Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

(PSSJ2022 oral) Inverse Mixed-Solvent Molecular...

(PSSJ2022 oral) Inverse Mixed-Solvent Molecular Dynamics for Visualization of Residue Interaction Profile of Molecular Probes(第22回 日本蛋白質科学会年会)

Keisuke Yanagisawa

June 07, 2022
Tweet

More Decks by Keisuke Yanagisawa

Other Decks in Research

Transcript

  1. 8th June, 2022 PSSJ2022 | O7-12 | K Yanagisawa 1

    Inverse Mixed-Solvent Molecular Dynamics for Visualization of Residue Interaction Profile of Molecular Probes (インバース共溶媒分子動力学法による分子プローブ周辺残基環境の可視化) 〇Keisuke Yanagisawa1, Ryunosuke Yoshino2, Genki Kudo2, Takatsugu Hirokawa2 1 Tokyo Tech. / 2 Univ. Tsukuba K Yanagisawa, R Yoshino, G Kudo, and T Hirokawa. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 4749, 2022. doi: 10.3390/ijms23094749 N N O O - Inverse MSMD OH Mixed-solvent MD (MSMD) O7-12
  2. Outline 2 • Introduction • An Overview of Inverse MSMD

    protocol • Application examples • Benzamidine • Catechol • Benzene • Conclusion 8th June, 2022 PSSJ2022 | O7-12 | K Yanagisawa
  3. Structure-Based Drug Design (SBDD) 3 Design a drug compound with

    a protein structure Introduction 8th June, 2022 PSSJ2022 | O7-12 | K Yanagisawa Search/Modify a chemical structure fitted to it better O N O N O O N N N O N O O O O O O IC50 ≈ 5nM IC50 = 0.9nM
  4. Interaction profiles of functional groups 8th June, 2022 PSSJ2022 |

    O7-12 | K Yanagisawa 4 It has been explored based on known 3D co-structures Applicable only for well-known chemical substructures Kasahara+2013[1] Wang+2011[2] [1] Kasahara K et al., JCIM 53, 241-248, 2013. [2] Wang L et al., JCIM 51, 807-815, 2011. Introduction Profiles of: - Presence of residues - Spatial placement
  5. Mixed-solvent MD (MSMD) simulation 5 Introduction 8th June, 2022 PSSJ2022

    | O7-12 | K Yanagisawa MD in explicit water mixed with probe molecules Explore a protein surface where probe is likely to bind N N N OH N N Probes High probability regions MSMD simulation Possible to enumerate interaction poses of any probes [1] Yanagisawa K et al., JCIM 61, 2744-2753, 2021.
  6. Research aim & achievement 8th June, 2022 PSSJ2022 | O7-12

    | K Yanagisawa 6 Aim: Explore interaction profiles of any probes ✓ Independent from known co-structures Achievement:Propose Inverse MSMD method ✓ Extract interaction poses from MSMD ✓ Visualize with mesh representation Introduction *Code is available at https://github.com/keisuke-yanagisawa/exprorer_msmd Interaction poses obtained from MSMD simulation
  7. The proposed method 8th June, 2022 PSSJ2022 | O7-12 |

    K Yanagisawa 7 Results & Discussion Enumerate preferred protein surfaces Enumerate interaction poses Aggregate to a interaction profile MSMD with 15 diverse proteins
  8. Benzamidine: Assessment of the method 8th June, 2022 PSSJ2022 |

    O7-12 | K Yanagisawa 8 Benzamidine has a positive-charged (amidino) group Acidic amino acid residues localized against it The result agreed with X-ray structures Results & Discussion Interaction profile Superimposition to a 3D structure (Trypsin + Benzamidine) Ser171 Asp170 red: acidic blue: basic cyan: hydrophilic green: hydrophobic
  9. Catechol: Preference of hydroxy groups 8th June, 2022 PSSJ2022 |

    O7-12 | K Yanagisawa 9 Catechol has two hydroxy groups Interestingly, acidic residues localized against them rather than hydrophilic residues Results & Discussion Interaction profile Superimposition to a 3D structure (Catalase + Catechol) red: acidic blue: basic cyan: hydrophilic green: hydrophobic Leu150 Asp110 Leu181
  10. Benzene: Weak binder 8th June, 2022 PSSJ2022 | O7-12 |

    K Yanagisawa 10 Benzene does not show any strong preference The profile indicates the importance of chemical context Merely focusing on phenyl group is not enough Results & Discussion Interaction profile red: acidic blue: basic cyan: hydrophilic green: hydrophobic
  11. Conclusion & Future work 8th June, 2022 PSSJ2022 | O7-12

    | K Yanagisawa 11 Conclusion ・Propose Inverse MSMD to explore interactions ・The method can be applied to any probes Future work ・Quantitative evaluation of consistency ・Application to more diverse probes Conclusion