Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Uncertainty in the Representation of Climate Extremes Across Downscaled and Bias-Corrected CMIP Model Ensembles

Uncertainty in the Representation of Climate Extremes Across Downscaled and Bias-Corrected CMIP Model Ensembles

My presentation at the 2022 AGU Fall Meeting.

David Lafferty

January 28, 2023
Tweet

More Decks by David Lafferty

Other Decks in Science

Transcript

  1. Uncertainty in the
    Representation of Climate
    Extremes Across Downscaled
    and Bias-Corrected CMIP
    Model Ensembles
    David Lafferty & Ryan Sriver
    University of Illinois

    View Slide

  2. D. Lafferty (University of Illinois) 1
    Managing local climate risks requires high-resolution, accurate
    climate information.
    Downscaled and bias-corrected model outputs are often used
    for this purpose.
    Downscaling & bias-correction can contribute considerable
    uncertainty to local climate projections.

    View Slide

  3. How much uncertainty in local climate projections
    arises from downscaling & bias-correction?
    Downscaling and bias-correction are important sources of
    uncertainty:
    • in the near-term (early-to-mid 21st century)
    • in projections of precipitation
    • in projections of extremes
    2
    D. Lafferty (University of Illinois)

    View Slide

  4. D. Lafferty (University of Illinois) 3
    We include all* global, publicly available,
    downscaled and bias-corrected CMIP6 outputs
    Ensemble # GCMs
    Spatial
    resolution
    Algorithm
    Training
    dataset
    Reference
    NEX-GDDP 22 1/4° BCSD
    GMFD
    (1960-2014)
    Thrasher, B., Wang, W., Michaelis, A. et al. NASA Global
    Daily Downscaled Projections, CMIP6. Sci Data 9, 262
    (2022).
    CIL-GDPCIR 17 1/4° QDM + QPLAD
    ERA5
    (1995-2014)
    Diana Gergel, Kelly McCusker, Brewster Malevich, Emile
    Tenezakis, Meredith Fish, Michael Delgado (2022).
    ClimateImpactLab/downscaleCMIP6: (v1.0.0). Zenodo
    ISIMIP3b 10 1/2° ISIMIP3BASD
    W5E5 v2.0
    (1979-2019)
    Lange, S.: Trend-preserving bias adjustment and statistical
    downscaling with ISIMIP3BASD (v1.0),
    Geoscientific Model Development, 12, 3055–3070,.
    carbonplan
    GARD-SV
    4 1/4°
    Generalized Analog
    Regression ERA5
    (1981-2010)
    O Chegwidden, R Hagen, K Martin, M Jones, A Banihirwe,
    C Chiao, S Frank, J Freeman, J Hamman (2022) “Open
    data and tools for multiple methods of global climate
    downscaling" CarbonPlan.
    https://carbonplan.org/research/cmip6-downscaling-
    explainer
    carbonplan
    DeepSD-BC
    2 1/4° SRCNN
    *that we are aware of

    View Slide

  5. D. Lafferty (University of Illinois) 4
    Parent CMIP6 models
    Downscaling & bias-correction
    methods
    SSP scenarios
    Model uncertainty: variance across models, averaged over SSPs and downscaling methods
    We employ a simple variance-decomposition
    approach to partition uncertainty

    View Slide

  6. D. Lafferty (University of Illinois) 5
    Downscaling & bias-correction
    methods
    SSP scenarios
    Model uncertainty: variance across models, averaged over SSPs and downscaling methods
    We employ a simple variance-decomposition
    approach to partition uncertainty

    View Slide

  7. D. Lafferty (University of Illinois) 6
    Model uncertainty: variance across models, averaged over SSPs and downscaling methods
    We employ a simple variance-decomposition
    approach to partition uncertainty

    View Slide

  8. We employ a simple variance-decomposition
    approach to partition uncertainty
    D. Lafferty (University of Illinois) 7
    Parent CMIP6 models
    Downscaling & bias-correction
    methods
    SSP scenarios
    Model uncertainty: variance across models, averaged over SSPs and downscaling methods
    Downscaling uncertainty: variance across downscaling methods, averaged over SSPs and models
    Scenario uncertainty: variance across SSPs of the multi-model, multi-downscaling method mean

    View Slide

  9. We separate inter-annual variability from the
    forced response
    • Forced response is extracted
    via a 4th order polynomial fit
    • Inter-annual variability is
    characterized as the average
    magnitude of the residuals
    D. Lafferty (University of Illinois) 8
    o Hawkins, E. & Sutton, R. The Potential to Narrow Uncertainty in Regional Climate Predictions. B Am Meteorol Soc 90, 1095–1107 (2009).
    o Hawkins, E. & Sutton, R. The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation change. Clim Dyn 37, 407–418 (2011).
    o Lehner, F. et al. Partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and CMIP5/6. Earth Syst Dynam 11, 491–508 (2020).

    View Slide

  10. Downscaling and bias-correction are important sources of
    uncertainty:
    • in the near-term (early-to-mid 21st century)
    • in projections of precipitation
    • in projections of extremes
    9
    D. Lafferty (University of Illinois)

    View Slide

  11. D. Lafferty (University of Illinois) 10
    Downscaling and bias-correction are important
    in the near term
    Near-term
    (2020s)
    Medium-term
    (2050s)
    Long-term
    (2080s)
    Annual average temperature
    Scenario uncertainty Model uncertainty Downscaling uncertainty Inter-annual variability

    View Slide

  12. Downscaling and bias-correction are important
    in projections of precipitation
    D. Lafferty (University of Illinois) 11
    Near-term
    (2020s)
    Medium-term
    (2050s)
    Long-term
    (2080s)
    Annual average precipitation
    Scenario uncertainty Model uncertainty Downscaling uncertainty Inter-annual variability

    View Slide

  13. Downscaling and bias-correction are important
    in projections of extremes
    D. Lafferty (University of Illinois) 12
    Near-term
    (2020s)
    Medium-term
    (2050s)
    Long-term
    (2080s)
    Annual maximum temperature (tasmax)
    Scenario uncertainty Model uncertainty Downscaling uncertainty Inter-annual variability

    View Slide

  14. Downscaling and bias-correction are important
    in projections of extremes
    D. Lafferty (University of Illinois) 13
    Near-term
    (2020s)
    Medium-term
    (2050s)
    Long-term
    (2080s)
    Annual maximum 1-day precipitation
    Scenario uncertainty Model uncertainty Downscaling uncertainty Inter-annual variability

    View Slide

  15. D. Lafferty (University of Illinois) 14
    Downscaling and bias-correction are important sources of
    uncertainty:
    • in the near-term (early-to-mid 21st century)
    • in projections of precipitation
    • in projections of extremes
    In ongoing work, we are analyzing:
    • multivariate extremes
    • spatially-compounding extremes
    • spatial patterns of the uncertainty decomposition
    [email protected] @DavidCLafferty

    View Slide

  16. Supplementary slides
    D. Lafferty (University of Illinois) 15

    View Slide

  17. CMIP6 model NEX-GDDP CIL-GDPCIR GARD-SV DeepSD-BC ISIMIP3BASD
    ACCESS-ESM1-5 SSP5-8.5
    BCC-CSM2-MR SSP1-2.6; pr
    CanESM5 SSP1-2.6 SSP1-2.6 SSP2-4.5
    CMCC-ESM2
    CNRM-CM6-1 SSP2-4.5
    CNRM-ESM2-1 SSP2-4.5
    EC-Earth3 SSP2-4.5
    EC-Earth3-Veg-LR
    GFDL-ESM4
    HadGEM3-GC31-LL SSP3-7.0 SSP3-7.0
    INM-CM4-8
    INM-CM5-0
    IPSL-CM6A-LR
    MIROC-ES2L
    MIROC6 SSP1-2.6; pr SSP2-4.5
    MPI-ESM1-2-HR SSP1-2.6
    MPI-ESM1-2-LR
    MRI-ESM2-0 SSP1-2.6; pr for SSP5-8.5
    NESM3 SSP3-7.0 SSP3-7.0
    NorESM2-LM
    NorESM2-MM
    UKESM1-0-LL

    View Slide

  18. What will the temperature be on the hottest day
    of the year in Chicago in 2050?
    17
    D. Lafferty (University of Illinois)

    View Slide

  19. What will be the temperature on the hottest
    day of the year in Chicago in 2050?
    D. Lafferty (University of Illinois) 18

    View Slide

  20. Downscaling and bias-correction are important
    in regions of complex terrain
    D. Lafferty (University of Illinois) 19
    Iturbide, M. et al. An update of IPCC climate reference
    regions for subcontinental analysis of climate model data:
    definition and aggregated datasets. Earth Syst Sci Data 12,
    2959–2970 (2020).

    View Slide

  21. Downscaling and
    bias-correction
    uncertainty does
    not increase for
    temporally-
    compounding
    extremes

    View Slide

  22. Downscaling and
    bias-correction
    uncertainty does
    not increase for
    temporally-
    compounding
    extremes

    View Slide

  23. Downscaling and
    bias-correction is
    less important for
    threshold-based
    (temperature)
    extremes

    View Slide

  24. Downscaling and
    bias-correction is
    less important for
    threshold-based
    (temperature)
    extremes

    View Slide