in linguistics

    The study of genesis is not the study of evolution

    Condition of being literary is defined by the
    opposition with the non-literary
    – Experiments with sound symbolism are sometimes
    child play, sometimes vanguard (зáумь [zaum])
    – Elevated odes of the 18th c. (Derzhavin) automatized,
    replaced first by “feminine” poetry (Karamzin), and then
    by the narrative strategies of letters (Turgenev),
    preparing the way for the Golden Age (Tolstoy,
    Dostoyevsky)

    View Slide

  13. Tynyanov and Series
    Narrative Fiction
    Poetry

    View Slide

  14. Tynyanov and Series
    Narrative Fiction
    Poetry
    Popular Verse
    Court Verse

    View Slide

  15. Tynyanov and Series
    Narrative Fiction
    Poetry
    Popular Verse
    Court Verse
    Letters, Private Communication
    Philosophy

    View Slide

  16. Tynyanov and Series
    Narrative Fiction
    Poetry
    Popular Verse
    Court Verse
    Letters, Private Communication
    Philosophy

    View Slide

  17. Tynyanov and Series
    Narrative Fiction
    Poetry
    Popular Verse
    Court Verse
    Letters, Private Communication
    Philosophy

    View Slide

  18. Tynyanov and Series
    Narrative Fiction
    Poetry
    Popular Verse
    Court Verse
    Letters, Private Communication
    Philosophy

    View Slide

  19. Tynyanov and Series
    Narrative Fiction
    Poetry
    Popular Verse
    Court Verse
    Letters, Private Communication
    Philosophy

    View Slide

  20. Hans-Robert Jauß

    Against the contempt for the contemporary

    The evolution is not explained by “sources”
    and especially “influences”

    History is the history of reception

    The horizon of expectation
    – The structure by which the public comprehends
    any text, based on cultural codes and conventions
    particular to their time in history
    – Influence comes not from the text, but from how
    the text is read
    – Influence is not only or necessarily intertextuality –
    there might be influence without the same text,
    and the same text might have a different meaning

    View Slide

  21. An example: Ulysses

    Iliad and Odyssey (8th-6th c. BCE)

    Attic Tragedies (5th c. BCE)

    Aeneid (Virgil, 29-19 BCE)

    Medieval vulgarizations
    – Le Roman de Troie (Sainte-Maure, c. 1160)

    Divine Comedy (Alighieri, 1308-1321)

    Troilus and Cressida (Shakespeare, 1602)

    Ulysses (Tennyson, 1842)

    Ulysses (Joyce, 1920)

    Post-war adaptations (including television,
    comics, etc.)

    View Slide

  22. Odyssey

    View Slide

  23. Odyssey
    Iliad

    View Slide

  24. Odyssey
    Iliad

    View Slide

  25. Odyssey
    Iliad
    Near-East Epics

    View Slide

  26. Odyssey
    Iliad
    Near-East Epics Oral Trojan Tradition

    View Slide

  27. Odyssey
    Iliad
    Near-East Epics Oral Trojan Tradition
    Hermes’ Trickster
    narratives

    View Slide

  28. Odyssey
    Iliad
    Near-East Epics Oral Trojan Tradition
    Hermes’ Trickster
    narratives
    Etruscan, Italic
    narratives

    View Slide

  29. Odyssey
    Iliad
    Near-East Epics Oral Trojan Tradition
    Hermes’ Trickster
    narratives
    Etruscan, Italic
    narratives
    Epic Cycle

    View Slide

  30. Odyssey
    Iliad
    Near-East Epics Oral Trojan Tradition
    Hermes’ Trickster
    narratives
    Etruscan, Italic
    narratives
    Epic Cycle Lyrical Poetry

    View Slide

  31. Odyssey
    Iliad
    Near-East Epics Oral Trojan Tradition
    Hermes’ Trickster
    narratives
    Etruscan, Italic
    narratives
    Epic Cycle Lyrical Poetry
    Attic Tragedy

    View Slide

  32. Odyssey
    Iliad
    Near-East Epics Oral Trojan Tradition
    Hermes’ Trickster
    narratives
    Etruscan, Italic
    narratives
    Epic Cycle Lyrical Poetry
    Attic Tragedy
    Pre-Cynic
    Philosophy

    View Slide

  33. Odyssey
    Iliad
    Near-East Epics Oral Trojan Tradition
    Hermes’ Trickster
    narratives
    Etruscan, Italic
    narratives
    Epic Cycle Lyrical Poetry
    Attic Tragedy
    Pre-Cynic
    Philosophy
    Post-Cynic
    Philosophy

    View Slide

  34. Odyssey
    Iliad
    Near-East Epics Oral Trojan Tradition
    Hermes’ Trickster
    narratives
    Etruscan, Italic
    narratives
    Epic Cycle Lyrical Poetry
    Attic Tragedy
    Pre-Cynic
    Philosophy
    Post-Cynic
    Philosophy
    Roman narratives
    Roman & Christian
    Philosophy

    View Slide

  35. Odyssey
    Iliad
    Near-East Epics Oral Trojan Tradition
    Hermes’ Trickster
    narratives
    Etruscan, Italic
    narratives
    Epic Cycle Lyrical Poetry
    Attic Tragedy
    Pre-Cynic
    Philosophy
    Post-Cynic
    Philosophy
    Roman narratives
    Roman & Christian
    Philosophy
    Second
    Sophistics

    View Slide

  36. Philosophy
    Fiction,
    Poetry
    Dictis & Dares

    View Slide

  37. Philosophy
    Fiction,
    Poetry
    Dictis & Dares
    Medieval Trojan
    Narratives

    View Slide

  38. Philosophy
    Fiction,
    Poetry
    Dictis & Dares
    Medieval Trojan
    Narratives
    Divine Commedy

    View Slide

  39. Philosophy
    Fiction,
    Poetry
    Dictis & Dares
    Medieval Trojan
    Narratives
    Divine Commedy
    New Interpretation of the
    Divine Comedy

    View Slide

  40. Philosophy
    Fiction,
    Poetry
    Dictis & Dares
    Medieval Trojan
    Narratives
    Divine Commedy
    Odyssey
    New Interpretation of the
    Divine Comedy
    Odyssey

    View Slide

  41. Philosophy
    Fiction,
    Poetry
    Dictis & Dares
    Medieval Trojan
    Narratives
    Divine Commedy
    Odyssey
    New Interpretation of the
    Divine Comedy
    Odyssey
    Translations,
    Adaptations

    View Slide

  42. Philosophy
    Fiction,
    Poetry
    Dictis & Dares
    Medieval Trojan
    Narratives
    Divine Commedy
    Odyssey
    New Interpretation of the
    Divine Comedy
    Odyssey
    Translations,
    Adaptations
    Shakespeare

    View Slide

  43. Philosophy
    Fiction,
    Poetry
    Dictis & Dares
    Medieval Trojan
    Narratives
    Divine Commedy
    Odyssey
    New Interpretation of the
    Divine Comedy
    Odyssey
    Translations,
    Adaptations
    Romanticism,
    Sea Narratives
    Shakespeare

    View Slide

  44. Philosophy
    Fiction,
    Poetry
    Dictis & Dares
    Medieval Trojan
    Narratives
    Divine Commedy
    Odyssey
    New Interpretation of the
    Divine Comedy
    Odyssey
    Translations,
    Adaptations
    Romanticism,
    Sea Narratives
    Most contemporary
    narratives
    Shakespeare

    View Slide

  45. Philosophy
    Fiction,
    Poetry
    Dictis & Dares
    Medieval Trojan
    Narratives
    Divine Commedy
    Odyssey
    New Interpretation of the
    Divine Comedy
    Odyssey
    Translations,
    Adaptations
    Romanticism,
    Sea Narratives
    Most contemporary
    narratives
    Shakespeare
    Joyce

    View Slide

  46. Darwinian literary studies

    Arising with the dissatisfaction with
    post-structuralism and post-
    modernism

    Study of literature in the context of
    evolution by means of natural
    selection (including gene-culture co-
    evolution)

    Digital Humanities, “distant reading”
    and longue durée

    Evolution of literature in the
    framework of cultural evolution

    View Slide

  47. “Admixture”

    Stemmatology can be used to study the evolution in the reception
    – Bédier and the “good copy”

    Historiography of literature is not ready to use quantitative methods
    (but Darwinian literary studies are getting there)
    – Understand its own history
    – Understand evolution in other fields, analogies and differences
    – Make hypotheses and test them – are features possible, and if so which
    features?
    – Intertextuality is not a complete answer… but it is where we should start

    For phylogenetics
    – Understand evolution in other fields
    – Consider literary evolution as one of the extreme cases in cultural evolution
    – Understand that descendency material might not be intertextual, and that
    influence might be “negative”

    View Slide

  48. Cited Refereces
    BARBROOK, Adrian C.; HOWE, Christopher J.; BLAKE, Norman; ROBINSON, Peter (1998). “The
    Phylogeny of the Canterbury Tales.” Nature, 394 (6696): 839.
    HOWE, Christopher J.; CONNOLLY, Ruth; WINDRAM, Heather F. (2012). “Responding to Criticisms of
    Phylogenetic Methods in Stemmatology.” Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, 52 (1): 51-67.
    LANTIN, Anne-Catherine; BARET, Philippe V.; MACÉ, Caroline (2004). “Phylogenetic Analysis of
    Gregory of Nazianzus’ Homily 27.” 7èmes Journées Internationales d’Analyse statistique des Données
    Textuelles: 700-707.
    MACÉ, Caroline; BARET, Philippe V. (2006). “Why Phylogenetic Methods Work: the Theory of Evolution
    and Textual Criticism.” in Linguistica Computazionale. The Evolution of Texts: Confronting
    Stemmatological and Genetical Methods 24: 89-108.
    PLATNICK, Norman I.; DON CAMERON, H. (1977). “Cladistic Methods in Textual, Linguistic, and
    Phylogenetic Analysis.” Systematic Zoology: 380-385.
    ROBINSON, Peter (2016). “Four Rules for the Application of Phylogenetics in the Analysis of Textual
    Traditions.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 31 (3): 637-651.
    SHAW, Prue (2011). Commedia: a Digital Edition. Birmingham: Scholarly Digital Editions.
    STOLZ, Michael (2003). “New Philology and New Phylogeny: Aspects of a Critical Electronic
    Edition of Wolfram’s Parzival.” Literary and Linguistic Computing, 18 (2): 139-150.

    View Slide

  49. Thank you!
    Thank you!
    Tiago Tresoldi
    [email protected]

    View Slide