Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
470
0

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey

Carlisle Rainey

August 29, 2014

More Decks by Carlisle Rainey

See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
290
Topic Sampling
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
1
500
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
110
Unnecessary
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
600
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
290
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
170
Logit Models in Small Samples
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
140
When BLUE is Not Best
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
500
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
570

Other Decks in Research

See All in Research
Language and AI
Avatar for Ayana Niwa ayaniwa
0
180
SAKURAONE: An Open Ethernet-based AI HPC System And Its Observed Workload Dynamics in a Single-Tenant LLM Development Environment
Avatar for Yuuki Tsubouchi (yuuk1) yuukit
1
480
言語モデルから言語について語る際に押さえておきたいこと
Avatar for Sho Yokoi eumesy
PRO
6
2.5k
AIで最適化を解けるか？
Avatar for MIKIO KUBO mickey_kubo
0
140
[CV勉強会＠関東 CVPR2026] PSDesigner: Automated Graphic Design with a Human-Like Creative Workflow / kantocv 67th CVPR 2026
Avatar for Shunsuke KITADA shunk031
0
200
シングルチャネルマルチトーカー音声認識の進展
Avatar for Ryo Masumura ryomasumura
0
200
AIエージェント時代のLLM-jpモデルのあるべき姿
Avatar for Kouta Nakayama k141303
0
530
National high-resolution cropland classification of Japan with agricultural census information and multi-temporal multi-modality datasets
Avatar for SatAI.challenge satai
3
390
SLAMはどこまで解決されたのか？
Avatar for tomonom tomonom
0
890
Scalable dynamic origin-destination demand estimation enhanced by high-resolution satellite imagery data
Avatar for SatAI.challenge satai
3
370
某助成金プロジェクト採択に向けて企業研究所のアウトリーチ専任者がやったこと
Avatar for afroscript afroscript
0
130
Cross-Media Information Spaces and Architectures
Avatar for Beat Signer signer
PRO
0
320

Featured

See All Featured
A Guide to Academic Writing Using Generative AI - A Workshop
Avatar for Kenji Saito ks91
PRO
1
360
The SEO Collaboration Effect
Avatar for Kristina Bergwall kristinabergwall1
1
510
Understanding Cognitive Biases in Performance Measurement
Avatar for Philip Tellis bluesmoon
32
3k
GraphQLとの向き合い方2022年版
Avatar for Yosuke Kurami quramy
50
15k
The Cost Of JavaScript in 2023
Avatar for Addy Osmani addyosmani
55
10k
Lightning talk: Run Django tests with GitHub Actions
Avatar for Sarah Abderemane sabderemane
0
230
How To Stay Up To Date on Web Technology
Avatar for Chris Coyier chriscoyier
790
250k
JavaScript: Past, Present, and Future - NDC Porto 2020
Avatar for David Neal reverentgeek
52
6k
CoffeeScript is Beautiful & I Never Want to Write Plain JavaScript Again
Avatar for Sam Stephenson sstephenson
162
16k
Fantastic passwords and where to find them - at NoRuKo
Avatar for Phil Nash philnash
52
3.8k
WENDY [Excerpt]
Avatar for Tessa Abrams tessaabrams
11
39k
Building a A Zero-Code AI SEO Workflow
Avatar for Ian Lurie portentint
PRO
0
640

Transcript

  1. Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle

    Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY) [email protected] @carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob

  2. “With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or

    from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)

  3. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation

  4. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any

  5. None
  6. None
  7. None
  8. None

  9. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  10. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  11. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality !

  12. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  13. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  14. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  15. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  16. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  17. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  18. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  19. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51%

  20. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  21. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  22. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  23. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  24. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  25. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  26. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  27. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  28. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  29. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  30. mobilization

  31. electoral rules

  32. competitiveness

  33. data

  34. None
  35. None
  36. None
  37. None
  38. None
  39. None
  40. None

  41. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,

    and code at crain.co/stratmob