Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...
Search
Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
0
430
Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.
Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Carlisle Rainey
See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
carlislerainey
0
200
Topic Sampling
carlislerainey
1
410
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
carlislerainey
0
77
Unnecessary
carlislerainey
0
560
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
carlislerainey
0
210
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
carlislerainey
0
140
Logit Models in Small Samples
carlislerainey
0
110
When BLUE is Not Best
carlislerainey
0
450
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
carlislerainey
0
500
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
サーブレシーブ成功率は勝敗に影響するか?
vball_panda
0
650
クラウドのテレメトリーシステム研究動向2025年
yuukit
3
880
大規模日本語VLM Asagi-VLMにおける合成データセットの構築とモデル実装
kuehara
5
2.1k
ラムダ計算の拡張に基づく 音楽プログラミング言語mimium とそのVMの実装
tomoyanonymous
0
460
PhD Defence: Considering Temporal and Contextual Information for Lexical Semantic Change Detection
a1da4
1
170
さくらインターネット研究所 アップデート2025年
matsumoto_r
PRO
0
550
研究テーマのデザインと研究遂行の方法論
hisashiishihara
5
1.2k
SI-D案内資料_京都文教大学
ryojitakeuchi1116
0
1.4k
ノンパラメトリック分布表現を用いた位置尤度場周辺化によるRTK-GNSSの整数アンビギュイティ推定
aoki_nosse
0
300
Weekly AI Agents News!
masatoto
33
65k
ウッドスタックチャン:木材を用いた小型エージェントロボットの開発と印象評価 / ec75-sato
yumulab
1
310
知識強化言語モデルLUKE @ LUKEミートアップ
ikuyamada
0
450
Featured
See All Featured
It's Worth the Effort
3n
184
28k
Bash Introduction
62gerente
613
210k
Measuring & Analyzing Core Web Vitals
bluesmoon
7
430
What’s in a name? Adding method to the madness
productmarketing
PRO
22
3.4k
Practical Orchestrator
shlominoach
187
11k
Cheating the UX When There Is Nothing More to Optimize - PixelPioneers
stephaniewalter
280
13k
No one is an island. Learnings from fostering a developers community.
thoeni
21
3.3k
We Have a Design System, Now What?
morganepeng
52
7.6k
Design and Strategy: How to Deal with People Who Don’t "Get" Design
morganepeng
129
19k
Raft: Consensus for Rubyists
vanstee
137
6.9k
I Don’t Have Time: Getting Over the Fear to Launch Your Podcast
jcasabona
32
2.3k
Large-scale JavaScript Application Architecture
addyosmani
512
110k
Transcript
Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle
Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY)
[email protected]
@carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob
“With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or
from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)
incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation
incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any
None
None
None
None
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive Plurality !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive Plurality !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%
mobilization
electoral rules
competitiveness
data
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,
and code at crain.co/stratmob