Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
470
0

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey

Carlisle Rainey

August 29, 2014

More Decks by Carlisle Rainey

See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
290
Topic Sampling
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
1
500
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
110
Unnecessary
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
600
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
280
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
170
Logit Models in Small Samples
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
140
When BLUE is Not Best
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
500
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
560

Other Decks in Research

See All in Research
論文紹介：HalluCitation Matters
Avatar for Takahiro Kawashima wasyro
0
120
CVPR2026論文紹介_VLMにとって​良いvision encoderとは何か？​Rethinking Model Selection in VLM Through the Lens of Gromov-Wasserstein Distance​
Avatar for 小林優斗 kobayashi31
1
160
機械学習で作った ポケモン対戦bot で 遊ぼう！
Avatar for Yusuke Fukasawa fufufukakaka
0
340
RS-Agent: Automating Remote Sensing Tasks through Intelligent Agent
Avatar for SatAI.challenge satai
3
350
SLAMはどこまで解決されたのか？
Avatar for tomonom tomonom
0
600
言語モデルから言語について語る際に押さえておきたいこと
Avatar for Sho Yokoi eumesy
PRO
6
2.4k
JICA QUEST 共創×革新プログラム Impact Report（海ノ向こうコーヒー）
Avatar for 坂ノ途中 ontheslope
0
120
Apache Gravitinoで実現する Icebergカタログ統合とアクセスの一元化
Avatar for matsumooon matsumooon
0
310
NII S. Koyama's Lab Research Overview AY2026
Avatar for NII S. Koyama's Lab skoyamalab
0
380
AY 2026 Guide to Academic Writing Using Generative AI - Workshop
Avatar for Kenji Saito ks91
PRO
0
130
(SIGQS17) Frasco-VS：フラグメントに基づく薬剤候補化合物選抜の量子アニーリングによる実現
Avatar for Keisuke Yanagisawa keisukeyanagisawa
PRO
0
150
2026 東京科学大 情報通信系 研究室紹介 (すずかけ台)
Avatar for Tokyo Tech ICT Dept. icttitech
0
4k

Featured

See All Featured
How to Ace a Technical Interview
Avatar for Jacob Kaplan-Moss jacobian
281
24k
Art, The Web, and Tiny UX
Avatar for Lynn Fisher lynnandtonic
304
22k
How STYLIGHT went responsive
Avatar for nonsquared nonsquared
100
6.2k
How To Speak Unicorn (iThemes Webinar)
Avatar for Michelle Schulp Hunt marktimemedia
1
500
Speed Design
Avatar for Sergey Chernyshev sergeychernyshev
33
1.9k
VelocityConf: Rendering Performance Case Studies
Avatar for Addy Osmani addyosmani
333
25k
What Being in a Rock Band Can Teach Us About Real World SEO
Avatar for Ade Holder 427marketing
0
1k
Dominate Local Search Results - an insider guide to GBP, reviews, and Local SEO
Avatar for Greg Gifford greggifford
PRO
0
200
jQuery: Nuts, Bolts and Bling
Avatar for Doug Neiner dougneiner
66
8.5k
Neural Spatial Audio Processing for Sound Field Analysis and Control
Avatar for NII S. Koyama's Lab skoyamalab
0
360
We Are The Robots
Avatar for Honza Javorek honzajavorek
0
260
What does AI have to do with Human Rights?
Avatar for Per Axbom axbom
PRO
1
2.2k

Transcript

  1. Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle

    Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY) [email protected] @carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob

  2. “With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or

    from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)

  3. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation

  4. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any

  5. None
  6. None
  7. None
  8. None

  9. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  10. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  11. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality !

  12. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  13. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  14. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  15. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  16. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  17. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  18. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  19. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51%

  20. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  21. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  22. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  23. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  24. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  25. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  26. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  27. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  28. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  29. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  30. mobilization

  31. electoral rules

  32. competitiveness

  33. data

  34. None
  35. None
  36. None
  37. None
  38. None
  39. None
  40. None

  41. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,

    and code at crain.co/stratmob