Pro Yearly is
to $50! »
Speaker Deck Pro
October 14, 2015
Just Do It!
October 14, 2015
More Decks by Janos Gyerik
See All by Janos Gyerik
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
See All Featured
code.reviews Janos Gyerik correct clean efﬁcient tested efﬁcient efﬁcient clean
clean tested tested correct correct correct tested correc orrect correc tested efﬁcient clean
2 what is it?
3 commit commit commit review commit commit review commit accept
commit commit commit NOT code reviewed code reviewed
4 why do it?
5 UCXGVKOG catch early catch early catch early bugs bad
7 peer review peer pressure
8 anything that gets reviewed gets better
9 quality time savings cost savings FACT
10 correct readable efficient tested buggy messy crappy untested NOT
code reviewed code reviewed
11 information sharing NO MORE bottleneck developers
13 why/when NOT do it?
14 big bang development too hard to control should be
the exception, not the norm! code reviews are not practical when…
15 without supporting tools tools help doing code reviews efﬁciently
don’t waste your time, get them and use them! code reviews are not practical…
16 what’s required? disciplined commits
17 incremental changes small and stable logical steps at all
18 one feature one purpose one branch feature
19 short-lived max 3 days feature
20 (example good branch)
21 (example bad branch)
22 one commit one logical change
23 one good commit == stable build; related changes; no
garbage; small; good comment
25 (example good commit)
26 example bad commit with many changes)
27 (example bad commit with garbage)
28 how to do it?
29 git fetch origin master git checkout -b feature-x origin/ma
# work work work git commit git commit git push origin feature-x # create merge request
30 Create Merge Request create; don’t assign! self-review: any WTFs?
31 peer review peer pressure
32 what to review?
33 readable is it clear? easy to read? easy to
understand? FACT Code is read far more often than written!
34 correct is the logic sane? does it work? bug
suspects? -> ask!
35 efficient any performance concerns? -> ask!
36 tested unit tests included? unit test opportunities?
37 good practices Code Complete Effective Java Sonar/Findbugs/… codereview.stackexchange.com
38 how bad can it be?
39 how in-depth? •not too much •not too little •just
right •DO IT FAST
41 a code review is… NOT about the developer it
is about the code
42 don’t just say something is “wrong” suggest a better
43 the focus is.. NOT on problems it is on
44 perfect code? don’t seek perfect seek good enough better
is good enough don’t be a pain in the ass be flexible be constructive
46 mistakes… it’s OK to make mistakes it’s NOT OK
to not learn from them