Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
0
460

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey

Carlisle Rainey

August 29, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by Carlisle Rainey

See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
260
Topic Sampling
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
1
470
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
100
Unnecessary
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
590
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
260
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
160
Logit Models in Small Samples
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
130
When BLUE is Not Best
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
480
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
540

Other Decks in Research

See All in Research
教師あり学習と強化学習で作る 最強の数学特化LLM
Avatar for Hiroshi Y (RabotniKuma) analokmaus
2
1k
Any-Optical-Model: A Universal Foundation Model for Optical Remote Sensing
Avatar for SatAI.challenge satai
3
250
SREのためのテレメトリー技術の探究 / Telemetry for SRE
Avatar for Yuuki Tsubouchi (yuuk1) yuukit
13
3.4k
【SIGGRAPH Asia 2025】Lo-Fi Photograph with Lo-Fi Communication
Avatar for Chinatsu Ozawa toremolo72
0
140
【NICOGRAPH2025】Photographic Conviviality: ボディペイント・ワークショップによる 同時的かつ共生的な写真体験
Avatar for Chinatsu Ozawa toremolo72
0
200
Multi-Agent Large Language Models for Code Intelligence: Opportunities, Challenges, and Research Directions
Avatar for Fatemeh Fard (UBC) fatemeh_fard
0
140
2026 東京科学大 情報通信系 研究室紹介 (すずかけ台)
Avatar for Tokyo Tech ICT Dept. icttitech
0
1.1k
英語教育 “研究” のあり方：学術知とアウトリーチの緊張関係
Avatar for TerasawaT terasawat
1
660
湯村研究室の紹介2025 / yumulab2025
Avatar for yumulab yumulab
0
330
Off-Policy Evaluation and Learning for Matching Markets
Avatar for Yudai Hayashi yudai00
0
110
学習型データ構造：機械学習を内包する新しいデータ構造の設計と解析
Avatar for Yusuke Matsui matsui_528
6
4.2k
A History of Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search from an Applications Perspective
Avatar for Yusuke Matsui matsui_528
1
210

Featured

See All Featured
Agile Actions for Facilitating Distributed Teams - ADO2019
Avatar for Mark Kilby mkilby
0
160
Designing for Performance
Avatar for Lara Hogan lara
611
70k
Why Mistakes Are the Best Teachers: Turning Failure into a Pathway for Growth
Avatar for Umar Saidu Auna auna
0
96
The Psychology of Web Performance [Beyond Tellerrand 2023]
Avatar for Tammy Everts tammyeverts
49
3.3k
From π to Pie charts
Avatar for Rasagy Sharma rasagy
0
160
The untapped power of vector embeddings
Avatar for Frank van Dijk frankvandijk
2
1.6k
Leading Effective Engineering Teams in the AI Era
Avatar for Addy Osmani addyosmani
9
1.8k
Ethics towards AI in product and experience design
Avatar for Skipper Chong Warson skipperchong
2
240
What Being in a Rock Band Can Teach Us About Real World SEO
Avatar for Ade Holder 427marketing
0
200
Max Prin - Stacking Signals: How International SEO Comes Together (And Falls Apart)
Avatar for Tech SEO Connect techseoconnect
PRO
0
130
GraphQLとの向き合い方2022年版
Avatar for Yosuke Kurami quramy
50
14k
Kristin Tynski - Automating Marketing Tasks With AI
Avatar for Tech SEO Connect techseoconnect
PRO
0
200

Transcript

  1. Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle

    Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY) [email protected] @carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob

  2. “With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or

    from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)

  3. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation

  4. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any

  5. None
  6. None
  7. None
  8. None

  9. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  10. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  11. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality !

  12. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  13. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  14. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  15. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  16. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  17. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  18. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  19. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51%

  20. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  21. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  22. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  23. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  24. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  25. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  26. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  27. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  28. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  29. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  30. mobilization

  31. electoral rules

  32. competitiveness

  33. data

  34. None
  35. None
  36. None
  37. None
  38. None
  39. None
  40. None

  41. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,

    and code at crain.co/stratmob