Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Sign up for free

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
480
0

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey

Carlisle Rainey

August 29, 2014

More Decks by Carlisle Rainey

See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
300
Topic Sampling
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
1
510
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
110
Unnecessary
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
610
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
300
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
170
Logit Models in Small Samples
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
150
When BLUE is Not Best
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
510
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
580

Other Decks in Research

See All in Research
[CV勉強会＠関東 CVPR2026] PSDesigner: Automated Graphic Design with a Human-Like Creative Workflow / kantocv 67th CVPR 2026
Avatar for Shunsuke KITADA shunk031
0
290
CVPR2026論文紹介_VLMにとって​良いvision encoderとは何か？​Rethinking Model Selection in VLM Through the Lens of Gromov-Wasserstein Distance​
Avatar for 小林優斗 kobayashi31
1
210
Sleuthcon Keynote - How Cybercriminals (ab)use AI
Avatar for Thomas Roccia fr0gger
0
320
NLP colloquium: AI Safety Survey
Avatar for Masahiro Kaneko kanekomasahiro
1
1.1k
量子サマースクール2026「量子計算機アーキテクチャ分野の概観」
Avatar for Yosuke Ueno youten622
1
860
Pretrain Where? Investigating How Pretraining Data Diversity Impacts Geospatial Foundation Model Performance
Avatar for SatAI.challenge satai
3
130
高性能計算機クラスタを用いた大規模点群処理による森林の単木抽出と構造解析
Avatar for Kenta Itakura kentaitakura
1
120
多様なデータを許容し学習し続ける模倣学習 / Advanced Imitation Learning for VLA
Avatar for PRIN Lab prinlab
0
300
実例から見るLLMのマンガ理解：実務VQAタスクによる長期的文脈と視覚情報の定性評価
Avatar for kzmssk kzmssk
0
110
EIRによる不正端末のブロッキング 5G時代におけるデバイス識別と不正対策の進化
Avatar for Stellar Craft, Inc. stellarcraft
0
130
Using our influence and power for patient safety
Avatar for Helen Bevan helenbevan
0
420
データサイエンティストの就労意識～2015 → 2026 一般(個人)会員アンケートより
Avatar for The Japan DataScientist Society datascientistsociety
PRO
0
770

Featured

See All Featured
How to make the Groovebox
Avatar for あそなす asonas
2
2.4k
RailsConf & Balkan Ruby 2019: The Past, Present, and Future of Rails at GitHub
Avatar for Eileen M. Uchitelle eileencodes
141
35k
Side Projects
Avatar for Sacha Greif sachag
455
43k
Speed Design
Avatar for Sergey Chernyshev sergeychernyshev
33
2.1k
Taking LLMs out of the black box: A practical guide to human-in-the-loop distillation
Avatar for Ines Montani inesmontani
PRO
3
2.4k
KATA
Avatar for Megan Lloyd mclloyd
PRO
35
15k
Docker and Python
Avatar for Tania Allard trallard
47
4.2k
Exploring anti-patterns in Rails
Avatar for Elle Meredith aemeredith
3
500
Rebuilding a faster, lazier Slack
Avatar for samanthasiow samanthasiow
85
9.6k
The SEO identity crisis: Don't let AI make you average
Avatar for Varn varn
0
550
What's in a price? How to price your products and services
Avatar for Michael Herold michaelherold
247
13k
Principles of Awesome APIs and How to Build Them.
Avatar for Keavy McMinn keavy
128
18k

Transcript

  1. Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle

    Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY) [email protected] @carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob

  2. “With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or

    from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)

  3. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation

  4. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any

  5. None
  6. None
  7. None
  8. None

  9. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  10. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  11. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality !

  12. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  13. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  14. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  15. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  16. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  17. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  18. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  19. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51%

  20. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  21. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  22. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  23. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  24. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  25. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  26. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  27. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  28. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  29. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  30. mobilization

  31. electoral rules

  32. competitiveness

  33. data

  34. None
  35. None
  36. None
  37. None
  38. None
  39. None
  40. None

  41. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,

    and code at crain.co/stratmob