Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...
Search
Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
0
450
Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.
Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Carlisle Rainey
See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
carlislerainey
0
230
Topic Sampling
carlislerainey
1
440
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
carlislerainey
0
88
Unnecessary
carlislerainey
0
570
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
carlislerainey
0
230
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
carlislerainey
0
150
Logit Models in Small Samples
carlislerainey
0
120
When BLUE is Not Best
carlislerainey
0
460
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
carlislerainey
0
530
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
[CV勉強会@関東 CVPR2025] VLM自動運転model S4-Driver
shinkyoto
2
550
言語モデルの地図:確率分布と情報幾何による類似性の可視化
shimosan
8
2k
ip71_contraflow_reconfiguration
stkmsd
0
110
SegEarth-OV: Towards Training-Free Open-Vocabulary Segmentation for Remote Sensing Images
satai
3
340
機械学習と数理最適化の融合 (MOAI) による革新
mickey_kubo
1
400
MIRU2025 チュートリアル講演「ロボット基盤モデルの最前線」
haraduka
15
9.3k
財務諸表監査のための逐次検定
masakat0
0
150
AIスパコン「さくらONE」のLLM学習ベンチマークによる性能評価 / SAKURAONE LLM Training Benchmarking
yuukit
2
760
Stealing LUKS Keys via TPM and UUID Spoofing in 10 Minutes - BSides 2025
anykeyshik
0
150
snlp2025_prevent_llm_spikes
takase
0
380
Time to Cash: The Full Stack Breakdown of Modern ATM Attacks
ratatata
0
160
論文読み会 SNLP2025 Learning Dynamics of LLM Finetuning. In: ICLR 2025
s_mizuki_nlp
0
290
Featured
See All Featured
How to Create Impact in a Changing Tech Landscape [PerfNow 2023]
tammyeverts
55
3k
Chrome DevTools: State of the Union 2024 - Debugging React & Beyond
addyosmani
9
930
実際に使うSQLの書き方 徹底解説 / pgcon21j-tutorial
soudai
PRO
190
55k
A designer walks into a library…
pauljervisheath
209
24k
ReactJS: Keep Simple. Everything can be a component!
pedronauck
667
130k
Why Our Code Smells
bkeepers
PRO
340
57k
It's Worth the Effort
3n
187
28k
The Success of Rails: Ensuring Growth for the Next 100 Years
eileencodes
46
7.7k
Become a Pro
speakerdeck
PRO
29
5.6k
Designing Experiences People Love
moore
142
24k
BBQ
matthewcrist
89
9.9k
Facilitating Awesome Meetings
lara
57
6.6k
Transcript
Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle
Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY)
[email protected]
@carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob
“With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or
from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)
incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation
incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any
None
None
None
None
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive Plurality !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive Plurality !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%
mobilization
electoral rules
competitiveness
data
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,
and code at crain.co/stratmob