Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
0
440

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey

Carlisle Rainey

August 29, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by Carlisle Rainey

See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
210
Topic Sampling
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
1
430
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
80
Unnecessary
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
560
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
210
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
140
Logit Models in Small Samples
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
120
When BLUE is Not Best
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
460
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
510

Other Decks in Research

See All in Research
Ad-DS Paper Circle #1
Avatar for Yusuke Kaneko ykaneko1992
0
5.8k
Delta Airlines® Customer Care in the U.S.: How to Reach Them Now
Avatar for booking.comcustomerservice bookingcomcustomersupportusa
0
110
一人称視点映像解析の最先端（MIRU2025 チュートリアル）
Avatar for Takuma Yagi takumayagi
6
3.2k
心理言語学の視点から再考する言語モデルの学習過程
Avatar for Masato Mita chemical_tree
2
540
SSII2025 [TS2] リモートセンシング画像処理の最前線
Avatar for 画像センシングシンポジウム ssii
PRO
7
3k
20250502_ABEJA_論文読み会_スライド
Avatar for Tomoki Fujihara flatton
0
190
多言語カスタマーインタビューの“壁”を越える~PMと生成AIの共創~ 株式会社ジグザグ 松野 亘
Avatar for Wataru Matsuno watarumatsuno
0
110
Computational OT #4 - Gradient flow and diffusion models
Avatar for Gabriel Peyré gpeyre
0
360
定性データ、どう活かす？ 〜定性データのための分析基盤、はじめました〜 / How to utilize qualitative data? ~We have launched an analysis platform for qualitative data~
Avatar for 株式会社カミナシ kaminashi
7
1.1k
診断前の病歴テキストを対象としたLLMによるエンティティリンキング精度検証
Avatar for Takashi Nishibayashi hagino3000
1
120
Vision And Languageモデルにおける異なるドメインでの継続事前学習が性能に与える影響の検証 / YANS2024
Avatar for Sansan R&D sansan_randd
1
140
なめらかなシステムと運用維持の終わらぬ未来 / dicomo2025_coherently_fittable_system
Avatar for monochromegane monochromegane
0
2.1k

Featured

See All Featured
Creating an realtime collaboration tool: Agile Flush - .NET Oxford
Avatar for Marc Duiker marcduiker
31
2.2k
実際に使うSQLの書き方 徹底解説 / pgcon21j-tutorial
Avatar for soudai sone soudai
PRO
183
54k
ReactJS: Keep Simple. Everything can be a component!
Avatar for Pedro Nauck pedronauck
667
120k
Done Done
Avatar for chrislema chrislema
185
16k
A Tale of Four Properties
Avatar for Chris Coyier chriscoyier
160
23k
Imperfection Machines: The Place of Print at Facebook
Avatar for Scott Boms scottboms
268
13k
Agile that works and the tools we love
Avatar for Rasmus Luckow-Nielsen rasmusluckow
329
21k
Build The Right Thing And Hit Your Dates
Avatar for Maggie C. maggiecrowley
37
2.8k
Designing Dashboards & Data Visualisations in Web Apps
Avatar for Des Traynor destraynor
231
53k
Sharpening the Axe: The Primacy of Toolmaking
Avatar for Bryan Cantrill bcantrill
44
2.4k
Documentation Writing (for coders)
Avatar for Carmen Chung carmenintech
73
5k
Fight the Zombie Pattern Library - RWD Summit 2016
Avatar for Marcelo Somers marcelosomers
234
17k

Transcript

  1. Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle

    Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY) [email protected] @carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob

  2. “With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or

    from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)

  3. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation

  4. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any

  5. None
  6. None
  7. None
  8. None

  9. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  10. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  11. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality !

  12. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  13. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  14. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  15. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  16. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  17. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  18. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  19. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51%

  20. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  21. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  22. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  23. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  24. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  25. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  26. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  27. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  28. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  29. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  30. mobilization

  31. electoral rules

  32. competitiveness

  33. data

  34. None
  35. None
  36. None
  37. None
  38. None
  39. None
  40. None

  41. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,

    and code at crain.co/stratmob