Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
0
430

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey

Carlisle Rainey

August 29, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by Carlisle Rainey

See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
200
Topic Sampling
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
1
410
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
77
Unnecessary
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
560
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
210
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
140
Logit Models in Small Samples
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
110
When BLUE is Not Best
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
450
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
500

Other Decks in Research

See All in Research
サーブレシーブ成功率は勝敗に影響するか？
Avatar for ぱんだ vball_panda
0
650
クラウドのテレメトリーシステム研究動向2025年
Avatar for Yuuki Tsubouchi (yuuk1) yuukit
3
880
大規模日本語VLM Asagi-VLMにおける合成データセットの構築とモデル実装
Avatar for Kohei Uehara kuehara
5
2.1k
ラムダ計算の拡張に基づく
音楽プログラミング言語mimium
とそのVMの実装
Avatar for Tomoya Matsuura tomoyanonymous
0
460
PhD Defence: Considering Temporal and Contextual Information for Lexical Semantic Change Detection
Avatar for Taichi Aida a1da4
1
170
さくらインターネット研究所 アップデート2025年
Avatar for MATSUMOTO Ryosuke matsumoto_r
PRO
0
550
研究テーマのデザインと研究遂行の方法論
Avatar for Hisashi Ishihara hisashiishihara
5
1.2k
SI-D案内資料_京都文教大学
Avatar for Ryoji Takeuchi ryojitakeuchi1116
0
1.4k
ノンパラメトリック分布表現を用いた位置尤度場周辺化によるRTK-GNSSの整数アンビギュイティ推定
Avatar for aoki nosse aoki_nosse
0
300
Weekly AI Agents News!
Avatar for masatoto masatoto
33
65k
ｳｯﾄﾞｽﾀｯｸﾁｬﾝ：木材を用いた小型エージェントロボットの開発と印象評価 / ec75-sato
Avatar for yumulab yumulab
1
310
知識強化言語モデルLUKE @ LUKEミートアップ
Avatar for Ikuya Yamada ikuyamada
0
450

Featured

See All Featured
It's Worth the Effort
Avatar for 3n 3n
184
28k
Bash Introduction
Avatar for André Augusto Costa Santos 62gerente
613
210k
Measuring & Analyzing Core Web Vitals
Avatar for Philip Tellis bluesmoon
7
430
What’s in a name? Adding method to the madness
Avatar for Product Marketing Alliance productmarketing
PRO
22
3.4k
Practical Orchestrator
Avatar for Shlomi Noach shlominoach
187
11k
Cheating the UX When There Is Nothing More to Optimize - PixelPioneers
Avatar for Stéphanie Walter stephaniewalter
280
13k
No one is an island. Learnings from fostering a developers community.
Avatar for Antonio thoeni
21
3.3k
We Have a Design System, Now What?
Avatar for Morgane Peng morganepeng
52
7.6k
Design and Strategy: How to Deal with People Who Don’t "Get" Design
Avatar for Morgane Peng morganepeng
129
19k
Raft: Consensus for Rubyists
Avatar for Patrick Van Stee vanstee
137
6.9k
I Don’t Have Time: Getting Over the Fear to Launch Your Podcast
Avatar for Joe Casabona jcasabona
32
2.3k
Large-scale JavaScript Application Architecture
Avatar for Addy Osmani addyosmani
512
110k

Transcript

  1. Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle

    Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY) [email protected] @carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob

  2. “With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or

    from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)

  3. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation

  4. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any

  5. None
  6. None
  7. None
  8. None

  9. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  10. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  11. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality !

  12. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  13. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  14. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  15. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  16. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  17. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  18. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  19. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51%

  20. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  21. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  22. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  23. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  24. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  25. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  26. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  27. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  28. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  29. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  30. mobilization

  31. electoral rules

  32. competitiveness

  33. data

  34. None
  35. None
  36. None
  37. None
  38. None
  39. None
  40. None

  41. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,

    and code at crain.co/stratmob