and Drug Administration (FDA). (2009). Guidance for Industry. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidances/ucm193282.pdf. LMq+. (2014). Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9, PHQ-15) GKV± Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 GKV: up to date. FU ',',v3;Z,cg, (7), 35-39. >tª¯b³´?&:²µ´
Reflection Paper on the use of patient reported outcome 5 (PRO) measures in oncology studies. 2014. Available at: http://www. ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_ library/Scientific_guideline/2014/06/ WC500168852.pdf. • d G mYc d c d • in • ind • a MQRMV N • a f
(2011). Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science. BMC medicine, 9(1), 86. Doward, L. C., Gnanasakthy, A., & Baker, M. G. (2010). Patient reported outcomes: looking beyond the label claim. Health and quality of life outcomes, 8(1), 89.
MEDICAL ONCOLOGY AMERICAN SOCIETY of CLINICAL ONCOLOGY Mercieca-Bebber, R., King, M. T., Calvert, M. J., Stockler, M. R., & Friedlander, M. (2018). The importance of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials and strategies for future optimization. Patient related outcome measures, 9, 353.
~ r • A m ~ ~ mg y • ~ s m ~ u ~ • s u • u h hm t m h A s h h – u m r h 9 Mercieca-Bebber, R., King, M. T., Calvert, M. J., Stockler, M. R., & Friedlander, M. (2018). The importance of patient- reported outcomes in clinical trials and strategies for future optimization. Patient related outcome measures, 9, 353. Ruiz, S. P. (2017). Patient-reported outcomes: How useful are they?. Medical Writing, 26, 42-47.
c) ( • r y A m A ) c) (. r y • A m ) ( ) • f m 753 A A ~s s g m A m ~ g h A m h mg d 11 Mercieca-Bebber, R., King, M. T., Calvert, M. J., Stockler, M. R., & Friedlander, M. (2018). The importance of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials and strategies for future optimization. Patient related outcome measures, 9, 353. Gaulin, C., & Osorio, G. (2019). Patient Reported Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer Studies: Evaluating the Impact of the FDA Guidance for Industry. Journal of Scientific Innovation in Medicine, 2(1).
i ) )/ ((- A – )/ i .( A m – m / ) (( ) ( 1 – 753 i (. (/) A m – i .. A m 12 Gnanasakthy, A., Mordin, M., Clark, M., DeMuro, C., Fehnel, S., & Copley-Merriman, C. (2012). A review of patient-reported outcome labels in the United States: 2006 to 2010. Value in health, 15(3), 437-442. Gnanasakthy, A., Mordin, M., Evans, E., Doward, L., & DeMuro, C. (2017). A review of patient- reported outcome labeling in the United States (2011–2015). Value in Health, 20(3), 420-429.
COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health MeasurementINstruments (COSMIN) 39 768 0 o t v o b cm ) n x t k b ]7 C ?I[ ( ? ( 39 768 k0 x : 9 v
D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) – user manual. http://www.cosmin.nl/.
D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) – user manual. http://www.cosmin.nl/. 8. {u=§.[=ª} 9. D(ª-6 10. kpÖÍÑÙª& A. EYNlª.y B. CQªW=} C. PROMª B 5. 0`*7=ª} 6. `Pª} 7. ¡ªªW=} 1. ÖÍÑÙªa`ª-6 2. o¯µ%Tª-6 3. EYNlª.y 4. zH§Eª B
H. (2019). Systematic review of the measurement properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales–21 by applying updated COSMIN methodology. Quality of Life Research, 1-15.
H. (2019). Systematic review of the measurement properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales–21 by applying updated COSMIN methodology. Quality of Life Research, 1-15. 1. cgª¶Ìº¸ÄªÔÄÀƼÇÀÔÄʦ} ¥´ 2. 14W=ª¶xCQW=ª%T¦} ¥´ 3. ½ÍÉØĪ¶GRADE¸Î×ÙƦ} ¥´
97 ue B ( k ( : ) k ) lk b + yi + , , - - . o . / / Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C. A., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) – user manual. http://www.cosmin.nl/.
D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., ... & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 63(7), 737-745. : 97 ue B ( k ( : ) k ) lk b + yi + , , - - . o . / / a~m« ·²
B., De Vet, H. C., Prinsen, C. A., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1171-1179. 39 768 t r PR A C c PR A C c 1 C CO ? C p lk b 0 . PR A C 1 k 0 356 / 7 42 PR A C 1 ) 1 a~m« ·²
t t https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-RoB-checklist-V2-0-v17_rev3.pdf Mokkink, L. B., De Vet, H. C., Prinsen, C. A., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1171-1179. 39 768 t s SCO E ? CNR? C R RI ? CNR? C a~m« ·²
Moon, S. H. (2019). Systematic review of the measurement properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales–21 by applying updated COSMIN methodology. Quality of Life Research, 1-15.
Moon, S. H. (2019). Systematic review of the measurement properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales–21 by applying updated COSMIN methodology. Quality of Life Research, 1-15.
Kalff, M. C., Prinsen, C. A. C., Coulman, K. D., den Haan, C., Welbourn, R., ... & van Wagensveld, B. A. (2018). Recommendations on the most suitable quality-of-life measurement instruments for bariatric and body contouring surgery: a systematic review. Obesity reviews, 19(10), 1395-1411.
y A i ~ s u • sy h 37 Chiarotto, A., Boers, M., Deyo, R. A., Buchbinder, R., Corbin, T. P., Costa, L. O., ... & Lin, C. W. C. (2018). Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain. Pain, 159(3), 481.
& Karunajeewa, H. (2019). Patient-reported outcome measures in community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review of application and content validity. BMJ Open Respiratory Research, 6(1), e000398.