Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Sign up for free
Menu
Search
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Pricing
Search
Sign in
Sign up for free
Licenses in the WILD
Search
Sponsored
·
SiteGround - Reliable hosting with speed, security, and support you can count on.
→
Dan Foreman-Mackey
January 06, 2015
Programming
820
1
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Licenses in the WILD
My slides for the #aas225 panel discussion on software licensing practices.
Dan Foreman-Mackey
January 06, 2015
More Decks by Dan Foreman-Mackey
See All by Dan Foreman-Mackey
Open software for Astronomical Data Analysis
dfm
0
230
Open Software for Astrophysics, AAS241
dfm
2
620
My research talk for CCA promotion
dfm
1
820
Astronomical software
dfm
1
780
emcee-odi
dfm
1
780
Exoplanet population inference: a tutorial
dfm
3
530
Data-driven discovery in the astronomical time domain
dfm
6
770
TensorFlow for astronomers
dfm
6
900
How to find a transiting exoplanets
dfm
1
540
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
世界の中心で、AI(App Intents)をさけぶ ー App Intents中心設計の実践ガイド
touyou
0
580
AI × TiDD / 2026.09.05 Redmine 大阪
tokudiro
1
170
TiDB Cloudのカスタムコントローラーによるオートスケール対応
takaidohigasi
0
120
【高い買い物LT会】初任給で話題の国産フィジカルAIを買った話
akagami
PRO
0
160
Family mrubyの進捗
kishima
1
120
Intent as Code
shoppingjaws
6
1k
AGENTS.md Is Not Enough:Build Skills, Don't Download Them
lx_t
0
120
Augmenting AI with the Power of Jakarta EE
ivargrimstad
0
110
Starting & Sustaining Code-Based E2E Testing for Non-Coding QA Teams( #jasstniigata )
teyamagu
PRO
1
290
GKE で Pod の見方を変えたら、スケールアウト時の挙動を真に捉えられた話
stkk
0
120
LoopHub - ローカルで動く GitHub で、AI と共同開発
jugyo
1
550
個人開発基盤をまるごとCloudflareに引っ越して爆速で総合的体験を向上させた話
tinykitten
0
190
Featured
See All Featured
Leveraging LLMs for student feedback in introductory data science courses - posit::conf(2025)
minecr
1
390
Leading Effective Engineering Teams in the AI Era
addyosmani
9
2.6k
Reflections from 52 weeks, 52 projects
jeffersonlam
356
21k
JAMstack: Web Apps at Ludicrous Speed - All Things Open 2022
reverentgeek
1
600
Technical Leadership for Architectural Decision Making
baasie
3
570
Claude Code のすすめ
schroneko
67
230k
A brief & incomplete history of UX Design for the World Wide Web: 1989–2019
jct
2
510
職位にかかわらず全員がリーダーシップを発揮するチーム作り / Building a team where everyone can demonstrate leadership regardless of position
madoxten
69
65k
Building AI with AI
inesmontani
PRO
1
1.2k
More Than Pixels: Becoming A User Experience Designer
marktimemedia
3
520
WENDY [Excerpt]
tessaabrams
14
39k
The Art of Programming - Codeland 2020
erikaheidi
57
14k
Transcript
! " # $ CCPP@NYU dfm dfm.io @exoplaneteer Dan Foreman-Mackey
I don't know anything about licensing!
but...
I do know about data science!
None
None
None
None
28,569,100 largest public repo ID (as of 2014-12-28)
5,000 requests/hour rate limit
a few requests/repo required
1,578,967 repositories ("randomly" selected)
6% of the GitHubz (representative)
{ "name": "emcee", "full_name": "dfm/emcee", "language": "Python", "fork": false, "subscribers_count":
39, "forks": 117, "stargazers_count": 414, "open_issues": 35, ... } + README*, LICENSE*, COPYING* for each repository, download: in the top directory
JavaScript Ruby Java Python PHP C C++ CSS C# Objective-C
Shell Perl VimL 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 percentage of repos
63 languages more popular than IDL (only?)
1,578,967 repositories
263,288 are licensed
17% are licensed that's up from 15% in 2012! softwarefreedom.org/resources/2013/lcs-slides-aaronw
28,972 only mention the license in the README of these,
JavaScript Ruby Java Python PHP C C++ CSS C# Objective-C
Shell Perl VimL 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 percentage with a license
license popularity
MIT License GPL Apache License BSD unknown LGPL Public Domain
Eclipse Public License Creative Commons A↵ero GPL Mozilla Public License Artistic License ISC license 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 percentage of licensed repos all repositories
None
EXCITED about licensing the internet gets really
MIT License GPL Apache License BSD unknown LGPL Public Domain
Eclipse Public License Creative Commons A↵ero GPL Mozilla Public License Artistic License ISC license 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 percentage of licensed repos all repositories
MIT License GPL Apache License BSD unknown LGPL Public Domain
Eclipse Public License Creative Commons A↵ero GPL Mozilla Public License Artistic License ISC license 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 percentage of licensed repos Python
MIT License GPL Apache License BSD unknown LGPL Public Domain
Eclipse Public License Creative Commons A↵ero GPL Mozilla Public License Artistic License ISC license 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 percentage of licensed repos IDL
MIT License GPL Apache License BSD unknown LGPL Public Domain
Eclipse Public License Creative Commons A↵ero GPL Mozilla Public License Artistic License ISC license 0 10 20 30 40 50 percentage of licensed repos C
MIT License GPL Apache License BSD unknown LGPL Public Domain
Eclipse Public License Creative Commons A↵ero GPL Mozilla Public License Artistic License ISC license 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 percentage of licensed repos Fortran
MIT License GPL Apache License BSD unknown LGPL Public Domain
Eclipse Public License Creative Commons A↵ero GPL Mozilla Public License Artistic License ISC license 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 percentage of licensed repos Emacs Lisp
MIT License GPL Apache License BSD unknown LGPL Public Domain
Eclipse Public License Creative Commons A↵ero GPL Mozilla Public License Artistic License ISC license 0 10 20 30 40 50 percentage of licensed repos VimL
MIT License GPL Apache License BSD unknown LGPL Public Domain
Eclipse Public License Creative Commons A↵ero GPL Mozilla Public License Artistic License ISC license 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 percentage of licensed repos all repositories
MIT License GPL Apache License BSD unknown LGPL Public Domain
Eclipse Public License Creative Commons A↵ero GPL Mozilla Public License Artistic License ISC license 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 percentage of licensed repos JavaScript
MIT License GPL Apache License BSD unknown LGPL Public Domain
Eclipse Public License Creative Commons A↵ero GPL Mozilla Public License Artistic License ISC license 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 percentage of licensed repos Ruby
MIT License GPL Apache License BSD unknown LGPL Public Domain
Eclipse Public License Creative Commons A↵ero GPL Mozilla Public License Artistic License ISC license 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 percentage of licensed repos all repositories
MIT License GPL Apache License BSD unknown LGPL Public Domain
Eclipse Public License Creative Commons A↵ero GPL Mozilla Public License Artistic License ISC license 0 10 20 30 40 50 popularity weighted percentage all repositories (weighted by popularity)
⾠CAVEATS I only scraped GitHub
I only found top-level license files (with the right names)
⾠CAVEATS
my README parsing was pure hack! (it's called data science)
⾠CAVEATS
17% of repos are licensed and the kids are permissive
TAKE HOME Thanks to Aaron Williamson for the 2012 data!