Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.
Search
Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
0
420
Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.
Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Carlisle Rainey
See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
carlislerainey
0
170
Topic Sampling
carlislerainey
1
350
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
carlislerainey
0
75
Unnecessary
carlislerainey
0
520
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
carlislerainey
0
190
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
carlislerainey
0
130
Logit Models in Small Samples
carlislerainey
0
110
When BLUE is Not Best
carlislerainey
0
430
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
carlislerainey
0
460
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
DiscordにおけるキャラクターIPを活用したUGCコンテンツ生成サービスの ラピッドプロトタイピング ~国際ハッカソンでの事例研究
o_ob
0
150
-SSII技術マップを通して見る過去・現在,そして未来-
hf149
1
490
方策の長期性能に対する効率的なオフライン評価・学習 (Long-term Off-Policy Evaluation and Learning)
usaito
PRO
2
410
LayerXにおけるAI・機械学習技術の活用と展望 / layerx-ai-jsai2024
shimacos
2
2.5k
ソースコード問い合わせのための長コンテキストLLM向けRAG手法の提案
toskamiya
0
140
「Goトレ」のご紹介
smartfukushilab1
0
210
Introduction of NII S. Koyama's Lab (AY2024)
skoyamalab
0
330
Threat Intelligence and Beyond
rishikadesai_7
0
240
自動運転・AIシステムの問題を賢く探す・賢く直す / Smart Search & Repair Techniques for Automated Driving Systems and AI Systems
ishikawafyu
0
130
研究効率化Tips_2024 / Research Efficiency Tips 2024
ryo_nakamura
5
4.1k
DroidKaigi CfP分析
yukihiromori
0
110
スモールデータ勉強会発表資料
natsutan
0
310
Featured
See All Featured
What's new in Ruby 2.0
geeforr
338
31k
Optimising Largest Contentful Paint
csswizardry
18
2.6k
Happy Clients
brianwarren
94
6.5k
10 Git Anti Patterns You Should be Aware of
lemiorhan
652
58k
The Illustrated Children's Guide to Kubernetes
chrisshort
39
47k
Typedesign – Prime Four
hannesfritz
37
2.2k
Stop Working from a Prison Cell
hatefulcrawdad
266
20k
Build The Right Thing And Hit Your Dates
maggiecrowley
28
2.2k
The Cost Of JavaScript in 2023
addyosmani
31
4.7k
Testing 201, or: Great Expectations
jmmastey
33
6.9k
A designer walks into a library…
pauljervisheath
201
24k
Building an army of robots
kneath
301
42k
Transcript
Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle
Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY)
[email protected]
@carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob
“With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or
from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)
incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation
incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any
None
None
None
None
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive Plurality !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive Plurality !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%
mobilization
electoral rules
competitiveness
data
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,
and code at crain.co/stratmob