Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
0
460

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey

Carlisle Rainey

August 29, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by Carlisle Rainey

See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
250
Topic Sampling
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
1
460
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
95
Unnecessary
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
580
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
260
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
160
Logit Models in Small Samples
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
120
When BLUE is Not Best
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
480
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
540

Other Decks in Research

See All in Research
説明可能な機械学習と数理最適化
Avatar for kelicht kelicht
2
810
Open Gateway 5GC利用への期待と不安
Avatar for Stellar Craft, Inc. stellarcraft
2
170
[RSJ25] Enhancing VLA Performance in Understanding and Executing Free-form Instructions via Visual Prompt-based Paraphrasing
Avatar for Semantic Machine Intelligence Lab., Keio Univ. keio_smilab
PRO
0
190
生成的情報検索時代におけるAI利用と認知バイアス
Avatar for Y. Yamamoto trycycle
PRO
0
170
Satellites Reveal Mobility: A Commuting Origin-destination Flow Generator for Global Cities
Avatar for SatAI.challenge satai
3
350
Time to Cash: The Full Stack Breakdown of Modern ATM Attacks
Avatar for D ratatata
0
180
[Devfest Incheon 2025] 모두를 위한 친절한 언어모델(LLM) 학습 가이드
Avatar for Beomi beomi
2
1.4k
Thirty Years of Progress in Speech Synthesis: A Personal Perspective on the Past, Present, and Future
Avatar for Keiichi Tokuda ktokuda
0
140
機械学習と数理最適化の融合 (MOAI) による革新
Avatar for MIKIO KUBO mickey_kubo
1
450
その推薦システムの評価指標、ユーザーの感覚とズレてるかも
Avatar for kuri8ive kuri8ive
1
300
20251023_くまもと21の会例会_「車1割削減、渋滞半減、公共交通2倍」をめざして.pdf
Avatar for Traffic Brain trafficbrain
0
150
An Open and Reproducible Deep Research Agent for Long-Form Question Answering
Avatar for Ikuya Yamada ikuyamada
0
180

Featured

See All Featured
Applied NLP in the Age of Generative AI
Avatar for Ines Montani inesmontani
PRO
3
2k
GitHub's CSS Performance
Avatar for Jon Rohan jonrohan
1032
470k
AI Search: Implications for SEO and How to Move Forward - #ShenzhenSEOConference
Avatar for Aleyda Solis aleyda
1
1.1k
A Guide to Academic Writing Using Generative AI - A Workshop
Avatar for Kenji Saito ks91
PRO
0
170
Intergalactic Javascript Robots from Outer Space
Avatar for Vicent Martí tanoku
273
27k
A Tale of Four Properties
Avatar for Chris Coyier chriscoyier
162
23k
Writing Fast Ruby
Avatar for Erik Berlin sferik
630
62k
Practical Orchestrator
Avatar for Shlomi Noach shlominoach
190
11k
Helping Users Find Their Own Way: Creating Modern Search Experiences
Avatar for Dan Newman danielanewman
31
3.1k
The Illustrated Guide to Node.js - THAT Conference 2024
Avatar for David Neal reverentgeek
0
220
The Psychology of Web Performance [Beyond Tellerrand 2023]
Avatar for Tammy Everts tammyeverts
49
3.3k
The Limits of Empathy - UXLibs8
Avatar for Cassini Nazir cassininazir
1
200

Transcript

  1. Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle

    Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY) [email protected] @carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob

  2. “With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or

    from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)

  3. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation

  4. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any

  5. None
  6. None
  7. None
  8. None

  9. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  10. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  11. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality !

  12. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  13. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  14. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  15. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  16. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  17. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  18. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  19. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51%

  20. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  21. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  22. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  23. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  24. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  25. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  26. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  27. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  28. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  29. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  30. mobilization

  31. electoral rules

  32. competitiveness

  33. data

  34. None
  35. None
  36. None
  37. None
  38. None
  39. None
  40. None

  41. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,

    and code at crain.co/stratmob