Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
0
450

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey

Carlisle Rainey

August 29, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by Carlisle Rainey

See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
230
Topic Sampling
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
1
440
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
88
Unnecessary
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
570
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
230
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
150
Logit Models in Small Samples
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
120
When BLUE is Not Best
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
460
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
530

Other Decks in Research

See All in Research
[CV勉強会@関東 CVPR2025] VLM自動運転model S4-Driver
Avatar for Shin-kyoto shinkyoto
2
550
言語モデルの地図：確率分布と 情報幾何による類似性の可視化
Avatar for Hidetoshi Shimodaira shimosan
8
2k
ip71_contraflow_reconfiguration
Avatar for SatokiMasuda stkmsd
0
110
SegEarth-OV: Towards Training-Free Open-Vocabulary Segmentation for Remote Sensing Images
Avatar for SatAI.challenge satai
3
340
機械学習と数理最適化の融合 (MOAI) による革新
Avatar for MIKIO KUBO mickey_kubo
1
400
MIRU2025 チュートリアル講演「ロボット基盤モデルの最前線」
Avatar for Kento Kawaharazuka haraduka
15
9.3k
財務諸表監査のための逐次検定
Avatar for MasaKat0 masakat0
0
150
AIスパコン「さくらONE」のLLM学習ベンチマークによる性能評価 / SAKURAONE LLM Training Benchmarking
Avatar for Yuuki Tsubouchi (yuuk1) yuukit
2
760
Stealing LUKS Keys via TPM and UUID Spoofing in 10 Minutes - BSides 2025
Avatar for AnyKeyShik anykeyshik
0
150
snlp2025_prevent_llm_spikes
Avatar for Sho Takase takase
0
380
Time to Cash: The Full Stack Breakdown of Modern ATM Attacks
Avatar for D ratatata
0
160
論文読み会 SNLP2025 Learning Dynamics of LLM Finetuning. In: ICLR 2025
Avatar for S s_mizuki_nlp
0
290

Featured

See All Featured
How to Create Impact in a Changing Tech Landscape [PerfNow 2023]
Avatar for Tammy Everts tammyeverts
55
3k
Chrome DevTools: State of the Union 2024 - Debugging React & Beyond
Avatar for Addy Osmani addyosmani
9
930
実際に使うSQLの書き方 徹底解説 / pgcon21j-tutorial
Avatar for soudai sone soudai
PRO
190
55k
A designer walks into a library…
Avatar for Paul Jervis Heath pauljervisheath
209
24k
ReactJS: Keep Simple. Everything can be a component!
Avatar for Pedro Nauck pedronauck
667
130k
Why Our Code Smells
Avatar for Brandon Keepers bkeepers
PRO
340
57k
It's Worth the Effort
Avatar for 3n 3n
187
28k
The Success of Rails: Ensuring Growth for the Next 100 Years
Avatar for Eileen M. Uchitelle eileencodes
46
7.7k
Become a Pro
Avatar for Speaker Deck speakerdeck
PRO
29
5.6k
Designing Experiences People Love
Avatar for Jonathan Moore moore
142
24k
BBQ
Avatar for Matthew Crist matthewcrist
89
9.9k
Facilitating Awesome Meetings
Avatar for Lara Hogan lara
57
6.6k

Transcript

  1. Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle

    Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY) [email protected] @carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob

  2. “With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or

    from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)

  3. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation

  4. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any

  5. None
  6. None
  7. None
  8. None

  9. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  10. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  11. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality !

  12. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  13. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  14. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  15. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  16. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  17. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  18. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  19. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51%

  20. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  21. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  22. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  23. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  24. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  25. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  26. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  27. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  28. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  29. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  30. mobilization

  31. electoral rules

  32. competitiveness

  33. data

  34. None
  35. None
  36. None
  37. None
  38. None
  39. None
  40. None

  41. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,

    and code at crain.co/stratmob