Upgrade to PRO for Only $50/Year—Limited-Time Offer! 🔥

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
0
450

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey

Carlisle Rainey

August 29, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by Carlisle Rainey

See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
240
Topic Sampling
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
1
450
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
91
Unnecessary
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
570
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
250
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
150
Logit Models in Small Samples
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
120
When BLUE is Not Best
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
470
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
530

Other Decks in Research

See All in Research
病院向け生成AIプロダクト開発の実践と課題
Avatar for Takashi Nishibayashi hagino3000
0
420
[IBIS 2025] 深層基盤モデルのための強化学習 驚きから理論にもとづく納得へ
Avatar for Akifumi Wachi akifumi_wachi
14
7.8k
SkySense V2: A Unified Foundation Model for Multi-modal Remote Sensing
Avatar for SatAI.challenge satai
3
110
論文紹介：Safety Alignment Should be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deep
Avatar for Kazutoshi Shinoda kazutoshishinoda
0
140
大規模言語モデルにおけるData-Centric AIと合成データの活用 / Data-Centric AI and Synthetic Data in Large Language Models
Avatar for tsurubee tsurubee
1
390
EarthDial: Turning Multi-sensory Earth Observations to Interactive Dialogues
Avatar for SatAI.challenge satai
3
370
「どう育てるか」より「どう働きたいか」〜スクラムマスターの最初の一歩〜
Avatar for hirakawa hirakawa51
0
1k
GPUを利用したStein Particle Filterによる点群6自由度モンテカルロSLAM
Avatar for TakumiNakao takuminakao
0
610
問いを起点に、社会と共鳴する知を育む場へ
Avatar for MATSUMOTO Ryosuke matsumoto_r
PRO
0
720
CVPR2025論文紹介：Unboxed
Avatar for 村川卓也 murakawatakuya
0
210
単施設でできる臨床研究の考え方
Avatar for Shuntaro Sato shuntaros
0
3.3k
学習型データ構造：機械学習を内包する新しいデータ構造の設計と解析
Avatar for Yusuke Matsui matsui_528
4
1.6k

Featured

See All Featured
Bash Introduction
Avatar for André Augusto Costa Santos 62gerente
615
210k
What's in a price? How to price your products and services
Avatar for Michael Herold michaelherold
246
12k
Designing for Performance
Avatar for Lara Hogan lara
610
69k
Mobile First: as difficult as doing things right
Avatar for Swwweet swwweet
225
10k
Scaling GitHub
Avatar for Zach Holman holman
464
140k
Agile that works and the tools we love
Avatar for Rasmus Luckow-Nielsen rasmusluckow
331
21k
Faster Mobile Websites
Avatar for Dean Hume deanohume
310
31k
The Invisible Side of Design
Avatar for Vitaly Friedman smashingmag
302
51k
Exploring the Power of Turbo Streams & Action Cable | RailsConf2023
Avatar for Kevin Liebholz kevinliebholz
36
6.2k
How to Ace a Technical Interview
Avatar for Jacob Kaplan-Moss jacobian
280
24k
Reflections from 52 weeks, 52 projects
Avatar for Jefferson Lam jeffersonlam
355
21k
RailsConf 2023
Avatar for Aaron Patterson tenderlove
30
1.3k

Transcript

  1. Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle

    Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY) [email protected] @carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob

  2. “With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or

    from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)

  3. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation

  4. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any

  5. None
  6. None
  7. None
  8. None

  9. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  10. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  11. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality !

  12. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  13. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  14. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  15. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  16. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  17. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  18. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  19. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51%

  20. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  21. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  22. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  23. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  24. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  25. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  26. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  27. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  28. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  29. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  30. mobilization

  31. electoral rules

  32. competitiveness

  33. data

  34. None
  35. None
  36. None
  37. None
  38. None
  39. None
  40. None

  41. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,

    and code at crain.co/stratmob