Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

HPHY 212, week 3, lecture 2 Fall 2014

HPHY 212, week 3, lecture 2 Fall 2014

University of Oregon, Human Physiology Department.

Annie Zeidman-Karpinski

October 15, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by Annie Zeidman-Karpinski

Other Decks in Education

Transcript

  1. This  photo  shows  the  damage  done  to  bicyclist  Laurie  Nommsen-­‐Rivers'

     helmet  a<er  a   pick-­‐up  truck  hit  her  on  MLK  Blvd.  on  August  29,  2014.   (Photo:  Provided  by  Laurie  A.  Nommsen-­‐Rivers)  
  2. Thankfully,  a  helmet  is  much  more  than  a  "piece  of

      Styrofoam."  As  a  recent  scien?fic  study  reports,   the  risk  of  severe  brain  injury  aCer  head  impact  at   12  mph  (realis?c  in  downtown  traffic)  is  99.9   percent  without  a  helmet,  but  declines  to  9.3   percent  with  a  helmet.   My  experience  corroborates  these  results.  ACer  being   struck  by  the  truck  and  swept  under  it,  I  will  never  forget   the  split  second  when  I  saw  the  truck  axle  coming   straight  at  my  head  and  thinking  my  life  was  over.     hOp://www.cincinna?.com/story/opinion/readers/2014/10/11/if-­‐not-­‐for-­‐my-­‐helmet-­‐i-­‐could-­‐be-­‐dead/16959685/  
  3. Learning  objec?ves     •  Dis?nguish  and  recall  steps  of

     the  peer   review  process.  (finish  from  Monday)   •  Recognize  that  science  in  the  news  comes   from  science  research.     •  Iden?fy  the  differences  between  a  case   study,  a  scien?fic  study,  a  review  or  a  meta-­‐ analysis  for  a  scholarly  ar?cle.     •  Review  crea?ng  a  hypothesis  to  research.  
  4. Peer  Review  Process   Manuscript     (poten?al  ar?cle)  

    Sent  to  journal  editor   Blind  review   Blind  review   Blind  review   Sent  to  three  to  five  experts  in  the  field     Manuscript     (poten?al  ar?cle)   1.  Accept   2.  Revise   3.  Reject   Graphic  from  Dominque  Turnbow,  UCSD  
  5. You  found  the  perfect  criteria  for   showing  that  a

     student-­‐athlete  was   fully  recovered  from  a  concussion,   how  would  you  let  the  world  know?  
  6. ① Match  the  cita?ons  to  the  ar?cle   ② Fix  the  cita?ons

      ③ Put  them  in  chronological  order   ④ What’s  the  story  these  cita?ons  tell?     Prac?ce  telling  the  story:  ulcers  
  7. Legisla?on  about  concussions   4   1   2  

    3   Event   happens   Blogs/twiOer/ FB/TV/radio   Newspapers/   magazines     Journal   ar?cles  based             on  research   Books/   movies  
  8. 4   1   2   3   Peer  

    review   process   Journal   ar?cle   News   (twiOer,   blogs,  TV,   newspaper)   Poster/   conference   talk       Chapter/   book/   textbook   Research  
  9. Your  ideas  included:   A.  Fix  the  cita?ons  (find  beOer

     sources,  fix  dead  links,   etc.)   B.  Fix  the  cita?ons  and  check  for  accuracy  (see  if  the   ar?cles  say  what  the  wiki  entry  says  they  should   say,  are  there  beOer  sources  to  use  for  those   sec?ons/improve  the  cita?ons,  etc.)   C.  Improve  the  cita?ons  used  and  revise  the  exis?ng   informa?on  in  the  ar?cle.   D.  Expand  the  ar?cle  (sports  concussions,  gender   differences,  treatment  op?ons,  brain  ac?vity,   severity,  causes,  etc.)   E.  Do  research  on  a  concussion  related  topic  of  your   own.  
  10. Vote:   A.  Fix  the  cita?ons  and  check  for  accuracy

     (see  if   the  ar?cles  say  what  the  wiki  entry  says  they   should  say,  are  there  beOer  sources  to  use  for   those  sec?ons/improve  the  cita?ons,  etc.)   B.  Expand  the  ar?cle  (sports  concussions,  gender   differences,  treatment  op?ons,  brain  ac?vity,   severity,  causes,  etc.)   C.  Wikipedia  To-­‐Do  List   D.  Wikipedia  images  list   E.  Other  
  11. Using  the  spreadsheets  you  created   Find  the  5  most

     cited  ar?cles  in  the  wikipedia   ar?cle  on  concussions       circle  your  answers  on  the  spreadsheets  
  12. Reference   number   Cited  by   (GS)   Part

     of  the  Utle   7   1015   "Consensus  statement  on  concussion  in  sport:  the  3rd   Interna?onal  Conference  on  Concussion  in  Sport  held  in   Zurich,  November  2008.”  Journal  of  athle>c  training.   77   796    Alexander  MP  (1995).  "Mild  trauma?c  brain  injury:   Pathophysiology,  natural  history,  and  clinical  management".   Neurology  45  (7):  1253–60.   34   679   (April  2005).  "Summary  and  agreement  statement  of  the  2nd   Interna?onal  Conference  on  Concussion  in  Sport,  Prague   2004".  Br  J  Sports  Med  39  (4):  196–204   19   670    (2002).  "Summary  and  agreement  statement  of  the  first   Interna?onal  Conference  on  Concussion  in  Sport,  Vienna   2001*".  Bri?sh  Journal  of  Sports  Medicine  36  (1):  6–10.   Your  results  so  far:  Concussion  
  13. Referenc e  number   Times  Cited   (WoS)   Part

     of  the  Utle   90   616   Langlois  JA,  Rutland-­‐Brown  W,  Wald  MM  (2006).  "The   epidemiology  and  impact  of  trauma?c  brain  injury:  A  brief   overview".  J  of  Head  Trauma  Rehabilita?on  21  (5):  375–8.   77   429   Alexander  MP  (1995).  "Mild  trauma?c  brain  injury:   Pathophysiology,  natural  history,  and  clinical  management".   Neurology  45  (7):  1253–60.   34   316    (April  2005).  "Summary  and  agreement  statement  of  the  2nd   Interna?onal  Conference  on  Concussion  in  Sport,  Prague   2004".  Br  J  Sports  Med  39  (4):  196–204   31   202    Iverson  GL  (2005).  "Outcome  from  mild  trauma?c  brain   injury".  Current  Opinion  in  Psychiatry  18  (3):  301–17.  doi: 10.1097/01.yco.0000165601.29047.ae.  PMID  16639155.   19   162    (2002).  "Summary  and  agreement  statement  of  the  first   Interna?onal  Conference  on  Concussion  in  Sport,  Vienna   2001*".  Bri?sh  Journal  of  Sports  Medicine  36  (1):  6–10.   Your  results  so  far:  Concussion  
  14. Explain  the  steps  of  the  google  form   •  Look

     up  the  ar?cle.   •  Look  it  up  in  WoS  and  GS   •  Cita?on  count  
  15. Hierarchy  of  Evidence     or     levels  of

     evidence     q   Meta-­‐analyses   q   Review     q   Scien?fic  studies     (e.g.,  cross-­‐sec?onal  vs  longitudinal,   randomised  controlled  trials)   q   Case  reports  
  16. Concussions  –  wiki  references   How  many  are…..   Meta-­‐analyses

     =  12   ScienUfic  studies  =  52     Case  studies  =  11     Reviews  =  28    
  17. How to join PubMed Commons PubMed Commons home Neuroimage. 2009

    Aug;47 Suppl 2:T152-3. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.060. Epub 2009 Feb 10. Case report of a soldier with primary blast brain injury. Warden DL , French LM, Shupenko L, Fargus J, Riedy G, Erickson ME, Jaffee MS, Moore DF. Abstract Primary blast injury of the central nervous system is described in a service-member exposed to a large ordinance explosion. Neuroimaging abnormalities are described together with normalization of the fractional anisotrophy on diffusion tensor imaging after follow-up imaging studies. PMID: 19457364 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] PubMed Commons 0 comments Display Settings: Abstract 1 Author information Publication Types, MeSH Terms LinkOut - more resources Full text links PubMed 19457364[uid] Case  Reports   ….in  a  service-­‐member  exposed  to  a  large  ordinance   explosion.   #13  -­‐  Concussion  entry  
  18. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Sep;10(5):640-56. Frontal lobe contributions to theory

    of mind. Stone VE , Baron-Cohen S, Knight RT. Abstract "Theory of mind," the ability to make inferences about others" mental sta cognitive capacity that underlies humans" ability to engage in complex so in several distinct stages, which can be measured with social reasoning t Individuals with Asperger"s syndrome, a mild form of autism, perform we tests but show deficits on more developmentally advanced theory of min with bilateral damage to orbito-frontal cortex (n = 5) and unilateral dama prefrontal cortex (n = 5) on a series of theory of mind tasks varying in di frontal lesion patients performed similarly to individuals with Asperger"s on simpler tests and showing deficits on tasks requiring more subtle socia ability to recognize a faux pas. In contrast, no specific theory of mind de Display Settings: Abstract 1 Author information Scien?fic  Study   How to join PubMed Commons PubMed Commons home J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Sep;10(5):640-56. Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. Stone VE , Baron-Cohen S, Knight RT. Abstract "Theory of mind," the ability to make inferences about others" mental states, seems to be a modular cognitive capacity that underlies humans" ability to engage in complex social interaction. It develops in several distinct stages, which can be measured with social reasoning tests of increasing difficulty. Individuals with Asperger"s syndrome, a mild form of autism, perform well on simpler theory of mind tests but show deficits on more developmentally advanced theory of mind tests. We tested patients with bilateral damage to orbito-frontal cortex (n = 5) and unilateral damage in left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (n = 5) on a series of theory of mind tasks varying in difficulty. Bilateral orbito- frontal lesion patients performed similarly to individuals with Asperger"s syndrome, performing well on simpler tests and showing deficits on tasks requiring more subtle social reasoning, such as the ability to recognize a faux pas. In contrast, no specific theory of mind deficits were evident in the unilateral dorsolateral frontal lesion patients. The dorsolateral lesion patients had difficulty only on versions of the tasks that placed demands on working memory. PMID: 9802997 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] PubMed Commons 0 comments Display Settings: Abstract 1 Author information Publication Types, MeSH Terms, Grant Support LinkOut - more resources Full text links PubMed "Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind" 1998 We  tested  pa?ents  with   bilateral  damage  to  orbito-­‐ frontal  cortex  (n  =  5)  and   unilateral  damage  in  leC   dorsolateral  prefrontal   cortex  (n  =  5)  on  a  series  of   theory  of  mind  tasks   varying  in  difficulty.   #36  -­‐TBI  
  19. Scien?fic  study   OBJECTIVE: DESIGN: SETTING: PARTICIPANTS: INTERVENTIONS: MAIN OUTCOME

    MEASURES: RESULTS: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Aug;94(8):1513-20. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.04.015. Epub 2013 Apr 30. Dual-task effect on gait balance control in adolescents with concussion. Howell DR , Osternig LR, Chou LS. Abstract To prospectively and longitudinally examine how concussion affects gait balance control in adolescents during single- and dual-task walking. Cohort, prospective, repeated-measures design. Motion analysis laboratory. Adolescents (N=20) identified as suffering a concussion were matched with healthy control subjects (N=20) and tested 5 times across a 2-month period after injury. Not applicable. Gait temporal-distance parameters included average walking speed, step length, and step width; whole body center of mass (COM) parameters included medial/lateral displacement and peak COM medial/lateral and anterior velocities; dual-task cost, which was defined as percent change from single- to dual-task conditions; and Stroop test accuracy. No between-group differences were observed for step length and step width. The dual- task cost for average walking speed for subjects with concussion was greater than control subjects across the 2-month testing period (main effect of group P=.019), as was the dual-task costs for peak Display Settings: Abstract 1 Author information Full text links PubMed howell 2013 stroop OBJECTIVE: DESIGN: SETTING: PARTICIPANTS: INTERVENTIONS: MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: RESULTS: CONCLUSIONS: KEYWORDS: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Aug;94(8):1513-20. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.04.015. Epub 2013 Apr 30. Dual-task effect on gait balance control in adolescents with concussion. Howell DR , Osternig LR, Chou LS. Abstract To prospectively and longitudinally examine how concussion affects gait balance control in adolescents during single- and dual-task walking. Cohort, prospective, repeated-measures design. Motion analysis laboratory. Adolescents (N=20) identified as suffering a concussion were matched with healthy control subjects (N=20) and tested 5 times across a 2-month period after injury. Not applicable. Gait temporal-distance parameters included average walking speed, step length, and step width; whole body center of mass (COM) parameters included medial/lateral displacement and peak COM medial/lateral and anterior velocities; dual-task cost, which was defined as percent change from single- to dual-task conditions; and Stroop test accuracy. No between-group differences were observed for step length and step width. The dual- task cost for average walking speed for subjects with concussion was greater than control subjects across the 2-month testing period (main effect of group P=.019), as was the dual-task costs for peak anterior COM velocity (main effect of group P=.017) and total COM medial/lateral displacement (main effect of group P=.013). The total COM medial/lateral displacement (group × task interaction P=.006) and peak COM medial/lateral velocity (main effect of group P=.027; main effect of task P=.01) were significantly greater in subjects with concussion compared with control subjects during dual-task walking. Subjects with concussion were significantly less accurate than controls on the Stroop test (main effect of group P=.004). The findings suggest that concussion affects the ability of adolescents to control body posture during gait up to 2 months after injury. Furthermore, dual-task paradigms may provide additional useful information in the clinical assessment and recovery of concussion. Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Attention, Brain concussion, Brain injuries, COM, Gait, Postural balance, Rehabilitation, center of mass Display Settings: Abstract 1 Author information Full text links PubMed howell 2013 stroop …longitudinally  examine   how  concussion  affects   gait….   Adolescents  (N=20)  iden?fied   as  suffering  a  concussion  were   matched  with  healthy  control   subjects  (N=20)  and  tested  5   ?mes  across  a  2-­‐month  period   aCer  injury.  
  20. Case  Reports   •  chief  complaint     •  Diagnosis

      •  treatment,  and     •  deviaUon  from  the  expected   ObservaUons  ,  not  planned  studies  
  21. ScienUfic  studies       includes:    randomized  controlled  trials

      cross-­‐sec?onal   and/or  longitudinal  studies   In  addi?on  to  the  parts  of  a  scholarly  ar?cle  this   ar?cle  describes  how  the  authors     Test  a  hypothesis  
  22. A  good  clinical  trial  will  use  these  3   guiding

     principles     •  Compare  like  with  like   •  The  bigger  the  group  studied  the  more  reliable   the  conclusions   •  Bayes  theorem:    things  that  should  be  true  and   have  good  suppor?ng  evidence  to  back  them  up,   are  likely  to  be  true   For  more  details  see  Appendix  1  of:   Greenhalgh  T.  How  to  Read  a  Paper:  The  Basics  of  Evidence-­‐based  Medicine.  3rd  ed.  BMJ  Books;  2006.  
  23. Meta-­‐analysis   BACKGROUND: OBJECTIVES: SEARCH STRATEGY: SELECTION CRITERIA: DATA COLLECTION

    AND ANALYSIS: MAIN RESULTS: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;(4):CD004609. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the adjunctive treatment of traumatic brain injury. Bennett MH , Trytko B, Jonker B. Update in Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD004609. Abstract Traumatic brain injury is common and presents a health problem with significant effect on quality of life. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been suggested to improve oxygen supply to the injured brain and, therefore, to reduce the volume of brain that will ultimately perish. It is postulated that the addition of HBOT to the standard intensive care regimen may result in a reduction in patient death and disability as a result of these additional brain-preserving effects. To assess the benefits and harms of adjunctive HBOT for treating traumatic brain injury. We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 - 2003), EMBASE (1974 - 2003), CINAHL (1982 - 2003), DORCTHIM (1996 - 2003), and reference lists of articles. Relevant journals were handsearched and researchers in the field were contacted. Randomised studies comparing the effect on traumatic brain injury of therapeutic regimens which include HBOT with those that exclude HBOT (with or without sham therapy). Three reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the relevant trials using the validated Oxford-Scale (Jadad 1996) and extracted the data from the included trials. Four trials contributed to this review (382 patients, 199 receiving HBOT and 183 control). There was a trend towards, but no significant increase in, the chance of a favourable outcome when defined as full recovery, Glasgow outcome score 1 or 2, or return to normal activities of daily living (relative risk [RR] for good outcome with HBOT 1.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92 to 4.08, P=0.08). Pooled data from the three trials with 327 patients that reported mortality, showed a significant reduction in the risk of dying when HBOT was added to the treatment regimen (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.88, P=0.003). Heterogeneity between studies was low (I(2) =0%), and sensitivity analysis for the allocation of dropouts did not affect that result. This analysis suggests we would have Display Settings: Abstract 1 Author information Full text links PubMed BACKGROUND: OBJECTIVES: SEARCH STRATEGY: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;(4):CD004609. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the adjunctive treatment of traumatic brain injury. Bennett MH , Trytko B, Jonker B. Update in Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD004609. Abstract Traumatic brain injury is common and presents a health problem with significant effect on quality of life. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been suggested to improve oxygen supply to the injured brain and, therefore, to reduce the volume of brain that will ultimately perish. It is postulated that the addition of HBOT to the standard intensive care regimen may result in a reduction in patient death and disability as a result of these additional brain-preserving effects. To assess the benefits and harms of adjunctive HBOT for treating traumatic brain injury. We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 - 2003), EMBASE (1974 - 2003), CINAHL (1982 - 2003), DORCTHIM (1996 - 2003), and reference lists of articles. Relevant journals were handsearched and researchers in the field were contacted. Display Settings: Abstract 1 Author information Full text links PubMed SEARCH  STRATEGY:   DATA  COLLECTION  AND  ANALYSIS:   Three  reviewers  independently  evaluated   the  quality  of  the  relevant  trials  using  the   validated  Oxford-­‐Scale  (Jadad  1996)  and   extracted  the  data  ….   Pooled  data  from  the  three  trials  with  327  pa?ents   that  reported  mortality,  showed  a  significant   reduc?on  in  the  risk  of  dying  when  HBOT  was   added  to  the  treatment  regimen  (RR  0.69,  95%  CI   0.54  to  0.88,  P=0.003).     #54  -­‐  TBI      
  24. Meta-­‐analysis   •  Single  focused  ques?on  or  overview  of  several

      related  ques?ons   •  +    data  sources,  study  selec?on,  data   extrac?on,  data  synthesis   •  An  analysis  of  the  data.    
  25. Review   How to join PubMed Commons PubMed Commons home

    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001 Dec;23(6):837-51. Prediction of outcome in mild to moderate head injury: a review. van der Naalt J. Abstract This paper reviews the functional outcome of patients sustaining mild and moderate head injury (HI). Discrepancies across studies in the definition of minor, mild, and moderate HI are discussed in terms of hindering the interpretation of recovery. The predictive value of acute severity indices, neuroimaging findings, and the results of other techniques are summarized. Measurement of outcome based solely on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) is critiqued, and it is recommended that a differentiated outcome scale involving emotional, behavioral, cognitive, and physical domains should be used. PMID: 11910548 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] PubMed Commons 0 comments Display Settings: Abstract Author information Publication Types, MeSH Terms LinkOut - more resources Full text links PubMed PubMed Commons home J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001 Dec;23(6):837-51. Prediction of outcome in mild to moderate head injury: a review. van der Naalt J. Abstract This paper reviews the functional outcome of patients sustaining mild and moderate head injury (HI). Discrepancies across studies in the definition of minor, mild, and moderate HI are discussed in terms of hindering the interpretation of recovery. The predictive value of acute severity indices, neuroimaging findings, and the results of other techniques are summarized. Measurement of outcome based solely on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) is critiqued, and it is recommended that a differentiated outcome scale involving emotional, behavioral, cognitive, and physical domains should be used. PMID: 11910548 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] PubMed Commons Display Settings: Abstract Author information Publication Types, MeSH Terms LinkOut - more resources Full text links PubMed Discrepancies  across  studies  in  the   defini?on  of  minor,  mild,  and  moderate   head  injuries….   #28  -­‐  concussion  
  26. Systema?c  Reviews   Reviews   Went  through  literature  and  found

     all  ar?cles   on  a  topic.     Similar  to  what  you  might  do  for  a  really  well   researched  term  paper.     Bibliographies  of  these  papers  are  a  goldmine.  
  27. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: CASE DESCRIPTION: INTERVENTIONS: OUTCOMES: DISCUSSION: See 1

    citation in 2011 by Rabago CA and Wilken JM: J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011 Dec;35(4):185-93. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e318235d7e6. Application of a mild traumatic brain injury rehabilitation program in a virtual realty environment: a case study. Rábago CA , Wilken JM. Abstract Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) can compromise reaction time, visual perception, memory, attention, balance, and gait. These deficits, especially if persistent, can restrict participation in daily activities and the resumption of personal and profession roles. The purpose of this case study is to describe an mTBI-specific clinical assessment and rehabilitation intervention administered in a virtual reality environment. The case involved a 31-year-old male service member who had sustained an mTBI (concussion) during a recreational softball game 36 days prior to physical therapist evaluation. He had complaints of severe visual and physical motion intolerance. He demonstrated impaired static balance and was restricted from full military duty. The assessment included measurements of postural and gait balance during cognitive, visual, and vestibular challenges within a Computer-Assisted Rehabilitation Environment. Phase 1 of the intervention consisted of clinical techniques (ie, optokinetic stimulation/habituation, visual/physical perturbations, and postural stability exercises) targeting specific impairments. Phase 2 training consisted of weapon handling and target recognition tasks to simulate the requirements of his military occupation. At the conclusion of 6 treatments, the patient demonstrated significant increases in postural and gait balance with a near complete resolution of all postconcussion symptoms. He successfully returned to full duty and training for combat deployment. Service members and civilians exhibit similar impairments, limitations, and restrictions following mTBI. A rehabilitation program delivered in a virtual-reality environment can be structured to manage complex mTBI symptoms through the integration of multiple treatment modalities specific to a patient's personal and professional roles. PMID: 22027473 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Display Settings: Abstract 1 Author information Publication Types, MeSH Terms Full text links PubMed Rábago, C. A., & Wilken, J. M. (2011) INTRODUCTION: PURPOSE: METHODS: RESULTS: CONCLUSION: See 1 citation in 2006 by Chou LS and Osternig LR and Parker TM and Van Donkelaar P: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Jun;38(6):1032-40. Gait stability following concussion. Parker TM , Osternig LR, VAN Donkelaar P, Chou LS. Abstract The need to identify functional impairment following a brain injury is critical to prevent reinjury during the period of recovery. However, little is known about the effect of concussion on dynamic motor function. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of concussion on a dynamic motor task under conditions of divided and undivided attention over the course of 28 d. Fifteen subjects with concussions (CONC) and 15 uninjured controls (NORM) were observed while walking with undivided attention and while concurrently completing simple mental tasks. The CONC were assessed within 48 h of injury and again at 5, 14, and 28 d postinjury. The NORM were evaluated at the same time intervals. Whole-body motion data were collected to examine displacement and velocity of the center of mass (COM) and the maximum separation between the COM and center of pressure (COP). Three-way repeated-measures mixed-design ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests were completed to determine differences between group, task, and testing day (P<0.05). Several aspects of gait stability were compromised in the CONC group for up to 4 wk after injury. CONC were found to walk significantly slower during dual tasks on all testing days when compared with the uninjured controls. The injured subjects were also found to have greater sway and sway velocity than controls when attention was divided for up to 28 d postinjury. The findings of this study suggest that concussion may have long-term observable and measurable effects on the control of gait stability. PMID: 16775541 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Display Settings: Abstract 1 Author information Publication Types, MeSH Terms LinkOut - more resources Full text links PubMed Parker, T. M., Osternig, L. R., Van Donkelaar, P., & Chou, L.-S. (2006) See 1 citation in 2008 by Broglio SP and Puetz TW: Sports Med. 2008;38(1):53-67. The effect of sport concussion on neurocognitive function, self-report symptoms and postural control : a meta-analysis. Broglio SP , Puetz TW. Abstract Sport concussion is commonly assessed using a battery of tests that evaluate neurocognitive functioning, postural control and self-report symptoms. The degree to which concussion affects each of these measures is unclear. Thus, the purpose of this meta-analysis is to systematically review and quantify the effect of sport concussion on each assessment measure when administered immediately post-injury and in the 2 weeks following injury. PubMed and PsychINFO databases were searched from January 1970 to June 2006, from which 39 were included for review. Studies were selected for review if they included concussed athletes who were evaluated using one of the three assessment measures. One post-morbid assessment must have been completed within 14 days of injury and compared with a baseline measure or control group. Study design, type of neurocognitive assessment, timing of assessment following injury and number of post-concussion assessments were extracted as potential moderators. Sport-related concussion had a large negative effect (mean Delta; 95% confidence interval) on neurocognitive functioning (-0.81; -1.01, -0.60), self-report symptoms (-3.31; -6.35, -0.27) and postural control (-2.56; -6.44, 1.32) in the initial assessment following injury. A reduced, but large effect, was also seen in the 14 days following the initial assessment for neurocognitive functioning (-0.26; -0.46, -0.06), self-report symptoms (-1.09; -2.07, -0.11) and postural control (-1.16; -2.59, 0.27). Our findings demonstrated large effects for each aspect of the assessment battery. These findings support the use of the multifaceted concussion evaluation. Comment in The value of various assessment techniques in detecting the effects of concussion on cognition, symptoms, and postural control. [J Athl Train. 2009] PMID: 18081367 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Display Settings: Abstract 1 Author information Publication Types, MeSH Terms LinkOut - more resources Full text links PubMed Broglio, S. P., & Puetz, T. W. (2008) 1.     2.     3.     4.    
  28. Where  in  the  Hierarchy  of  Evidence?   1.    Rábago,

     C.  A.,  &  Wilken,  J.  M.  (2011).   hOp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=22027473       A.  Meta  analysis   B.  Review   C.  Scien?fic  Study     D.  Case  studies   BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: CASE DESCRIPTION: INTERVENTIONS: See 1 citation in 2011 by Rabago CA and Wilken JM: J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011 Dec;35(4):185-93. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e318235d7e6. Application of a mild traumatic brain injury rehabilitation program in a virtual realty environment: a case study. Rábago CA , Wilken JM. Abstract Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) can compromise reaction time, visual perception, memory, attention, balance, and gait. These deficits, especially if persistent, can restrict participation in daily activities and the resumption of personal and profession roles. The purpose of this case study is to describe an mTBI-specific clinical assessment and rehabilitation intervention administered in a virtual reality environment. The case involved a 31-year-old male service member who had sustained an mTBI (concussion) during a recreational softball game 36 days prior to physical therapist evaluation. He had complaints of severe visual and physical motion intolerance. He demonstrated impaired static balance and was restricted from full military duty. The assessment included measurements of postural and gait balance during cognitive, visual, and vestibular challenges within a Computer-Assisted Rehabilitation Environment. Display Settings: Abstract 1 Author information Full text links PubMed Rábago, C. A., & Wilken, J. M. (2011)
  29. Where  in  the  Hierarchy  of  Evidence?   2.  Parker,  T.

     M.,  Osternig,  L.  R.,  Van  Donkelaar,   P.,  &  Chou,  L.-­‐S.  (2006)   hOp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=16775541           A.  Meta  analysis   B.  Review   C.  Scien?fic  Study     D.  Case  studies   INTRODUCTION: PURPOSE: METHODS: See 1 citation in 2006 by Chou LS and Osternig LR and Parker TM and Van Donkel Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Jun;38(6):1032-40. Gait stability following concussion. Parker TM , Osternig LR, VAN Donkelaar P, Chou LS. Abstract The need to identify functional impairment following a brain injury is critical prevent reinjury during the period of recovery. However, little is known about the effect of conc on dynamic motor function. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of concussion on a dynamic task under conditions of divided and undivided attention over the course of 28 d. Fifteen subjects with concussions (CONC) and 15 uninjured controls (NORM) we observed while walking with undivided attention and while concurrently completing simple me tasks. The CONC were assessed within 48 h of injury and again at 5, 14, and 28 d postinjury. NORM were evaluated at the same time intervals. Whole-body motion data were collected to examine displacement and velocity of the center of mass (COM) and the maximum separation Display Settings: Abstract 1 Author information Full text li PubMed Parker, T. M., Osternig, L. R., Van Donkelaar, P., & Chou, L.-S. (2006)
  30. Where  in  the  Hierarchy  of  Evidence?   3.  Broglio,  S.

     P.,  &  Puetz,  T.  W.  (2008).   hOp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=18081367   A.  Meta  analysis   B.  Review   C.  Scien?fic  Study     D.  Case  studies   See 1 citation in 2008 by Broglio SP and Puetz TW: Sports Med. 2008;38(1):53-67. The effect of sport concussion on neurocognitive function, self-report symptoms and postural control : a meta-analysis. Broglio SP , Puetz TW. Abstract Sport concussion is commonly assessed using a battery of tests that evaluate neurocognitive functioning, postural control and self-report symptoms. The degree to which concussion affects each of these measures is unclear. Thus, the purpose of this meta-analysis is to systematically review and quantify the effect of sport concussion on each assessment measure when administered immediately post-injury and in the 2 weeks following injury. PubMed and PsychINFO databases were searched from January 1970 to June 2006, from which 39 were included for review. Studies were selected for review if they included concussed athletes who were evaluated using one of the three assessment measures. One post-morbid assessment must have been completed within 14 days of injury and compared with a baseline measure or control group. Study design, type of neurocognitive assessment, timing of assessment following injury and number of post-concussion assessments were extracted as potential moderators. Sport-related concussion had a large negative effect (mean Delta; Display Settings: Abstract 1 Author information Full text links PubMed Broglio, S. P., & Puetz, T. W. (2008)
  31. Where  in  the  Hierarchy  of  Evidence?   4.  Leddy,  J.

     J.,  Sandhu,  H.,  Sodhi,  V.,   Baker,  J.  G.,  &  Willer,  B.  (2012).     hOp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=23016082           A.  Meta  analysis   B.  Review   C.  Scien?fic  Study     D.  Case  studies  
  32. Suggested  reading  -­‐  hierarchy  of  evidence     Greenhalgh,  T.

     (1997).  How  to  read  a  paper.  Geyng   your  bearings  (deciding  what  the  paper  is  about).   BMJ  (Clinical  research  ed.),  315(7102),  243–6.   Retrieved  from   hOp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ar?cles/ PMC2127173/pdf/9253275.pdf   Understanding  and  using  the  Hierarchy  of  Evidence   hOps://hive.library.uwa.edu.au/hive/cache/ 202902/hive.cgi/zip/202902/LO2ACQ_FBE/html/ understand.html