$30 off During Our Annual Pro Sale. View Details »

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.

Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
0
360

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.

Carlisle Rainey

August 29, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by Carlisle Rainey

See All by Carlisle Rainey
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
carlislerainey
0
54
Unnecessary
carlislerainey
0
400
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
carlislerainey
0
160
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
carlislerainey
0
110
Logit Models in Small Samples
carlislerainey
0
91
When BLUE is Not Best
carlislerainey
0
400
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
carlislerainey
0
420
Politics and Need
carlislerainey
0
350
Testing Hypotheses of No Meaningful Effect
carlislerainey
1
370

Other Decks in Research

See All in Research
第16回チャンピオンズミーティング・レオ杯ラウンド1集計 / Umamusume Leo 2022 Round１
kitachan_black
0
540
文章のなかの地理空間 － 地理空間情報科学(GIS)と自然言語処理(NLP)の融合へ向けて －
hiroki13
3
3k
Compositional Evaluation on Japanese Textual Entailment and Similarity (JSICK：構成的推論・類似度データセットSICK日本語版の紹介)
verypluming
2
350
セレンディピティはトキメキの夢を見せるか？
kuri8ive
1
710
論文紹介 / Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionality
kyoun
0
220
第19回チャンピオンズミーティング・スコーピオ杯ラウンド1集計 / Umamusume Scorpio 2022 Round1
kitachan_black
0
590
【YANS2022 チュートリアル】対話システムのすすめ
rhigashinaka
4
2.6k
論文紹介：∞-former: Infinite Memory Transformer
yuri00
0
120
RecSys22読み会_MTRS
daimoriwaki
0
300
ECサイトにおける作品の特徴ラベル分類に
関する精度と付与率の向上に向けた取り組み/2022年度 情報処理学会 関西支部 支部大会
tossy
0
190
組込み機器へのROP攻撃の検証のためのプロセッサエミュレータを用いた調査 / IPSJHokkaido2022
yumulab
0
200
DoubleField_CV勉強会_CVPR2022.pdf
kanosawa
0
340

Featured

See All Featured
Into the Great Unknown - MozCon
thekraken
0
170
Facilitating Awesome Meetings
lara
33
4.4k
Why You Should Never Use an ORM
jnunemaker
PRO
48
7.8k
BBQ
matthewcrist
75
8.1k
The Invisible Side of Design
smashingmag
292
48k
The Straight Up "How To Draw Better" Workshop
denniskardys
225
130k
Reflections from 52 weeks, 52 projects
jeffersonlam
337
18k
XXLCSS - How to scale CSS and keep your sanity
sugarenia
236
1.1M
How New CSS Is Changing Everything About Graphic Design on the Web
jensimmons
214
11k
The Brand Is Dead. Long Live the Brand.
mthomps
48
2.9k
Rebuilding a faster, lazier Slack
samanthasiow
65
7.5k
Building Applications with DynamoDB
mza
84
4.9k

Transcript

  1. Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle

    Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY) carlisle@crain.co @carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob

  2. “With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or

    from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)

  3. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation

  4. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any

  5. None
  6. None
  7. None
  8. None

  9. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  10. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  11. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality !

  12. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  13. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  14. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  15. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  16. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  17. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  18. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  19. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51%

  20. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  21. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  22. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  23. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  24. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  25. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  26. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  27. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  28. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  29. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  30. mobilization

  31. electoral rules

  32. competitiveness

  33. data

  34. None
  35. None
  36. None
  37. None
  38. None
  39. None
  40. None

  41. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,

    and code at crain.co/stratmob