Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...
Search
Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
0
460
Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.
Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Carlisle Rainey
See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
carlislerainey
0
250
Topic Sampling
carlislerainey
1
460
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
carlislerainey
0
95
Unnecessary
carlislerainey
0
580
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
carlislerainey
0
260
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
carlislerainey
0
160
Logit Models in Small Samples
carlislerainey
0
120
When BLUE is Not Best
carlislerainey
0
480
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
carlislerainey
0
540
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
大規模言語モデルにおけるData-Centric AIと合成データの活用 / Data-Centric AI and Synthetic Data in Large Language Models
tsurubee
1
470
Aurora Serverless からAurora Serverless v2への課題と知見を論文から読み解く/Understanding the challenges and insights of moving from Aurora Serverless to Aurora Serverless v2 from a paper
bootjp
6
1.3k
Multi-Agent Large Language Models for Code Intelligence: Opportunities, Challenges, and Research Directions
fatemeh_fard
0
120
AIスーパーコンピュータにおけるLLM学習処理性能の計測と可観測性 / AI Supercomputer LLM Benchmarking and Observability
yuukit
1
470
若手研究者が国際会議(例えばIROS)でワークショップを企画するメリットと成功法!
tanichu
0
130
AWSの耐久性のあるRedis互換KVSのMemoryDBについての論文を読んでみた
bootjp
1
400
Earth AI: Unlocking Geospatial Insights with Foundation Models and Cross-Modal Reasoning
satai
2
300
競合や要望に流されない─B2B SaaSでミニマム要件を決めるリアルな取り組み / Don't be swayed by competitors or requests - A real effort to determine minimum requirements for B2B SaaS
kaminashi
0
460
機械学習と数理最適化の融合 (MOAI) による革新
mickey_kubo
1
450
説明可能な機械学習と数理最適化
kelicht
2
810
Self-Hosted WebAssembly Runtime for Runtime-Neutral Checkpoint/Restore in Edge–Cloud Continuum
chikuwait
0
270
Satellites Reveal Mobility: A Commuting Origin-destination Flow Generator for Global Cities
satai
3
350
Featured
See All Featured
Building Flexible Design Systems
yeseniaperezcruz
330
40k
A Modern Web Designer's Workflow
chriscoyier
698
190k
Sharpening the Axe: The Primacy of Toolmaking
bcantrill
46
2.6k
技術選定の審美眼(2025年版) / Understanding the Spiral of Technologies 2025 edition
twada
PRO
115
100k
Public Speaking Without Barfing On Your Shoes - THAT 2023
reverentgeek
1
280
The Myth of the Modular Monolith - Day 2 Keynote - Rails World 2024
eileencodes
26
3.3k
Marketing Yourself as an Engineer | Alaka | Gurzu
gurzu
0
110
Practical Tips for Bootstrapping Information Extraction Pipelines
honnibal
25
1.7k
The AI Search Optimization Roadmap by Aleyda Solis
aleyda
1
5.1k
Reflections from 52 weeks, 52 projects
jeffersonlam
355
21k
Become a Pro
speakerdeck
PRO
31
5.8k
The Language of Interfaces
destraynor
162
26k
Transcript
Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle
Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY)
[email protected]
@carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob
“With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or
from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)
incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation
incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any
None
None
None
None
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive Plurality !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive Plurality !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%
mobilization
electoral rules
competitiveness
data
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,
and code at crain.co/stratmob