ICTS 2013

Presented on ICTS 2013.

Transcript

1. MOODLE XML TO IMS QTI ASSESSMENT TEST PORTABILITY ON LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Irwan Alnarus Kautsar *1, Shin-Ichiro Kubota*, Yasuo Musashi*, and Kenichi Sugitani* *Center for Multimedia and Information Technologies Laboratory * Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kumamoto University 2-39-1 Kurokami, Central W., Kumamoto, JAPAN, 860-855 1: 120D9307@st.kumamoto-u.ac.jp
2. ICTS 2013 2 Outline – questions. Research ? Education ? Images Sources: http://globeattractions.com/tree-landscape-wallpaper/
3. ICTS 2013 3 Outline – answer. LMS is best way to share knowledge Image Source : http://answerstoquestions.co.uk/
4. ICTS 2013 4 Learning/Knowledge Component [1]. • Learning Content • Question • Grades • Forum • Portfolio [1] P. J. Muñoz-Merino, C. D. Kloos, and J. F. Naranjo, “Enabling interoperability for LMS educational services,” Comput. Stand. Interfaces, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 484–498, Feb. 2009.
5. ICTS 2013 5 Indonesia Source images: http://www.e-onlinedegrees.com/ How we improve this in better way's ?
6. ICTS 2013 6 So.. • Q: How we improve this in better way's ? • A: Having interoperability in among LMS. [3] • Q: What Interoperability? • A: Whole learning material.[1] [2] [3] • It's very convenience. • But … • From where we start ? What Component ? [1] R. M. Ijtihadie, B. C. Hidayanto, A. Affandi, Y. Chisaki, and T. Usagawa, “Dynamic content synchronization between learning management systems over limited bandwidth network,” Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 17, Nov. 2012. [2] S. Martin, G. Diaz, I. Plaza, E. Ruiz, M. Castro, and J. Peire, “State of the art of frameworks and middleware for facilitating mobile and ubiquitous learning development,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 84, no. 11, pp. 1883–1891, Nov. 2011. [3] P. J. Muñoz-Merino, C. D. Kloos, and J. F. Naranjo, “Enabling interoperability for LMS educational services,” Comput. Stand. Interfaces, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 484–498, Feb. 2009.
7. ICTS 2013 7 We start with 2 LMS. • Moodle (www.moodle.org) • Chamilo (www.chamilo.org)
8. ICTS 2013 8 Moodle Fact [1] [2] • More than 1500 Site Registered. • Easy to develop--> more community, more developer. • More User --> More Learning Material's. [1] “Moodle.org: Registered sites.” [Online]. Available: https://moodle.org/sites/index.php?country=ID. [Accessed: 15-Oct-2012]. [2] R. M. Ijtihadie, B. C. Hidayanto, A. Affandi, Y. Chisaki, and T. Usagawa, “Dynamic content synchronization between learning management systems over limited bandwidth network,” Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 17, Nov. 2012.
9. ICTS 2013 9 Chamilo Fact [1][2][3][4] • New LMS • Fewer User, Fewer Learning Materials. • User Friendly with social network features [1] J.-M. Maes, “Chamilo 2.0: A Second Generation Open Source E-learning and Collaboration Platform,” International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. pp. 26–31, Mar. 2010. [2] “BeezNest Reveals LMS Chamilo’s Social Networking Functionalities and Their Potential Influence on Student Motivation - PR.com.” [Online]. Available: http://www.pr.com/press-release/295994. [Accessed: 11-Nov-2012]. [3] “Chamilo LMS becomes one of the most promising open-source projects at the packt publishing awards | PRLog.” [Online]. Available: http://www.prlog.org/11732145-chamilo-lms-becomes-one-of-the-most-promising-open-source-projects-at-the-packt-publishing-awards.html. [Accessed: 15-Oct-2012]. [4] Jones, R. Godwin, “Merging Technologies challenging Hegemonies in Online Learning”, Language Learning and Technology, Vol. 16 No. 2. P4-13
10. ICTS 2013 10 Learning/Knowledge Component [1]. • Learning Content. • Question/Assessment. • Grades. • Forum. • Portfolio. [1] P. J. Muñoz-Merino, C. D. Kloos, and J. F. Naranjo, “Enabling interoperability for LMS educational services,” Comput. Stand. Interfaces, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 484–498, Feb. 2009. Any Problems?
11. Here is Problem • For Learning Content is not becoming problem • For Assessment Item is becoming problem ? SCORM SCORM IMS-QTI Moodle XML Content Assessment Can we do this portability
12. Research Problem • Standart Assessment From Moodle : Moodle XML • Standart Assesment From Chamilo : IMS-QTI.
13. Example Assesment • With an example question. • How in Moodle XML, actually ? • How in IMS QTI, actually ?
14. Assessment Standard • In Moodle is Moodle Moodle XML. [1] • In Chamilo is IMS QTI • Assessment standard from IMS Global Consortium. [2]. [1] :http://docs.moodle.org/24/en/Moodle_XML_format [2]:http://www.imsglobal.org/question/
15. Assessment Standard • In Moodle is Moodle Moodle XML. [1] • In Chamilo is IMS QTI • Assessment standard from IMS Global Consortium. [2]. [1] :http://docs.moodle.org/24/en/Moodle_XML_format [2]:http://www.imsglobal.org/question/
16. Question Text Moodle XML IMS QTI?
17. Question Type
18. Question Answer Moodle XML IMS QTI
19. Correct Answer Moodle XML IMS QTI
20. Other Option
21. Research Goal • Having portability for assessment item from MoodleXML to IMS QTI. • Provide Data Exchange.
22. ICTS 2013 22 Our Work • Proposing using bridge.xml
23. ICTS 2013 23 Our work
24. Our work IMS-QTI Moodle XML Assessment Portability
25. ICTS 2013 25 Result • Having assessment portability between Moodle XML and IMS QTI. • Using bridge.xml to solve difference format.
26. ICTS 2013 26 Conclusion • Our work is first approach towards more global portability : • Share other question component/assessment • Share other learning object (learning content, forum, portfolio).
27. ICTS 2013 27 Future Work • More question types : matching, True/False, Short Answer/Essay. • Enabling portability with XSLT. • Employ XML Schema Design (XSD) from IMS Global Learning Consortium. • Integration between content and assessments in both LMS.
28. ICTS 2013 28 Terima Kasih ありがとう Thank you