Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Monads in Scala
Search
Alexey Novakov
March 06, 2020
Programming
120
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Monads in Scala
Monad as an abstract interface. Usage of Monads in Scala
Alexey Novakov
March 06, 2020
More Decks by Alexey Novakov
See All by Alexey Novakov
Особенности разработки Flink джобов на Scala
alexeyn
0
70
Streamhouse Architecture with Flink and Paimon
alexeyn
0
310
Flink Forward 2023: State of Scala API in Apache Flink
alexeyn
0
200
State of Scala API in Apache Flink
alexeyn
0
440
Deployment of Streaming Application with Ververica Platform on Kubernetes
alexeyn
0
260
Rapid Deployment with Apache Flink and Ververica Platform
alexeyn
0
210
Scalacon 2021 - Deep Learning in Scala
alexeyn
0
120
AWS Airflow and EMR
alexeyn
0
140
EMR Data Ingestion with Apache Hudi
alexeyn
0
60
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
才能?センス?知らん、 続けたもん勝ちだ。-- 結婚・出産・癌を越えてなお、私がプロダクトを創り続ける理由
16bitidol
1
110
そのテスト、説明できますか?~LWテスト戦略FW~のご紹介
nakahara
0
160
Semantic Version 単位で戦略を柔軟に変えて、パッケージアップデートを自動化する
daitasu
1
300
TSKaigi Night Talks 2026_TypeScriptでサプライチェーンの整合性を型に閉じ込める
geekplus_tech
0
400
Skillsは効率化、Agentsは"自分の拡張"——Builder時代のエージェント編成(CC Night 2026)
wemra
1
150
Spec Driven Development | AI Summit Lisbon
danielsogl
PRO
0
210
肥大化するレガシーコードに立ち向かうためのインターフェース分離と依存の逆転 / JJUG CCC 2026 Spring
hirokunimaeta
0
610
Honoでのサプライチェーン侵害対策 〜 3つのライブラリに学ぶ
yusukebe
7
1.4k
LLMによるContent Moderationの本番運用の裏側と品質担保への挑戦
suikabar
3
740
JavaDoc 再入門
nagise
1
410
トークンをケチるな、設計しろ:GitHub Copilotを賢く使うコンテキスト戦略
ochtum
0
150
不変条件と整合性境界—ビジネスが決める設計判断と実現パターン / Invariants and Consistency Boundaries
nrslib
14
5.8k
Featured
See All Featured
Max Prin - Stacking Signals: How International SEO Comes Together (And Falls Apart)
techseoconnect
PRO
0
190
Sam Torres - BigQuery for SEOs
techseoconnect
PRO
0
290
The SEO Collaboration Effect
kristinabergwall1
1
490
Marketing to machines
jonoalderson
1
5.5k
Documentation Writing (for coders)
carmenintech
77
5.4k
Impact Scores and Hybrid Strategies: The future of link building
tamaranovitovic
0
310
HU Berlin: Industrial-Strength Natural Language Processing with spaCy and Prodigy
inesmontani
PRO
0
420
Taking LLMs out of the black box: A practical guide to human-in-the-loop distillation
inesmontani
PRO
3
2.3k
Creating an realtime collaboration tool: Agile Flush - .NET Oxford
marcduiker
35
2.5k
Are puppies a ranking factor?
jonoalderson
1
3.6k
Responsive Adventures: Dirty Tricks From The Dark Corners of Front-End
smashingmag
254
22k
The untapped power of vector embeddings
frankvandijk
2
1.8k
Transcript
Monads in Scala Alexey Novakov, Ultra Tendency, 2020
"A monad is just a monoid in the category of
endofunctors”
“Monad is an abstract interface” Book: Functional Programming in Scala
(Red Book)
Option Either List Future Map Set Stream Vector Future Try
And others … Monads in standard Scala
flatMap unit a.k.a bind a.k.a pure What makes thing a
Monad? “apply” in Scala
class Box[A](v: A) { def flatMap[B](f: A => Box[B]): Box[B]
= f(v) } def map[B](f: A => B): Box[B] = flatMap(a => new Box(f(a))) A Monad modeled as a class minimum set
scala> new Box(1) res2: Box[Int] = 1 scala> res2.map(_ +
1) res3: Box[Int] = 2 scala> res3.flatMap(i => new Box(1 + i)) res5: Box[Int] = 3
scala> val l = List(1,2,3) l: List[Int] = List(1, 2,
3) scala> l.map(_ + 1) res0: List[Int] = List(2, 3, 4) scala> l.flatMap(i => List(i + 1)) res1: List[Int] = List(2, 3, 4) List
val isOn = Some(1) val isBlack = None def makeCoffee:
Option[String] = Some(1) scala> isOn .flatMap(_ => isBlack .flatMap(_ => makeCoffee)) res0: Option[String] = None Option stopped here
trait Functor[F[_]] { def map[A,B](fa: F[A])(f: A => B): F[B]
} trait Monad[F[_]] extends Functor[F] { def unit[A](a: => A): F[A] def flatMap[A,B](ma: F[A])(f: A => F[B]): F[B] def map[A,B](ma: F[A])(f: A => B): F[B] = flatMap(ma)(a => unit(f(a))) } Generic Monad another abstract interface
Monads are like burritos
“f” function application in flatMap & map depends on the
concrete Monad instance “f” applied when: - Option[A]: is Some(A) - Either[A, B]: is Right(B) - List[A]: is non-empty - Future[A]: is ready
Moreover, Monad laws are there
Monad law 1. Identity Example def f(x: Int): Option[Int] =
Some(x) scala> Some(1).flatMap(f) == f(1) res0: Boolean = true scala> f(1) == Some(1).flatMap(f) res1: Boolean = true
Monad law 1. Left Identity def f[A](x: A): Monad[A] =
??? flatMap(unit(x))(f) == f(x) Right Identity f(x) == flatMap(unit(x))(f)
Monad law 2. Associative Example def f1(a: Int): Option[Int] =
Some(a + 1) def f2(a: Int): Option[Int] = Some(a * 2) scala> Some(1).flatMap(f1).flatMap(f2) res0: Option[Int] = Some(4) scala> Some(1).flatMap(a => f1(a).flatMap(f2)) res1: Option[Int] = Some(4)
Monad law 2. Associative def f1[A](a: A): Monad[A] def f2[A](a:
A): Monad[A] if x is a Monad instance, flatMap(flatMap(x)(f1))(f2) == flatMap(x)(a => flatMap(f1(a))(f2))
Functor law 1. Identity map(x)(a => a) == x Example:
map(Some(1))(a => a) == Some(1) the same value returned
Functor law 2. Associative Example: val f1 = (n: Int)
=> n + 1 val f2 = (n: Int) => n * 2 map(map(Some(1))(f1))(f2) // Some(4) == map(Some(1))(f2 compose f1) // Some(4)
Functor law 2. Associative map(map(x)(f1))(f2) == map(x)(f2 compose f1) one
by one apply f1 then f2 in one step
None
final case class Coffee(name: String) val isOn = Some(1) val
coffeeName = Some("black") val makeCoffee = (name: String) => Some(Coffee(name)) for { _ <- isOn name <- coffeeName coffee <- makeCoffee(name) } yield coffee scala> Op)on[Coffee] = Some(Coffee(black)) Compose Option
case class Cluster(pods: Int) def validateNamespace(ns: String): Either[String, Unit] =
Right(()) def clusterExists(ns: String): Either[Cluster, Unit] = Right(()) def createCluster(ns: String, cluster: Cluster): Either[String, Cluster] = Right(Cluster(cluster.pods)) val ns = "my-cluster" for { _ <- validateNamespace(ns) _ <- clusterExists(ns).left.map(c => s"Cluster with ${c.pods} pods already exists") newCluster <- createCluster(ns, Cluster(4)) } yield newCluster Compose Either scala> Either[String,Cluster] = Right(Cluster(4))
scala> Either[String,Cluster] = LeC( Cluster namespace is not valid name,
choose another name ) def validNamespace(ns: String): Either[String, Unit] = if (ns == "my-cluster") Left( “Cluster namespace is not valid name, choose another name” ) else Right(())
for {…} yield is a syntactic sugar for a sequence
of calls: flatMap1(… + flatMapN(.. + map(…))) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powdered_sugar#/media/File:Powdered_Sugar_-_Macro.jpg
validNamespace("my-cluster") .flatMap(_ => clusterExists(ns) .left .map(c => s"Cluster with ${c.pods}
pods already exists” ).flatMap(_ => createCluster(ns, Cluster(4)) .map(newCluster => newCluster) ) ) Desugared
for { _ <- validNamespace("my-cluster") _ <- clusterExists(ns) .left.map(c =>
s"Cluster with ${c.pods} pods already exists") newCluster <- createCluster(ns, Cluster(4)) } yield newCluster Sugared
Caveat: different Monads do not compose.
def validateNamespace(ns: String): Either[String, Unit] def clusterExists(ns: String): Option[Either[String, Cluster]]
def createCluster(ns: String, cluster: Cluster): Either[String, Cluster] Problem for { _ <- validateNamespace(ns) cluster <- clusterExists(ns) updated <- createCluster(ns, cluster) } yield updated two monad stacks
updated <- createCluster(ns, cluster) ^ <pas)e>:4: error: type mismatch; found
: Either[String,Cluster] required: Cluster cluster <- clusterExists(ns) ^ <pas)e>:3: error: type mismatch; found : Op)on[Nothing] required: scala.u)l.Either[?,?] Op)on[Nothing] <: scala.u)l.Either[?,?]? false
Monad Transformers
- custom-written monad - specifically constructed for composition OptionT: Option
+ Any other Monad EitherT: Either + Any other Monad ReaderT: Reader + Any other Monad WriterT: Writer + Any other Monad … others
EitherT *Example: unwrap second stack * from cats.data.EitherT.scala final case
class EitherT[F[_], A, B](value: F[Either[A, B]]) { def flatMap[AA >: A, D]( f: B => EitherT[F, AA, D])( implicit F: Monad[F]): EitherT[F, AA, D] = EitherT(F.flatMap(value) { case l @ Left(_) => F.pure(l.rightCast) case Right(b) => f(b).value }) }
case class Cluster(pods: Int, updated: Long) def validateNamespace(ns: String): Either[String,
Unit] = Right(()) def clusterExists(ns: String): Option[Either[String, Cluster]] = Some(Right(Cluster(3, System.currentTimeMillis()))) def updateCluster(ns: String, cluster: Cluster): Either[String, Cluster] = Right(Cluster(cluster.pods, System.currentTimeMillis())) Usage
import cats.implicits._ import cats.data.EitherT val cluster = for { _
<- validateNamespace(ns).toEitherT[Option] cluster<- EitherT(clusterExists(ns)) updated <- updateCluster(ns, cluster).toEitherT[Option] } yield updated scala> cluster.value Some(Right(Cluster(3,1583095558496))) EitherT: Either + Option common ground
Error case def clusterExists(ns: String): Option[Either[String, Cluster]] = Left("Cluster is
invalid").some scala> cluster.value res4: Op)on[Either[String,Cluster]] = Some(LeC(Cluster is invalid))
Alexey Novakov email: - alexey.novakov at ultratendency.com - novakov.alex at
gmail.com Blog: https://medium.com/se-notes-by-alexey-novakov https://novakov-alexey.github.io/ Code: https://github.com/novakov-alexey Twitter: @alexey_novakov Thank you! Questions?