Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.

Bf99409063473973c7f9d3cf4f882492?s=47 Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
0
340

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.

Bf99409063473973c7f9d3cf4f882492?s=128

Carlisle Rainey

August 29, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by Carlisle Rainey

See All by Carlisle Rainey
Bf99409063473973c7f9d3cf4f882492?s=48 carlislerainey
0
44
Bf99409063473973c7f9d3cf4f882492?s=48 carlislerainey
0
300
Bf99409063473973c7f9d3cf4f882492?s=48 carlislerainey
0
130
Bf99409063473973c7f9d3cf4f882492?s=48 carlislerainey
0
110
Bf99409063473973c7f9d3cf4f882492?s=48 carlislerainey
0
83
Bf99409063473973c7f9d3cf4f882492?s=48 carlislerainey
0
370
Bf99409063473973c7f9d3cf4f882492?s=48 carlislerainey
0
410
Bf99409063473973c7f9d3cf4f882492?s=48 carlislerainey
0
350
Bf99409063473973c7f9d3cf4f882492?s=48 carlislerainey
1
360

Other Decks in Research

See All in Research
Db1b7e3c6fe6f6a0e9752b2c19bf5473?s=48 makenowjust
1
130
65241d0356dc5a93b0fec68bcf7b42ac?s=48 yumulab
0
4.7k
3d644406158b4d440111903db1f62622?s=48 ianozsvald
2
580
3c1faf46ed965b7e4f8dd91a7faff117?s=48 kawasita
0
120
00cc87fe4bac9d2f3c213ae97fde667a?s=48 ivanovskiy
0
1.3k
2c0947c6a28e7f771ebd9859ecf54e5c?s=48 shinyorke
1
380
04cbc695636a545b79baaf4b6c24760e?s=48 interdax
0
190
A8e5603efe2e904e5643163d1e0cb0d6?s=48 butsugiri
5
1.4k
Fdcc88b334334c866232fab429ccca33?s=48 lancers_pr
0
790
067c2e9dfad1914df731f6f0d65d9890?s=48 kyoun
10
1.7k
13f3313ae1ec1d9b3ed76ccbd746291b?s=48 takuyaa
0
160
Fccb5974b63d64636a7c90faf3bab51f?s=48 kikuzo
0
320

Featured

See All Featured
D83926c323d4f9289f947b4b4e76b939?s=48 jensimmons
208
10k
24fc194843a71f10949be18d5a692682?s=48 gr2m
84
11k
B3ace07412a5178ea778e7eec161fc0a?s=48 jcasabona
8
590
Dafc4723e9a1c067796c0fec6f509774?s=48 lemiorhan
629
48k
D36d2c1821af9249b69ff7f5ed60529b?s=48 tammielis
237
23k
A60068bce2e73de3a37ca9d2dbe36092?s=48 bryan
32
3.5k
D8fc2580cfaca035f666d9e4ee79a7f7?s=48 mongodb
23
3.9k
8081b26e05bb4354f7d65ffc34cbbd67?s=48 chriscoyier
146
20k
9128d500301ae51524e887bb680f471d?s=48 caitiem20
311
17k
E190023b66e2b8aa73a842b106920c93?s=48 zenorocha
298
40k
9cde37f47e4a800ea081ea42de8d749a?s=48 dougneiner
56
5.4k
4262b9cfacfb6b2c77f23e1d0310cd3e?s=48 myddelton
109
11k

Transcript

  1. Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle

    Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY) carlisle@crain.co @carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob

  2. “With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or

    from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)

  3. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation

  4. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any

  5. None
  6. None
  7. None
  8. None

  9. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  10. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  11. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality !

  12. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  13. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  14. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  15. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  16. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  17. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  18. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  19. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51%

  20. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  21. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  22. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  23. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  24. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  25. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  26. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  27. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  28. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  29. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  30. mobilization

  31. electoral rules

  32. competitiveness

  33. data

  34. None
  35. None
  36. None
  37. None
  38. None
  39. None
  40. None

  41. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,

    and code at crain.co/stratmob