Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
0
460
Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.
Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Carlisle Rainey
See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
carlislerainey
0
260
Topic Sampling
carlislerainey
1
470
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
carlislerainey
0
99
Unnecessary
carlislerainey
0
590
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
carlislerainey
0
260
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
carlislerainey
0
160
Logit Models in Small Samples
carlislerainey
0
130
When BLUE is Not Best
carlislerainey
0
480
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
carlislerainey
0
540
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
ブレグマン距離最小化に基づくリース表現量推定:バイアス除去学習の統一理論
masakat0
0
180
2026年1月の生成AI領域の重要リリース&トピック解説
kajikent
0
790
SREはサイバネティクスの夢をみるか? / Do SREs Dream of Cybernetics?
yuukit
3
420
討議:RACDA設立30周年記念都市交通フォーラム2026
trafficbrain
0
550
FUSE-RSVLM: Feature Fusion Vision-Language Model for Remote Sensing
satai
3
190
2026年3月1日(日)福島「除染土」の公共利用をかんがえる
atsukomasano2026
0
410
生成AI による論文執筆サポート・ワークショップ 論文執筆・推敲編 / Generative AI-Assisted Paper Writing Support Workshop: Drafting and Revision Edition
ks91
PRO
0
140
2026-01-30-MandSL-textbook-jp-cos-lod
yegusa
1
570
COFFEE-Japan PROJECT Impact Report(海ノ向こうコーヒー)
ontheslope
0
890
競合や要望に流されない─B2B SaaSでミニマム要件を決めるリアルな取り組み / Don't be swayed by competitors or requests - A real effort to determine minimum requirements for B2B SaaS
kaminashi
0
970
AIスーパーコンピュータにおけるLLM学習処理性能の計測と可観測性 / AI Supercomputer LLM Benchmarking and Observability
yuukit
1
720
「車1割削減、渋滞半減、公共交通2倍」を 熊本から岡山へ@RACDA設立30周年記念都市交通フォーラム2026
trafficbrain
1
700
Featured
See All Featured
A Tale of Four Properties
chriscoyier
163
24k
Visualizing Your Data: Incorporating Mongo into Loggly Infrastructure
mongodb
49
9.9k
Discover your Explorer Soul
emna__ayadi
2
1.1k
Why Your Marketing Sucks and What You Can Do About It - Sophie Logan
marketingsoph
0
100
個人開発の失敗を避けるイケてる考え方 / tips for indie hackers
panda_program
122
21k
Color Theory Basics | Prateek | Gurzu
gurzu
0
240
Intergalactic Javascript Robots from Outer Space
tanoku
273
27k
Distributed Sagas: A Protocol for Coordinating Microservices
caitiem20
333
22k
How to Grow Your eCommerce with AI & Automation
katarinadahlin
PRO
1
130
Designing for humans not robots
tammielis
254
26k
[SF Ruby Conf 2025] Rails X
palkan
2
820
Typedesign – Prime Four
hannesfritz
42
3k
Transcript
Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle
Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY)
[email protected]
@carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob
“With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or
from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)
incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation
incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any
None
None
None
None
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive Plurality !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive Plurality !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%
mobilization
electoral rules
competitiveness
data
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,
and code at crain.co/stratmob