Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Everything You Wanted to Know About Wikipedia But Were Too Embarrassed to Ask

Everything You Wanted to Know About Wikipedia But Were Too Embarrassed to Ask

Here’s a paradox: Everyone wants a Wikipedia page for themselves, their C.E.O., or their organization, yet few people know what it takes to create one.

In this workshop, I’ll explain how to bridge that gap. Specifically, we’ll run down the six rules of Wikipedia sourcing.

Jonathan Rick
PRO

October 11, 2022
Tweet

More Decks by Jonathan Rick

Other Decks in Education

Transcript

  1. EVERYTHING YOU
    WANTED TO KNOW
    ABOUT WIKIPEDIA
    BUT WERE TOO EMBARRASSED TO ASK

    View Slide

  2. MY CREDENTIALS

    View Slide

  3. The Continental Pool Lounge
    Arlington, Virginia
    2007

    View Slide

  4. View Slide

  5. 16
    That’s how many years I’ve been
    helping clients navigate Wikipedia.

    View Slide

  6. 5
    That’s how many services I offer.
    1. Create
    2. Edit
    3. Consult
    4. Monitor
    5. Train

    View Slide

  7. WHY WIKIPEDIA MATTERS

    View Slide

  8. Reason #1

    View Slide

  9. Reason #1

    View Slide

  10. Reason #2

    View Slide

  11. Reason #3

    View Slide

  12. The Bottom
    Line

    View Slide

  13. THE 6 CRITERIA FOR SOURCING

    View Slide

  14. “Unreliable”

    View Slide

  15. MEDIA
    COVERAGE

    View Slide

  16. Are you “notable”?
    Create Edit
    Are your sources “reliable”?

    View Slide

  17. CRITERION #1
    Your Media Coverage Must
    Come From a Media Outlet

    View Slide

  18. “Unreliable”

    View Slide

  19. View Slide

  20. “Unreliable”

    View Slide

  21. Q&As

    View Slide

  22. Q&As
    Press Release

    View Slide

  23. “Are you saying there’s a
    blanket ban on all interviews?”
    WAIT!

    View Slide

  24. “Does this mean that all
    broadcast hits are useless?”
    WAIT!

    View Slide

  25. Television

    View Slide

  26. Podcasts

    View Slide

  27. Interviews Reportage

    View Slide

  28. View Slide

  29. CRITERION #2
    Both the Outlet and the Content
    Must Be Independent From You

    View Slide

  30. FreeEnterprise.com
    O
    utlets

    View Slide

  31. Content

    View Slide

  32. Forbes
    “The Forbes.com article,
    posted in 2013, praised
    Epstein as ‘one of the largest
    backers of cutting-edge
    science around the world’
    while making no mention
    of his criminal past.

    View Slide

  33. CRITERION #3
    The Media Outlet
    Must Be Notable

    View Slide

  34. ARLnow.com Patch
    Local Pubs

    View Slide

  35. The Executive Communication
    Report
    The Washington
    Business Journal
    P.R. Daily Nextgov
    Trade Pubs

    View Slide

  36. “Trades are arbiters of the given
    trade; nobody knows me
    better than my peers.”
    WAIT!

    View Slide

  37. The Mainstream
    Media

    View Slide

  38. To be part of the mainstream media, an outlet needs
    to do three things:
    1. Employ editors.
    2. Disclose conflicts of interest.
    3. Issue corrections when it makes a mistake.
    “Reliable Sources”

    View Slide

  39. A reliable publication is reliable because it has
    a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.
    In general, the more people who are engaged
    in the following three activities, the more that
    readers can trust that publication:
    1. Checking facts.
    2. Analyzing legal issues.
    3. Scrutinizing the writing.
    “Reliable Sources”

    View Slide

  40. CRITERION #4
    The Coverage Must
    Focus on You

    View Slide

  41. 3,500 Words 6,000 Words 11,000 Words
    Individuals

    View Slide

  42. 3,500 Words 4,000 Words 9,000 Words
    Companies

    View Slide

  43. “What about an article that quotes
    me — even extensively —
    or cites my work?”
    WAIT!

    View Slide

  44. CRITERION #5
    Your Coverage Must
    Be Available Online

    View Slide

  45. Wikipedia is what economists call a “lagging
    indicator.”
    A topic is Wikipedia-worthy only if the outside world
    has already taken notice of it.
    “No Original Research”

    View Slide

  46. CRITERION #6
    Your Coverage Must
    Be Sustained

    View Slide

  47. Recentism occurs when a Wikipedia page has
    an inflated or imbalanced focus on recent events.
    A recentist page lacks a long-term, historical view.
    “Recentism”

    View Slide

  48. “Wikipedia’s stated goal is to be an encyclopedia,
    not a newspaper, which generally means the project
    should focus on the information that will be
    historically significant for the long term.”
    —STEPHEN HARRISON
    “Wikipedia Is Not a Newspaper”

    View Slide

  49. APPENDIX
    A Cheat Sheet

    View Slide

  50. Source Significant? Independent? Reliable? Pass
    /Fail?
    Is the coverage of you in
    the given article significant?
    Being cited or even quoted
    a few times in an article is
    not particularly helpful.
    Being quoted extensively
    is better, but still not a deal
    maker.
    What you’re looking for
    are full-fledged profiles
    where you’re the focus.
    Is the publication
    completely independent
    from you?
    This rules out news
    releases, sponsored
    content, and Q&As.
    Does the publication have
    a reputation for fact-
    checking and accuracy?
    Does it employ
    editors, disclose conflicts
    of interest, and issue
    corrections when it makes
    a mistake?

    View Slide

  51. Source Significant? Independent? Reliable? Pass
    /Fail?
    Is the coverage of you in
    the given article significant?
    Being cited or even quoted
    a few times in an article is
    not particularly helpful.
    Being quoted extensively
    is better, but still not a deal
    maker.
    What you’re looking for
    are full-fledged profiles
    where you’re the focus.
    Is the publication
    completely independent
    from you?
    This rules out news
    releases, sponsored
    content, and Q&As.
    Does the publication have
    a reputation for fact-
    checking and accuracy?
    Does it employ
    editors, disclose conflicts
    of interest, and issue
    corrections when it makes
    a mistake?
    Remy Tumin, “How
    M.T.V. Broke News
    for a Generation,”
    New York Times,
    May 11, 2023.
    Yes Yes Yes Pass

    View Slide

  52. QUESTIONS YOU DIDN’T
    KNOW WERE QUESTIONS

    View Slide

  53. QUESTION #1
    Isn’t Media Coverage
    a Flawed Gold Standard?

    View Slide

  54. QUESTION #2
    Can I Work on a Page for a Client
    (or, for That Matter, My Employer)?

    View Slide

  55. QUESTION #3
    Must I Subject Myself
    to the Disclosure Gauntlet?

    View Slide

  56. N.Y.P.D. Caught Trying to Edit
    “Police Brutality” Out of Its Wikipedia Page
    North Face Forced to Issue Grovelling Apology After It Was Caught
    Editing Wikipedia Pages to Boost Its Results on Search Sites
    Political Staffers Tried to Delete the Senate Scandal
    (and Other Bad Behavior) From Wikipedia
    Congress Banned From Editing Wikipedia
    After Staff Caught Trolling
    Senator Doug Mastriano Caught Editing
    Wikipedia Page With Sock-Puppet Accounts

    View Slide

  57. QUESTION #4
    Can I Cite an Award We Won
    or a List We Were Named To?

    View Slide

  58. QUESTION #5
    Why Does Another Page Do
    Something You Said We Can’t Do?

    View Slide

  59. QUESTION #6
    Will My Page Be Vandalized?

    View Slide

  60. QUESTION #6
    Is Wikipedia Trustworthy?

    View Slide

  61. Should We Chat?
    [email protected]

    View Slide