Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...

Sponsored · Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly. Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest. →
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
470
0

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey

Carlisle Rainey

August 29, 2014

More Decks by Carlisle Rainey

See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
290
Topic Sampling
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
1
490
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
100
Unnecessary
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
600
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
280
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
170
Logit Models in Small Samples
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
140
When BLUE is Not Best
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
500
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
560

Other Decks in Research

See All in Research
Ghost in the 7‑Zip: The Shadow of Residential Proxies Creeping into Your Life
Avatar for NTT docomo Business nttcom
0
1.1k
AY 2026 Guide to Academic Writing Using Generative AI - Workshop
Avatar for Kenji Saito ks91
PRO
0
120
RS-Agent: Automating Remote Sensing Tasks through Intelligent Agent
Avatar for SatAI.challenge satai
2
290
(SIGQS17) Frasco-VS：フラグメントに基づく薬剤候補化合物選抜の量子アニーリングによる実現
Avatar for Keisuke Yanagisawa keisukeyanagisawa
PRO
0
100
Dual Quadric表現を用いた動的物体追跡とRGB-D・IMU制約の密結合によるオドメトリ推定
Avatar for Toyozo Shimada nanoshimarobot
0
400
Cross-Media Information Spaces and Architectures
Avatar for Beat Signer signer
PRO
0
300
2026年1月の生成AI領域の重要リリース＆トピック解説
Avatar for KAJI | 梶谷健人 kajikent
0
1k
COFFEE-Japan PROJECT Impact Report（Uminomukou Coffee）
Avatar for 坂ノ途中 ontheslope
0
180
衛星×エッジAI勉強会 衛星上におけるAI処理制約とそ取組について
Avatar for SatAI.challenge satai
4
540
Using our influence and power for patient safety
Avatar for Helen Bevan helenbevan
0
360
明日から使える！研究効率化ツール入門
Avatar for Yusuke Matsui matsui_528
13
7.3k
Research Engineerという仕事 / Research Engineering: Bridging Research and Business
Avatar for chck chck
1
210

Featured

See All Featured
Context Engineering - Making Every Token Count
Avatar for Addy Osmani addyosmani
9
960
Building Applications with DynamoDB
Avatar for Matt Wood mza
96
7.1k
Information Architects: The Missing Link in Design Systems
Avatar for Michelle Chin soysaucechin
0
970
Heart Work Chapter 1 - Part 1
Avatar for Lake Fama lfama
PRO
7
36k
The Power of CSS Pseudo Elements
Avatar for Geoffrey Crofte geoffreycrofte
82
6.3k
職位にかかわらず全員がリーダーシップを発揮するチーム作り / Building a team where everyone can demonstrate leadership regardless of position
Avatar for MADOX madoxten
62
54k
Templates, Plugins, & Blocks: Oh My! Creating the theme that thinks of everything
Avatar for Michelle Schulp Hunt marktimemedia
31
2.8k
CoffeeScript is Beautiful & I Never Want to Write Plain JavaScript Again
Avatar for Sam Stephenson sstephenson
162
16k
Faster Mobile Websites
Avatar for Dean Hume deanohume
310
31k
Marketing to machines
Avatar for Jono Alderson jonoalderson
1
5.4k
Exploring anti-patterns in Rails
Avatar for Elle Meredith aemeredith
3
400
The Language of Interfaces
Avatar for Des Traynor destraynor
162
27k

Transcript

  1. Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle

    Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY) [email protected] @carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob

  2. “With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or

    from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)

  3. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation

  4. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any

  5. None
  6. None
  7. None
  8. None

  9. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  10. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  11. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality !

  12. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  13. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  14. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  15. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  16. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  17. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  18. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  19. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51%

  20. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  21. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  22. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  23. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  24. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  25. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  26. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  27. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  28. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  29. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  30. mobilization

  31. electoral rules

  32. competitiveness

  33. data

  34. None
  35. None
  36. None
  37. None
  38. None
  39. None
  40. None

  41. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,

    and code at crain.co/stratmob