Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
0
440

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey

Carlisle Rainey

August 29, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by Carlisle Rainey

See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
210
Topic Sampling
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
1
430
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
81
Unnecessary
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
570
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
210
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
140
Logit Models in Small Samples
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
120
When BLUE is Not Best
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
460
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
510

Other Decks in Research

See All in Research
ストレス計測方法の確立に向けたマルチモーダルデータの活用
Avatar for Yuriko Kikuchi yurikomium
0
1.4k
国際論文を出そう！ICRA / IROS / RA-L への論文投稿の心構えとノウハウ / RSJ2025 Luncheon Seminar
Avatar for koide3 koide3
6
4.5k
SSII2025 [SS1] レンズレスカメラ
Avatar for 画像センシングシンポジウム ssii
PRO
2
1.1k
日本語新聞記事を用いた大規模言語モデルの暗記定量化 / LLMC2025
Avatar for Shotaro Ishihara upura
0
180
引力・斥力を制御可能なランダム部分集合の確率分布
Avatar for Takahiro Kawashima wasyro
0
240
投資戦略202508
Avatar for Pragmaworks pw
0
560
When Submarine Cables Go Dark: Examining the Web Services Resilience Amid Global Internet Disruptions
Avatar for Irvin Chen irvin
0
300
論文紹介：Not All Tokens Are What You Need for Pretraining
Avatar for Kosuke Nishida kosuken
0
170
電力システム最適化入門
Avatar for MIKIO KUBO mickey_kubo
1
910
Adaptive Experimental Design for Efficient Average Treatment Effect Estimation and Treatment Choice
Avatar for MasaKat0 masakat0
0
110
多言語カスタマーインタビューの“壁”を越える~PMと生成AIの共創~ 株式会社ジグザグ 松野 亘
Avatar for Wataru Matsuno watarumatsuno
0
120
時系列データに対する解釈可能な 決定木クラスタリング
Avatar for MIKIO KUBO mickey_kubo
2
930

Featured

See All Featured
Optimizing for Happiness
Avatar for Tom Preston-Werner mojombo
379
70k
Making the Leap to Tech Lead
Avatar for Ryan Cromwell cromwellryan
135
9.5k
Performance Is Good for Brains [We Love Speed 2024]
Avatar for Tammy Everts tammyeverts
12
1.1k
Testing 201, or: Great Expectations
Avatar for Joseph Mastey jmmastey
45
7.6k
Done Done
Avatar for chrislema chrislema
185
16k
Product Roadmaps are Hard
Avatar for C. Todd Lombardo iamctodd
PRO
54
11k
個人開発の失敗を避けるイケてる考え方 / tips for indie hackers
Avatar for panda_program panda_program
111
20k
Stop Working from a Prison Cell
Avatar for Chris Michel hatefulcrawdad
271
21k
Unsuck your backbone
Avatar for Amy Palamountain ammeep
671
58k
How STYLIGHT went responsive
Avatar for nonsquared nonsquared
100
5.8k
Building Flexible Design Systems
Avatar for Yesenia Perez-Cruz yeseniaperezcruz
328
39k
KATA
Avatar for Megan Lloyd mclloyd
32
14k

Transcript

  1. Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle

    Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY) [email protected] @carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob

  2. “With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or

    from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)

  3. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation

  4. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any

  5. None
  6. None
  7. None
  8. None

  9. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  10. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  11. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality !

  12. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  13. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  14. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  15. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  16. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  17. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  18. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  19. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51%

  20. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  21. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  22. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  23. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  24. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  25. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  26. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  27. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  28. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  29. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  30. mobilization

  31. electoral rules

  32. competitiveness

  33. data

  34. None
  35. None
  36. None
  37. None
  38. None
  39. None
  40. None

  41. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,

    and code at crain.co/stratmob